h-rtitle.gif (7604 bytes)

Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note below the arrangements between the administrative, the judiciary and the media; read of the all-embracing guarantee in place, in contempt of all law : the root shall be pointed to.

WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read below:-

"The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State"

*Link from here to founder's tribulations in 1972-75 and marvel at the creativity of allegedly honourable officers of Justice and the Law in the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies

  • And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the affidavit which visitors can link to directly from here [*Link].
  • Link also from here to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts organised and processed to fruition while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of:-

'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy.

*Link from here to proof of the parts the police play in promotion and expansion of the criminal activities instigated, processed and imposed on society by the legal circles. Read of assertions by a typical hypocrite, none other than the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Robert Mark QPM, when he spoke of FALSE RECORDS / FORGERIES by the legal circles while delivering his famous Dimbleby Lecture on BBC-TV in November 1973, 15 months after he received true copy of THE FORGERY advanced and promoted by the licensed criminals : solicitors and barristers for their evil ends in the case that opened Andrew Yiannides' mental eyes to the realities of life in the United Kingdom, a typical PSEUDOdemocracy. Can anyone enlighten Andrew and the millions of victims of the legal circles WHY NO PROSECUTION of the solicitors & the barristers in 1972 or thereafter?.

  • With such a facility in place (the words we point to above) and arrogant abuse of public office, can anyone assert, or argue, that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts? (>Hence the c reation of www.jusaticeraped.org <)
  • ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm

*Link from here to the realities - in due course also a link to the warning (indirect but nonetheless very clear) for thinkers to recognise 

  • On 3rd March 2008 >someone's birthday< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other.
  • >>> IN THE MEANTIME we have been naming and shaming a number who know of and engage in much more than just approve wrongs imposed on Mr & Mrs Average, the millions of taxpayers, in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union created by politicians, without reference to the taxed for fraud sucker-serfs, allegedly for the benefit of the citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION, among other promotions.

Needless to say the case entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies.

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored and ignore all complaints and submissions by victims of the organised crimes we point to and expose in our pages, irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.

[*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions, covered in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' (>thinkers<) from animals.

Fraud in court  Council staff use Forgeries   Misconduct in Public Office. 2 cases relative to applicable law One Protocol says it ALL It betrays arrogant intentions Law Provides for THEFTS and it covers Judges too Judges' duties   TIME 4 CHANGE   & CHALLENGES Site CONTENTS - Table of Contents & ongoing work Your Rights & OBLIGATIONS to Society SITE SEARCH facility for any specific element / issue of concern to visitors / readers
COURTS : their Facilities Abused For ORGANISED CRIME : FRAUD Solicitor's Perjury & Victim Ignores it all Just like the Law Society always does Blackmailed or is it Just Conditioned & Subjugated Victims who join the club ? We name Lovers of blunt fraud through courts - Users of the facilities 4 illicit gains Local Authorities & FRAUD on 'serfs' the Taxpayers who are kept in the dark Police Party to & Endorsing Criminal Acts, Activities Arrogant Fraud FALSE Records & Contempt of Law by the legal Circles & Public Services The crafty ones & Vexatious Litigant PLOYS for the rewarded silent

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

family.uk-human-rights justiceraped.org dssfraud.htm confraud.htm dadscare.htm contract.htm converts.htm MensAid
solicitorsfromhell.co.uk chancellor.htm theyknow.htm solfraud.htm sheknows.htm 4deceit.htm convicti.htm forward.htm

December 2006 - SUMMONS ISSUED & SERVED IN RESPECT OF FRAUDULENT & RECKLESSLY IRRESPONSIBLE ACTIVITIES & IMPOSITIONS THROUGH THE FAMILY COURTS

*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

An explicit Affidavit [*L] plus exhibits and
     letters to a Chief Inspector of Police
[*L],
          one to solicitors
[*L] and another to the Lord Chancellor [*L] evince
               ORGANISED CRIMES
(Access and read the letter to the police in September 2006 [*L])

Access & read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister : * I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link from here to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister forwarded / delegated submissions and evidence received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister / Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES

3rd March 2011 added link [*L] to the BBC-TV Dimbleby Lecture in 1973 as the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Robert Mark prepared & presented to the sucker-serfs

...
 
