The system as evolved is covered
in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the
same after the Woolf reforms.
|An explicit Affidavit plus exhibits and
letters to a Chief Inspector of Police
one to solicitors and another
to the Lord Chancellor
CRIMES (read the letter to the police in September 2006)
& read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister : * I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the wrongs we have been
suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential and
capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not
through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the
minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link from here to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister
forwarded / delegated submissions received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister /
Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES *Link
thereafter to the Prime Minister's reference to the issue of Organised Crime in June 2005]
of CORRUPT Detectives, Judges, Lawyers, Ministers - article in the
London Evening Standard [ *Link to image & text]
3rd March 2011 added link [*L]
to the BBC-TV Dimbleby Lecture in 1976 as the Metropolitan
Police Commissioner, Sir Robert
Mark prepared & presented to the sucker-serfs
This Page is DEDICATED
US TO HELP YOU Please (*Link to plea).
others On Line and publish your Statement
of Facts and the Evidence you have. (Member's case at the
European Court on Human Rights - paves the way TO PLEAD VIOLATIONS [*Link] caused through abuse of the courts in
allegedly civilised Democratic States. Victims do not know that IT IS ALL ORGANISED by the
very circles who have been arranging all of humanity's TRIBULATIONS FOR THOUSANDS of
years) Use your rights in law (link)
and ACT collectively with others, EXPOSE the offenders. Join us
/ others and chip in for the creation of the mass of evidence against abusers
of public office : the abductors and rapists of Justice. You can then
benefit from THE FACTS & THE EVIDENCE that you will help establish. It can all be used
in any action, severally or jointly with others, as the case may be. Crimes against humanity are not ruled out when a large number
of citizens can come up with evidence and as victims concur and or expand upon on the FACTS STATED & The VIOLATIONS PLEADED as LODGED at the ECoHR,
- PAGE ELEMENTS
INTRODUCTION to page
FRAUD & Public Servants
INLAND REVENUE Party
LAND REGISTRY - discovery
LEGAL AID BOARD - party
- PAGE ELEMENTS
INTRODUCTION to page
Case STRUCK OUT
Contempt to EVIDENCE
Contempt to LAW
Need to APPEAL - FRAUD
Contempt to Evidence
Haringey Police - H/B Fraud
V. B. Foden - Mortgage
V. B. Foder - Divorce
V. B. Foden-Solicitor Case
Contempt to Law
Enfield Council - C.Court
Hackney Council - C.Court
Haringey Council - C.Court
Haringey Police - H/B Fraud
Len Miskulin - Divorce
V. B. Foden - Mortgage
Len Miskulin - Divorce
P. Constantinou - Divorce
V. B. Foden - Financial
Haringey Council-H/B Fraud
PERJURY - Used
V.B. Foden-Solicitor Case
P. Constantinou - Divorce
Crown Prosecution Service
Court of Appeal - R.B.Del C
Helen Patey - Assertions
Divorce Frauds Challenged
V. B. Foden - Plymouth
|EVES USED - by the rapists of humanity *Page Created October 2005*
||*Page Revised: June 20, 2012* >new lay out, additional links, bookmarks
|Site under reconstruction. Improvements & additional material in
VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE
IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in
January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO
THE TREASURY. Our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us
accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation
of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. You will find
the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will
share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt
and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes.
We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as
conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between
Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET.
Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive
material: access instructions. The first step for
visitors to acquaint themselves with the extensive material should be to use the SEARCH FOR facility. Just type in any word or combination of words /
issues that are of concern / interest - need information and our views about. Remember
that our views rest on factual experiences and research with evidence in support. We urge
visitors and in particular victims of the legal circles and the Law Enforcement Agencies
to access the introduction page to the Community on Line [*Link to the page where the
facility FOR CHALLENGES & EXPOSURES by the concerned and the genuine victims of the
organised crimes against 'humanity' (' the sons of men'). We emphasise and stress that the
facility was never intended for the fraudsters who sold and sell their souls
(consciousness) to the system as is, such as *the fraudsters club recruits* we name and
expose in our pages].
As part of the reconstruction process our new pages
and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages
are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes
visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and
links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in other pages. For
further clarification email: webmaster@
|In this page we are pointing to realities
and exposing the activities behind the scenes, attached to the targeting of a family.
Victims, visitors, readers and researchers get to know how an Eve was used in order to get
to the member, of the family (Mr Andrew Yiannides), who had been causing too many waves,
for years. We point in another page*[1*] to activities at the Royal Courts of Justice, when Mr Yiannides
was first made aware how managers and controllers of the Law Enforcement Agencies (Legal
circles : the judiciary & the police) engaged in fraudulent use of the courts'
facilities in order to defraud Mr A Yiannides of his properties and his rights that,
allegedly, are assured in law, in an allegedly civilised 'pseudodemocracy'.
|[1* Link from here to the page
where we point to proof after an introduction to the most basic of principles 'justice to
be seen to be done']
We released the first trickle of
evidence that establishes how abusers of public office benefit from use of the naive, the
gullible, the selfish and the greedy. Needless to say the latter / last are
primed and assured of success when and if they co-operate with the organisers of it all.
The offending organisers : Public Servants, publicly funded groups and services are all
seen to be acting in contempt of the law and the evidence applicable, in almost every
other case we looked into, if not all cases.
