h-rtitle.gif (7604 bytes)

Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note below the arrangements between the administrative, the judiciary and the media; read of the all-embracing guarantee in place, in contempt of all law : the root shall be pointed to.

WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read below:-

"The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State"

*Link from here to founder's tribulations in 1972-75 and marvel at the creativity of allegedly honourable officers of Justice and the Law in the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies

  • And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the affidavit which visitors can link to directly from here [*Link].
  • Link also from here to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts organised and processed to fruition while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of:-

'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy.

*Link from here to proof of the parts the police play in promotion and expansion of the criminal activities instigated, processed and imposed on society by the legal circles. Read of assertions by a typical hypocrite, none other than the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Robert Mark QPM, when he spoke of FALSE RECORDS / FORGERIES by the legal circles while delivering his famous Dimbleby Lecture on BBC-TV in November 1973, 15 months after he received true copy of THE FORGERY advanced and promoted by the licensed criminals : solicitors and barristers for their evil ends in the case that opened Andrew Yiannides' mental eyes to the realities of life in the United Kingdom, a typical PSEUDOdemocracy. Can anyone enlighten Andrew and the millions of victims of the legal circles WHY NO PROSECUTION of the solicitors & the barristers in 1972 or thereafter?.

  • With such a facility in place (the words we point to above) and arrogant abuse of public office, can anyone assert, or argue, that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts? (>Hence the c reation of www.jusaticeraped.org <)
  • ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm

*Link from here to the realities - in due course also a link to the warning (indirect but nonetheless very clear) for thinkers to recognise 

  • On 3rd March 2008 >someone's birthday< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other.
  • >>> IN THE MEANTIME we have been naming and shaming a number who know of and engage in much more than just approve wrongs imposed on Mr & Mrs Average, the millions of taxpayers, in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union created by politicians, without reference to the taxed for fraud sucker-serfs, allegedly for the benefit of the citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION, among other promotions.

Needless to say the case entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies.

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored and ignore all complaints and submissions by victims of the organised crimes we point to and expose in our pages, irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.

[*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions, covered in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' (>thinkers<) from animals.

Fraud in court  Council staff use Forgeries   Misconduct in Public Office. 2 cases relative to applicable law One Protocol says it ALL It betrays arrogant intentions Law Provides for THEFTS and it covers Judges too Judges' duties   TIME 4 CHANGE   & CHALLENGES Site CONTENTS - Table of Contents & ongoing work Your Rights & OBLIGATIONS to Society SITE SEARCH facility for any specific element / issue of concern to visitors / readers
COURTS : their Facilities Abused For ORGANISED CRIME : FRAUD Solicitor's Perjury & Victim Ignores it all Just like the Law Society always does Blackmailed or is it Just Conditioned & Subjugated Victims who join the club ? We name Lovers of blunt fraud through courts - Users of the facilities 4 illicit gains Local Authorities & FRAUD on 'serfs' the Taxpayers who are kept in the dark Police Party to & Endorsing Criminal Acts, Activities Arrogant Fraud FALSE Records & Contempt of Law by the legal Circles & Public Services The crafty ones & Vexatious Litigant PLOYS for the rewarded silent

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

family.uk-human-rights justiceraped.org dssfraud.htm confraud.htm dadscare.htm contract.htm converts.htm MensAid
solicitorsfromhell.co.uk chancellor.htm theyknow.htm solfraud.htm sheknows.htm 4deceit.htm convicti.htm forward.htm


*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

An explicit Affidavit [*L] plus exhibits and
     letters to a Chief Inspector of Police
          one to solicitors
[*L] and another to the Lord Chancellor [*L] evince
               ORGANISED CRIMES
(Access and read the letter to the police in September 2006 [*L])

Access & read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister : * I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link from here to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister forwarded / delegated submissions and evidence received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister / Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES

3rd March 2011 added link [*L] to the BBC-TV Dimbleby Lecture in 1973 as the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Robert Mark prepared & presented to the sucker-serfs

beware.htm      Page KEY 
PageChanges 15 Nov. 2006
This Page is DEDICATED
import.gif (1348 bytes)
Please (*Link to plea).

hrbnrsml.gif (1162 bytes) JOIN

others On Line and publish your Statement of Facts and the Evidence you have.

Member's case at the European Court on Human Rights - paves the way TO PLEAD VIOLATIONS caused through abusive use of the courts in allegedly civilised Democratic States.
Victims do not know that IT IS ALL ORGANISED by the very circles who have been arranging all of humanity's TRIBULATIONS  FOR THOUSANDS of years
Use your rights in law [*Link] and ACT, with others, against the offenders.

Join them and chip in for the creation of the mass of evidence against abusers of public office : the abductors and rapists of Justice. You can then benefit from THE FACTS & THE EVIDENCE that you will help establish. It can all be used in any action, severally or jointly with others, as the case may be . Crimes against humanity are not ruled out when a large number of citizens can come up with evidence and as victims concur and or expand upon on the FACTS STATED & The VIOLATIONS PLEADED as LODGED at the ECoHR, already.

An Order RUSHED OUT as soon as a 'victim' acted... 

FAX received from Mr William Spring a victim-lover of the rampant constructive FRAUD THROUGH THE COURTS. He sent out a Press Release as soon as his first pages were published in a personal web site and PRESTO he received the order below whereby he was being granted leave to appeal WITHOUT SUCH AN APPLICATION by him in the pipeline... If such a miracle means nothing to any alleged victim-come-legal guru ANY PERSON contacted by such persons should consider his or her obligations to The next generation instead of going by what such persons aim for..... the cash under the table AND ADDITIONAL DEBT & LIABILITIES for the next generations.  WAKE UP U.K.  'serfs of the 21st century'.
wsfltarr.jpg (65011 bytes)

We will release a FAX to Mr. W. Spring relative to his FAILURES to act as warranted when a property was targeted by a convert to the very practices he, his sister & his brothers had been the victim of.  