1913fact.htm        KEY Changes 21 March 2011
The 1913 Forgery Act * Page created December 2006 *

forgeryr.jpg (67076 bytes)

cacanltr.jpg (48132 bytes)

Many joined Andrew Yiannides at: urrights.ning.com as challengers and victims wishing to EXPOSE abusers of trust, public office, and public facilities.
Regrettably, the facility merited from a two prong attack*. [
*Link]

VISITORS should note that ning.com the providers of the facility elected to introduce charges for the facility, AND, ALTHOUGH the creator of the subdomain  URrights was informed that facilities to download and save / archive the material before the charges were introduced, the FACILITY TO copy one's own work and intellectual property never materialised.  FOOD FOR THOUGHT as to why the obstructions and 'the blackmail element attached to the new terms and conditions' introduced by 'the brains behind the ning.com set-up.

undercon.gif (1065 bytes) Last Revised April 24, 2013 >>> Introduced link [*L] to the words of Sir Robert Mark QPM when delivering his famous Dimbleby Lecture on BBC-TV as a typical HYPOCRITE operating as a false front in a PSEUDOdemocracy.
Site reconstruction with ongoing improvements and additions to pages / site

An Act of Parliament listed, but not available at HMSO - Her Majesty's Stationery Office - staff at HMSO Holborn, for months asserting the act had been repealed, therefore, not available.

The two images, on the right, below, with our compliments to the media barons and to the Intellectual Prostitutes they retain and maintain for and towards the creation of the societies of their own making. One and all simply followers of the teachings by examples stated in the most vile of works ever to have been misrepresented to 'the sons of men' with fraudulent intentions. Access from here and read an exclusive article by the founder of human-rights.org and promoter / creator of the Human-Rights Organisation Community on Line.

*Link from here to pre-existing states and provisions in law & consider the assertions of the HMSO staff that necessitated additional research after establishing the fact that all had been lying.

*

Readers, researchers and visitors who have not accessed the page where we released the blunt FORGERY that was created and introduced in High Court proceedings by the legal circles are afforded the opportunity to marvel at the creativity of the Licensed Criminals who are in control / manage our Law Enforcement Agencies : the legal circles, the Courts and the Police.



The blunt FORGERY
forgeryr.jpg 
			(67076 bytes)
We point to the fact that such a document was declared non existent, in a letter, by the fraudster who indulged. The above FORGERY was created and promoted 2 YEARS after the events. As it was the wrong year was entered by the criminals who indulged. One need NOT be a genius to recognise WHY the need to alter the date


Cancellation date proof.
cacanltr.jpg (48132 bytes)
The image and details can be accessed in the page where we also publish a page from the transcript when two  abusers of judicial chair occupation elected to act as corrupt as they come, in contempt of Parliament's Law. [*Link
DEMOCRACY?
LAW & ORDER?
REALLY?
[*Link to a report in the solicitors journal]
*

On the right, image of a copy of the forgery and copy of a letter from the documents the Plaintiff's solicitors had been given as part of the evidence that established the grounds for the Claim that rested and was founded on FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATIONS, by the Defendants in the action. The copy confirms the fcat that the document had been lodged and was perused / seen by all abusers of judicial chair occupation at the Royal Courts of Justice, all the way to the Court of Appeal.

*

On the extreme right copy of a letter from the quarters where the records pertaining to the truth of the matter were maintained. The disclosure from the parties who were in a position to shed the light which the victim sought, simply confirmed what the victim suspected and in the circumstances the fraudulent misrepresentations were also confirmed.

*

Setting aside the disclosure and confirmation as to the truth of the matter, the solicitor, Kypros Nicholas, when instructed to instigate legal proceedings, he was handed, also, additional evidence to the effect that the Defendants by accepting and paying for another batch of the same goods had established the simple fact that there must have been other reasons for their inexcusable and unjustified false promotions.

*Link from here to the part of the BBC Television annual 'Dimbleby Lecture' when the fraudster in charge of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Robert Mark, delivered in 1973. Read there of his reference to the criminal activities by the legal circles, what they engaged and indulged in. Read what the criminals were caused to do AFTER THE POLICE investigated a questionable document >false records< (copy of) pertaining to an alleged alibi. The very commissioner, a year earlier received copy of the blunt forgery the legal circles >collectively were using and promoting as legitimate in the open and shut case of the original commercial fraud.   

*

The FORGERY was introduced to the victim of Fraudulent misrepresentations, the Plaintiff in a High Court Action, by his own solicitors almost TWO YEARS AFTER ISSUE & SERVICE OF THE WRIT OF SUMMONS.

*

The uninitiated who are not familiar with the proficiency of the legal circles in 'Institutionalised, Organised Crime' should access the extract from the work of Stephen Knight, we reproduce in our pages.