It also goes without saying that
other alleged Servants of the Public, and affiliates / associated circles create FALSE
STATES & INSTRUMENTS that are used by the criminals who are in control of it all.
The words of the Prime Minister in the House of Commons said it all, in June 2005.
We are preparing for more revelations about the institutionally organised fraud
and corruption to which the citizens fall prey. In the meantime some official statement
provides the assurances that relate to the recognition of the issue of organised crime
which is not far from the mind of our government. This is as good a page as any where we
can report and draw attention to the words of the Prime Minister, the Rt. Hon. Tony Blair
when he returned from the last Summit attended by the leaders of member states of the
European Union, in Holland, in June 2005. The prime Minister when addressing the House of
Commons stated that:
United Kingdom, will work to resolve the impasse on the EU budget".
He also defended his decision to reject a compromise deal at a
Summit meeting the previous week. He spoke of and reiterated, to Parliament, his belief
that: "The European Common
Agricultural Policy and the United Kingdom's rebate should be reviewed together".
carried on: "This rebate
must be examined. This crisis is not about the failure of Europe's leaders to reach
agreement, with each other. The crisis is about that of Europe's Leaders to reach
agreement with the people of Europe on issues that concern them; economically and
socially; and they want answers to the challenges they face. They worry about
globalisation and organised crime, and they do not, at present,
see Europe giving a credible response. If we answer these concerns Europe will strengthen
and we need a strong Europe to bolster the strength of individual nations. It is those who
believe in Europe most who should be 'the most ardent advocates at changing it'. The
European budget shouldn't be separate from that debate but part of it, and it is that
debate which we will look forward to, in our presidency.
When answering a question on the issue of the Constitution, he said that: "It could not proceed after the recent rejections in
the French and Dutch referendums". The UK taking over the
Presidency of the Union on 1st July 2005.
|The article, below, from the 'Daily Mail' of 19th July 2005 qualifies how women feel about the state of affairs in so far as
'personal happiness and satisfaction with one's own self and well being goes. Nowhere,
however, any of the elements that are organised and imposed by and through the very
activities we expose in our pages. Refer to our comments after the conclusion of the
[*Link from here to thek]
Odd it is not that for over 30 years we have (the founder of
human-rights has) been pointing to the fact that women are used and encouraged by the
organisers of allegedly civilised pseudo-democracies. One has only to refer to a few of
the cases we point to and consider the irrefutable evidence we publish in each of the
cases stated. [*Link to examples / cases stated]
Odd it is not that the encouraged women are
also organised through the agents of the criminals who move in and take over any castles
built. Such persons are and have been in control for decades that we know of. The Eves
simply co-operate with one another and in particular with those who are using them for the
end result that always rests and is founded on just the conversion and transfer of assets
/ properties through CONTEMPT OF ALL LAW & ALL EVIDENCE.
Lamentable and disgraceful, however,
happens to be the behaviour of the men-victims who fail to recognise the simple elements
used by the rapists of humanity, with the arrogant assaults on the families 'of the sons
of men' as organised by the abductors and rapists of Democracy & Justice, and
followers of the teachings, by example stated, in the most vile of works ever to have been
presented to 'the sons of men'. (*Link to proof &
July, 2005, page14 the article title said it all.
|We won the
battle of the sexes. So, why are women unhappier than ever?
|Of all the social battles of the
last century - against poverty, class, racism, the battle of the sexes began with the best
of intentions, yet ended with so many casualties on both sides that it is increasingly
difficult to see who the victors were.
|Thirty-five years on from the first
women's liberation conference, held at Ruskin College, Oxford. in 1970, one of the largest
surveys into what academics call 'life satisfaction' (in other words, what we mortals call
'happiness' ) has now concluded that many defining principles of the feminist manifesto
brought sadness, not salvation, to millions of women.
|Far from liberating women, says the
survey, the feminist movement has created its own sexual tyranny. And ironically it is
women who are the victims.
|The research, by Dr Silvia Pezzini
for the London School of Economics, examined the effects on women over two decades of four
key tenets of the feminist movement: the introduction of the Pill, legalised abortion,
liberal divorce laws and enhanced right for women in the workplace.
|These were seen as a package devised
to liberate women, to give the control over their own bodies, to ensure them equal rights
in marriage and secure a package of benefits at work.
|The research spanned 23 years in 12
European countries tracking the life satisfaction' of 450,000 women from 1975 to 1998.
|Dr Pezzini's work paints quite a
different picture to the to the one of the high-flying designer c1ad superwoman, deftly
juggling a fabulous career with an exciting marriage and gorgeous children, that we all
imagined ewe would become back in the Seventies.
|Yes, the universal1y available Pill
and legalised abortion did give women social and sexual freedoms they could once only
dream of. On the surface, this was indeed a triumph for women's lib. For the first time,
we had true control of our bodies.
|And what has happened to that
|Children as young as 14 are now in
the Pill, forced into sexual relationships they neither want nor understand. We have the
highest rate of teenage pregnancy in Europe. Our ever-increasing abortion rates are a
disgrace to a modern Christian civilisation.
|We may control our bodies and we are
certainly more sexually experienced, but more marriages break up now than ever before and
the rate among cohabiting couples is even higher.