Contempt to EVIDENCE 
Contempt to LAW 
Processes Posted LATE

Cases/Sites by Element
Contempt to Evidence
Haringey Police - H/B Fraud
V. B. Foden - Mortgage
V. B. Foden - Divorce
V. B. Foden-Solicitor Case
Contempt to Law
Enfield Council - C.Court
Hackney Council - C.Court
Haringey Council - C.Court
Haringey Police - H/B Fraud
Len Miskulin - Divorce
V. B. Fodden - Mortgage
False Instruments
Len Miskulin - Divorce
P. Constantinou - Divorce
Forgery Used
V. B. Fodden - Financial
Haringey Council-H/B Fraud
V.B. Fodden-Solicitor Case
Obstruct - Examination
P. Constantinou - Divorce
Obstructing Justice
Crown Prosecution Service
Court of Appeal - R.B.Del C
part 3     
Strike Out
Helen Patey - Assertions
Divorce Frauds Challenged
V. B. Fodden - Plymouth

Posting Certificates, (3) as submitted by Mrs Helen Patey among the copies we received in support of her 'private cheek to cheek dance routines, allegedly constituting matters dealt with / by the courts, the way of the abductors and rapists of Justice, naturally, AS ARRANGED WITH & BY such charlatans and fraudsters as the alleged victims we expose in our pages.  hppopmcr.jpg (64623 bytes)

We point above to the chosen ways of fraudsters who elect to operate for, with  and as organised by abusers of the legal system & the courts facilities. [*Link to page]
Readers/researchers need to access the explicit appeal that caused Lord Irvine to announce the Bill of Rights as the occasion commanded at the time. 






Beware of Evil agents & dreamers  * Page created August 2005 *
undercon.gif (1065 bytes) Page Revised: August 04, 2012* :  
Site under reconstruction
; Ongoing improvements / additions to site & pages
  • In the left margin window - the first image is of a Court Order that was received by Mr William Spring out of the blue. (*F6)
  • It was dispatched in haste by the courts, as soon as he released / circulated news that he had created the first pages & a web-site where he was to EXPOSE HOW A LEGACY (from a father to his off-spring) had been converted to legal costs care of the abused court facilities in as typical a case as they come in an allegedly civilised democracy.
  • The alleged democracy promoted by the media as one that allegedly rests and is founded on principles of Law & Order.
  • The promoters of the false states (re: democracy & law and order) conveniently failing to inform the ill-educated and ill-informed that all was and is created in accordance with the most evil of ways that were 'delivered to the sons of men', by the creators of the most vile of works created by its deliverers.
  • The last words, above, relate and point to the work that introduced and promoted to the ill-educated, and ill-informed (by design) 'serfs' in the UK and in other pseudodemocracies the alleged creator of all and everything. [*Link from here to a typical example of the teachings by examples stated in that most vile of works ever to have been concocted by evil minds].
  • Mr William Spring, had been (and carried on) abusing the time and generous assistance he was benefiting from, as offered, by Mr Andrew Yiannides for and to victims of the legal circles & the courts. [*Link to image of the Order that sprung out of the blue without an application to court. *Link also to references to Mr W Spring's parts as an allegedly 'civilised Christian' (?) / sold to the system as is craft-y one].
  • The reasons for the work and the assistance the abuser benefited from are very clearly and succinctly covered in the declaration of intent, *OUR AIMS*, which the abuser read and allegedly endorsed. [*Link to page / file].
  • All victims who contacted and contact *human-rights* naturally, to all intents and purposes endorse and intend to adhere to the very 'Declaration of Intent', naturally when and if honourable in their intentions. [*Link to a page where we expose a typical fraud of an alleged victim, who was a conscious party to and in the abuse of the courts processes and the facilities one and ALL were abusing for conversion of assets to the legal circles leading to the consequential rewards from taxpayers' contributions to the participating fraudsters we cover in another exclusive page *Link].
  • In connection with the miracle of the order we release now, we simply state that it was faxed to human-rights by Mr Spring, when he received it after he let it be known that he had gone public and that he was going to publish everything, as a member of the human-rights.org Community on Line. [*Link to an email Mr William Spring forwarded to Mr Andrew Yiannides after he was caused to reflect on his mentality and reckless attitude on the issue of the rampant fraud through the courts].
  • Our submissions to one Mrs Helen Patey who had contacted us, as a victim with much to allege and promote, should clarify our stance with such dreamers / sold to the devil souls. We add that she was 'connected to Mr James Todd of VOMIT repute. What was most intriguing however, was the fact that she apparently hailed from the same woods as Mr Paul Talbot-Jenkins. Both of the aforesaid gentlemen and Mrs H Patey of the most vociferous Free Mason bashers we ever encountered; as such they all presented and present themselves to be. [*Link to the image of a letter evincing the fact that Mrs. Helen Patey could not possibly have been unaware of 'the existence of Mr Paul Talbot-Jenkins, a possible neighbour of his too].
  • Mrs H Patey came along with similar assertions and promotions even though we were NOT publishing anything in any page on the issues that all of the aforesaid persons could not be outspoken by any other safe perhaps another 'subliminal indoctrination operative', Mr Maurice Kellett. The last maintained and still maintains a couple of web-sites where he promotes and projects his speciality as a another self appointed expert on the subject. [*Link to the first page of Mrs. H Patey's Statement of Particulars where she is noted to have put her opinions and views on record, in respect of the Free Masons].
  • Mrs H Patey informed us later that her case had been struck out, by the courts, on application from the defendants. We had been given ample causes and reasons not to be involved in the case. We had no choice after the way she had chosen to go about to establish her case (and claims) in the usual manner. Naturally, it was to be by dancing cheek to cheek with the abductors and rapists of Justice, behind closed doors. In other words in closed  / special sessions of kangaroo courts where other actors and charlatans might attend, along with targeted suckers whom such actors & fraudsters club recruits invite along. She made it clear that it was her chosen way and in the circumstances she was told that as far as we were concerned she was simply aiming to act in contempt of the provisions and THE NEED FOR OPEN COURTS; she was told that through her utter disregard of the PRINCIPLE THAT JUSTICE TO BE SEEN TO BE DONE she had betrayed her true colours and intentions.
  • Readers, researchers should therefore not be surprised at and with the content of the email response from Mr. Andrew Yiannides when Mrs Helen Patey sent out an email by way of a release of information in respect of developments in 'her case'. [*Link to the images of the response from Mr Yiannides - first three images and the elements Mrs.Patey was covering in her posting - last part of the third image and the fourth image].
  • We publish also in this page NINE PAGES [*Link to the images] of a printout of an explicit email. It was sent to charlatan and stooge, one Mr Ashok Mahadjin who came along complaining about all manner of wrongs which he stated had been imposed on him through abuse of the courts facilities. (*NOTE please that we shall be publishing in HTML the email for links to and from the matters covered in the email and in our pages at the site. We could also create bookmarks / anchor points to which other pro-active citizens could / shall be able to link to, thereby enhancing their own Statements of Truth by establishing the inexcusable 'common practices' of and by the criminals who ARE and have been in control of the Law Enforcement Agencies for far too long).
  • ...
The THREE IMAGES BELOW, are of the email Andrew received from Mr William Spring AS SOON AS THE LATTER received copy of the challenges to Mrs Helen Patey; her email with pertinent and very relevant challenges we publish further down (the group of four images).
wsfwmo1r.jpg (47824 bytes)
wsfwmo2r.jpg (77475 bytes)
Dear Andrew Please see below text which I want to put on crook judges web site. Will talk to you later William.