Link from here to the extract & note when & why we introduced the specific revelations from the work of Stephen Knight, in our pages.

No need to emphasise the fact that the solicitor Kypros Nicholas attempted to influence his client to abandon the High Court action against the fraudsters who indulged at the Plaintiff's expense.

WE PUBLISH BELOW THE EVIDENCE THE VICTIM ENSURED HE RECEIVED FROM THE FRAUDSTERS BY WRITING AND DEMANDING EXPLANATIONS AS TO THE REASONS WHY CERTAIN DISCREPANCIES IN THEIR ASSERTIONS & ACTIONS COMMANDED EXPLANATIONS AND CLARIFICATION FROM THE FRAUDSTERS

*  

 

chjad69r.jpg (54922 bytes)
*
*
*
*
*

The Provisions in Law, were and remained very clear as of 1913. The explicit Sections of the Forgery Act 1913, in respect of false / forged court records etc., establish the simple fact that the Members of Parliament were aware that such criminal activities had been / were taking place, within the courts, hence the explicit section

*Link from here to the page / image - below.

*Link also from here to a House of Lords ruling and deliberations relevant to the duties of solicitors and activities / failings attached to:-

1. Deception
2, Conspiracy
3, FRAUD
4, What electing to maintain silence in respect of wrongs and damages imposed on third parties amounts to. Wake up serfs
*

The corporation ning.com (see the panel above in the left margin column) moved on from the provision of the facility free of charges to a provision WITH THREE LEVELS OF CHARGES. Attached to the changes were provisions for the creators to have their group's material (such as at URrights dot ning dot com) archived while Andrew Yiannides (the creator of the network) and his friends / affiliates elected which of the three level of charges was to be adopted by the creator and the group.

*

When announcing the change of policy >the new terms of provision for the facilities<, the creators of network groups under the ning.com banner, were informed that they could download and archive their material to their own systems.

*

MANY THE ATTEMPTS TO USE the facilities to download, as 'provided, created and pointed to by ning dot com WITHOUT SUCCESS, after downloading and installing the software suggested by ning dot com. All attempts to benefit from clarification as to why the defaults, what the cause, what the reasons for the repetitious failures to access, download and edit the existing material merited no response whatsoever from the irresponsible in control / management of the ning dot com servers / facilities.

*

In the circumstances Andrew considers it essential to publicly denounce the 'unfortunate / unacceptable state that subsists care of the developments related here'; in particular the 'inability and the obstructions to download the creator's & contributors' own work for reference to and for consideration as to the possible 'direction and changes (if necessitated) FOR THE GROUP'S AIMS, as initiated by Andrew Yiannides.

*

AS FAR AS the creator, Andrew Yiannides was and is concerned, THE OBSTRUCTIONS WERE & CONSTITUTED CONSCIOUS ASSAULTS on the rights to freedom of expression from within the United States, where ning.com operates.

*

It would appear that the 'entrepreneur behind the ning.com provision' elected to overlook / ignore the accusations levied against the leaders / politicians / governments of other countries (such as China, North Korea, etc.) from within the USA the nation / country that prides itself on the provisions under the First Amendment to its Constitution.

*

The state created and in particular the issues raised here speak ill of the adopted approach to the rights assured to the citizens of an allegedly FREEDOM LOVING NATION. Simply put one has to recognise the reality that "Humankind is faced with the states imposed from within one of a number of allegedly civilised PSEUDOdemocracies, allegedly resting and founded on principles of law and order".

Definition of FORGERY as clarified and quantified under Sections of the Forgery Act, 1913, one reads:-
1.- (1)

For the purposes of this Act, forgery is the making of a false document in order that it may be used as genuine, and in the case of the seals and dies mentioned in this Act the counterfeiting of a seal or forgery with intent to defraud or deceive, as the case may be, is punishable as in this Act provided. 

(2)

A document is false within the meaning of this Act if the whole or any material part thereof purports to be made by or on behalf or on account of a person who did not make it nor authorise its making; or if, though made by or on behalf or on account of the person by whom or by whose authority it purports to have been made, the time or place of making, where either is material, or, in the case of a document identified by number or mark, the number or any distinguishing mark identifying the document, is falsely stated therein; and in particular a document is false:-

(a)

if any material alteration, whether by addition, insertion, insertion, obliteration, erasure, removal, or otherwise, has been made therein; 

(b)

if the whole or some material part of it purports to be made by or on behalf of a fictitious or deceased person;

(c)

if though made in the name of an existing person, it is made by him of by his authority with the intention that it should pass as having been made by some person, real or fictitious, other than the person who made or authorised it.