|And what about our children? What
about those young girls on the threshold of puberty who are coerced into having casual sex
and who pay the price for their naive promiscuity with sexually transmitted disease like
chlamydia that can rob them of the chance of being a mother?
|These problems are not unique to
Britain, but they are being felt here more keenly than anywhere else in Europe. Some
|This is not to say, for one moment,
I want to return to the time when women were forced into desperate marriages because of
the shame of pregnancy out of wedlock. And I would defend any woman's right to decide
when, and if, she starts her family.
|Much as it pains me, nor would I
deny any woman the right to abort a young foetus under some circumstances - in particular
where the child is likely to be denied the loving care which ought to be its birthright.
|But did any of my generation imagine
that when we fought so hard for these rights, it would end in a generation of teenagers
having anonymous sex on beaches in Greece and getting so drunk they can't even remember
who they were with, or how many?
|And if the Pill and legal abortion
have given is the same control over our bodies, as men have over theirs, then legislation
in the workplace has secured us the same opportunities in our careers. The question is
whether it has made us happy.
|Dr Pezzini's research into the
improvements for women in the workplace makes particularly interesting reading.
|'There is no life satisfaction
improvement for women in enhanced maternity rights,' she says. Instead of making women
more satisfied, it has the reverse effect, as the longer the maternity leave, the less
employable the woman becomes'.
|In fact Dr Pezzini points out that
maternity rights are now so onerous on businesses that employers are becoming increasingly
reluctant to take on any women of childbearing age. Where is the liberation in that?
|Even when it comes to marriage, Dr
Pezzini concludes that more liberal divorce laws have certainly not made women any
|'There is a marked decline in women's
happiness from the moment easier divorces became legal. The no fault, mutual divorces have
not brought women the happiness one might have expected ,' she says.
|'That is because, love aside,
marriage is ultimately a contract between two people for mutually beneficial financial,
child-rearing and support arrangements'.
|The possibility of easy divorce
changes all that, she says. The more government loosens the 'marriage contract' through
making divorce easier, the more commitment becomes a flexible term. In other words,
quickie divorce only make for quickie marriages.
|Is this really what we fought for:
the right to ruin our personal lives?
|For what we feminists lost sight of,
our march on the barricades if prejudice, was that we never listened to the mothers who
wanted to stay at home.
|We treated them as second-class
citizens and invited society to sneer at them and their narrow horizons.
|Yet, now it turns out that they
understood a fundamental truth that escaped us all: that to create a home you have to
spend time in it; that to enjoy your family, you have to spend time with it.
|On the Continent, this truth has been
overlooked, but not entirely forgotten. In Britain it has been cast aside altogether in
recent years by a ruling elite which has done everything possible to drive women into the
workplace. In so doing, it has placed political idealism above any notion of personal
|Again, I am not proposing frilly
gingham aprons and mum's apple pie (or in any case, tinned peach Pavlova). All I am
advocating us an honest appraisal, not just of how far we have come, but also what we've
|None of us would wish a return to the
days wan divorce was a disgrace, nor a bad marriage a shackle for life, but we must be
aware of the consequences of the changes we have wrought.
|Women's liberation was driven by the
most terrible inequalities; it was a social necessity, but as with al social experiments,
no one could have fully foreseen the consequences.
|Did really not calculate that the
more you have of the things we thought would make us happy - independence, career, status,
and money - the less we would have of those things that truly bring contentment:
relationships, family and friendship?
|We assumed these would follow in the
wake of our success as fabulous careerists. We were wrong. While worshipping the ground
Superwoman walked on, we were too busy admiring her Jimmy Choos to notice that her feet
were made of clay.
|It has taken us decades to realise
the one thing real happiness really requires is time, and that when we are devoted to
ourselves and our work, there is no time left for the mainstays of our life.
|Dr Pezzini is insistent that, despite
her findings, there is no turning back the clock, and she would not wish to remove any of
the rights women have fought so hard to gain. Nor would I. But it is time to recognise the
consequences of our actions; time for a nit of balance.
|We started off burning our
bras. May be now we should burn our pride, admit our mistakes and try to end this tinpot
tyranny in which the greatest victims are ourselves.
Associated Newspapers - 2005
It may well be that the authoress of the above article was / is not
aware of the ARROGANTLY ORGANISED CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY BY ALLEGED SERVANTS OF THE
PUBLIC. The most offensive of 'failures' is not mistakes by 'the greatest victims of
the tinpot tyranny' but the programming of the ill-educated and the ill-informed who are
'conditioned through the established practices'; in short 'the naive and the gullible, the
non-thinking serfs : the 'sheeple of the pseudodemocarcies, created, organised and managed
by fraudsters'. The sad reality happens to be the simple fact that the lives of 'the
sucker-serfs' are organised through abuse of trust, disinformation and wilful deceit, care
of the controllers and managers whose gurus planned it all centuries / millennia ago.
*Link from here to the
plans of the followers of the vile scenarios and scripts, alleged to be holy scriptures
about the one and only, the master creator and suporter of evil, the one who called for
assistance in order to come down to earth and put an end to the co-operation that existed
between the sons -NO daughters- of men -NO women manding of non-humans / non-thinkers to
obey and follow directi vile ]
|Octobner 1995, letter to Lord Mackay the Lord Chancellor raising issues commanding attention
||On the left confirmation from postal services that the
above letter was delivered.
||On the left second letter to the Lord Chancellor.