The email was received on 31st October 2003. An addenda / introduction to the Home Page in January 2004, was THE ONLY CONTRIBUTION towards the warranted exposures and challenges from a victim who, with his sister and two brothers SAW AN INHERITED PROPERTY & CHATTELS CONVERTED TO LEGAL COSTS CARE OF THE USUAL CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES AND THE FREE-FOR-ALL that JUDICIAL CHAIR OCCUPANTS IMPOSE ON SERFS & SHITIZENS CARE OF THE MENTALITY OF CONDITIONED MORONS.

wsfwmo3r.jpg (67162 bytes)
*Link to the changes in the abuser's web-site that proved yet again to have been 'false promises' (page to transfer)

The two images above & the one to the left cover assertions and promotions by a person who saw fit to selfishly abuse Andrew's time & goodwill. All the while she, Mrs. Helen Patey, was benefiting from assistance as a 'victim' who allegedly wished to challenge and expose the wrongs that were/are imposed, by the self-appointed Lords & Masters of the citizens. The fact was and remains that Andrew was simply ignoring the maligned whose objectives were & had been exposed through their connections with obvious agents provocateurs and lovers / maintenance engineers of the system, as is, whom Andrew recognised as a result of the research he engaged in for well over 30 years by then. Two of the most offensive facilities are pointed to and exposed in our pages: 1. Arrogantly created criminal in intent conditions & provisions by judicial chair occupants, 2. Fraud through False Instruments aplenty.

The FOUR IMAGES BELOW are of the printed email we received from Mrs Helen Patey on 30th October 2003. Her posting starts at the bottom of the third image and goes on to the last image. Andrew's submissions, and his challenges to her (from the first page through to the third page), rest on the realities and the simple fact that she HAD SUPPRESSED MUCH, as most lovers-promoters of the system of operations invariably do. Such 'attributes and tendencies are INSTILLED IN ALL DECEITFUL FRAUDSTERS CLUB RECRUITS. Such persons aspire to work for & with others for more constructive frauds through the courts, as they themselves 'fell for'. All the while every one conscious of their part as ACCESSORIES & ABETTORS to the rampant fraud on the taxpayers. Readers, visitors and researchers should access the explicit letter, from one such victim-convert-fraudster to another victim (?). We publish copy of the letter in our pages in order that persons who pay taxes should become aware of how billions of imposed tax contributions are plundered (siphoned as intended) through the courts with apparent blessings by the police and Ministers as explicit Press Releases by the government confirmed whenever we submitted substantive evidence to Ministers and Members of Parliament. [*Link to an explicit letter to ex-Minister Frank Field MP. Read also, in the same page, the succinctly stated views of the Home Secretary of the day  - within days of the letter reaching its destination, in an article published by the London Evening Standard].

hpo03m1r.jpg (63388 bytes)
hpo03m2r.jpg (69124 bytes)
hpo03m3r.jpg (63628 bytes)
hpo03m4r.jpg (52617 bytes)
  • On the left the four pages of the printed email exchanges with the fraud of an alleged victim of the system, Mrs Helen Patey.
  • She allegedly wished to challenge and expose the abusers of public office all of whom, collectively, she referred to as Free Masons.
  • She was so doing without any proof in support of her assertions, or any evidence in support of her aspersions.
  • She did benefit from evidence pointing to the root of the problem and, like others, she crawled back to the hole from which she emerged as an allegedly civilised 'member of society'.
  • We refer to the group of 'shysters / shitizens' with similar opinions and BLUNT CONTEMPT for the law and their OBLIGATIONS to the rest of society.
  • Needless to say, as converts to and lovers of the facilities for RAMPANT FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS & CORRUPTION of the subjugated to the said fraud, through abuse of the courts facilities, she was serving other agendas than what she came along to promote.
  • As with the rest of 'the converts to' and lovers of the system as is, simply aimed to abuse and waste our time while NOT PREPARED TO USE THE LAW & HER RIGHTS UNDER THE LAW, as it stood and stands.
  • Persons of her mentality and attitude, simply aim to use the elements that facilitate the creation of 'more fraudulent, in intent use, of the courts facilities for REWARDS TO LOVERS OF & USERS OF the facilities in place leading to the cash under the table, since cessation of making public the facts stated in petitions and the recorded results by the ECoHR.  [*Link to the evidence, clarifying the issue].