(3) For the purposes of this Act:-
(a)

it is immaterial in what language a document is expressed or in what place within or without the King's dominions it is expressed to take effect;

(b)

Forgery of a document may be complete even if the document when forged is incomplete, or is not or does not purport to be such a document as would be binding or sufficient in law;

(c)  

The crossing on any cheque, draft on a banker, postal office money order, postal order coupon, or other document the crossing of which is authorised or recognised by law, shall be a material part of such cheque, draft, order, coupon, or document.  

2.- (1)

Forgery of the following documents, if committed with intent to defraud, shall be felony and punishable with penal servitude for life:- 

(a) Any will, codicil, or other testamentary document, either of a dead or a living person, or any probate or letters of administration, whether with or without the will annexed; 

(b) Any deed or bond, or any assignment at law or in equity of any deed or bond, or any attestation of the execution of any deed or bond;  

(c) Any bank note, or any endorsement on or assignment of any bank note.

(2)

Forgery of the following documents, if committed with intent to defraud, shall be felony and punishable with penal servitude for any term not exceeding fourteen years:-

(a)

Any valuable security or assignment thereof or endorsement thereon, or, where the valuable security is a bill of exchange, any acceptance thereof;

(b)

Any document of title to lands or any assignment thereof or endorsement thereon;

(c) 

Any document of title to goods or any assignment thereof or endorsement thereon;

(d)

Any power of attorney or other authority to transfer any share or any share or interest in any stock, annuity, or public fund of the United Kingdom or any part of His Majesty's dominions or of any foreign state or country or to transfer any share or interest in the debt of any public body, company, or society, British or foreign, or in the capital stock of any such company or society, or to receive any dividend or money payable in respect of such share or interest or any attestation of any such power of attorney or other authority;

(e)   

Any entry in any book or register which is evidence of the title of any person to any share or interest hereinbefore mentioned or to any dividend or interest payable in respect thereof;

(f)

Any policy of insurance or any assignment thereof or endorsement thereon;

(g)

Any charter-party or any assignment thereof;

(h)

Any declaration, warrant, order, affidavit, affirmation, certificate, or other document required or authorised to be made by or for the purposes of the Government Act, 1829, or the Government Annuities Act, 1832, or by the National Debt Commissioners acting under the authority of the said Acts;

(i)

Any certificate the Commissioners of Inland Revenue or any other Commissioners acting in execution of the Income Tax Acts;

(j)

Any certificate, certificate of valuation, sentence or decree of condemnation or restitution, or any copy of such sentence or decree, or any receipt required by the Slave Trade Acts.

3. (1)

Forgery of the following documents, if committed with intent, to defraud or deceive, shall be felonry, and punishable with penal servitude for life:-  

Any document whatsoever having thereupon or affixed thereto the stamp or impression of the Great Seal of the United Kingdom, His Majesty's Privy Seal, any privy signet of His Majesty, His Majesty's Royal Sign Manual, any of His Majesty's seals appointed by the twenty-fourth Article of the Union between England and Scotland to be kept, used, and continued in Scotland, the Great Seal of Ireland or the Privy Seal of Ireland.     

(2)

Forgery of the following documents, if committed with intent to defraud or deceive, shall be felonry, and punishable with penal servitude for any term no exceeding fourteen years:-  

(a)

Any register or record of births, baptisms, naming, dedications, marriages, deaths, burials, or cremations, which now is, or hereafter may be, by law authorised or required to be kept in the United Kingdom, relating to any birth, baptism, naming, dedication, marriage, death, burial, or cremation, or any part of any such register, or of any part thereof;

(b)

Any copy of any any register of baptisms, marriages, burials, or cremations, directed or required by law to be transmitted to any registrar or other officer;

(c)

Any register of the birth, baptism, death, burial, or cremation of any person person to be appointed a nominee under the provisions of the Government Annuities Act, 1829, or any copy or certificate of any such register, or the name of any witness to any such certificate;

(d)

Any certified copy of a record purporting to be signed by an assistant keeper of the Public Records in England;

(e)

Any wrapper or label provided by or under the authority of the Commissioners of Inland Revenue or the Commissioners of Customs and Excise.

