1999dfax.htm
Fax from http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/
| To: |
Mr Norman Scarth
( Tel.01572-812-042 ) |
Fax: |
01724 – 499-124 |
| From: |
andrew@human-rights.demon.co.uk [*F1] |
Date: |
14 January 2001 |
| Re: |
New Year
Assault on the Villains Who Ruin Families |
Pages: |
4 – with cover sheet |
| CC: |
Mr Paul Talbot Jenkins & William Spring |
|
|
| þ Urgent |
þ For
Review |
þ Please
Comment |
¨ Please Reply |
¨ Please
Recycle |
MESSAGE:
Dear Friends
I transmit copy of the fax that was received by
Messrs G. Ebert and Geoffrey Scriven. I
transmit also copy of the letter I delivered to 10 Downing Street on 8th
December 1999, the day when the victims of financial institutions presented their
petition, following of which they staged their protest, inside the Treasury Building.
Copy of the letter from the Prime Minister's private
office, of 29th November 1999, is published by human-rights at the above URL.
By securing a copy from the Internet any member of the public has proof of the date each
citizen becomes aware of the existence of the communication. That way the statutory period
becomes effective for each victim as of the date of discovery. The letter proves that the
elected Prime Minister, a legally qualified person, determined the issues as submitted to
him by me pertained to crimes. And as such the Minister responsible and in charge of
investigations and laying of information for prosecutions is the Home Secretary as the
Minister responsible for the maintenance of Law and Order, policing and Crime reduction,
etc.
The two letters and in particular my letter of 8
December 1999, copy of which I furnished you earlier should be of help to ALL VICTIMS in
order to challenge the type of responses Mr. Ebert received from the police. The
justifications given by the police are inexcusable, unacceptable and unjustified. I look
forward to receiving the copies of letters Mr Ebert received. I assured him that I would
do my best to assist him to put the material evidence in his case in his Community On
Line web-site [*F2].
Victims should recognise that it is the only avenue through which they can and will expose
all of the activities by the offenders who harmed them.
I transmit also copy page with the Article (ECoHR
38) which I pointed out to a few victims(!) because of the fact that they appear to be
keen to play at law in the corrupt theatres of abducted Justice instead of challenging
collectively and with respect for the rights of others, those they have been complaining
of and about while wasting valuable time and promoting excuses for failures to co-operate
with others towards the goal of impartial and unadulterated Justice. The victims need to
release Goddess Justice from the dungeons at the R.C.J and from any other corrupt state or
place they shackled her in. Persons who may have taken advantage of the facility under
Article 38 should retire gracefully from the arena under any pretext. They should let
others get on with the difficult task; they should cease promoting all sorts of
inexcusable justifications for failing to co-operate with and assist other victims to
challenge collectively the blunt corruption in the theatres of abducted Justice.
andrew@human-rights
(human-rights.org - Registered In the USA) |
NOTE:- The crafty ones who set out to expand the
system of operations as we cover in the exclusive page:-
http://www.human-rights.org/confraud.htm#records
simply elected to ignore the polite request to withdraw from the arena gracefully; in
other words, they did not abandon their plans for expansion of the rampant fraud
operations, arrogantly organised and ongoing through abuse of the courts' facilities.
|
*Link from here
to a letter, written by a solicitor on behalf of his client, to another solicitor.