The image below, on the right, qualifies the fact that the victim / claimant, Mrs Helen Patey, apparently lived in Oakham Rutland when she contacted human-rights. As of the first instance it was noted where the lady lived / lives. Remarkable indeed the fact that another vociferous and outspoken Free Mason basher, like her, lives in the same area. Amazing it was / is not the fact that both were / are well connected to and with the most blunt of lovers of that which he and they were / are complaining of and allegedly exposing. We refer of course to the puke production machine Mr James Todd of VOMIT repute and his fixation / psychosis with and about the Free Masons, promoting his (and the two named here, as with others that we know of), THEIR VIEWS & OPINIONS , YET NOT ONE OF THEM EVER PRODUCING ANY EVIDENCE UPON WHICH REST THE FOUNDATIONS OF THEIR ASSERTIONS & PROMOTIONS.... as subliminal indoctrination operatives..... in love with the system of operations.... THE DOUBLE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS through abuse of the courts facilities.

Page 84 of the Particulars
hppocp8r.jpg (134511 bytes)

The image on the right is from the top part of a letter that Mrs. Helen Patey included in her bundle of documents and as part of her case stated. We reproduce the part ONLY AS PROOF of the fact that she could not possibly have been unaware of the promotions by Mr. Paul Talbot-Jenkins who lives in the same area & VERY INTERESTINGLY did / does share her views about who were / are responsible for the abuse of the courts facilities FOR FRAUD. Both very well connected with the great James Todd of VOMIT repute, the most vociferous of 'the subliminal indoctrination tactics used for subjugation of the ill-educated non-thinking taxpayers and conditioned 'serfs' in the U.K, as is the situation in all other pseudo-democracies.

The arrow & underlined text in the lower part of the first image, on the left, is from page 84 of the STATEMENT OF FACTS, as pleaded and served by Mrs. Helen Patey. The part pointed to relates to her re-assessed opinions in respect of the role of Mr James Todd, after she made contact with us. No one can OVERLOOK the fact that she most definitely was well connected with Mr James Todd of VOMIT repute when she contacted human-rights.

hpaltmlr.jpg (26753 bytes)
First Page of Claim
hpcafmir.jpg (66909 bytes)

On the left, the first page of the Statement of Particulars as issued by Mrs Helen Patey.

Visitors should note the fact that Mrs. H Patey did act as she had been stating / claiming. The arrow in the lower half of the image / page points to the relevant statement.

The right to reply and to justify behaviour and the activities we cover in our pages, is assured to all named victim-lovers and abusers of our tolerance and patients. We will publish their excuses &  whatever is submitted to us. Legal argument that shall arise out of their submissions we will use as we apply ourselves to relevant issues in the cases they referred to us. We will cover their activities and defaults as befits the situation. 

This page is dedicated to the all craft-y abusers of our time. All came along with long stories about their tribulations in and through the courts, care of the Rampant Fraud Through Abuse of The Courts Facilities. All complaining of the relentless suppression of material facts and evidence AS INDULGED INTO BY THE LEGAL CIRCLES & ENTERTAINED *IF NOT INSTIGATED* BY JUDICIAL CHAIR OCCUPANTS.

All were complaining of events and activities, by the Legal Circles, within the courts while promoting their personal VIEWS & OPINIONS. Odd it never was that they were stating similar opinions as the Great Puke Production Machine, one Mr. James Todd of VOMIT (Victims Of Masonic Ill Treatment) repute.

The emails and exchanges published in this page refer to such actors and charlatans. ALL wilfully and with intent happily suppressing the very facts they were complaining of and about. ALL SIMPLY WERE READY WILLING & CAPABLE to dance cheek to cheek with the ABUSERS OF THE COURTS FACILITIES. Their main pre-occupation the CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS, through abuse of the courts, as covered in the exclusive page where ALL IS EXPOSED. Not one of the fraudsters listed and pointed to in our pages ADDRESSED THE ISSUES EXPOSED. in the very page, notwithstanding repetitious demand made of each and everyone. (*List of some of the lovers of fraud through the courts)  