(3)

Forgery of the following documents, if committed with intent to defraud or deceive, shall be felonry, and punishable with penal servitude for any term not exceeding seven years:-

(a)

Any official document whatsoever of or belonging to any court of justice, or made or issued by any judge, magistrate, officer, or clerk of any such court;  

(b)

Any register or book kept under the provisions of any law in or under the authority of any court of justice;

(c)

Any certificate, office copy, or certified copy of any such document, register, or book or of any part thereof;

(d)

Any document which any magistrate or any master or registrar in lunacy is authorised or required by law to make or issue;

(e)

Any document which any person authorised to administer an oath under the Commissioners fir Oaths Act, 1889, is authorised or required by law to make or issue; 

(f)

Any document made or issued by an officer of state or law officer of the Crown, or any document upon which, by the law of usage at the time in force, any court of justice or any officer might act

(g)

Any document or copy of a document used or intended to be used in evidence in any Court of Record, or any document which is made evidence by law;

(h)

Any certificate required by any Act for the celebration of marriage;

(i)

Any license for the celebration of marriage which may be given by law;

(j)

Any certificate, declaration, or order under any enactment relating to the registration of births or deaths; 

(k)

Any register book, builder's certificate, surveyor's certificate, certificate of registry, declaration, bill of sale, instrument of mortgage, or sale under Part I of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1894, or any entry or endorsement required by the said Part of the said Act to be made in or on any of those documents;  

(l)

Any permit, certificate, or similar document made or granted by or under the authority of the Commissioners of Customs and Excise. 

4. (1)

Forgery of any document, which is not made felony under this or any other statute for the time being in force, if committed with intent to defraud, shall be a misdemeanour and punishable with imprisonment with or without hard labour for any term not exceeding two years.  

(2)

Forgery of any public document which is not made felony under this or any other statute for the time being in force, if committed with intent to defraud or deceive, shall be a misdemeanour and punishable with imprisonment with or without hard labour for any term not exceeding two years.

5. (1)

Forgery of the following seals, if committed with intent to defraud or deceive, shall be felony and punishable with penal servitude for life:-

(a)

The Great Seal of the United Kingdom, His Majesty's Privy Seal, any privy signet of His Majesty's seals appointed by the Twenty-fourth Article of the Union between England and Scotland to be kept, used, and continued in Scotland, the Great Seal of Ireland or the Privy Seal of Ireland;   

(b)

The seal of the Public Record Office of England;

(c)

The seal of any court of record;

(d)

The seal of the office of the Registrar-General of Births, Deaths, and Marriages. 

(2)

Forgery of the following seals, if committed with intent to defraud or deceive, shall be felony, and punishable with penal servitude for any term not exceeding fourteen years:- 

(a)

The seal of any register office relating to births, baptisms, marriages, or deaths;

(b)

The seal of any burial board or any local authority performing the duties of a burial board;

(c)

The seal of or belonging to any office for the registry of deeds or titles of lands.

(3)

Forgery of the following seals, if committed with intent to defraud or deceive, shall be felony and punishable with penal servitude for any term not exceeding seven years:-  

(a)

The seal of any court of justice other than a court of record;

(b)

The seal of the office of any master or registrar in lunacy.

(4)

Forgery of the following dies, if committed with intent to defraud or deceive, shall be felony and punishable with penal servitude for any term not exceeding fourteen years:-

(a)

Any die provided, made, or used by the Commissioners of Inland Revenue or the Commissioners of Customs and Excise;

(b)

Any die which is or has been required or authorised by law to be used for the marking or stamping of gold or silver plate, or gold or silver wares.

(5)

Forgery of the following die, if committed with intent to defraud or deceive, shall be felony and punishable with penal servitude for a term not exceeding seven years:-

Any stamp or die provided, made or used in pursuance of the Local Stamp Act, 1869.

6. (1)

Every person who utters any forged document, seal or die shall be guilty of an offence of the like degree (whether felony or misdemeanour) and on conviction thereof shall be liable to the same punishment as if he himself had forged the document, seal, or die.

(2)

A person utters a forged document, seal, or die, who, knowing the same to be forged, and with either of the intents necessary to constitute the offence of forging the said document, seal, or die, uses, offers, publishes, delivers, disposes of, tenders in payment or in exchange, exposes for sale or exchange, exchanges, tenders in evidence, or puts off the said forged document, seal, or die.       

(3)

It is immaterial where the document, seal, or die was forged.

7.

Every person shall be guilty of felony and on conviction thereof shall be liable

The 1913 FORGERY & Kindred Offences Act

An Act of Parliament although listed in the index of the records at HMSO, the Forgery Act 1913 was never available. It took Mr Andrew Yiannides, over two and a half years to gain access, and to secure a photocopy of it.