CONTEMPT, for the citizens
rights under the law : NO RESPONSE
Victims, visitors and especially readers and
researchers should consider the above realities in conjunction with the RIGHTS OF THE
CITIZENS, in any properly constituted and managed democratic state. We point to the
fundamental principles we cover in the exclusive page where the blunt constructive frauds
on the taxpayers & the corruption of morons gifted with the mentality of persons
such as the organised *the fraudsters club recruits* we name and expose in our pages. The
crucial issue is that of ACCOUNTABILITY BY PUBLIC SERVANTS TO THE CITIZENS, the taxpayers
who foot the costs of ORGANISED CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY through false instruments created
and used by abusers of trust & public office as covered in the exclusive page.
WE URGE ALL VISITORS TO ACCESS & READ the extract from Isocrates' 'Aeropagiticos'
in our quotes page and to consider thereat the simple and all important words relative
to states that existed in the civiliastion thatwas targeted by the criminals who went
along to Ptolemy of Egypt in the latter part of the fourth century before Jesus Christ
with their creation the Old Testament, rubbish, and ever since promoted as alleged Holy
Scriptures by persons who never really STUDIED the rubbish, as humans gifted with the
power of reasoning and LOGIC. *Link from here to an extract from the vile work of
the fraudsters and note with what other teachuings by examples stated young Andrew
Yiannides, the creator of this website and founder of human-rights compared the vile
scenario / script from the scribes who concocted the alleged Holy Scriptures.
page is dedicated to all abusers of our time and in particular to
two women / female evil-mongering fraudsters, Mrs. Veronica Beryl Foden and Mrs. Helen
Patey. Both contacted us as 'victims' who were faced with very serious problems. The
former complained that she had already been subjected to the most horrendous of
obstructions to her rights and the most contemptuous of fraudulent activities in the
courts were noted upon inspection of her files. She needed assistance to challenge it all,
all the way to the ECoHR (Strasbourg) and she declared her intentions to expose it all
with our assistance, as a member of the human-rights.org Community on Line. However, it
was not long before her actions and defaults; established that she was part of a scam and
that she had been and was a participating fraudster in all that she was complaining of and
about. She actually engaged in criminally motivated activities that were intended to cause
damages to Mr Andrew Yiannides, the person she was sent along to mess about with. The
latter, Mrs. H Patey, was sent along by persons who operate as 'lovers of the system as
is, circles', all of whom excel in the subliminal indoctrination, of 'victims they
contact' through their relentless complaints and references to their allegations about the
The right to reply and to justify behaviour and
activities we cover in our pages, is assured to any one named. We will publish excuses
& whatever is submitted to us. Legal argument that shall arise out of their
submissions will be used as we apply ourselves to relevant issues in the cases they
referred to us & we will cover their acts and all defaults.
The article we reproduce, above,
from the 'Daily Mail' issue of 19th July 2005, most clear.
Eight years earlier, in 1997,
the best known and most ardent fighter for the protection of abused / violated women came
in with her own views on the very issue of abducted & misdirected / used provisions,
such as women's refuge homes which the one and only Erin Pizey was instrumental in
creating. Access above [*Link] and read the Amanda Platell article, from the 'Daily Mail' of 19th July
Below, the content of two letters
from the letters page, above, of the Daily Mail of Thursday, the 16th December, 1997.
'Why Feminism has failed most women'
AS AN ardent anti-feminist, unlike Fay Weldon (Mail) I feel sorry for women of
my generation who were tricked into believing the so-called women's movement had anything
to offer women except tears.
Harvard Professor Ruth Wisse has this to say about the feminsit movement : '
By definition relationships between men and women in rerms of power and competiotion, the
movement tore apart the most basic and fragile human contract in human society, the unit
from which all other social institutions draw their strenth'.
I believe the women's movement internationally has been the most influential
causes in the destruction of family kife this century. Men have been cast out of their
role as fathers but women havbe been disenfrachised from their most potent role in
society. Millions of women worldwide now face the fcat that because of the vicious
spiteful war waged against men by a handful of middle-class women, they will never be
married nor have the choice to have children.
The injustice to men deserves our concern, but spare your tears for the
victims of the feminist movement - other women.
ERIN PIZZEY, Twickenham, Middlesex.
WELDON says women are better able to live without men than men are to live without women.
Yet on the same day we read that the Government is desperate to reduce
the number of women dependants (Mail).
It seems women can live without men provided the men keep paying them
extortionate amounts in taxes or through the CSA.
Let's hope the feminist fantasy bubble is burst soon before more damage
E. DIGGINS, Andover, Hants.
21st July 2005
M.. Koula Demetriou(?) Yiannides(?)
65 Abbotts Park Road
My Ref. Jul05Ins
Your Ref. Sort this out please
'One Begins with Logic' Heraclitus ( ‘Εν
Αρχή Ην Ο Λόγος’ – Ηράκλειτος)
Re: Documents forwarded to mother's
I acknowledge receipt of the documents
you received (at 65) from the Norwich Union. Copies I attach hereto
for the purposes of this, my present response and request.
I trust that with the passing of time, you
have reflected on a number of events and issues, and that you will
duly consider my request below.
