CONTEMPT, for the citizens rights under the law : NO RESPONSE 

Victims, visitors and especially readers and researchers should consider the above realities in conjunction with the RIGHTS OF THE CITIZENS, in any properly constituted and managed democratic state. We point to the fundamental principles we cover in the exclusive page where the blunt constructive frauds on the taxpayers & the corruption of  morons gifted with the mentality of persons such as the organised *the fraudsters club recruits* we name and expose in our pages. The crucial issue is that of ACCOUNTABILITY BY PUBLIC SERVANTS TO THE CITIZENS, the taxpayers who foot the costs of ORGANISED CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY through false instruments created and used by abusers of trust & public office as covered in the exclusive page. WE URGE ALL VISITORS TO ACCESS & READ the extract from Isocrates' 'Aeropagiticos' in our quotes page and to consider thereat the simple and all important words relative to states that existed in the civiliastion thatwas targeted by the criminals who went along to Ptolemy of Egypt in the latter part of the fourth century before Jesus Christ with their creation the Old Testament, rubbish, and ever since promoted as alleged Holy Scriptures by persons who never really STUDIED the rubbish, as humans gifted with the power of reasoning and LOGIC. *Link from here to an extract from the vile work of the fraudsters and note with what other teachuings by examples stated young Andrew Yiannides, the creator of this website and founder of human-rights compared the vile scenario / script from the scribes who concocted the alleged Holy Scriptures.     

21^st July 2005

M.. Koula Demetriou(?) Yiannides(?)
65 Abbotts Park Road
London
E10 6HU.

My Ref. Jul05Ins
Your Ref. Sort this out please

'One Begins with Logic' Heraclitus ( ‘Εν Αρχή Ην Ο Λόγος’ – Ηράκλειτος)

I acknowledge receipt of the documents you received (at 65) from the Norwich Union. Copies I attach hereto for the purposes of this, my present response and request.

In order to assist you to reflect and to consider/possibly re-consider past events that you, alone, may/must have been privy to, (had knowledge of, as presented to you by third parties) I attach a true copy of an Affidavit by Mrs Jesus Rosalia Baldwin Del Castilo. I simply trust and hope that you will duly refer it to both Alexandros (age before beauty) and Artemis, after you have 'digested' all that it covers. I am most certain that you will not fail to comprehend the implications and the activities behind the scenes leading to the situation that was first brought to my attention in the course of the visit to Harrow Land Registry, as covered in the affidavit.

You will be receiving additional evidence and proof about the 'organised criminal activities' in which abusers of public office indulge and engage in, 'as self-assured protected species', in most pseudo-democracies. I trust that you will be giving such matters some of your valuable time, because the issues covered relate to and apply to millions of families world-wide and billions of innocent children. I am sure that common sense will prevail and that you will act both as a mother and as a person who 'had your plans for the future of the family you were to have / create'.

I return to the attached copies of the communications received from the Norwich Union and I humbly request that you write to the company. Request of them, please, for information as to 'from which bank account they applied for funds' AND at the same time 'request of them to furnish you with details of ALL payments they received over the last six years'. In the event that you may need clarification or explanations (or reasons for the request from me) you COULD contact me by telephone and or arrange for me to speak with you in the presence of a relative of yours in view of the fact that 'the issues command attention and explanations', at the same time.

     Copies of Communications received

NOTE: Due to the very nature of the facts covered above, this communication is t o be treated as an OPEN COMMUNICATION and will be referred to whomsoever it concerns and is to be published in the public domain, following the anticipated 'civil actions from your goodself'.

Koulla / Kyriaki the gestation vessel had been engaging in all manner of foul co-operation with the many who used her for the INTENDED DAMAGES BEING IMPOSED ON THE TARGETED author of the above letter. ALL HAD BEEN RELYING ON THE VERY GESTATION VESSEL to carry on co-operating for their joint plans of all for the tageted one. She failed to address the issues she was presented with, in line with her character as of the days when with her sister both proved to have been perfect clones of the Eve who brought them both into the world of the followers of the teachings by examples stated in the most vile of works ever to have been misrepresnted to mankind, 'the Old Testament. References in the letter to the Norwich Union related to a 'life mortgage insurance cover' BUT THE MORTGAGE HAD BEEN PAID FOR, WELL OVER 6 years earlier; in the circumstances the gestation was fully aware of the fact that there subsisted no need for the cover; the bank had been instructed accordingly, to cease payments for a non-existent mortgage.

We will be publishing additional evidence that will further strengthen the element and issue of OTHERS JOIN THE BANDWAGON OF FRAUD APLENTY & FALSE RECORDS FOR THE IMPOSITION OF THEFT OF ASSETS AND RIGHTS ASSURED IN LAW. Attention is drawn to the affidavit below, 2nd page, paragraph 7.