Note how, the solicitor treats an offer from the other solicitor, who happened to have
been one of a few solicitors who engaged earlier in fraud aplenty on the client. NOTE
ALSO, the assertions about the police conducting investigations in the matter of the
organised constructive frauds by the legal circles WHILE ALSO INFORMING THE OTHER
SOLICITOR that the client's case was nearing its conclusion at the European Court for
Human Rights. >>> In other words the taxpayers are to make good the damages
>the legal circles< collectively caused to the client <<< |
All simply carried on as they indicated when they failed
to respond as commanded of any decent and law abiding citizen when they received the
invitations to submit statements / respond to the request for information and evidence
warranted in order to challenge the denial of rights to secure 'true and unadulterated
records of hearings in the courts in the United Kingdom; all concerned readers /
visitors, taxpayers should access the evidence in the exclusive web-page Andrew Yiannides
created after one of 'the wily dreamers' attempted to abuse a copy of the letter Andrew
Yiannides received from the Opposition in July 1995, whereby two senior politicians, both
Barristers, acknowledged to Andrew the element / issue of FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM. |
*Link from here to
the page Andrew Yiannides created after the Secretary of the LIPS crowd/mob wrote to
Andrew in order to express his disappointment for being blamed by Andrew Yiannides for the
states he, Norman Scarth had been subjected to. DO ACCESS and READ CAREFULLY how Andrew
Yiannides reacted upon receipt of the complaint. No mention in Mr Scarth's letter of the
theatrical productions he had Andrew dragged up to Bradford in order to watch the
theatrical scenarios presented for the last week of the trial in Sheffield Crown Court. No
mention of the fact that the judge and Mr Scarth himself failed to comply with the Jury's
request and produce / provide copies of the communications the defendant (Mr Scarth) was
alluding to in his presentations DESPITE THE FACT that Andrew Yiannides had gone prepared
with such material when Patrick Cullinane collected him from London and took him all the
way to Bradford... in order to observe the theatrical productions. NO MENTION OF THE FACT
that Mr Scarth decided to abuse the copy of the letter he secured from Andrew Yiannides
for other purposes that his attempt to discredit the author of the letter and in the
process diminish the true value of the letter. We refer to the letter whereby TWO
BARRISTERS / POLITICIANS >Mr Paul Boateng and Mr Tony Blair, acknowledged to Mr
Yiannides the issue / element of THE FRAUD (ongoing) IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM. Readers /
visitors who bother to access the reasons WHY ALL ALLEGED VICTIM-CHALLENGERS who go about
ranting on and on about about the abused court facilities CAN & SHOULD UNDERSTAND why
>ALL< without exception of the dreamers who contacted Andrew Yiannides through the
LIPS crowd-mob and other false fronts (affiliates of the LIPS dreamers) failed to
co-operate as invited, by Andrew Yiannides in 1997 and thereafter did not carry on simply
failing to co-operate BUT THEY ALSO SET ABOUT OBSTRUCTING Andrew in his work and plans for
the abusers of the courts facilities. The evidence published in the page linked to from
this paragraph SHOULD SUFFICE TO CONVINCE the thickest of morons as to WHY the attempt to
diminish the worth of the acknowledgement care of an obliging local paper, the editor of
which received an appropriate letter from the owner of the property > the EXPLICIT
LETTER. |
Needless to point out, the wily one secured
a copy of the letter, subject to specific terms and conditions. However, as a typical
fraudsters-club-recruit, all out to expand the system of operations ongoing through the
abused courts' facilities, the agreement meant nothing to the abuser of trust. Access from
here the web-page:-
http://www.human-rights.org/4deceit.htm
and consider the realities exposed and challenged as the occasion commanded of Andrew
Yiannides, at the time. |
* |
The URL / link above takes the visitor /
reader to the very page where the link from the above paragraph takes one to specific
elements and introduction to the convenient failures and the wilfull obstructions to the
use of rights, allegedly assured in law, in respect of and relative to the principle that JUSTICE
MUST BE SEEN & BE RECORDED AS DONE. In our pages we cover and relate the facts and
the realities born of the criminal in intent activities by the legal circles. In one of
our explicit webpages, we point to the evidence and the realities behind the
constructively engineered litigation cases between three generations of the same
family.... three generations 'talking in different tongues as organised and arranged by
followers of the most vile of the teachings by examples related in alleged holy scriptures
as concocted and promoted by fraudsters. |
* |
The REALLY CONCERNED and the interested reader / researcher should
consider the evidence published in the web-page along with the material facts related in
and born of the letter that Mr Norman Scarth, the Secretary of the LIPS crowd-mob sent to
the founder of human-rights.org Mr Andrew Yiannides. |
| * |
The most important element and reality commanding consideration and
address, SHOULD BE THE RIGHT TO RECORD COURT HEARINGS, for obvious reasons. ONE HAS TO
CONSIDER THE PERPETUAL PROMOTIONS INTENDED FOR SUBLIMINAL INDOCTRINATION OF TARGETED NEW
VICTIMS OF THE LEGAL CIRCLES AND THE ABUSED COURTS FACILITIES, as orchestrated by alleged
victim-challengers, such as Mr Norman Scarth and his affiliates / associates. |
| * |
Needless to point out and emphasise that we are referring to NEW
VICTIMS who are targeted BY THE CONVERTED WHO ELECT to join the operatives of 'the
system as is', as *fraudsters-club-recruits*. We refer to persons who made and make
it their business to expand the cash under the table facilities on offer to all victims
who endorse the condition stipulated >IN WRITING< by and through the
European Court for Human Rights. *Link from here to
the absolute proof and evidence. |
| * |
We refer above [*Link] to the exclusive web-page
created by Andrew Yiannides when using the letter he received from the conniving and
deceitful fraud of an alleged human, Mr Norman Scarth. It was and as such it has remained
an issue of 'THE UNACCEPTABLE AND CRIMINAL IN INTENT BREACH OF TRUST', second only to the
reckless abuse of fatherhood by the animal who used marriage to a decent woman in order to
impose his evil ways on 'the family he created but maintained by the woman he married with
hardly any input from him', |
| * |
Through the material facts related and the evidence we point to in the
specific page Andrew Yiannides created when using the letter he rceieved from the wily and
deceitful Norman Scarth, we point to and we draw attention to the most crucial of
elements. We refer to the issue of unadulterated records (audio recordings) of all court
hearings AS THE APPLICATION to the ECoHR was intended for..... but the dreamers who
received the essential invitation / request ignored it all. corners of the caves where
ALL congregate. |
| * |
As LOVERS of and converts to the system of operations, one and all made it
their business to expand the system of operations and as such all failed to co-operate.