*

Assertions that the Act may well had been repealed, hence the non-availability promotions by the staff at Her Majesty's Stationery Office, at Holborn, London. Such, however, could not & can NEVER be justified. [*Link - important]

Page1
1913a01r.jpg (150986 bytes)
Page2
1913a02r.jpg (164265 bytes)
Page3
1913a03r.jpg (138041 bytes)
*

The need arose to visit and engage in searches at any library reported to be carrying extensive Legal Sections, starting with the Library at the Royal Courts of Justice, with no luck there.

*

After securing a photocopy of the Act, renewed pressures on the police, in London, expecting of the officers of Law to set the wheels in motion for the prosecution of the parties / persons who engaged in criminal activities. Typical of the Metropolitan Police, hoever, no interest, no concerns and worse no prosecutions!

The reader and researcher should note that a number of 'break-ins (6 in four weeks) at the residence of Mr Andrew Yiannides occurred within days of the first report to the police in 1972. Typical in such cases the police failed to act in accordance with their retainers as officers of the law, including the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Robert Mark QPM, himself.

Access from here his performance when he spoke of his alleged concerns as 'the guest who delivered the annual BBC Televised 'Dimbleby Lecture', in 1973. As a typical hypocrite he spoke of FORGERIES promoted and used by the legal circles, a year after he received a copy of the FORGERY we point to above >*Link<.

Visitors, readers and researchers MUST READ the provisions by Parliament (in place since 1913) and consider WHY Parliament incorporated such provisions if not because of 'existing practices in the courts? Hence the need, as of 1913, for the provisions'(?). Access the provisions by clicking on the image for Page4 above, and consider the simple fact that Acts of Parliament are but material for 'the serfs' to be lulled into false states of security and fraudulently promoted 'protection from crime and criminals'.

*Link from here to the only sound provisions warranted for any truly Democratic State *Link to the conclusions of C L Montesquieu]. 

Visitors, readers and researchers MUST CONSIDER the elements of 'an abducted life' & the warranted (as imposed by the legal circles and the courts) SLAVE LABOUR, IN GROSS VIOLATION of the right to life (the life that one had planned or plans for one's self and his / her family). ARROGANTLY ORGANISED CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, through abuse of the courts' facilities by alleged servants of the law and 'justice' >the abducted deity, of classical Hellas days<. Servants of the citizens, of an allegedly civilised society, treating the taxpayers as serfs of the Middle Ages. The taxpayers referred to subjects of the realm >by definition serfs who are simply SUBJECTED TO THE WHIMS OF THE CORRUPTERS, THE CORRUPT and the corrupted, such as the charlatans we name, we point to and we expose in our pages as the bricks and mortar used for the maintenance of the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies, the United Kingdom. 

*

Nothing from the deaf, the blind and the dumb; the managers of the protection rackets; the network, took over. Nothing but pressures on the victim of criminal activities in the courts, including inexcusable / fraudulent demands by the Inland Revenue and the Local Authority >abuse of public facilities<.

Page4
1913a04r.jpg (128276 bytes)
Page5
1913a05r.jpg (136402 bytes)
Page6
1913a06r.jpg (142299 bytes)
*

There followed over 3 years of RESEARCH, looking into all consequential Acts of Parliament. Volumes of annual records, for each year, from 1914 to 1977, in order to establish that no sections of the Act had been repealed.

*

Thereafter more visits and renewed pressure on the police all the way to the office of the Commissioner who simply failed to take any interest in the performance of the police force under his command and supervision.

 

References above to the Inland Revenue. Readers, researchers and victims of THE ORGANISED CRIMES the Prime Minister, spoke of in June 2005, are invited to access and read a letter to an accountant. The accountant was retained to address the issues arising out of the IMPOSED CRIMINAL DAMAGES by the legal circles care of abusers of legal chair occupation ALL THE WAY TO THE COURT OF APPEAL. Needless to say the victim of all HAD NO OPTION but to retain a second accountant because the original 'fraudster' had been failing to address the issues covered in the letter pointed to. Apparently the original accountant WAS RELATED (bloodline) to a partner of the solicitor Mr Kypros Nicholas of Nicholas & Co., London N4. The solicitor Kypros Nicolas had been entrusted with the legal rights of his client, an old school friend, who had been the victim of an open and shut case of ARROGANT COMMERCIAL FRAUD.

*

Link from here to the letter pointing the second accountant to his part as a greased gear in the mechanics & workings of the *organised crimes against humanity* in an allegedly civilised democracy. A pseudo-democracy which allegedly rests and is founded on principles of law and order. The citizens of should seriously consider the activities of the type of *sold to the system as is* charlatans, stooges and *fraudsters club recruits* such as the morons we name and expose in our pages' list of which can be accessed below.

*

We have transcribed part of relevant sections of the Forgery Act, above, for the benefit of visitors and readers / researchers. 

Page7
1913a07r.jpg (142461 bytes)
Page8
1913a08r.jpg (135991 bytes)
Page9
1913a09r.jpg (128792 bytes)
*

Visitors who desire access to the rest of the Act, if not able to secure a copy of it from Her Majesty's Stationery Office, can click on the thumbnail images, above, here and below.

*

Thus through access to the larger images of the pages, each can transcribe the rest of the actual document, the Act as published by the Government.

*

ALL VISITORS and serious readers / researchers are pointed to the specific footnote below.

Page10
1913a10r.jpg (145480 bytes)
Page11
1913a11r.jpg (150453 bytes)
Pag12
1913a12r.jpg (94161 bytes)

*

*

*

ALL VISITORS and serious readers / researchers are pointed to the specific footnote below.

Page13
1913a13r.jpg (97182 bytes)


Page14
1913a14r.jpg (89041 bytes)


Page15
1913a15r.jpg (89189 bytes)


*

*

ALL VICTIMS OF THE ABUSED PUBLIC FACILITIES, no matter from which quarters each was / has been or is the victim of fraud >through abuse of public office and facilities< should contact their Member of Parliament in the United Kingdom and refer their MP to the specific undertaking and commitment of the the Attorney General, the Rt. Hon. Dominic Grieve and insist that the case of each one be investigated by the reckless abusers of office operating as alleged police officers whose main duty has been to investigate and instigate prosecutions of criminals. (*Footnote)

*

Page16
1913a16r.jpg (80048 bytes)

GROUNDS FOR THE PROSECUTION OF THE CRIMINALS >who abused the courts facilities and the trust placed in Solicitors and Barristers, such as the fraudsters, who, in 1972, opened the eyes of the creator of these pages / this website< were and remain as clear as can be. Thus the Attorney General, the Director of Public Prosecutions shall be called upon to account for the past failures of the holders of such office as they held and or the present holders of such offices as Commanders of Police, The Crown Prosecution Service, and the office of Attorney General, successive holders of which over the four decades plus, habitually and inexcusable failed and fail to prosecute the criminals who relied and rely on one another to violate and deny the rights assured in law, allegedly, to the citizens, to the taxpayers, to honest and hardworking members of the business community who are targeted by the criminal who systematically abuse public office and public facilities. One and all engaging and indulging as each does by relying on judicial chair occupants such as the fraudsters who entertained the criminal activities of the legal circles by IGNORING THE BLUNT FORGERY the solicitor entertained from the legal team of the fraudsters he, Kypros Nicholas was retained to Summons to Court in order to account for their fraudulent in intent false assertions to the victim of all, including the legal circles and the contemptuous of Parliament's Law judicial chair occupants, all the way to the Court of Appeal, in the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies. (*Footnote)

Visitors are invited to access from here the submissions to the European Court of Human Rights and acquaint themselves with the facts & the reatlities submitted in the case of 'the woman victim of the family courts'. All should consider the simple fact that it was not the only case Andrew Yiannides worked with and for the woman 'victim' after she had been 'denied rights in contempt of the realities placed before the court, not to mention the established usual  deniakl of rights to the male in matrimonial proceedings. 

FOOTNOTE common to most web-pages at this website
MOST IMPORTANT

In October 2010, the coalition Government's Attorney General, in an interview published by 'COUNSEL' the monthly legal banter magazine, specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves from cases of (small-fry) fraud and he asserted that he was making that element his department's priority*

*Link from here to the evidence, to the images of the published article.

IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT FRAUD, and IF IT WILL DEAL with the criminals who abuse public office, especially when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course. Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003

*Link from here to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers that they, the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law"?

While there, above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us.

*Link to our explicit submissions to (a) the Prime Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) the Home Secretary. We acted so after we had secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew Yiannides.

Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998

*Link from here to the letter

& note the results evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do

*Link from here to the evidence we point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob..

PAGE FOOTNOTES
1.