In order to assist you to reflect and to
consider/possibly re-consider past events that you, alone, may/must have been privy to,
(had knowledge of, as presented
to you by third parties) I attach a true copy of an Affidavit by Mrs Jesus Rosalia Baldwin
Del Castilo. I simply trust and hope that you will duly refer it to both Alexandros (age
before beauty) and Artemis, after you have 'digested' all that it covers. I am most
certain that you will not fail to comprehend the implications and the activities behind
the scenes leading to the situation that was first brought to my attention in the course
of the visit to Harrow Land Registry, as covered in the affidavit.
You will duly note that the deponent (Mrs.
J.R.Baldwin Del Castilo) withheld the requested 'essential confirmation of the events she
witnessed', for reasons that were/are too obvious to a researcher such as yours truly,
especially after yours truly, took her case all the way to the European Court of Human
Rights, where Titina Loizidou presented her petition in respect of her rights that are
assured through the Convention and International Treaties & Accords.
You will be receiving
additional evidence and proof about the 'organised criminal activities' in which abusers
of public office indulge and engage in, 'as self-assured protected species', in most
pseudo-democracies. I trust that you will be giving such matters some of your valuable
time, because the issues covered relate
to and apply to millions of families world-wide and billions of innocent children. I am sure that common sense will prevail and that
you will act both as a mother and as a person who 'had your plans for the future of the
family you were to have / create'.
I return to the attached copies of the
communications received from the Norwich Union and I humbly request that you write to the
company. Request of them, please, for information as to 'from which bank account they
applied for funds' AND at the same time 'request of them to furnish you with details of
ALL payments they received over the last six years'. In the event that you may need
clarification or explanations (or reasons for the request from me) you COULD contact me by
telephone and or arrange for me to speak with you in the presence of a relative of yours in view of the fact
that 'the issues command attention and explanations', at the same time.
I trust that this present communication and any ensuing exchanges will
be conducted in a civil and proper manner, in view of the facts pointed out, now; above
all there has to be due consideration of the events and the issues covered in the copy of
the attached affidavit.
Do convey to both Alexandros and Artemis my most sincere wishes for
them both and future generations 'of the sons of men' to benefit from changes in
practices, by public servants. Most certainly I desire for them that they may be allowed /
permitted to enjoy life as they plan, in a world that could be freed from the activities I
am dealing with in collaboration with many others who were subjected to similar
impositions by abusers of public office.
ENCL.: 1. Copy of Affidavit (4 X A4 sheets)
Copies of Communications
NOTE: Due to the very nature of the facts covered above, this
communication is t o be treated as an OPEN COMMUNICATION and will be referred to
whomsoever it concerns and is to be published in the public domain, following the
anticipated 'civil actions from your goodself'.
/ Kyriaki the gestation vessel had been engaging in all manner of foul co-operation with
the many who used her for the INTENDED DAMAGES BEING IMPOSED ON THE TARGETED author of the
above letter. ALL HAD BEEN RELYING ON THE VERY GESTATION VESSEL to carry on co-operating
for their joint plans of all for the tageted one. She failed to address the issues she was
presented with, in line with her character as of the days when with her sister both proved
to have been perfect clones of the Eve who brought them both into the world of the
followers of the teachings by examples stated in the most vile of works ever to have been
misrepresnted to mankind, 'the Old Testament. References in the letter to the Norwich
Union related to a 'life mortgage insurance cover' BUT THE MORTGAGE HAD BEEN PAID FOR,
WELL OVER 6 years earlier; in the circumstances the gestation was fully aware of the fact
that there subsisted no need for the cover; the bank had been instructed accordingly, to
cease payments for a non-existent mortgage.
|The three images below are of an affidavit
that covers issues and activities that relate to fraudulent in intent records which
abusers of Public Office created. Visitors, readers and researchers who accessed and read
of the perversion and corruption of justice through the creation of a FORGERY should have
noted THAT THE FORGERY WAS SUBSEQUENTLY EVEN MADE FALSER. It was after the criminals who
sought, secured and indulged in the creation and production of such an instrument,
discovered that it had been endorsed with the wrong date, year. [*Link from here to
image of the forgery - copy lodged and perused at court, as handled by abusers of judicial
chair occupation all the way to the Court of Appeal]
We will be publishing additional
evidence that will further strengthen the element and issue of OTHERS JOIN THE BANDWAGON
OF FRAUD APLENTY & FALSE RECORDS FOR THE IMPOSITION OF THEFT OF ASSETS AND RIGHTS
ASSURED IN LAW. Attention is drawn to the affidavit below, 2nd page, paragraph 7.
Needless to say victims
of the divorce industry should access the page /solfraud.htm. In the letters challenging
the offenders and abusers of the courts facilities / processes references to specific
divorce cases. In two of the cases pointed to, SIMPLY BLUNT ASSAULTS ON THE FAMILIES
TARGETED WITH INTENT. Nothing but deliberate IMPOSITIONS FOR THE BREAK UP OF FAMILIES.
Participating in those cases not just the legal circles but professionals from within the
financial and other associated services too; also envious and spiteful siblings.
|The reader / visitor and in particular
victims of the constructive frauds through the courts - when other Public Services,
Government departments or publicly funded bodies were / are seen to be proactive and
engaging as we are pointing and will be adding in our pages, should get in touch with us.