Through their relentless failings each simply indicated that EACH OBJECTED TO THE
WARRANTED FACILITY. |
| * |
And, best of all, Mr Norman Scarth, after securing a recording of a
hearing at the Court of Appeal, care of directives from Mr Andrew Yiannides (who did not
attend the hearing of the application, for obvious reasosn)..... the wily one
CONVENIENTLY BURIED IT ALL in the dark. *Link from here
to the evidence (part of) and when next you hear of or you are pointed to any assertions
about 'the martyr' who was sent down >years later< for recording at a lower court,
AFTER A FRIEND / COLLEAGUE conveniently 'betrayed him to the bench', point such others to
the evidence we point to and simply ask: "WHY DID HE SUPPRESS THE PRECEDENT CASE BY
FAILING TO PUBLISH THE TRANSCRIPT HE CREATED IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN, either as webmaster@yorkshire.human-rights.org
or as webmaster@leeds.human-rights.org
>Reader please note that both email address are not in use and for the reasons access
please: www.justiceraped.org/2011/12/h-rocol/
|
|
|
After considering the realities covered in the above two
web-pages, access also the web-page where we point to the extract from the most offensive
of frauds on mankind, at:-
http://www.human-rights.org/convicti.htm#Star
Read there and consider the vile scenario / script concocted by the creators of the
alleged holy scriptures from which the extract we reproduce and point to in the above
web-page. THEN CONSIDER that the fraudsters who created the alleged holy scriptures
attributed the very scenario you will be reading to their creation, the alleged creator of
all and everything.... including crimes aplenty on humanity!!! |
The URL / link, above, takes one to the most obvious
of hints, which any serious reader should be considering as THE LESSON for grey matter
users > for TRUE HUMANS, FOR >THINKERS<. The content of the web-page relates
to the case of just another dreamer who set out to secure assistance in order to 'benefit
from the cash under the table facility, on offer to such morons as the woman who ALSO
FAILED TO ADHERE TO HER COMMITMENT & UNDERTAKINGS to Andrew Yiannides. She failed (as
was expected of any egocentric moron), TO STATE what she was subjected to in the public
domain, as a member of the Human-Rights Organisation Community on Line... just like Mr
Norman Scarth and his affiliates / associates.... for some of whom, we created specific
page material. In the craft-y wily woman's case, however, one Veronica Beryl Foden,
ONE SHOULD TAKE ON BOARD the simple fact and reality that she set off to provide better
living conditions for her ailing father and her elderly mother.... BUT THE
LEGAL CIRCLES HAD OTHER PLANS for that family. It was not long before the abusers
of trust, the experts at manipulating the naive and the gullible when they imposed on the
woman THEIR CONDITIONS (inexcusable and unjustified) in order to create the different
tongues and FRAUDULENT IN INTENT LEGAL CASES from which the criminals, the legal circles
were to benefit through use of the elderly mother. And case after case (a)
mother -v- daughter and (b) daughter at war with the
granddaughter (her own daughter) who (the latter) the fraudsters arranged with the
grandmother 'to inherit' one of the three properties targeted by the abusers of the courts
facilities >>>THE EXPERTS WERE SEEN TO HAVE BEEN PRO-ACTIVE IN
CREATING THE DIFFERENT TONGUES SCENARIOS (to which the above link takes
the serious reader) >conflicts< FOR legal actions and
FRAUDULENT court proceedings, naturally. Odd it was not, most interesting indeed, the
fact that the scenarios were created and enacted within the district / city of
Plymouth; the city of the founding fathers (of the New World settlements in
America) >>> THE CITY that boasts the evil one, the god of the old
testament as one of its protectors! >>>The god of the old testament, the
one who objected to the sons (NO daughters) of men (NO women) of earth >co-operating
and achieving great things< JUST as the abusers of Andrew Yiannides' time objected and
set about obstructing the development of the human-rights organisation Community on Line,
as the abductors of the Community, the staff and officers of NorthSky engaged in, in
breach of the corporations contract / agreement with the creator Andrew Yiannides! |
.... |
FOOTNOTE
common to most web-pages at this website
MOST IMPORTANT In October 2010, the coalition's Attorney
General, in an interview published by 'COUNSEL' specifically spoke of
the police distancing themselves from cases of (small-fry) fraud
and asserted that he was making that element his department's priority* |
| *Link from
here to the evidence |
| IT REMAINS TO BE
SEEN, WHAT the coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY WILL IN FACT ATTEND
TO THE RAMPANT FRAUD, and IF IT WILL DEAL with the criminals who abuse public office,
especially when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that will be
delivered in due course. Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published
in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary
in 2003 |
| *Link from
here to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why
tolerate the arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the
lawmakers that they, the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law?" |
| While there,
above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few
days earlier. ALL alleged victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time
the letter was sent to the Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received
copies of other letters submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official
appointees to public office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is
of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when
called upon properly in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other
'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens did
lead to the right actions by government departments, such as the explicit challenges we
set about exposing when one of the most evil of alleged victims of the legal circles
contacted us as a hypocrite whose main objectives were to test the water -so to speak- and
suck Andrew Yiannides into the circle of lovers of the system as is >the LIPS crowd
mob<, one and all in love with the cash under the terms and conditions we point to in
our pages. |
| *Link from here to our explicit
submissions to (a) the Prime Minister, (b)
the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) the
Home Secretary. We acted so after we had secured more than enough evidence
about the parts of an alleged victim whose only interests were (i) the
rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE
COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were
intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew
Yiannides. |
| Access please the
letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998 |
| *Link from here to the
letter |
| And note the
results evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter
reaching its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the
system as is'- on the job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do. |
| *Link from here to the
evidence we point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system
fraudsters who were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers /
organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob. |
| PAGE
FOOTNOTES |
|
1. We hasten to inform visitors to this web-page that the
email address embeded in the content of the FAX happens to be the email address in use
currently, even though one reads (above) the old email address when the original
human-rights pages were published as a sub-domain to the Internet Service
Provider demon.co.uk. |
|
2. Serious researchers and visitor-readers should note
that although Mr Ebert 'joined the human-rights.org Community on Line, he never proceeded
to publication of anything related to facts and the reasons / causes for the ongoing
tribulations he was faced with in his encounters with the abusers of the courts
facilities. Also when he met with me in the Grand Hall at the Royal Courts of
Justice (both of us were attending there for completely separate issues and purposes on
the day) and produced (showed to me) the letter he received from the Police he did not
comply with my polite request for a copy in order for me to take the matter up with the
Prime Minister. I refrain from submitting further information as to that day's event,
bearing in mind that Mr Ebert never published anything about his tribulations in the
courts, thereby establishing >like many others< that he regarded such matters and
issues as of no concern to any other but the actors engaging in theatrical productions in
the courts. In other words OUT OF THE WINDOW WENT THE PRINCIPLE OF "JUSTICE
TO BE SEEN TO BE DONE" as far as he was concerned. Needless
to say, like the many other lovers of the relentlessly promoted wrongs imposed on such
persons by the abusers of judicial chair occupation, Mr Ebert was very much aware of the
fact that the Prime Minister >at the time< did concede to me the very element of 'FRAUD
IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM', when leader of the Opposition in July1995. Like many
others he had been shown a true copy of the letter I received. I hasten to add that all
who were shown a true copy of the letter I received, were informed that I was to make
EVERYTHING PUBLIC after I completed certain aspects of my research; like all others he was
informed as to how and WHY I WAS CAUSED TO START RESEARCHING & INVESTIGATING the
very elements I had fallen victim to back in 1969-1976. Mr Ebert was also
told as to how, when and under what circumstances the managers / organisers of the
Litigants In Person Society, Mr Peter Hayward and Mrs Philomena Cullen contacted me, in
1992; the LIPS group being the common factor that brought the two of us together and
thereby getting to know of each others causes, reasons and the common issues: 'the abuse
of the courts facilities by alleged Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court. |
|
3. |
|
|
... |
...
|