We point in our pages to the fact that the police operating from within the London Borough of Islington and in particular Blackstock Road, Hornsey Road and Upper Street received copies of THE BLUNT FORGERY the legal circles set about promoting as an acceptable document in evidence in support of a concocted defence to the open and shut case of Commercial Fraud. Copy of the FORGERY [*Link from here to image of it] was handed to the silent, to the dumb Member of Parliament representing the Islington North Constituency, one Michael O'Haloran; he actually did speak only on the occasion when he announced that he was crossing the floor to join 'the gang of four' who set off to create the Social Democrats. The forgery was also delivered to the office of the Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Robert Mark QPM. Needless to say his performance >as an officer of law< matched that of the arrogant abusers of trust, (a) the solicitors, (b) the barristers and (c) the judicial chair occupants who collectively were operating in contempt of the law and as protectors of the fraudsters who indulged (1) In commercial fraud and (2). Relied on the invisible services on offer by the legal circles in an allegedly civilised PSEUDOdemocracy, where the courts' facilities and judicial chair occupants are used for the imposition of the criminal states the sucker-serfs are subjected to systematically, as part of the intended New World Order planned for by the successors, by the followers and by the promoters of the vile teachings by examples stated / created by the creators of the alleged creator of all and everything. [*Link from here to the >most clear of hints which the criminals who created the alleged creator put on record, through their vile creation, the old testament rubbish].

2.

We point in our pages to the fact that Sir Robert Mark QPM when delivering his 'commendable Dimbleby Lecture on BBC television, as a typical public services actor, he spoke of and referred to other instances >when solicitors and barristers engaged in the creation and promotion of a blunt FORGERY<, such as THE FORGERY his office received >therefore himself too received<, just as all of his subordinates who were operating as alleged officers of the law also received, when the creator of these pages, this website, was being put through the mill and the grinding wheels, by the criminals in control of the courts and the courts' facilities. INCLUDED IN THE LIST, >JUDICIAL CHAIR OCCUPANTS ALL THE WAY TO THE COURT OF APPEAL<. One and all ready, willing and happy to protect the criminals who indulged in commercial fraud on >a serf, as far as one and all were concerned<. [*Link from here to the part of the lecture which Sir Robert Mark QPM, prepared and delivered to the sucker-serfs as part of his presentation, intended for the naive, the gullible and the impressionable suckers who have taxes imposed on them for the creation of states criminals create as alleged officers of the law and justice, including other alleged servants of the public; one and all imposing on the taxpayers the planned-for New World Order through such states as the states at long last spoken of by the politicians who signed up to the creation of the monster state marketed as the European Union, created through the proposed European Economic Community, the EU simply the follow-up product of the EEC without any reference of the plans of the fraudsters, to the sucker-serfs such as the taxpayers whose politicians NOW, at last have spoken of the IMPOSED MELTING POT of different cultures and in particular the third wing of the religion that failed to conquer >through its marauding sword brandishing armies< and convert the continent of Europe to the religion created by 'the enlightened one who allegedly benefited from messages delivered to him by a third party an alleged messenger from the alleged creator of all and everything]. 

...

...

 

The creator of this website was inviting victims to access URrights & join him there with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office until the providers of the facilities >ning.com< introduced new terms and conditions for the provision of the facilities. Access from here and read of the imposed states by the brains behind ning.com and consider only one element "WHY OBSTRUCT & HINDER THE DOWNLOAD of the existing material at URrights.ning.com >the intellectual properties of the creator of that presence on the Internet and those who joined him there? Read below of the unacceptable conduct and behaviour by the reckless abusers of trust, who set out to obstruct and blackmail the creator of URrights.ning

Persons who are genuinely concerned and object to the ways they were / are being treated by alleged servants of the publicand the law >in any PSEUDOdemocracy, or whatever states / conditions they are subjected to< by abusers of public facilities and public office >as we cover in our web-pages< should contact webmaster@human-rights.org for information relevant to the creation of similar facilities for INFOrmation on URrights, for facilities for URrights EUrope and for a NETwork of URrights activists.

  • APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility (ning.com) Andrew Yiannides created and used the portal to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers who joined with him to expose and challenge the arrogant and blunt abuse of public services in all allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.

  • The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for ning.com to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.

  • HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the ning.com servers THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were contemptuously ignored.

  • Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for ning.com

  • In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from ning.com to existing members.

  • EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

.org/1999dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org/actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
  • Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
  • All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegdely reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
  • Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
  • Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
  • Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
  • The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
  • Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
  • All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s)

> MOST IMPORTANT <
On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org/ (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter,
Access also http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/ (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE.It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the European Court for Human Rights* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR], arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
Ú╝»font> Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster
...