The NINE IMAGES BELOW, are of printed email exchanges which Mr Andrew Yiannides had no choice but to enter into with an alleged victim-come-challenger BUT LOVER of the system as is. The convert, one Ashok Mahadjin (*F1), within a month of making contact with us, through his CONVENIENT AND INEXCUSABLE DEFAULTS did establish that he had no intention to either challenge, as OUR AIMS stipulate, or use the facilities provided to members of the Community on Line, through which to EXPOSE those whom he alleged had defrauded him of much. HE WAS ONLY INTERESTED & ATTEMPTED ON MANY INSTANCES to entice and draw Andrew into the web of organised fraudsters who specialise in the promotion of and the attached benefits secured though the constructive frauds in the courts.... FOR THOSE WHO ADOPT & ENDORSE THE METHOD OF OPERATIONS. The arrangements in place, for achieving such goals, are covered in our exclusive page. One and all of his like-minded contacts [*link to list below] failed to address the facts and the realities covered and pointed to in the exclusive page. Mr Mahadjin simply exposed himself to have been more than just a well connected and a sold to the system in place; an endorser of the FRAUD & CORRUPTION APLENTY, as promoted through the ranting of a number of Subliminal Indoctrination Operatives, himself included. [*Link to the page where we EXPOSE and cover the arrangements in place for converting morons and conditioned idiots to lovers, promoters and ASPIRING USERS OF THE FACILITIES FOR RAMPANT FRAUD on the taxpayers through the abused court facilities. *Link also from here to part of the Lord Chancellor's responses (Lord Irvine) in November 1999 to the House of Commons Select Committee. Read of the Lord Chancellor's plans & benefit from an insight on the use of the morons who are drawn into the WEB OF ORGANISED FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, all care of the criminals in control of our allegedly civilised and democratic state / country / nation. *Link also to a response from Mr Andrew Yiannides when a judge suggested & enquired of Mr Yiannides if he was likely to join the Legal Circles]

ams01p1r.jpg (65764 bytes)
ams01p2r.jpg (79287 bytes)
ams01p3r.jpg (77482 bytes)
ams01p4r.jpg (80184 bytes)
ams01p5r.jpg (81880 bytes)
ams01p6r.jpg (78926 bytes)
ams01p7r.jpg (83609 bytes)
ams01p8r.jpg (76208 bytes)
ams01p9r.jpg (48889 bytes)

Mr Ashok Mahadjin contacts us and within days the email we received from Mr James Todd exposed him to have been an arrogant liar. Below our observations when the email was received from suspect quarters, initiator and poster.  It revealed much more than Andrew was looking for and researching. It established ORGANISED FRAUDSTERS WHO OPERATED & CO-OPERATE as collaborating maintenance engineers and users of the facilities in place, FOR THEFT OF THE FAMILY SILVER. [*Link from here to a list of some of the participants and suckers].

An email received from JT of VOMIT repute. He, the master of Subliminal Indoctrination Services to the criminals who have been in control in our pseudo-democracy simply forwarded 'an invitation for and to suckers' to attend a theatrical production at the RCJ, in London. Instigator of the posting one David Turner. Another alleged victim come LOVER and promoter of the system as is, a maintenance engineer and suspect from the second posting he ever sent to Mr Andrew Yiannides at *human-rights*.  [*Link to the text in the lower part for the warranted observations].

Among the recipients of the email Mr Ashok Mahadjin. He hardly contacted us, after discovering, allegedly, the site where the realities are   exposed. The invitation as received, most INTRIGUING. The intended hearing to be of an application by the victim(!) who went underground, Dr Akene Adoko, the barrister whose tribulations with the Law Society & the courts were shoved in the family closet. [*Link to the explicit page where we expose the realities suppressed by the victim and his chums).

How terribly interesting.

  • An e-mail is posted by none other than the mischief making and 'beware of the enemy within' expert at prognosis - the brilliant puke production machine, Mr James Todd of VOMIT repute!
  • The very James Todd received, from Carolyn Marsden, an email informing him of the six-year jail sentence imposed on Norman Scarth. He sent his propositions to her by editing the submissions and excluding from it the fact that none of Norman's mates, from the Litigants In Person Society, bothered to attend the sentencing, just as they had failed to attend the trial (revelations as to why shall be released at the right time). One need be no genius to recognise that all who operate as promoters of the system do not address issues which they know are part of the pre-arranged / organised theatrical *productions intended only for the targeted, whom the participants seek to impress with their parrts in theatrical productions*.
  • Whether James Todd knew of the fact that such persons had been party to the attempts to have Norman certified/sectioned, while in hospital for his injured shin, was and remained irrelevant at that point in time. Later, at a very pertinent time he was all too keen and eager to report of the alleged arrest of another LIPS member, for an alleged but NOT reported offence!

VERY ODD that the very same James Todd, who had written to Carolyn Marsden NEVER to communicate or submit anything to VOMIT from Andrew Yiannides (he did not mention *human-rights*, at the time) BUT HE DECIDES OUT OF THE BLUE TO SUBMIT to *human-rights* an email which curiously enough was from David Turner and was addressed to another 8 persons and MIRACULOUSLY, AMONG THE EIGHT the 'new Internet scout / researcher and blunt lover of the system as is', Mr. Ashok Mahadjin. List on right --->

MOST INTRIGUING the posting especially by James Todd. Most interesting the fact that the list includes a person who contacted <CAMILA> only a couple of days ago, with ravings on such issues as JT and the initiator persistently promote. Both initiator and poster (who presumably failed to notice that the initiator included Andrew in his list (!) acting either as automatons (as instructed by others) OR AS STUPID DREAMERS. Three persons seeking, yet again on the occasion, to implicate Andrew and human-rights in the usual attempts for the promotion of ranting about the Free Masons, the Free Masons, the Free Masons. ALL OF THEM all the while (and for years, except the new stooge) ignoring the very clear declaration, 'OUR AIMS', published by and at *human-rights*. The new  attempt simply reminiscent of the "Jewish Or Otherwise....." through the Lord Chancellor's letter that was introduced in 1999, by the same group of charlatans, as Mr Nick Haralabidis knew of, and allegedly arranged, as the initiator of the complaint to the Lord Chancellor(!).