Citizens, especially victims, first and foremost should consider THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO
SOCIETY (*F2), not simply their personal rights, especially when
*fraudsters-club-recruits* invite them to keep it all under their hats in order to qualify
for the rewards under the table that we point to.
WE STRESS & EMPHASISE that in
order to further their criminal activities in and through the courts, the legal circles
and the judiciary relied on the corrupt and corrupted fraudsters within the Inland Revenue
to rush in and to demand tax for earnings declared but not received.
The parasitic fraud of a
brother, Mr Constantine (Costas) Kyriacou Joannides (who ended up as a split personality
because of the relentless lies and the fraudulent misrepresentations he had engaged in for
decades) was aware of the fact that the accountant he had introduced to the family (the
Joannides clan) was related to one of the solicitors who was operating out of the firm
Nicolas & Co. The connection between the original failures, by the account and
his subsequent defaults to submit amended accounts to the Inland Revenue, for tax return
purposes, was made all the clearer after the fraud of a brother disclosed the connection
of the accountant to the solicitor, some 20 years later.
In the meantime the
criminals operating out of the Inland Revenue, did proceed with a fraudulent invitation
(through another accounted who was contacted and instructed to deal with the problems) for
the purpose of discussing the issues that arose because of the fraudulent activities, at,
in and through the courts. The aim was to secure the essential and warranted consent to
submit amended accounts, especially after the criminals at the Royal Courts of Justice,
went all the way and struck out the case against the fraudsters who relied on delaying
tactics (creation of fraudulently imposed legal costs, a bonus for the operatives too) and
the USE OF THE FORGERY TO SECURE A FRAUDULENT JUDGEMENT. [*Link from
here to a letter sent to the second accountant who was retained to right the vile
wrongs the first accountant wilfully failed to correct].
The Inspector of Taxes
invited the victim and the new accountant to the his office BUT ARRANGED ALSO with the
Collector of Taxes to send along one of their officers to serve a Bankruptcy Notice on the
targeted victim of all. [*Link
from here to an extract from the research work of the late
Stephen Knight author of 'The Brotherhood', relative to the practices / activities of
organised networks of Freemasons]
THAT, WAS NOT ENOUGH.
The Inspector &
Collector of Taxes engaged in furthering the fraudulent / criminal activities of the legal
circles and the JUDICIARY (all the way to the court of appeal). They
worked with & relied also on the very fraudsters at the Royal Courts of Justice to
ENFORCE FRAUDULENT & INEXCUSABLE DEMANDS FOR TAXES ARISING OUT OF MONEYS NOT RECEIVED,
as organised and arranged by the very criminals who were operating out of the very courts.
[*Link from here to part of a letter sent to an accountant who
was retained to attend to the issue of demands for money declared earned but not received,
as organised and arranged by the criminals operating out of the Royal Courts of Justice.
Through the accountant a fraudulent invitation by the Inspector of Taxes who initiated the
invitation under false pretences in order to pursue the fraudulent demands consequential
to the criminal activities of the legal circles with judicial chair occupants, all the way
to the Court of Appeal party to the constructive frauds]
IMPOSING A FRAUDULENT
DEMAND, as above stated, was not enough apparently. The fraudsters also registered a
charge on a property in North London, which many set their sights upon. The affidavit
published in this page relates to the events that led to the discovery and confirmation of
the inaccessible charge. Needless to say the demanded taxes had been paid under duress and
the charge on the property was NOT DISCLOSED either by the Inland Revenue or the bankers
of the targeted victim. Neither could ever justify or excuse the activities when one
considers that ALTHOUGH THE ACTION WAS NOT REFERRED TO THE TARGETED VICTIM, OTHERS WERE
VERY MUCH AWARE OF THE FACILITY IN PLACE FOR ADDITIONAL INTENDED DAMAGES.
Evidence will be released that should make it clear that the Inland Revenue activity
WAS PART OF AN ORGANISED PLAN that included assaults on the career of the victim, USING
THE PARASITIC FRAUD OF A BROTHER Mr Constantine Kyriacou Joannides-Hadjiantonevris, the
EVE IN HIS LIFE and others who evidently were aware of the charge and plans for the victim
who was to have imposed upon him more damages though fraudulently created FALSE
INSTRUMENTS intended for the break-up of a family through use of the Eve and intended /
planned-for thefts of properties (including rights assured in law) via conversions of
assets care of additional abuse of the courts facilities IN CONTEMPT OF ALL APPLICABLE LAW
APPLICABLE TO THE ACTIVITIES and CONTEMPT FOR THE RIGHTS TO PROTECTION FROM CRIME &
Below, the Affidavit in HTML for links to and from
General Form of Affidavit
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
Affidavit of: Jesus Rosalia Baldwin Del Castillo
By : ..............................................................
AFFIDAVIT OF JESUS ROSALIA BALDWIN Del CASTILLO
I Jesus Rosalia Baldwin Del Castillo of 16 West End Court, Priory
Road, West Hampstead, NW6 3NU, in the London Borough of Camden, presently at Finca
Castillo, 52 Pardida Benesein, 03110 Muxamel, Alicante, Spain, MAKE OATH and say as
any other alleged
liability or legitimate debts.