Needless to say victims of the divorce industry should access the page /solfraud.htm. In the letters challenging the offenders and abusers of the courts facilities / processes references to specific divorce cases. In two of the cases pointed to, SIMPLY BLUNT ASSAULTS ON THE FAMILIES TARGETED WITH INTENT. Nothing but deliberate IMPOSITIONS FOR THE BREAK UP OF FAMILIES. Participating in those cases not just the legal circles but professionals from within the financial and other associated services too; also envious and spiteful siblings.

We will also release letters attached to evil attempts by alleged victims of the system (fraudsters club recruits) who set about creating false instruments / records in respect of alleged earnings by the founder of *human-rights* which the criminals at the Inland Revenue might use. [*Link from here to one such attempt and evidence *Link also from here to the text in HTML format for links to and from]    

WE STRESS & EMPHASISE that in order to further their criminal activities in and through the courts, the legal circles and the judiciary relied on the corrupt and corrupted fraudsters within the Inland Revenue to rush in and to demand tax for earnings declared but not received.

The parasitic fraud of a brother, Mr Constantine (Costas) Kyriacou Joannides (who ended up as a split personality because of the relentless lies and the fraudulent misrepresentations he had engaged in for decades) was aware of the fact that the accountant he had introduced to the family (the Joannides clan) was related to one of the solicitors who was operating out of the firm Nicolas & Co. The connection between the original failures, by the account and his subsequent defaults to submit amended accounts to the Inland Revenue, for tax return purposes, was made all the clearer after the fraud of a brother disclosed the connection of the accountant to the solicitor, some 20 years later.

In the meantime the criminals operating out of the Inland Revenue, did proceed with a fraudulent invitation (through another accounted who was contacted and instructed to deal with the problems) for the purpose of discussing the issues that arose because of the fraudulent activities, at, in and through the courts. The aim was to secure the essential and warranted consent to submit amended accounts, especially after the criminals at the Royal Courts of Justice, went all the way and struck out the case against the fraudsters who relied on delaying tactics (creation of fraudulently imposed legal costs, a bonus for the operatives too) and the USE OF THE FORGERY TO SECURE A FRAUDULENT JUDGEMENT. [*Link from here to a letter sent to the second accountant who was retained to right the vile wrongs the first accountant wilfully failed to correct].

The Inspector of Taxes invited the victim and the new accountant to the his office BUT ARRANGED ALSO with the Collector of Taxes to send along one of their officers to serve a Bankruptcy Notice on the targeted victim of all. [*Link from here to an extract from the research work of the late Stephen Knight author of 'The Brotherhood', relative to the practices / activities of organised networks of Freemasons]

THAT, WAS NOT ENOUGH.

The Inspector & Collector of Taxes engaged in furthering the fraudulent / criminal activities of the legal circles and the JUDICIARY (all the way to the court of appeal). They worked with & relied also on the very fraudsters at the Royal Courts of Justice to ENFORCE FRAUDULENT & INEXCUSABLE DEMANDS FOR TAXES ARISING OUT OF MONEYS NOT RECEIVED, as organised and arranged by the very criminals who were operating out of the very courts. [*Link from here to part of a letter sent to an accountant who was retained to attend to the issue of demands for money declared earned but not received, as organised and arranged by the criminals operating out of the Royal Courts of Justice. Through the accountant a fraudulent invitation by the Inspector of Taxes who initiated the invitation under false pretences in order to pursue the fraudulent demands consequential to the criminal activities of the legal circles with judicial chair occupants, all the way to the Court of Appeal party to the constructive frauds]

IMPOSING A FRAUDULENT DEMAND, as above stated, was not enough apparently. The fraudsters also registered a charge on a property in North London, which many set their sights upon. The affidavit published in this page relates to the events that led to the discovery and confirmation of the inaccessible charge. Needless to say the demanded taxes had been paid under duress and the charge on the property was NOT DISCLOSED either by the Inland Revenue or the bankers of the targeted victim. Neither could ever justify or excuse the activities when one considers that ALTHOUGH THE ACTION WAS NOT REFERRED TO THE TARGETED VICTIM, OTHERS WERE VERY MUCH AWARE OF THE FACILITY IN PLACE FOR ADDITIONAL INTENDED DAMAGES.

Evidence will be released that should make it clear that the Inland Revenue activity WAS PART OF AN ORGANISED PLAN that included assaults on the career of the victim, USING THE PARASITIC FRAUD OF A BROTHER Mr Constantine Kyriacou Joannides-Hadjiantonevris, the EVE IN HIS LIFE and others who evidently were aware of the charge and plans for the victim who was to have imposed upon him more damages though fraudulently created FALSE INSTRUMENTS intended for the break-up of a family through use of the Eve and intended / planned-for thefts of properties (including rights assured in law) via conversions of assets care of additional abuse of the courts facilities IN CONTEMPT OF ALL APPLICABLE LAW APPLICABLE TO THE ACTIVITIES and CONTEMPT FOR THE RIGHTS TO PROTECTION FROM CRIME & CRIMINALS.

Below, the Affidavit in HTML for links to and from

General Form of Affidavit

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

By : ..............................................................

========================================================

1. In 1994 I acquired the leasehold and freehold rights to my residence, a flat at the above address, following a divorce. I relied on a firm of solicitors for the conveyance and the securities attached to the acquisition of the property through a part-loan charge facility. The solicitors, who acted for me, never forwarded the certificate for the rights to the freehold share of the block of flats and the land where the complex is built. I assumed that the Freehold Share Certificate was kept as part of the securities attached to the loan facility. In the circumstances I never enquired of the solicitors as to the position regarding the said Share Certificate.
2. In 1998 I had secured evidence to the effect that a number of irregularities and issues attached and arose out of the handling of my affairs by the solicitors who acted for me, in the divorce proceedings. There arose the need for a number of applications to court and a consequential necessity to raise a loan in order to consolidate my liabilities and assets. When I applied for the alternative loan facility, I was informed that the Freehold Share Certificate was not held, as Security, by any of the solicitors who were involved in the handling of the conveyance and the Loan charge facility, in 1994. In the circumstances, after the solicitors failed to respond to my enquiries and did not provide me with explanations as to where or who was holding the certificate, I determined that there existed good reasons and causes for me to attend the local Land Registry offices.
3. On 7^th February 2002, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, of the Human Rights (NGO), and I, went to the Land Registry at Harrow. I explained to the staff that as I was considering placing my property on the market I needed to know that there were no other mortgage charges apart from the one that I had incurred as a result of the loan facility in 1994. A search confirmed the aforesaid loan and charge, only. There was no record, however, in respect of the Freehold Share Certificate with and for the attached rights to the land and share of the complex and land property rights.
4. On the way to the Land Registry Mr Andrew Yiannides had explained to me of problems and obstructions he had faced, when he visited the Land Registry Records Department near Plymouth, the previous year. Like me, he was seeking information and full particulars in respect of two properties in London. He asked of the staff to check their records for both properties and to provide full information and particulars in respect of any charges on the properties.
5. Mr Yiannides when applying for the information, and the particulars he was seeking, clarified to the member of staff that he had been told by the staff and officers at Plymouth, that they were not able to provide full particulars because only the Local Land Registry offices keep comprehensive records. When the member of staff returned, with the details on record at Harrow, Mr Yiannides pointed out that the information was as incomplete as the information provided earlier by the staff and officers at Plymouth. He clarified that the information, on record, in respect of the property in North London, was simply as given by Plymouth. He also pointed out, to the member of the staff that an alleged charge on the relevant property was dating back to 1979 and that as far as he was aware, at no time had anyone notified him of such an action and activity. He further clarified that as there had been a first charge by his bankers it was incumbent upon the bank to inform him of any such action or activity for and in respect of any other alleged liability or legitimate debts.
6. The member of staff then stated that she was going to seek additional information from a senior officer in view of what Mr Yiannides had said. While we were waiting for the member of staff to return Mr Yiannides told me that it would appear that no one was really giving proper information just as had been the case in my circumstances leading to the reason for my enquiries of and at the Land Registry. He further informed me that if the recorded charge were in respect of what he had been subjected to in 1979, then there would be too many questions and much to account for, to him.
7. When the lady returned she informed Mr Yiannides that her colleagues were making arrangements to have the charge removed. Mr Yiannides responded to that announcement, with words to the effect that 'Everybody appeared to have engaged in the organised break up of his family, through the undisclosed, to him, charges and inexcusable activities after he had been subjected to many improprieties by public servants, for years. He stated that it appeared that much had been created by people who acted in breach of the law and by persons who readily abused public office, and that they all indulged at his expense initially and that of his children, in recent years. He also spoke of the simple fact 'and confirmation as to of when the charges had been placed on record' pointed to who the offenders were. He told the lady that he would prefer it if those who acted as they had done, in the past, should not seek to change anything at that point in time. He stated that, in his view, those who acted as they had done had breached his rights under the law and that violations of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights had taken place, not to mention a number of other breaches and violations in law.