The email from James Todd of VOMIT repute.
mahadokr.jpg (90817 bytes)
List of recipients:

WE POINT all of the above and their associates / affiliates to the House of Lords precedent case, dating back to 1939-40 which we released on 3rd March 2008. All are requested to re-consider their evil activities and in particular their maligned defaults, their omissions and their failures to co-operate as invited, IF THEY GENUINELY WISHED TO CHALLENGE & EXPOSE THE FRAUDULENT DAMAGES IMPOSED ON THEM (as alleged victims of the system) THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES* (*F2). All, should also access the FAX sent to Mr. Paul Talbot-Jenkins on 1st November 2001; Mr Jenkins was / is one of the self-promoting authorities on everything Masonic* (*F3). P.T-J's grasp of the arrangements through the financial institutions was shared by Andrew Yiannides but his promotions in respect of his submissions to the Church of England Synod, 'if Christianity & Freemasonry were / are compatible', lacked the necessary elements which the late Stephen Knight DID COVER IN HIS RESEARCH on 'The Brotherhood' (The Freemasons), way back in 1983* (*F4).  

In other pages we cover some of the most common elements to which 'the serfs' are exposed routinely, when they seek justice in modern pseudo-democracies.

In this page we point to persons we name, to their practices and their recklessly irresponsible & very convenient, indeed, defaults* (*F5). In other words, to the elements that establish what powers and elements are used by the lovers of the free-for-all, who thrive in and through the courts. It is such persons who ultimately are responsible for the arrogant perpetuation of the activities that Jesus Christ was reported, as recorded in the New Testament, to have spoken of to the lawyers of His days in the presence of 'the spiritual gurus of the Hebrews in Palestine, before they were scattered & distributed by the managers and 'organisers of the Roman Empire, throughout the dominions under their control'. [*Link from here to material we are to introduce / release in due course; for the time being *link from here to a facsimile we were obliged to transmit to the editor of the London Evening Standard (daily newspaper) in order to point to the editor material facts and historical realities which the agents, puppets and lapdogs of the creators of most, if not all, evil imposed on mankind throughout history has been and is being suppressed, with malice aforethought, by irresponsible and unprincipled, amoral stooges, non-humans, non-thinkers : in other words conditioned and indoctrinated morons, who operate and act as programmed robots].

The email exchanges, published in this page, relate to issues that expose the named as blunt maintenance engineers and wannabes / lovers of the fraud through the courts.

You read, in our pages, of the 'arrangements in place for the constructive frauds on the 'serfs', through the provisions of Article 38 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Consider, therefore, why there exist among those who

  • visit the newsgroups,
  • blow their trumpets about 'the system',
  • proclaim their disaffection and
  • 'disgust at the practices' in the courts,
  • assert personal knowledge and experiences,
  • in ANY WEB-SITE, through which to
  • inform and prove to
  • Mr and Mrs Average of that which they profess knowledge of!!!
  • WHO BUT THE REAL SHYSTERS, are party to the above fraud on YOU, Mr and Mrs Average?

Go To: http://www.uk-human-rights.org/comonlin.htm and consider stating the facts of your own experiences in a personal web-pages / web-site. Join with others and work together in exposing and challenging all offending Public(!) Servants(?) who misconduct in public office.

JOIN the COMMUNITY ON LINE if you have been cheated out of your rights, by the legal circles and or were denied protection, under the law, by the police.

If you have the evidence against the offenders, you can publish it in your personal web-site as your rights in law provide. Be not fooled by planted mischief-makers and read of the directives from THE authority (Link)

Every citizen is duty bound to report crime and if the police ignored or ignore you, USE YOUR RIGHTS, EXPOSE THE OFFENDERS who ignore the law.

Visit the Stephen Lawrence page (Link) and note how Parliament provided for your rights. Yet, our Law Enforcement Agencies simply ignore such provisions, and act as contemptuous of your rights as a member of the *human-rights.org * Community On Line * has pleaded and lodged at the European Court on Human Rights. Through defaults and omissions, the police / authorities fail (Link) to protect you and in fact they actually torment and torture you, the victims.

READ OF SUCH PROVISIONS and exercise your rights!  Challenge and EXPOSE THE VILE OFFENDERS, who endorse and promote crime through defaults and omissions in the purported exercise of their public duties, AS YOUR SERVANTS.

"Do for, by and with yourself that which satisfies you so long as that which you do does not infringe upon and or violates the rights of any other". © AY 1972


The development of and FOR THE RIGHTS OF CITIZENS, in modern times begun with the Magna Carta, in Europe. Below, in as simple as can be defined, the principles of rights and freedoms, clarified by Mark Janis, (fellow) Richard Kay (professor) and Anthony Bradley (professor).

  • 1. Men are born and remain free and equal in rights; social distinctions may be based only upon general usefulness.
  • 2. The aim of every political association is the preservation of the natural and inalienable rights of man; these rights are liberty, property, security, and resistance to oppression.
  • 3. The source of all sovereignty resides essentially in the nation; no group, no individual may exercise authority not emanating expressly therefrom.
  • 4. Liberty consists of the power to do whatever is not injurious to others; thus the enjoyment of the natural rights of every man has for its limits only those that assure other members of society the enjoyment of those same rights; such limits may be determined only by law.
  • 5. The law has the right to forbid only actions which are injurious to society. Whatever is not forbidden by law, may not be prevented, and no one may be constrained to do what it does not prescribe.
  • 6. Law is the expression of the general will; all citizens have the right to concur personally, or through their representatives, in its formation; it must be the same for all, whether it protects or punishes. All citizens, being equal before it, are equally admissible to all public offices, positions, and employment, according to their capacity, and without other distinction than that of virtues and talents.
  • 7. No man may be accused, arrested, or detained except in the cases determined by law, and according to the forms prescribed thereby. Whoever solicits, expedites, or executes arbitrary orders, or has them executed, must be punished; but every citizen summoned or apprehended in pursuance of the law must obey immediately; he renders himself culpable by resistance.
  • 8. The law is to establish only penalties that are absolutely and obviously necessary; and no one may be punished except by virtue of a law established and promulgated prior to the offence and legally applied.
  • 9. Since every man is presumed innocent until declared guilty, if arrest be deemed indispensable, all unnecessary severity for securing the person of the accused must be severely repressed by law.
  • 10. No one is to be disquieted because of his opinions, even religious, provided their manifestation does not disturb the public order established by law.
  • 11. Free communication of ideas and opinions is one of the most precious of the rights of man. Consequently, every citizen may speak, write, and print freely, subject to responsibility for the abuse of such liberty in the eases determined by law.
  • 12. The guarantee of the rights of man and citizen necessitates a public force; such a force, therefore, is instituted for the advantage of all and not for the particular benefit of those to whom it is entrusted.
  • 13. For the maintenance of the public force and for the expenses of administration a common tax is indispensable; it must be assessed equally on all citizens in proportion to their means.
  • 14. Citizens have the right to ascertain, by themselves or through their representatives, the necessity of the public tax, to consent to it freely, to supervise its use, and to determine its quota, assessment, payment, and duration.
  • 15. Society has the right to require of every public agent an accounting of his administration.
  • 16. Every society in which the guarantee of rights is not assured or the separation of powers not determined has no constitution at all.
  • 17. Since property is a sacred and inviolable right, no one may be deprived thereof unless a legally established public necessity obviously requires it, and upon condition of a just and previous indemnity.