The member of staff then stated that she was going to seek
additional information from a senior officer in view of what Mr Yiannides had said. While
we were waiting for the member of staff to return Mr Yiannides told me that it would
appear that no one was really giving proper information just as had been the case in my
circumstances leading to the reason for my enquiries of and at the Land Registry. He
further informed me that if the recorded charge were in respect of what he had been
subjected to in 1979, then there would be too many questions and much to account for, to
When the lady returned she informed Mr Yiannides that her
colleagues were making arrangements to have the charge removed. Mr Yiannides responded to
that announcement, with words to the effect that 'Everybody appeared to have engaged in
the organised break up of his family, through the undisclosed, to him, charges and
inexcusable activities after he had been subjected to many improprieties by public
servants, for years. He stated that it appeared that much had been created by people who
acted in breach of the law and by persons who readily abused public office, and that they
all indulged at his expense initially and that of his children, in recent years. He also
spoke of the simple fact 'and confirmation as to of when the charges had been placed on
record' pointed to who the offenders were. He told the lady that he would prefer it if
those who acted as they had done, in the past, should not seek to change anything at that
point in time. He stated that, in his view, those who acted as they had done had breached
his rights under the law and that violations of Article 8 of the European Convention on
Human Rights had taken place, not to mention a number of other breaches and violations in
- In 1994 I acquired the leasehold and freehold rights to my residence,
a flat at the above address, following a divorce. I relied on a firm of solicitors for the
conveyance and the securities attached to the acquisition of the property through a
part-loan charge facility. The solicitors, who acted for me, never forwarded the
certificate for the rights to the freehold share of the block of flats and the land where
the complex is built. I assumed that the Freehold Share Certificate was kept as part of
the securities attached to the loan facility. In the circumstances I never enquired of the
solicitors as to the position regarding the said Share Certificate.
- In 1998 I had secured evidence to the effect that a number of
irregularities and issues attached and arose out of the handling of my affairs by the
solicitors who acted for me, in the divorce proceedings. There arose the need for a number
of applications to court and a consequential necessity to raise a loan in order to
consolidate my liabilities and assets. When I applied for the alternative loan facility, I
was informed that the Freehold Share Certificate was not held, as Security, by any of the
solicitors who were involved in the handling of the conveyance and the Loan charge
facility, in 1994. In the circumstances, after the solicitors failed to respond to my
enquiries and did not provide me with explanations as to where or who was holding the
certificate, I determined that there existed good reasons and causes for me to attend the
local Land Registry offices.
- On 7th February 2002, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, of the Human
Rights (NGO), and I, went to the Land Registry at Harrow. I explained to the staff that as
I was considering placing my property on the market I needed to know that there were no
other mortgage charges apart from the one that I had incurred as a result of the loan
facility in 1994. A search confirmed the aforesaid loan and charge, only. There was no
record, however, in respect of the Freehold Share Certificate with and for the attached
rights to the land and share of the complex and land property rights.
- On the way to the Land Registry Mr Andrew Yiannides had explained to
me of problems and obstructions he had faced, when he visited the Land Registry Records
Department near Plymouth, the previous year. Like me, he was seeking information and full
particulars in respect of two properties in London. He asked of the staff to check their
records for both properties and to provide full information and particulars in respect of
any charges on the properties.
- Mr Yiannides when applying for the information, and the
particulars he was seeking, clarified to the member of staff that he
had been told by the staff and officers at Plymouth, that they were not able to provide
full particulars because only the Local Land Registry offices keep comprehensive records.
When the member of staff returned, with the details on record at Harrow, Mr Yiannides
pointed out that the information was as incomplete as the information provided earlier by
the staff and officers at Plymouth. He clarified that the information, on record, in
respect of the property in North London, was simply as given by Plymouth. He also pointed
out, to the member of the staff that an alleged charge on the relevant property was dating
back to 1979 and that as far as he was aware, at no time had anyone notified him of such
an action and activity. He further clarified that as there had been a first charge by his
bankers it was incumbent upon the bank to inform him of any such action or activity for
and in respect of
Jesus Rosalia Baldwin Del Castillo
16 West End Court - Priory Road
London NW6 3NU
County of .....................................................................
This................................. day of
me................................................. Officer Authorised to take Affidavits
To the Court
To the Defendants / Respondents
To the Lord Chancellor’s Department
To Whom It May Concern
In the Matter of Land Registry Charges
|Readers and researchers should note that the deponent of the above
realities DELAYED ATTENDING TO THE REQUESTED AFFIDAVIT warranted after the discovery of
the inexcusable and unjustified charges pointed to the element of ORGANISED FRAUD INTENDED
FOUNDED ON FALSE INSTRUMENTS. (*F most important footnote)
In October 2010, the coalition's Attorney General, in an interview
published by 'COUNSEL' specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves
from cases of (small-fry) fraud and asserted that he was
making that element his department's priority. IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the
coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY, WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE
RAMPANT FRAUD. IF IT WILL DEAL APPROPRIATELY with the criminals who abuse public office,
especially when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that will be
delivered in due course. Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published
in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary
in 2003 [*Link from here to the article we reproduce in another webpage
and consider "Why tolerate the
arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers
that the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law"]. While there, above it, the explicit letter to
ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged
victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the
Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters
submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public
office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance.
