With Compliments From Andrew of *human-rights*.
click for INFORMATION about the Community
On line plan.
Charville, who frequented the firstname.lastname@example.org
and published much that had no relevance to the issues and THE WAY WE COVER THE ISSUES IN
OUR PAGES, had taken it upon himself to grossly misrepresent the facts stated in the page
/yourrights.htm (*3) published at and by
YOU ARE INVITED TO VISIT
THE PAGE (*3). READ OF THE FACTS AND THE CONFIDENTIAL
ARRANGEMENTS that many sold and bought souls engage in, at: */confraud.htm. Read also of the
activities we cover in the other four and very important pages you can link to: */convicti.htm, */chaldep1.htm, */abuse.htm and */4deceit.htm.
USE COMMON SENSE and
determine which parties carry on benefiting? Why the persistent attempts by the aforesaid
John Charville who, like others who crossed our paths, set out to obstruct our work and
was seeking, for undisclosed reasons, to misdirect and influence the victims who were
reading his postings? What for the perpetuation of 'the existing arrangements by and for
the abductors and rapists of Justice' who are seen to be relying on persons who joined 'the fraudsters' club'?
CONSIDER, also, WHICH
LEGAL RIGHTS AND UNDER WHAT VENUE WE PROPOSE ACTION BY THE VICTIMS of Fraud In The Legal System.
Access the Skeleton Argument, on appeal, by and for victims of banking fraud and
consider the references to European Union PROVISIONS IN LAW for protection of the citizens from fraud and corruption. The
maligned, interfering, and allegedly concerned 'victim', wilfully ignored our statements
and submissions. He carries on ignoring the clearly stated facts in the page /confraud.htm and the crystal clear
application and submissions to the European Court of
Human Rights. The maligned promoter of irrelevant waffle persistently (as with others
before him) FAILED to address and comment on the context of substantive documents. It is
as if he is a non tax paying billionaire who does not mind the constructive frauds on the budget
through the courts and the
legal system. He has taken it upon himself to urge citizens to act as he! In other
words as ostriches to bury their heads in the sand, to turn a blind eye and or to blank
out their brains and thus fail to comprehend the facts and the realities our pages cover.
NOTE: Anyone interested should
access our submissions to the Treasury in February 2001. We published it with other
submissions and actions taken by us.
As stated in the page /chaldelp1.htm, Andrew had no
option but to act after catching the abuser of our time. The alleged victim had been
observed over a long period and was seen to have been bluntly co-operating in the
constructive frauds on the budget, YOUR TAX CONTRIBUTIONS (*1).
The letter to the Treasury was from a
genuinely concerned citizen, and Andrew's approach was as with the letter to the Home
Secretary in December 1998.(*2.)
aforesaid John Charville has nothing of his own to promote, but searches for old and
INAPPLICABLE material, through which to influence and misguide the victims he targets,
with intent. In the circumstances WE HAVE ADDED MATERIAL at the bottom of the page /confraud.htm ACCESS the page and read of: "THE
CONVENTION IN LEGAL TERMS" as defined by three professors who, we are sure, were not
tutored by the self appointed legal guru of 'Victims Misguided'.
smacks of contempt for the wise words from Plato, nearly two and a half thousand years
cost to the good citizens for their indifference, in public affairs,
is to be ruled by evil men". PLATO Greece (428 - 347 BC)
Citizens in Europe
were slaves and serfs for centuries. They were 'subjected to the whims of their Lords
& Masters'. They were ruled by Emperors, Dictators, Kings (subjects of), and under the
pseudo-democracy adopted in modern times they are supposed to elect 'leaders' of parties
into office. They are meant to live in a state of 'total ignorance and as 'the misinformed
and indoctrinated to follow even self appointed 'leaders', as J Charville & Co.
DO READ the material you are asked to and MAKE UP
YOUR OWN MINDS AS INFORMED CITIZENS IN A TRULY DEMOCRATIC MANNER.
ACCESS the Skeleton Argument, on appeal, by
and for Victims of Banking Fraud. Recognise how the abductors and rapists of Justice,
indulge as administrators and controllers of CIUKU Enterprises.
Victims of misconduct or abusers in public office, JOIN
& CLAIM: Access the page /yourrights.htm (link
no (*3) below) and recognise that you do have rights.
YOU CAN ACT FOR RESTITUTION.
You can demand damages against the state that retains
the type of employees (as public servants) who are let loose to defraud and plunder as
they please uncontrolled, unsupervised and unaccountable to anyone.
SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS PERMITTED & CONDONED THE
NOTE: An asterisk & number in brackets indicates
a footnote under that asterisk number.
The footnote lines, below, link to relevant material
Citizens who are publishing material and evidence in
their own web-pages (whether members of the Community on Line or not) CAN COPY THE PAGE
from the *human-rights* web-site.
The page has provisions for additional links (those
with alphabetic suffixes, *1a. *1b. *1c. etc.).
The citizens can use the additional links to create
links to material in their own pages where similar issues are covered.
The original links to the *human-rights* pages should
not be removed but left as these are with the full URL, as below, for access to the
material in the linked *human-rights* pages. All other users of the page should introduce
short links under the *number+alphabetic suffix free lines and link them to the material
they publish at their web-sites. They should inform *human-rights* and furnish details for
inclusion of their lines at the *human-rights* and all other co-operating web-sites.
The idea is to create MANY links from many web-sites
that expose issues the article covers, and in particular pointing to the realities covered
by each link subject.
Hit them back WITH YOUR
RIGHTS IN LAW as the *human-rights* pages cover.
The article below is from 'the Observer' of 14th April
Blunkett plans UK fraud squad
by Conal Walsh
NOTE: Underlined text,
asterisk & number indicates footnote link to material in web-pages
DAVID BLUNKETT, the Home Secretary, is preparing to endorse plans for a national squad to tackle
white-collar crime(*1), which costs an estimated £14
billion a year.
The force would unite the fraud squads of the 43 police forces of
England and Wales for the first time and absorb the Serious Fraud Office(*2), which is responsible for investigating large and complex
The move would reverse previous Government policy, but a police source
said Ministers interest in the scheme had been rekindled by fears(*3) that Britain could suffer an Enron-style corporate(*4) disaster.
The change of heart follows intense lobbying by Rosalind Wright,
director of the SFO(*5), and the City of London police
commissioner, Perry Nove(*6). Both argue that fighting
fraud is a low priority(*7) for many hard-up forces(*8) and that officers would be better trained in a specialist
A national crime squad has also been recommended by the Fraud Advisory
Panel, a government-backed body, set up to recommend new ways(*9)
to fight white-collar crime.
The squad would be modelled on the National Crime Squad(*10) set up to fight serious organised crime, and its
creation would not require legislation.
The Association of British Insurers recently estimated that the annual
cost of crime in the UK was £2,5bn, and that fraud(*11)
accounted for up to 40 per cent of this. But hundreds of suspected(*12) cases are not investigated.
A Home Office spokesman said: 'We are considering the best way to take
this forward. Ministers are looking(*13) at the proposals
as a matter of urgency.'(*3)
Ó The Observer -
NOTE: "Wriqht, wants priority for fraud", reads a caption under
the photograph of the Director of the Serious Fraud Office (SFO). And the comment from
*human-rights*: "Not surprised"(*14) -
see the succinct and explicit page /yourrights.htm(*3)
reader and If you are a victim JOIN(*15)
all Read HOW the fraudsters' club drains billions
*1b. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
*1c. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
SFO & Public Auditor to Home Secretary Dec.98
*2a. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
*2b. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
*2c. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
Invitation for a class action
*3a. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
*3b. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
*3c. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
: Crimes Incorporated UK Unlimited
*4a. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
*4b. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
*4c. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd --
reported White Collar Council FRAUD not prosecuted!
*5a. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
*5b. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
*5c. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
Hypocrites at work - Defaults BY CHOICE.
*6a. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
*6b. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
*6c. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
The Media Barons - UNLIKE US - silent.
*7a. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
*7b. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
*7c. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
Minister Councils steal to pay their salaries.
*8a. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
*8b. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
*8c. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
evidence No Prosecutions -SEND WRONG MESSAGES
*9a. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd.
*9b. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
*9c. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
Letters exchanged - WHY Failures to Act?
*10a. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
*10b. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
*10c. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
Incompetent? OR SIMPLY UNWILLING?
*11a. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
*11b. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
*11c. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
Talk IS CHEAP. Contacted Tory first, in Haringey.
*12a. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
*12b. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
*12c. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
We An Offer to Home Secretary in 1998 - Read letter
*13a. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
*13b. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
*13c. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
29 Fraud & Corruption & Protection
*14a. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
*14b. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
*14c. http://www.lj;l> gfgdgd
*15. http://www.members.human-rights.org The USA corporation breached their agreement with Mr
Yiannides; contact email@example.com
To HomeBase demon.co.uk
To Top Of Page To uk-human-rights.org ...