Consider the above in the context of our founder's proclamation on true Democracy [*Link] and do not fail to note the obvious : Society, CITIZENS  HAVE THE RIGHT TO REQUIRE OF EVERY PUBLIC AGENT AN ACCOUNTING OF HIS / HER ADMINISTRATION. [Refer to 15 above]

We add:

  • When the representatives of the citizens
  • fail in their public duties and
  • assume the right to dictate to, instead of serving, the citizens,
  • then
  • the citizens can and should "take the law in their own hands" and
  • the citizens can "use it in accordance with the provisions the representatives put in place".
  • There is no need for
  • violence,
  • abuse of body and
  • misuse of mind.
  • There is no need for revolution and bloodshed.


  • It is time for public servants to cease behaving as Lords and Masters.
  • It is time for them to 'humbly serve their employers, the citizens' AS THE LAW PROVIDES.


  • It would appear that
  • the media barons and their stooges
  • know not the true meaning of either.
  • Through defaults and omissions they fail to publish and deal with / address the facts, the realities and the truth.
  • THEY helped develop that which they expect of us to deliver to our children.
  • We will be dealing with and we will be pointing to the root of the evil the defaulters represent while asserting and proclaiming themselves / or their circles as allegedly civilised 'servants of the public' in the pseudo-democracy they misrepresent as the genuine article.

Andrew Yiannides
Founder *human-rights* (NGO)
London - United Kingdom
August 2002

Link from here to the Case as STATED / PLEADED at the European Court for Human Rights.
  • Everything was pleaded in the stated facts. However, one element was deliberately not pointed to in the violations, as pleaded. The petition and submissions were addressed to professionals whose prime duty is to apply FACTS & EVENTS STATED - acknowledged as PROVEN, to all / any applicable law, for that is the sole purpose of their retainers / appointments to judicial office.
  • Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the facility for citizens : human-rights.org Community on Line web-sites, had his own plans for any abusers of Public office.
  • The facilities on the Internet and the Community on Line were never intended for serfs or for 'the sold to the system as is' fraudsters and dreaming charlatans.
  • Link please to the explicit letter/FAX to the court (in the main window / frame of the page you are linked to from here) (ECoHR) and note the court's immediate response (in the margin / left window).
  • In due course we will disclose what was / has been in line for ALL abusers of public office and all SOLD TO THE SYSTEM charlatans, dreaming fraudsters and conniving shysters who contacted Mr Yiannides of their own steam or as contacted thereafter and directed, as controlled and or as blackmailed stooges.
  • USE OF THE LAW as is, was and remains the spring board FOR HUMAN-RIGHTS. (Never overlook the fact that the law is no ass).
  • The media barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes they retain and control had and have their plans for the sons of men.
  • Mr Yiannides (one of the sons of men targeted) has had his own plans for 'humans' and not the type of zombies and morons who were sent along through whom to prove NOT WHO, but WHAT ELEMENTS ARE USED BY THE CRIMINALS WHO HAVE BEEN IN CONTROL FOR FAR TOO LONG in allegedly democratic states that allegedly are founded and resting on principles of law and order.

FOOTNOTE common to most web-pages at this website
MOST IMPORTANT:- In October 2010, the coalition Government's Attorney General, in an interview published by 'COUNSEL' the mothly legal banter magazine, specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves from cases of (small-fry) fraud and he asserted that he was making that element his department's priority*

*Link from here to the evidence.

IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT FRAUD, and IF IT WILL DEAL with the criminals who abuse public office, especially when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course. Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003
*Link from here to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers that they, the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law"?
While there, above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us.

*Link from here to our explicit submissions to (a) the Prime Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) and, the Home Secretary. We acted so after we had secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew Yiannides.

Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998

*Link from here to the letter

& note the results evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do

*Link from here to the evidence we point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob..