It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly
in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among
such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions
by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of
alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us [*Link to our explicit submissions to (a) the Prime
Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) the Home Secretary. WE acted so after we had
secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only
interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD
THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were
intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew
Yiannides]. Access please the
letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998 [*Link*
[*L] from here to the letter] and note the results
evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching
its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the
job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do [*Link [*L] from here to the evidence we
point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who
were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS
crowd / mob].
ORGANISED CRIME, we point to the two most offending arrangements in place as created,
managed and promoted, USED by the criminals who are in control of the legal system and the
the courts in an allegedly civilised, pseudo-democracy. *Link ONE:
the provision by the protection racket fraudsters who parade themselves as allegedly
judicious persons, but 'sold to the naive and gullible 'serfs / shitizens' as 'judicial
persons' NOTE: for clarification use the links from the words that take you, the reader to
another page. *Link TWO: the arrogant provisions for the
constructive FRAUDS THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as organised by the legal
circles, the managers of the courts and as endorsed by the police and members of
Parliament who ARE OF A LEGAL PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND)
2. *Link from here to the provisions of Article 6 of the European
Convention on Human Rights and READ OF OBLIGATIONS, not just rights; obligations to
SOCIETY which ALL FRAUDSTERS CLUB RECRUITS WE NAME & EXPOSE CONTEMPTUOUSLY IGNORED
& IGNORE WHILE IN PURSUIT OF STOLEN TAXPAYERS CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE NATIONAL BUDGET as
convert-lovers to the system in place, the system devised by alleged servants of the
public and Parliament's Laws. *Link also from here to
the House of Lords case - dating back to 1940 - when their
Lordships deliberated on the issues of CONSPIRACY, DECEPTION, LIES and the implications
that arise as a result of maintaining silence..... as the
fraudsters-club-recruits agree & engage in because of their love for the stolen &
targeted funds for conversion to REWARDS TO PERSONS WHO AGREE (to the
conspiracy) TO KEEP THE TAXPAYERS IN THE DARK, about the rampant fraud
& corruption imposed through the abused court facilities we point to & expose in
3. Victims, readers
and researchers SHOULD ACCESS the FAX sent to the European Court of Human Rights on 24th
August 2003. The realities covered and pointed to the recipient in Strasbourg WARRANT THE
ESSENTIAL CONSIDERATIONS. As usual, the victim of the organised abuse of
the courts facilities in the course of family / divorce proceedings (in the United
Kingdom) received a communication (the usual dust in your eyes assertion
for promotion to the naive and the illiterates in law) which victims(!) (*fraudsters
club recruits*) brandish about as the usual 'end of the matter' waffle.
READ CAREFULLY THE CONTENT OF THE FAX, FRIENDS, NOTE THE CHALLENGES and consider
the simple fact that the documents submitted to Strasbourg >>> DESTINED FOR
DESTRUCTION <<< were rushed back to the victim in London. The victim
then simply handed ALL OF HER PAPERS to the person who settled the Application &
Submissions to Strasbourg and moved to Spain WITHOUT ANY MENTION OR CONSIDERATION /
commitment to proceed in the matter, as the challenges indicated in the FAX to Strasbourg.
ALL VICTIMS must access and read ALL OF THE MATERIAL in the exclusive and EXPLICIT PAGE
where Andrew Yiannides relates and EXPOSES the ORGANISED CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE
TAXPAYERS ONGOING THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES. RECOGNISE THEREAFTER WHY THE
VICTIM(!) SIMPLY PASSED ALL OF HER CASE PAPERS TO ANDREW YIANNIDES, the person who had
been instrumental in the extensive work WARRANTED FOR THE COURT PROCEEDINGS IN THE United
Kingdom. The EVIDENCE POINTED TO IN THE EXCLUSIVE PAGE EXPOSES THE ARROGANCE OF THE
CRIMINALS IN CONTROL OF THE LEGAL SYSTEM AND THE COURTS. Only morons and lovers of
the organised FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS (the use of taxpayers funds to 'secure' the
silence of the victims) could be excused for electing to ignore and SUPPRESS (fail to
point others to the arrangements covered and pointed to in the exclusive page) THE TERMS
OF OFFER to the victims.... 'confidential plundering of the funds secured through
TAX IMPOSITIONS on Mr & Mrs Average, in allegedly civilised pseudodemocracies! DEMOCRACY
where the sucker-serfs are kept in the dark??? [Access from here the FAX to the ECoHR, Strasbourg],
are urged to read first the article published in the London Evening Standard, as settled
by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003.(*Link).
While there read also, above it, the explicit letter to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP,
ex-Minister. It was delivered a few days earlier. Accessing the material pointed to from
the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the
citizen's rights at work', when called upon and used properly by the citizens, in any
truly democratic state. The above in 2003; there were other civilised and, within the law
'submissions'; among such approaches, by citizens to the government, other 'positive steps
were taken by the government. Access also, the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon.
Jack Straw, in December 1999 (*Link) and note the
results as evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal), also within days of the
letter reaching its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges (lovers and 'promoters of
the system as is', on the job for decades that Andrew knows of; all acting as sold souls
always do (*Links to reported activities and wilful defaults by such charlatans: *One, *Two, *Three,
*Four, *Five, *Six,
*Seven, & more).