   1.    It is imperative to note that the alleged victim, Mr Ashok Mahadjin, NEVER PRODUCED ANY EVIDENCE in support of his statements to Mr Andrew Yiannides. In any event, THE CREATION & USE OF FALSE INSTRUMENTS (by the Legal Circles & the Courts) WE ARE VERY FAMILIAR WITH [*Link from here to the blunt and most arrogant of criminal activities the legal circles indulged in WITH THE BLESSINGS OF JUDGES & THE POLICE, the cause and reasons why Mr Andrew Yiannides set off to investigate and research the practices of ''criminals', who, apparently, are licensed by the state to indulge in the free-for-all imposed on the taxpayers through abuse of the courts]. In the circumstances whether such existed or not remains immaterial.The simple fact was that the dreamer / alleged victim & APPARENT convert-to & LOVER OF THE METHOD OF OPERATIONS THROUGH THE COURTS, the scenarios he was speaking of relentlessly - WHILE FAILING TO CHALLENGE & EXPOSE IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN THE ABUSERS OF TRUST - rendered his assertions & aspersions empty tins, and exposed him as one whose aims were focused on fraudulent misrepresentations. When one considers the fact that THE DREAMER HAD NO INTENTION TO CHALLENGE & EXPOSE, IN  THE PUBLIC DOMAIN, THE ACTIVITIES HE WAS SPEAKING OF, by failing to  commit himself to exposing the abusers of the courts' facilities, he simply exposed himself as one WHO OBJECTED TO THE PRINCIPLE, *Justice to be seen to be done in OPEN COURTS*, (obviously intended for the taxpayers, the electorate, the citizens to be made aware that the law IS APPLIED and not cast aside by the judiciary & the managers of the legal system, as Montesquieu spoke of centuries ago [*Link from here to the French Jurist's words, resting on observation]. It was clear that Mr Mahadjin simply joined the system as *a fraudsters club recruit and as a committed subliminal indoctrination operative*. Of such persons the scenario bequeathed to mankind through the "Let Barrabas go and crucify the Nazarene" scenario one reads of in the New Testament; there one reads, also, of the words attributed to Jesus Christ by the creators / editors of the very book (circa 4th century Anno Domini - Christian era) to the lawyers of the days covered in 'The New Tent' [*Link from here to the words from the Gospel according to St. Luke].
    2.  *Link from here to the exclusive page where we cover the arrangements the above fell in love with, hence their failures to address the issues or point any other to the very facility intended to corrupt morons of their mentality and the victims who are conditioned and primed by the legal circles.
*Link from here to an email when the alleged authority, Mr Paul Talbot-Jenkins, was challenged about his maligned ways and false, inexcusable and unfounded assertions / promotions
    4.  *Link from here to the page where we reproduce the every element, from 'The Brotherhood', which Mr Paul Talbot-Jenkins, the alleged authority, conveniently elected to ignore or buried in the caves where he was / is congregating with others who also adopted the New World Order Code of Ethics.
    5.  *Link from here to the page where we point to a House of Lords Precedent case dating back to 1939-40, when their Lordships deliberated on the issues of (a) CONSPIRACY, (b) DISHONSETY & LIES, (c) MISREPRESENTATION, (d) FRAUD and (e) ELECTING to maitain silence when aware of wrongdoing and WHAT in such circumstances THE SILENCE IMPLIES.
*Access from here the page where we reproduced evidence qualifying breaches of trust & agreements, also inconsiderate abuse of Andrew's time, while the pesron was chasing and busy serving other interesrts than the challenge and the exposure of the abusers of the courts facilities which he kept asserting he wished to proceed with. The victim was / is stil asserting and promoting intentions to proceed with, by joining others in a united front directly to challenge the Law Society for Persistently Issuing Practice Certificates to frudsters in contempt of complaints submitted to the Law Society's clone, the Office for the Supervision of solicitors. *Link.from here directly to an email -above- Mr Spring sent to Andrew after one Helen Patey was pointed to the errors of her ways, for IF she genuinely wished to challenge the persons she claimed had conspired to impose on her the damages she had suffered from, from Public Servants, all of whom she simply branded Freemasons without considering the suggestions she had been asked to take on board and to co-operate with such others in the very areas we discussed with her and rthe othjers extesnively. xx
    7.   xxx
    8.   xxx
    9.   xxx
   10.  xxx
   11.  xxx
   12.  xxx


Back To HomePage To family.uk-human-rights.org/ To List of Affiliated web-sites To List of Web-sites Where Evil Practices ARE Exposed
Challenging ECoHR intended wrong-doing
Link to:   Lord Chancellor's Dpt.    Judges Schooled on racial issues
Link to:- The CAMILA Project   h-r Home Page   Judges independent of, FREE to ignore The LAW
Link to:- Typical Response from Lord Chancellor  The LAW   Frank Cunningham-case

The creator of this website was inviting victims to access URrights & join him there with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office until the providers of the facilities >ning.com< introduced new terms and conditions for the provision of the facilities. Access from here and read of the imposed states by the brains behind ning.com and consider only one element "WHY OBSTRUCT & HINDER THE DOWNLOAD of the existing material at URrights.ning.com >the intellectual properties of the creator of that presence on the Internet and those who joined him there? Read below of the unacceptable conduct and behaviour by the reckless abusers of trust, who set out to obstruct and blackmail the creator of URrights.ning

Persons who are genuinely concerned and object to the ways they were / are being treated by alleged servants of the publicand the law >in any PSEUDOdemocracy, or whatever states / conditions they are subjected to< by abusers of public facilities and public office >as we cover in our web-pages< should contact webmaster@human-rights.org for information relevant to the creation of similar facilities for INFOrmation on URrights, for facilities for URrights EUrope and for a NETwork of URrights activists.

  • APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility (ning.com) Andrew Yiannides created and used the portal to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers who joined with him to expose and challenge the arrogant and blunt abuse of public services in all allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.

  • The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for ning.com to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.

  • HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the ning.com servers THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were contemptuously ignored.

  • Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for ning.com

  • In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from ning.com to existing members.

  • EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

.org/1999dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org/actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
  • Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
  • All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegdely reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
  • Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
  • Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
  • Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
  • The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
  • Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
  • All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s)

On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org/ (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter,
Access also http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/ (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE.It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the European Court for Human Rights* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR], arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
鼯font> Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster