h-rtitle.gif (7604 bytes)

Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note below the arrangements between the administrative, the judiciary and the media; read of the all-embracing guarantee in place, in contempt of all law : the root shall be pointed to.

WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read below:-

"The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State"

*Link from here to founder's tribulations in 1972-75 and marvel at the creativity of allegedly honourable officers of Justice and the Law in the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies

  • And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the affidavit which visitors can link to directly from here [*Link].
  • Link also from here to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts organised and processed to fruition while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of:-

'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy.

*Link from here to proof of the parts the police play in promotion and expansion of the criminal activities instigated, processed and imposed on society by the legal circles. Read of assertions by a typical hypocrite, none other than the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Robert Mark QPM, when he spoke of FALSE RECORDS / FORGERIES by the legal circles while delivering his famous Dimbleby Lecture on BBC-TV in November 1973, 15 months after he received true copy of THE FORGERY advanced and promoted by the licensed criminals : solicitors and barristers for their evil ends in the case that opened Andrew Yiannides' mental eyes to the realities of life in the United Kingdom, a typical PSEUDOdemocracy. Can anyone enlighten Andrew and the millions of victims of the legal circles WHY NO PROSECUTION of the solicitors & the barristers in 1972 or thereafter?.

  • With such a facility in place (the words we point to above) and arrogant abuse of public office, can anyone assert, or argue, that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts? (>Hence the c reation of www.jusaticeraped.org <)
  • ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm

*Link from here to the realities - in due course also a link to the warning (indirect but nonetheless very clear) for thinkers to recognise 

  • On 3rd March 2008 >someone's birthday< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other.
  • >>> IN THE MEANTIME we have been naming and shaming a number who know of and engage in much more than just approve wrongs imposed on Mr & Mrs Average, the millions of taxpayers, in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union created by politicians, without reference to the taxed for fraud sucker-serfs, allegedly for the benefit of the citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION, among other promotions.

Needless to say the case entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies.

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored and ignore all complaints and submissions by victims of the organised crimes we point to and expose in our pages, irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.

[*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions, covered in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' (>thinkers<) from animals.

Fraud in court  Council staff use Forgeries   Misconduct in Public Office. 2 cases relative to applicable law One Protocol says it ALL It betrays arrogant intentions Law Provides for THEFTS and it covers Judges too Judges' duties   TIME 4 CHANGE   & CHALLENGES Site CONTENTS - Table of Contents & ongoing work Your Rights & OBLIGATIONS to Society SITE SEARCH facility for any specific element / issue of concern to visitors / readers
COURTS : their Facilities Abused For ORGANISED CRIME : FRAUD Solicitor's Perjury & Victim Ignores it all Just like the Law Society always does Blackmailed or is it Just Conditioned & Subjugated Victims who join the club ? We name Lovers of blunt fraud through courts - Users of the facilities 4 illicit gains Local Authorities & FRAUD on 'serfs' the Taxpayers who are kept in the dark Police Party to & Endorsing Criminal Acts, Activities Arrogant Fraud FALSE Records & Contempt of Law by the legal Circles & Public Services The crafty ones & Vexatious Litigant PLOYS for the rewarded silent

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

family.uk-human-rights justiceraped.org dssfraud.htm confraud.htm dadscare.htm contract.htm converts.htm MensAid
solicitorsfromhell.co.uk chancellor.htm theyknow.htm solfraud.htm sheknows.htm 4deceit.htm convicti.htm forward.htm

December 2006 - SUMMONS ISSUED & SERVED IN RESPECT OF FRAUDULENT & RECKLESSLY IRRESPONSIBLE ACTIVITIES & IMPOSITIONS THROUGH THE FAMILY COURTS

*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

An explicit Affidavit [*L] plus exhibits and
     letters to a Chief Inspector of Police
[*L],
          one to solicitors
[*L] and another to the Lord Chancellor [*L] evince
               ORGANISED CRIMES
(Access and read the letter to the police in September 2006 [*L])

Access & read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister : * I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link from here to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister forwarded / delegated submissions and evidence received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister / Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES

3rd March 2011 added link [*L] to the BBC-TV Dimbleby Lecture in 1973 as the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Robert Mark prepared & presented to the sucker-serfs

...
evilones.htm           KEY  PageChanges18 Feb 2007

import.gif (1348 bytes)

HELP US TO HELP YOU
Please
(*Link to plea)
hrbnrsml.gif (1162 bytes)

JOIN others On Line and publish your Statement of Facts and the Evidence you have.

(MEMBER'S CASE at the European Court on Human Rights - paves the way.  PLEADED VIOLATIONS all victims of the abused legal system and the courts' facilities are familiar with. UNACCEPTABLE activities from within an allegedly civilised Democratic State pleaded and challenged. Victims do not know that IT IS ALL ORGANISED by the very circles who arrange all TRIBULATIONS  FOR THOUSANDS of years).

Use your rights in law [*Link to your rights] and ACT with others, against the offenders. Join them and chip in for the creation of the mass of evidence against abusers of public office : the abductors and rapists of Justice. You can then benefit from THE FACTS & THE EVIDENCE that you will help establish. It can all be used in any action, severally or jointly with others, as the case may be . Crimes against humanity are not ruled out when a large number of citizens can come up with evidence and as victims concur and or expand upon on the FACTS STATED & The VIOLATIONS PLEADED as LODGED at the ECoHR, already.

The image of this rushed out order EVINCES the fact that as soon as a victim used his rights to PUBLISH & EXPOSE the offending Public Servants who abused the facilities of the courts for Constructive Frauds and CONVERSION OF ASSETS & PROPERTIES TO THE LEGAL CIRCLES. wsfltarr.jpg (65011 bytes) Visitors / researchers NOTE: The victim after setting up a home page, as a member of the Community on Line simply sent out a press release about his *crookjudges* Web Site. Without any application, by the victim (so he informed Mr Yiannides) A MIRACLE : he received  the above Court Order. It was rushed out to him, granting him permission for LEAVE TO APPEAL. DO NOTE, please, the date at the right hand corner, bottom of the document. LOOK also at the date when date stamped. It is obvious that the hand written order WAS RUSHED OUT first thing in the morning before changing the date in the rubber stamp. A Miracle 20th century style, we are sure all will agree, and there exist plenty of charlatans & stooges who are running around 'selling and promoting the practices as maintenance engineers who INFLUENCE SHYSTERS and or INVITE lovers of fraud to indulge with them in the very same practices we cover in the exclusive page that NONE OF THE ALLEGED VICTIMS who contacted us over the last 13 years addressed, for obvious reasons to us. (*Link to the exclusive page where we expose the blunt & arrogant CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES) 

Key TO PAGE ELEMENTS
INTRODUCTION to page
Letter/FAX to an EVIL ONE
Letter to a COURT MANAGER
Letter to HOME SECRETARY
FALSE INSTRUMENTS
Case STRUCK OUT 
Contempt to EVIDENCE 
Contempt to LAW 
FORGERIES USED
Need to APPEAL - FRAUD
OBSTRUCTING Examination
Processes Posted LATE

Cases/Sites by Element
Contempt to Evidence
Haringey Police - H/B Fraud
V. B. Fodden - Mortgage
V. B. Fodden - Divorce
V. B. Fodden - Solicitor Case
Contempt to Law
Enfield Council - C.Court
Hackney Council - C.Court
Haringey Council - C.Court
Haringey Police - H/B Fraud
Len Miskulin - Family Court
V. B. Fodden - Mortgage
False Instruments
Len Miskulin - Divorce
P. Constantinou - Divorce
Forgery Used
V. B. Fodden - Financial
Haringey Council-H/B Fraud
PERJURY - Used
V.B. Fodden-Solicitor Case
Obstruct - Examination
P. Constantinou - Divorce
Obstructing Justice
Crown Prosecution Service
Court of Appeal - R.B.Del C
part 3     
Strike Out
Helen Patey - Assertions
Divorce Frauds Challenged
V. B. Fodden - Plymouth
part 4     

We can introduce in our pages to any  web-sites or pages where citizens ARE STATING FACTS & PUBLISHING ANY EVIDENCE in respect of abuse of office by any public servants. We point out that in the case of the evil ones we expose here and in  other pages ASSETS & PROPERTIES WERE TARGETED for conversion to alleged legal costs.

Victims / webmasters who would like us to include links to their pages should contact us by e-mail.
LETTERS TO: -

1. The Home Secretary, David Blunkett M.P. on 18th April 2002. [*Link]
2. Plymouth County Court Manager on 11th Februa xxx  
3. The Prime Minister on 8th Dec. 1999. [*Link
4. The Home Secretary, Jack Straw Q.C, on 18th Dec. 1998 [*Link

 

LETTERS FROM: -

1. Police Complaints Secretary Authority. [*Link]
2. The Prime Minister's Private Office - 29th Nov. 1999 [*Link
3. Ply

...

 

 

 

 

One of The EVIL ONES - a fraudster club recruit, one too many   *Page created in July 2002*
Page RELEASED FOR GENERAL ACCESS in December 2005
undercon.gif (286 bytes) Site under reconstruction with ongoing additions to pages and new links to existing pages or new pages
*Page Revised: June 20, 2012*

VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY. Our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. 

Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.  The first step for visitors to acquaint  themselves with the extensive material should be to use the SEARCH FOR facility. Just type in any word or combination of words / issues that are of concern / interest - need information and our views about. Remember that our views rest on factual experiences and research with evidence in support. We urge visitors and in particular victimyiandrewAndrew Yianidescrimesinjs of the legal circles and the Law Enforcement Agencies to access the introduction page to the Community on Line [*Link].

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

We repeat, in this page also, the words of the Prime Minister to our representatives in the House of Commons on his return to the United Kingdom from the Summit of the leaders of the European Union, in June 2005. The Rt. Hon. Tony Blair specifically referred to the concerns of the citizens. Among other issues was the matter of ORGANISED CRIME and his statement included:

"The United Kingdom, will work to resolve the impasse on the EU budget". He also defended his decision to reject a compromise deal at a Summit meeting the previous week. He spoke of and reiterated, to Parliament, his belief that: "The European Common Agricultural Policy and the United Kingdom's rebate should be reviewed together".

He carried on: "This rebate must be examined. This crisis is not about the failure of Europe's leaders to reach agreement, with each other. The crisis is about that of Europe's Leaders to reach agreement with the people of Europe on issues that concern them; economically and socially; and they want answers to the challenges they face. They worry about globalisation and organised crime, and they do not, at present, see Europe giving a credible response. If we answer these concerns Europe will strengthen and we need a strong Europe to bolster the strength of individual nations. It is those who believe in Europe most who should be 'the most ardent advocates at changing it'. The European budget shouldn't be separate from that debate but part of it, and it is that debate which we will look forward to, in our presidency".

When answering a question on the issue of the Constitution, he said that: "It could not proceed after the recent rejections in the French and Dutch referendums". The UK taking over the Presidency of the European Union on 1st July 2005.

Putting it ON RECORD
vbfgorfr.jpg (133957 bytes)
The EXPLICIT FAX covers enough realities.
The researcher / reader should note the realities, the factual events and the actions taken whenever important elements arose in connection with the fraudster's parts in the CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS she was party to.

Mrs. V. B. Foden was more than a willing playmate; she proved to have been AN ACCOMPLISHED FRAUDSTERS CLUB RECRUIT. She, was NOT SIMPLY WORKING WITH & FOR OTHERS IN JOINT THEFTS OF PUBLIC FUNDS - as organised & arranged by the criminals who have been and ARE IN CONTROL of the courts, the Legal System, the Legal Services & Local Authorities / Local Government.

She never failed to 'impress' with her assertions (never anywhere in writing or by way of proper actions taken / recorded by her) in relation to the parts THE POLICE PLAYED IN THE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS INDUSTRY VIA ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES. The FAX, below, RECORDED IT ALL.

Below the text of the above letter / Fax in HTML format for links to and from

MESSAGE

Dear Beryl

I transmit copy of a page covering TWO PARAGRAPHS from the submissions I am preparing for the Prime Minister. THE CONTENT IS VERY CLEAR, and to the point.

I transmit also copy of my letter of today's date to the Court Manager at Plymouth Combined Courts, which is in response to the letter dated 4th February, copy of which you received. The content of my present letter to the court needs no clarification. I expect that you will ensure the copy of the order (November 2000) that sprung out of the conjurers hat will be made available to the Court Manager, as a matter of priority, in order to establish the fact that evidence exists covering the disputed issues.

I turn to the developments that you reported to me, in particular to the interest the police have shown in the matters arising out of the constructively engineered frauds through abuse of the courts facilities. The USE OF A BLUNT FORGERY that gave birth to many false instruments in the marathon run of the court cases you were/are involved in, having been ignored for far too long SHOULD BE ATTENDED TO without further prevarication and lame duck excuses, by anybody. The sudden change of heart, by the local police, is most interesting. When one considers the fact that you were told to leave the police station, without any statements taken by the police, at the time when you attended the police station escorted by Mr Ray Rees, can only cause bewilderment. You went to report the serious crimes you have been subjected to, and you were ignored as in the past. One can only consider the facts as of the attempts that were challenged by me following the rushing of the file / case to three judges at Strasbourg, which matters you reported to my sister, from whom a statement of fact can be secured.

The additional interest from and by Bryan, who, you say, volunteered out of the blue to assist you with your statement to the police(!) is another intriguing development. Persons, who have been negative in the need to challenge openly the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts, suddenly indicate interest! They have contributed and are contributing nothing towards the warranted exposures and no material evidence on and about the allegations/assertions they have been making, in their own cases! The situation calls for alertness and clarification other than your own:- "Presumably he wants to ride the tide/changes that I created". You should try to, and convince them both that they should join in with the exposures of any evidence they have, in order to help others and themselves at the same time.

The two paragraphs from the extensive submissions to be sent to the Prime Minister clarify and qualify much, as of the time when I was caused to challenge the obvious, which the paragraphs cover.

Sincerely

Andrew Yiannides NDD., ACFI., ATI.
human-rights (Registered in the USA)

[Link from here to a page where we expose the above actress for her parts in the constructive frauds industry through abuse of the courts facilities. We publish the evidence establishing more than just her parts. Included in the page, evidence that the local constabulary eventually recognised and reported the fact that she had been the victim of falsification of a mortgage contract. However, typical of CIUKU Enterprises management policies, the police did absolutely nothing, with the exemption that an investigating officer did submit a Section 9 Statement, which we publish in the page. The defaults by the police, in that instance, reminiscent of the failures by the police who failed to bring about the prosecution of solicitors and barristers who indulged in the procurement and or simply the promotion of a blunt FORGERY in the course of High Court proceedings, resting and founded on fraudulent misrepresentations and COMMERCIAL FRAUD. The High Court action opened the mental eyes of Mr. Andrew Yiannides, the founder of Human-Rights.Org, back in 1972-1978. The scenarios in which Mrs Veronica Beryl Foden engaged, reminiscent also of the activities and the scenarios when the police in Haringey failed to prosecute the criminals who were engaging in arrogant misappropriation and theft of Housing Benefit funds FROM TARGETED PRIVATE LANDLORDS & THE STATE, TOO, through creative accountancy practices. Readers should refer to Andrew's explicit letter to the Fraud Section at the Department for Social Security. [*Link from here to the page where we publish also the explicit letter to the Home Secretary that caused the government to act in December 1998]. The endemic / systematic abuse of the courts' facilities for theft and misappropriation of Housing Benefit funds we cover in a number of cases, such as the case that brought about the announcement for introduction of the Bill of Rights, in 1997, consequential to challenges, in pleadings, lodged at a county Court through a WARRANTED APPEAL consequential to typical abuse of judicial chair occupation by persons who misconduct in public office].

The letter below, to the Court Manager, from the founder of human-rights.org (UK based NGO) was called for
References to the FAX the evil one received.
vbfltcmrr.jpg (99786 bytes)
  • On the left image of copy of the letter from ANDREW YIANNIDES NDD., ACFI., ATI.
  • The founder of the NGO * human-rights.org * (UK based Non Governmental Organisation) had been targeted one's too often by stooges and sold to the system, as is, morons.
  • His time and goodwill had been abused for far too long by the evil one who failed to act as the conditions put to her for the assistance she had been benefiting from.
  • Her parts for the creation of theatrical productions, she was misrepresenting as genuine applications and hearings, 'solely for the beneficial interests of the actors' care of the costs awards leading to the charges on the properties targeted for conversion to the benefit of the abusers of the courts facilities and the legal system in general had gone too far.  
  • The creation of a FALSE & UNDISCLOSED instrument that referred to Mr Yiannides, as the Master of Ceremonies (the director of the shows sitting at Plymouth County Court) was MOST OFFENSIVE and recklessly breached the provisions of DATA Protection Act(s)

11th February 2002

The Court Manager
Plymouth County Court
The Law Courts
Armada Way - Plymouth
PL1 2ER

 
OPEN LETTER (Proof of posting secured - kindly respond by return)

My Ref. 11 FeCFTC
Your Ref. 97F00172

Dear Sir / Madam

Re: V. B. Foden -v- Wolferstans

I acknowledge the letter dated 4th instant. The content has been noted and presently is being referred to Mrs. Foden.

Mrs. Foden submitted to me, by fax, on Sunday 2nd instant, another court order, that had not been referred to me in the past. Kindly ensure that you contact her and seek a copy of the document yourselves. I am to post, and transmit by fax to you this communication, and the copies referred to herein. I am most concerned at ‘the discrepancies and the ever changing scenarios’ since Mrs. Foden contacted human-rights and my person, in October 1999.

An explicit page covering the assertions promoted through an affidavit, that Mr. Mark Barley filed at court last July (2001), copy of which was handed to me on 24th January by Mrs. Foden, has been prepared for release to the media and for publication on the Internet. The obvious is being challenged therein and it will also be referred to the police who, I understand have now expressed the wish to interview her about the serious issues, so far, brushed under the carpets.

Copies of other material already published by, and at, human-rights are being referred to the Prime Minister whose office, through the Parliamentary Spokes Person On Legal Affairs, acknowledged, in a letter to me in 1995, the ‘fraud in the legal system’ situation. As a law-abiding citizen, I strongly object to the activities that I was made aware of last month. The activities I observed thus far amount to constructive frauds on the budget through ‘the compensation culture’ that has been a feature of the system as operated through the legal circles via blunt abuse of the legal system and crude criminal acts, such as the FORGERY ignored as if non-existent.

Sincerely

Andrew Yiannides

ENCL. As text

11FeCFTC
Page 1 of 1

...

The right to reply and to justify behaviour and activities we cover in our pages, is assured to any one named. We will publish excuses & whatever is submitted to us. Legal argument that shall arise out of their submissions will be used as we apply ourselves to relevant issues in the cases they referred to us & we will cover their acts and all their defaults .

  • This page is dedicated to all abusers of our time and in particular to two evil mongering fraudsters, Mrs Veronica Beryl Foden and Mrs Helen Patey.
  • Both contacted us as 'victims' who were faced with very serious problems.
  • The former complained that she had been subjected to the most horrendous of violations and obstructions to her rights. The most contemptuous of fraudulent activities, in the courts, were noted upon inspection of her files.
  • She needed Andrew's assistance to challenge it all, all the way to the ECoHR (Strasbourg) and she declared her intentions to expose it all with our assistance, as a human-rights.org Community in Line member.
  • However, it was not long before her actions and convenient defaults, established that she was part of a scam. She HAD BEEN a participating fraudster in all that she was complaining of and about.
  • She even engaged in criminally motivated activities that were intended to cause damages to Mr Andrew Yiannides, whom she was sent along to mess about with.
  • The other, Mrs H Patey, was sent along by persons who operate as 'lovers of the system as is'; all excel in the subliminal indoctrination, of 'victims they contact' with their relentless complaints and references to their allegations about the Free Masons.
Below image of a letter from the Metropolitan Police Committee with the usual waffle from alleged servants of the public and the law.
metcom0r.jpg (42989 bytes)
  • Nothing but  promotion of the reckless mentality of and by officers of the law.
  • One and all persistently negating in the execution of their public duties and acting in contempt of the laws they were retained to apply themselves to.
  • In so far as we were aware, the author of the letter, Mr Carl Robinson was / is familiar with the law, otherwise his appointment to the position he was / is holding, as an alleged Servant(?) of the Public(!) is highly suspect.
  • When we sent the letter of 11th April 2002 to the Home Secretary we telephoned the number and recommended that the chairman of the MPC should download, duly complete the CHALLENGE form for publication in our pages along with the letter on the left. [*Link to the explicit form intended for completion by all who act in contempt of the evidence submitted to them].
  • WE ARE STILL WAITING!
  •  
  •  

Above the visitor, reader, researcher reads of CRIME, ORGANISED as spoken of by the Prime Minister in the House of Commons in June 2005. Ten years earlier he was addressing the issue of ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH THE COURTS care of the abductors and rapists of Justice - Themis, the Greek Goddess representing the PRINCIPLES OF MORAL CODE & THE SPIRIT OF FAIRNESS / JUSTICE.

In 1992 Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights (NGO) successfully challenged  many fraudulent activities of and by Public(!) Servants(?), alleged officers of the Law [*Link to full particulars briefly stated and an explicit appeal that caused one and all to abandon their plans for Mr Andrew Yiannides who founded *human-rights* (NGO)]. Ever since many the fraudsters club recruits who were sent along to mess with Mr. A Yiannides' rights and OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE LAW to tell / report it all, as it is.. Many the lovers of the system, as is, who came along as agents of the criminals who are in control of the Justice & Police in our country. All acting as instructed and used by others in order to create conditions and scenarios through which to discredit, if successful, the target of many, the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides.

In 1995, after two legally trained politicians HAD ACKNOWLEDGED THE ELEMENT OF FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM, in a letter sent to Mr Andrew Yiannides, the agents, the stooges and the charlatans increased in frequency and number but not because of 'The CAMILA PROJECT' work. Furthermore, it could not have been because of the work for human-rights, because, although the work and plans were in place as of 1992, it was not until 1997 that the plans were translated into actions.

The fact that in 1992 Andrew was contacted by the leaders of the LIPS (Litigants In Person Society) was and remained most significant. Neither the leaders Mr Peter Hayward & Mrs Philomena Cullen, nor any of the guided/used members, EVER ACTED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD ESTABLISH HONOURABLE INTENTIONS on their part in the problem area in which both, and the recorded membership, professed knowledge and concerns ONLY IN PRIVATE. The ONLY activities in which all were noted to be pro-active was for to aim and be seen to dancing cheek to cheek with the abductors and rapists of Justice in the halls all dare refer to as courts of justice. All were noted to be cashing in & using the the needs of victims of the legal circles and the courts THEY WERE POINTED TO OR INTRODUCED by others who were / are party of the rings of 'fraudsters club recruits'* [*Link to the foundations for the term].  THE VICTIMS OF THE LEGAL CIRCLES & THE COURTS FOR & THROUGH THE CASH UNDER THE TABLE SCENARIOS. [*Link to list of typical example cases and actors who  ]

Among the many, who were sent along to mess around and attempt their evil ways with the WORK FOR HUMAN RIGHTS, was the person who merited from the granting of an order in the context which researchers, readers, visitors, to these pages can read in the left margin / window. (*Link to the image).

Persons of the mentality and attitudes of such persons, all of whom were noted to have been acting on instructions from those who were holding them to ransom and or acting as their string pullers were commanding, ESTABLISHED THEIR EVIL WAYS, EARLY ON. In fact, the recipient of the order in the left margin, exhibited how naive he was on the very first day in the course of an arranged meeting after 'a theatrical production at the Royal Courts of Justice'; on that day another charlatan and fraudsters club recruit was, for good reasons, 'declared a vexatious litigant', a Section 42 protection racket beneficiary.

The stooge and fraudster exposed in this page was just one of the many who was sent along as another alleged victim of the legal circles and the courts. SHE, Mrs. Veronica Beryl Fodden, was provided with copy of an explicit Court of Appeal case that related to the type of theatrical production that Mr A Yiannides was invited to watch at the RCJ, on instructions BY THE MASTER OF CEREMONIES behind Mrs. Philomena Cullen (one of such Masters). None other than Mr Peter Hayward who instructed one Mr.William Spring to telephone Mr Andrew Yiannides with the news about the venue at the RCJ.

We request of readers to consider the simple issue that it is immaterial if the persons we expose were acting as blackmailed stooges or as greedy fraudsters. What was and remains most relevant and important is the fact that THEY ALL KNEW that they were acting as fraudsters. The other aspect that none of them can run away from, happens to be the fact that were all acting as greedy ego-centric idiots, all of whom were FULLY AWARE THAT THEY WERE TO BE REWARDED FOR THEIR PARTS FROM STOLEN CASH, as arranged by the criminals who are in control of thoroughly corrupted court and legal services.

  • In the left margin / window we publish and release an explicit Court Order; we also state how it came about, miraculously.
  • The 'beneficiary', thereafter, failed to take any steps that could be looked upon by 'thinkers' (any 'human', not indoctrinated zombie or moron) as steps intended to build upon the obvious:
  • The abusers of public office, are aware of the fact that 'the bubble is bursting' and, 'their criminal activities are no longer subject to 'the protection racket managed by the fraudsters who control the media'.
  • We include the Intellectual Prostitutes whom the controllers of the media retain simply to promote the RECKLESS plans of the abductors and rapists of Justice.
  • Needless to say the very media circles are seen to be operating as the abductors and rapists of Democracy, yet they have for decades been trumpeting much ado about the allegedly civilised states of Democratic governance that allegedly rest and are founded on principles of law and order.
  • The 'beneficiary' of the order we publish above, for years 'miraculously defaulted to act as the occasion commanded' of a victim(?) of the legal circles.
  • Somehow the beneficiary entertained notions that the work for human-rights, by Mr Andrew Yiannides could have been railroaded and hijacked by arrogant *fraudsters club recruits* and 'lovers / promoters / maintenance engineers of 'the arrangements in place FOR CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ON THE TAXPAYERS'.
  • Visitors / readers should access the page where we publish evidence PRESS RELEASES by the government whereby the rewards for playing the field and the 'compensation culture runs into BILLIONS ANNUALLY.
In April 2002, Mr Andrew Yiannides NDD., ACFI., ATI., FNAAAS
Founder of the human-rights.org (UK based Non Governmental Organisation) wrote of the facts of life in an allegedly civilised, pseudo-democracy. (The aforesaid with compliments to the Intellectual Prostitutes who are serving their masters, the media barons).

18th April 2002
The Rt. Hon. David Blunkett
Home Secretary
Home Office
50 Queen Anne’s Gate
London - SW1H 9AT

My Ref.: 18APSHSOC

OPEN LETTER

 

Dear Home Secretary

Re: Protection from Crime - Organised Institutionalised Fraud & Corruption

I attach hereto:

  1. True copy of a page from a transcript pertaining to a hearing before the Court of Appeal. Your staff will duly inform you that their Lordships were:
    1. dealing with and
    2. actually taking part in arrogant perversion of justice through:
    3. misconduct in public office by:
    4. endorsing and promoting the fraudulent activities of solicitors and barristers.
    5. Collectively they set out to pervert and corrupt justice by:
    6. introducing and using a forgery in order:
    7. to deny justice to a targeted citizen.
    8. And the police for over three years doing nothing about the forgery.
  2. True copy of a letter dated 3rd July 1995, which I received from the Rt. Hon Paul Boateng as Parliamentary Spokesperson on Legal Affairs for the Opposition.
    1. I received the letter following:
    2. submissions by me to the Rt. Hon. Tony Blair on:
    3. other issues that arose in the course of:
    4. fraudulent court proceedings / activities.
    5. Particulars of the criminal activities
    6. prior to, at and through the courts:
    7. have since been published on the Internet.
    8. All arose out of:
    9. receiving moneys under false pretences,
    10. securing moneys through deceptions and:
    11. through fraudulent misrepresentations,
    12. making demands with menaces and
    13. threats to life and property,
    14. criminal damages to property
    15. physical assault on the person.
    16. And the police:
    17. indifferent and inactive
    18. but party to the constructive frauds
    19. as in the Court of Appeal scenarios, above. (1.8)
  3. True copy of a communication intended for the press in our country. The invitation to the press, prior to and for publication of the facts arising out of two 'constructive frauds scenarios leading to the compensation (under the table) scenarios that are organised and executed by the legal circles.
    1. The judges in the director's chair.
    2. Solicitors, barristers and (in one of the two cases) the alleged victim, actors.
    3. The police in the first case/scenario godfather/protectors as in 1.8 above.

In the first case the police, for years, protecting the criminals through blunt defaults and omissions. Recklessly failing to prosecute criminals who were using a forgery while the judges secure and free to chose to ignore the forgery, just like the police. The judges thereafter issuing their own false instruments because the consequential rulings, were entered in contempt of the law and lacked/lack accountability due to the fact that the forgery was not taken into account by the judge/judges in their deliberations and judgements.

Result: theft of properties and conversion of assets through blunt contempt of the law with no protection from the police who ignored and carried on ignoring the forgery for years. The 'victim in that instance' failing to act as deemed essential but working through blunt defaults and eventually caught co-operating in 'scenarios leading only to the intended and worked for compensation under the table'.

In the second case/scenario the protection racket initiated by a judge. He elected to ignore his own finding and, as a split personality, issued a false instrument that other public servants, within the courts and court service, did their best to suppress through contempt of the evidence. I hasten to qualify: 'the judge, in that instance, after concluding at the end of a preliminary hearing that a solicitor had imposed on the client an alleged consent agreement, nevertheless proceeded to issue/endorse an order asserting there was no undue influence by the very solicitor on the client! In this second case/scenarios 'the invisible services' by and from the judge. Evidently our judges having determined decades, may be centuries, ago the solicitors should be protected species and that the Solicitors Indemnity Fund must also be protected from the foul and criminal in intent activities of the solicitors.

Result: The compensation under the table as imposed by judges and as organised by and through the courts, care of the protectors/godfathers.

The persons making good the damages: the tax revenue providers.

The cost: billions annually and the public kept in the dark care of the explicit provisions pointed to in the *human-rights* (NGO) web-pages as published now (*1)

Last year the public benefited from a show case trial. I refer to the trial of Lord Jeffrey Archer. The grounds for that prosecution: the use of a false instrument through which perversion of justice. The public and the media, accepting that in that instance, the 'administrators of justice' were not aware of the fact that a false instrument was used with criminal intent. Apparently, it took a conscientious citizen some time to report the criminal act that led to a miscarriage of justice. The report leading to the police and other law enforcing agents to act as their public duty commanded and as the law provides.

For years I have engaged in research and investigations covering the abuse of the legal system and the rampant constructive frauds at the expense of citizens and state funds by: -

  1. solicitors
  2. barristers
  3. judges
  4. court staff and
  5. collaborating citizens

All the while the police in the role of godfather / protectors.

Over the previous three years I have had the opportunity to study more than enough activities and scenarios as observer and witness to the practices. The productions are succinctly covered in the explicit web-page where the cornerstone of how and why the perpetuation of the activities within the courts and the compensation culture as developed and executed through the courts by the users, managers and administrators of the legal system and the police.

Sir, the demeaning proclamations from a member of the police who are assured protection from prosecution, when they turn a blind eye, can and are being challenged through this communication and my submissions. I can assure you that there exist many citizens, who, unlike he, are not blind to the realities of life within our Law Enforcement Agencies, as I discovered over 30 years ago. The facts stated above and below should be referred to the ostrich who spoke audaciously, as a challenge for the individual to justify the 'protection rackets he knows of and the constructive frauds that cost the nation billions annually through the compensation culture productions at and through the courts'.

The facts and the evidence will be published either by the press or on the Internet. The arrogant police officer and his colleagues can carry on turning a blind eye if they so choose. In the meantime the international community shall determine where persons of his calibre place our country and if we can claim to be an allegedly civilised and democratic state that allegedly is founded and rests on sound principles of law and order.

In a recent letter to 'the victim who was caught co-operating with the villains who are in control of the legal system' I had no option but to qualify my concerns:

"As far as I am concerned of such facts the international community will be learning and reading about on the Internet. Any confidential arrangements you may enter into with any party or parties, IF you are seen to legitimately qualify for benefit under Article 38, is not binding on me. I regard THE DUTY OF CITIZENS TO REPORT CRIME TO THE AUTHORITIES, to be sacrosanct and inalienable in any democracy founded and resting on LAW & ORDER. I made myself clear from the onset and you ought never to indulge in the cat and mouse games you embarked upon like others."

And:

"What the police and ministers do can and will be available to and for the World to marvel at. The realities from within our country, as created and promoted by citizens who get trained in the new art of morals and new law, should be made public for you to be proud of your part in the creation of a society with such morals".

Sir the activities of the legal circles and the maligned defaults and omissions by the police as of 'the initiation lesson' and the case that led to the Court of Appeal directors proving their part in the new morals and new law cannot be ignored (*2). Recent discoveries will be made public because of the organised and institutionalised fraud and corruption that other public servants and public bodies exposed through their part in generating fraudulent income WITH and for the legal circles and their partners in crime, judges and the police. Much more, including organised break up of families is in the order of the day. Breaking up families in order to get to the assets of the persons the criminals target is part of the scenarios the scriptwriters indulge in through undisclosed to the victims, arrangements, which the criminals and their collaborators / partners in organised crime conceal for years (*3).

Evidence exists covering the creation of false instruments the criminals introduce and use, by themselves or through their accomplices. False instruments and records used specifically for the break up of families. Precisely as in the case of 'the victim who was caught collaborating in the constructive fraud on the budget funds. I refer to the 'arrangements for compensation under the table' because of the theft of assets and properties by the legal circles and the managers - administrators of the legal system, care of the protection rackets the godfathers in the police manage and control.

Andrew Yiannides NDD., ACFI., ATI.
Founder of the *human-rights* (NGO)
Creators of the Community on Line

(*1) http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/confraud.htm (Note URL links to new website)
(*2) http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/yourrights.htm (Note URL links to new website)
(*3) http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/corruptcourts.htm (Note URL links to new website)

ENCL. As text

Victims, Readers & Researchers after reading the above letter should access the letter to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, ex-Minister. It was sent soon after the above letter to the Home Secretary. All should recognise why an explicit article by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, the Home Secretary was published by the London Evening Standard soon after the letter to the Member of Parliament reached its destination. [*Link to letter to MP, *Link to letters to the Prime Minister 3 years earlier]  

In this page we are to cover, as we go along, some of the most common elements that 'the serfs' are faced with, when they seek justice in pseudo-democracies.

We point to relevant practices that are intended, most definitely, to obstruct justice and to deny rights which, to all intents and purposes are assured in law and through International Treaties & Accords.

However, no diligent reader / researcher or victim of abuse of Public Office can overlook the arrangements in place [*L]. Such 'elements' as the one attached to the undisclosed 'provisions by judicial chair occupants' happen to be in contempt of all law. Thereby the criminals who ARE in control establish the fallacy of the promotions about alleged Democratic governance and alleged rule of law & order, as sold to the otherwise indoctrinated and misled citizens by the Hypocrites and Sycophants who ARE in control in all pseudo-democracies.

Listed below some typical examples attached to and arising out of blunt activities that are intended, by the reckless Organisers and Managers of 'Crimes Incorporated United Kingdom Unlimited - (CIUKU) Enterprises', to defraud and cause damages to the citizens:

  • Hearings behind closed doors in breach of Article 6 [*L] of the European Convention and the most fundamental of principles clearly stipulating that JUSTICE SHOULD BE SEEN TO BE DONE IN OPEN COURTS.

  • Issuing court Orders and delivering judgements in contempt of the evidence [*L] presented to and argued before abusers of public office who purport to be acting as judicious [*L] persons while in occupation of judicial [*L] chairs. (Seen to be relying on charlatans [*L] and illiterates, other Public Servants, to promote the type of waffle you can link to from here).

  • Judicial chair occupants acting in contempt of the law applicable [*L] to the evidence and the issues / matters / events presented to and argued before them.

  • Judicial chair occupants, acting in breach of their Judicial Oaths [*L] through contempt of the law applicable to the evidence presented to them.

  • Judicial chair occupants entertaining all manner of unsupported assertions and allegations. More often that not they obstruct the other side, in the matters litigated before them. The citizens who ARE thus targeted, for any number of reasons, ARE DENIED THE RIGHT TO CHALLENGE THE ASSERTIONS / LIES / FALSE EVIDENCE, and such 'abuse of judicial chair occupancy' happens to be in contempt of the right to fair hearings and another fundamental principle [*L], that of 'due process'.

  • Judicial chair occupants Striking Out actions [*L] and cases, properly and legitimately instigated, WITHOUT JUSTIFIABLE CAUSE OR REASONING in support of such abuse of office [*L].

  • Judicial chair occupants, entering wrong judgements by denying due process to applicants, thereby setting the wheels in motion for 'need to appeal [*L]' their reckless attitude to the citizens who thereat have imposed upon them the necessity to appeal while in search of 'abducted justice'.

  • Court office staff deliberately delaying the issue and or posting [*L] of court orders, even posting such to wrong addresses [*L] WITH INTENT, thereby introducing the most common of frauds, by the legal circles, on 'the serfs' who are thus put on the road to the most common of 'obstructions and perversion of justice', the 'need for leave to appeal out of time'.

  • Delaying with intent - Obstructing execution and delivery [*L] of Transcripts [*L] especially of misconducted court hearings(!), proceedings before judicial chair occupants who act in breach of judicial oaths, and in contempt of the evidence and the law. (NOTE: We will release evidence in respect of an invitation to court whereby the alleged hearing was for an application to impose on the victims allegedly legitimate legal costs, attached to and arising out of fraudulent court proceedings. The victims appeared to be hell bent on following through with the constructive frauds in contempt of the law and all ready to act as many of the lovers of the system who were introduced to us by *the usual fraudsters club recruits* and *the maintenance engineers* who are running around *promoting the system as is* and NOT CHALLENGING OR EXPOSING THE CRIMINAL IN INTENT ACTIVITIES, APPROPRIATELY).

  • Officers of the Court (solicitors are), clerical staff and 'process servers', employed/retained by the courts, making false statements [*L] as to their parts in the processing and execution of the business of the courts.

You read, in our pages, of the 'arrangements in place for the constructive frauds on the 'serfs', through the provisions of Article 38 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Consider, therefore, why there exist among those who

  • visit the newsgroups,
  • blow their trumpets about 'the system',
  • proclaim their disaffection and
  • 'disgust at the practices' in the courts,
  • assert personal knowledge and experiences,
  • YET FAILED AND OR FAIL TO PUBLISH ANY EVIDENCE
  • in ANY WEB-SITE, through which to
  • inform and prove to
  • Mr and Mrs Average of that which they profess knowledge of!!!
  • WHO BUT THE REAL SHYSTERS, are party to the above fraud on YOU, Mr and Mrs Average?

Go To: http://www.uk-human-rights.org/comonlin.htm and consider stating the facts of your own experiences in a personal web-site / web-pages. Join with others and work together in exposing and challenging all offending Public(!) Servants(?) who misconduct in public office.

JOIN the COMMUNITY ON LINE if you have been cheated out of your rights, by the legal circles and or were denied protection, under the law, by the police.

If you have the evidence against the offenders, you can publish it in your personal web-site as your rights in law provide. Be not fooled by planted mischief-makers and read of the directives from THE authority (Link)

Every citizen is duty bound to report crime and if the police ignored or ignore you, USE YOUR RIGHTS, EXPOSE THE OFFENDERS who ignore the law.

Visit the Stephen Lawrence page (Link) and note how Parliament provided for your rights. Yet, our Law Enforcement Agencies simply ignore such provisions, and act as contemptuous of your rights as a member of the *human-rights.org * Community On Line * has pleaded and lodged at the European Court on Human Rights. Through defaults and omissions, the police / authorities fail (Link) to protect you and in fact they actually torment and torture you, the victims.

READ OF SUCH PROVISIONS and exercise your rights!  Challenge and EXPOSE THE VILE OFFENDERS, who endorse and promote crime through defaults and omissions in the purported exercise of their public duties, AS YOUR SERVANTS.

Remember:

"Do for, by and with yourself that which satisfies you so long as that which you do does not infringe upon and or violates the rights of any other". © AY 1972

BE GUIDED BY AUTHORITIES WHO DEFINED YOUR RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS AS DERIVED FROM AND DEFINED AS : "THE CONVENTION IN LEGAL TERMS".

The development of and FOR THE RIGHTS OF CITIZENS, in modern times begun with the Magna Carta, in Europe. Below, in as simple as can be defined, the principles of rights and freedoms, clarified by Mark Janis, (fellow) Richard Kay (professor) and Anthony Bradley (professor).

  • 1. Men are born and remain free and equal in rights; social distinctions may be based only upon general usefulness.
  • 2. The aim of every political association is the preservation of the natural and inalienable rights of man; these rights are liberty, property, security, and resistance to oppression.
  • 3. The source of all sovereignty resides essentially in the nation; no group, no individual may exercise authority not emanating expressly therefrom.
  • 4. Liberty consists of the power to do whatever is not injurious to others; thus the enjoyment of the natural rights of every man has for its limits only those that assure other members of society the enjoyment of those same rights; such limits may be determined only by law.
  • 5. The law has the right to forbid only actions which are injurious to society. Whatever is not forbidden by law, may not be prevented, and no one may be constrained to do what it does not prescribe.
  • 6. Law is the expression of the general will; all citizens have the right to concur personally, or through their representatives, in its formation; it must be the same for all, whether it protects or punishes. All citizens, being equal before it, are equally admissible to all public offices, positions, and employment, according to their capacity, and without other distinction than that of virtues and talents.
  • 7. No man may be accused, arrested, or detained except in the cases determined by law, and according to the forms prescribed thereby. Whoever solicits, expedites, or executes arbitrary orders, or has them executed, must be punished; but every citizen summoned or apprehended in pursuance of the law must obey immediately; he renders himself culpable by resistance.
  • 8. The law is to establish only penalties that are absolutely and obviously necessary; and no one may be punished except by virtue of a law established and promulgated prior to the offence and legally applied.
  • 9. Since every man is presumed innocent until declared guilty, if arrest be deemed indispensable, all unnecessary severity for securing the person of the accused must be severely repressed by law.
  • 10. No one is to be disquieted because of his opinions, even religious, provided their manifestation does not disturb the public order established by law.
  • 11. Free communication of ideas and opinions is one of the most precious of the rights of man. Consequently, every citizen may speak, write, and print freely, subject to responsibility for the abuse of such liberty in the eases determined by law.
  • 12. The guarantee of the rights of man and citizen necessitates a public force; such a force, therefore, is instituted for the advantage of all and not for the particular benefit of those to whom it is entrusted.
  • 13. For the maintenance of the public force and for the expenses of administration a common tax is indispensable; it must be assessed equally on all citizens in proportion to their means.
  • 14. Citizens have the right to ascertain, by themselves or through their representatives, the necessity of the public tax, to consent to it freely, to supervise its use, and to determine its quota, assessment, payment, and duration.
  • 15. Society has the right to require of every public agent an accounting of his administration.
  • 16. Every society in which the guarantee of rights is not assured or the separation of powers not determined has no constitution at all.
  • 17. Since property is a sacred and inviolable right, no one may be deprived thereof unless a legally established public necessity obviously requires it, and upon condition of a just and previous indemnity.

Consider the above in the context of our founder's proclamation on true Democracy and do not fail to note the obvious : Society, CITIZENS  HAVE THE RIGHT TO REQUIRE OF EVERY PUBLIC AGENT AN ACCOUNTING OF HIS / HER ADMINISTRATION.

We add:

  • When the representatives of the citizens
  • fail in their public duties and
  • assume the right to dictate to, instead of serving, the citizens,
  • then
  • the citizens can and should "take the law in their own hands" and
  • the citizens can "use it in accordance with the provisions the representatives put in place".
  • There is no need for
  • violence,
  • abuse of body and
  • misuse of mind.
  • There is no need for revolution and bloodshed.

THE CITIZENS HAVE THE MEANS TO EXPOSE AND CALL TO BOOK ALL PUBLIC SERVANTS WHO ARE STILL DREAMING OF SERFDOM DAYS.

  • It is time for public servants to cease behaving as Lords and Masters.
  • It is time for them to 'humbly serve their employers, the citizens' AS THE LAW PROVIDES.

THE CITIZENS HAVE THE WORLD JURY TO RELY UPON FOR DELIVERY OF JUSTICE OUT OF THE BONDS HER ABDUCTORS AND RAPISTS HAVE BEEN HOLDING HER ALONG WITH DEMOCRACY.

  • It would appear that
  • the media barons and their stooges
  • know not the true meaning of either.
  • Through defaults and omissions to publish and
  • deal with the facts,
  • the realities and
  • the truth
  • THEY helped develop that which they expect of us to deliver to our children.
  • THEY WERE AND WILL REMAIN DREAMERS
  • SO LONG AS THEY MAINTAIN THEIR SILENCE AND
  • AS LONG AS THEY IGNORE THE VICTIMS OF THEIR OWN MAKING.

Andrew Yiannides
Founder *human-rights* (NGO)
London - United Kingdom
August 2002

Below the Case as STATED / PLEADED at the European Court for Human Rights.
  • Everything was pleaded in the stated facts but one element was deliberately not pointed to in the violations, as pleaded for professionals whose prime duty is to apply FACTS & EVENTS STATED - established / proven, to applicable law.
  • Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the facility for citizens : human-rights.org had his own plans for abusers of Public office.
  • The facilities on the Internet and the Community on Line were never intended for serfs or for 'the sold to the system as is' fraudsters and dreaming charlatans.
  • Link please to the explicit letter/FAX to the court (in the main window / frame of the page you are linked to from here - it is not the letter, in this page, to the Court Manager in Plymouth - UK ) (ECoHR) and note the court's immediate response (in the margin / left window).
  • In due course we will disclose what was / has been in line for ALL abusers of public office and all SOLD TO THE SYSTEM charlatans, dreaming fraudsters and conniving shysters who contacted Mr Yiannides of their own steam or as contacted thereafter and directed, as controlled and or as blackmailed stooges.
  • USE OF THE LAW as is, was and remains the spring board FOR HUMAN-RIGHTS. (Never overlook the fact that the law is no ass).
  • The media barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes they retain and control had and have their plans for the sons of men.
  • Mr Yiannides (one of the sons of men targeted) has had his own plans for 'humans' and not the type of zombies and morons who were sent along through whom to prove NOT WHO, but WHAT ELEMENTS ARE USED BY THE CRIMINALS WHO HAVE BEEN IN CONTROL FOR FAR TOO LONG in allegedly democratic states that allegedly are founded and resting on principles of law and order.

*Link from here to the STATEMENT OF FACTS settled for another victim of the abused courts facilities in the the United Kingdom as lodged at the European Court for Human Rights - Strasbourg.

In this page we are to cover, as we go along, some of the most common elements that 'the serfs' are faced with, when they seek justice in pseudo-democracies.

We point to relevant practices that are intended, most definitely, to obstruct justice and to deny rights which, to all intents and purposes are assured in law and through International Treaties & Accords.

However, no diligent reader / researcher or victim of abuse of Public Office can overlook the arrangements in place [*L]. Such 'elements' as the one attached to the undisclosed 'provisions by judicial chair occupants' happen to be in contempt of all law. Thereby the criminals who ARE in control establish the fallacy of the promotions about alleged Democratic governance and alleged rule of law & order, as sold to the otherwise indoctrinated and misled citizens by the Hypocrites and Sycophants who ARE in control in all pseudo-democracies.

Listed below some typical examples attached to and arising out of blunt activities that are intended, by the reckless Organisers and Managers of 'Crimes Incorporated United Kingdom Unlimited - (CIUKU) Enterprises', to defraud and cause damages to the citizens:

  • Hearings behind closed doors in breach of Article 6 [*L] of the European Convention and the most fundamental of principles clearly stipulating that JUSTICE SHOULD BE SEEN TO BE DONE IN OPEN COURTS.

  • Issuing court Orders and delivering judgements in contempt of the evidence [*L] presented to and argued before abusers of public office who purport to be acting as judicious [*L] persons while in occupation of judicial [*L] chairs. (Seen to be relying on charlatans [*L] and illiterates, other Public Servants, to promote the type of waffle you can link to from here).

  • Judicial chair occupants acting in contempt of the law applicable [*L] to the evidence and the issues / matters / events presented to and argued before them.

  • Judicial chair occupants, acting in breach of their Judicial Oaths [*L] through contempt of the law applicable to the evidence presented to them.

  • Judicial chair occupants entertaining all manner of unsupported assertions and allegations. More often that not they obstruct the other side, in the matters litigated before them. The citizens who ARE thus targeted, for any number of reasons, ARE DENIED THE RIGHT TO CHALLENGE THE ASSERTIONS / LIES / FALSE EVIDENCE, and such 'abuse of judicial chair occupancy' happens to be in contempt of the right to fair hearings and another fundamental principle [*L], that of 'due process'.

  • Judicial chair occupants Striking Out actions [*L] and cases, properly and legitimately instigated, WITHOUT JUSTIFIABLE CAUSE OR REASONING in support of such abuse of office [*L].

  • Judicial chair occupants, entering wrong judgements by denying due process to applicants, thereby setting the wheels in motion for 'need to appeal [*L]' their reckless attitude to the citizens who thereat have imposed upon them the necessity to appeal while in search of 'abducted justice'.

  • Court office staff deliberately delaying the issue and or posting [*L] of court orders, even posting such to wrong addresses [*L] WITH INTENT, thereby introducing the most common of frauds, by the legal circles, on 'the serfs' who are thus put on the road to the most common of 'obstructions and perversion of justice', the 'need for leave to appeal out of time'.

  • Delaying with intent - Obstructing execution and delivery [*L] of Transcripts [*L] especially of misconducted court hearings(!), proceedings before judicial chair occupants who act in breach of judicial oaths, and in contempt of the evidence and the law. (NOTE: We will release evidence in respect of an invitation to court whereby the alleged hearing was for an application to impose on the victims allegedly legitimate legal costs, attached to and arising out of fraudulent court proceedings. The victims appeared to be hell bent on following through with the constructive frauds in contempt of the law and all ready to act as many of the lovers of the system who were introduced to us by *the usual fraudsters club recruits* and *the maintenance engineers* who are running around *promoting the system as is* and NOT CHALLENGING OR EXPOSING THE CRIMINAL IN INTENT ACTIVITIES, APPROPRIATELY).

  • Officers of the Court (solicitors are), clerical staff and 'process servers', employed/retained by the courts, making false statements [*L] as to their parts in the processing and execution of the business of the courts.

You read, in our pages, of the 'arrangements in place for the constructive frauds on the 'serfs', through the provisions of Article 38 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Consider, therefore, why there exist among those who

  • visit the newsgroups,
  • blow their trumpets about 'the system',
  • proclaim their disaffection and
  • 'disgust at the practices' in the courts,
  • assert personal knowledge and experiences,
  • YET FAILED AND OR FAIL TO PUBLISH ANY EVIDENCE
  • in ANY WEB-SITE, through which to
  • inform and prove to
  • Mr and Mrs Average of that which they profess knowledge of!!!
  • WHO BUT THE REAL SHYSTERS, are party to the above fraud on YOU, Mr and Mrs Average?

Go To: http://www.uk-human-rights.org/comonlin.htm and consider stating the facts of your own experiences in a personal web-site / web-pages. Join with others and work together in exposing and challenging all offending Public(!) Servants(?) who misconduct in public office.

JOIN the COMMUNITY ON LINE if you have been cheated out of your rights, by the legal circles and or were denied protection, under the law, by the police.

If you have the evidence against the offenders, you can publish it in your personal web-site as your rights in law provide. Be not fooled by planted mischief-makers and read of the directives from THE authority (Link)

Every citizen is duty bound to report crime and if the police ignored or ignore you, USE YOUR RIGHTS, EXPOSE THE OFFENDERS who ignore the law.

Visit the Stephen Lawrence page (Link) and note how Parliament provided for your rights. Yet, our Law Enforcement Agencies simply ignore such provisions, and act as contemptuous of your rights as a member of the *human-rights.org * Community On Line * has pleaded and lodged at the European Court on Human Rights. Through defaults and omissions, the police / authorities fail (Link) to protect you and in fact they actually torment and torture you, the victims.

READ OF SUCH PROVISIONS and exercise your rights!  Challenge and EXPOSE THE VILE OFFENDERS, who endorse and promote crime through defaults and omissions in the purported exercise of their public duties, AS YOUR SERVANTS.

Remember:

"Do for, by and with yourself that which satisfies you so long as that which you do does not infringe upon and or violates the rights of any other". © AY 1972

BE GUIDED BY AUTHORITIES WHO DEFINED YOUR RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS AS DERIVED FROM AND DEFINED AS : "THE CONVENTION IN LEGAL TERMS".

The development of and FOR THE RIGHTS OF CITIZENS, in modern times begun with the Magna Carta, in Europe. Below, in as simple as can be defined, the principles of rights and freedoms, clarified by Mark Janis, (fellow) Richard Kay (professor) and Anthony Bradley (professor).

  • 1. Men are born and remain free and equal in rights; social distinctions may be based only upon general usefulness.
  • 2. The aim of every political association is the preservation of the natural and inalienable rights of man; these rights are liberty, property, security, and resistance to oppression.
  • 3. The source of all sovereignty resides essentially in the nation; no group, no individual may exercise authority not emanating expressly therefrom.
  • 4. Liberty consists of the power to do whatever is not injurious to others; thus the enjoyment of the natural rights of every man has for its limits only those that assure other members of society the enjoyment of those same rights; such limits may be determined only by law.
  • 5. The law has the right to forbid only actions which are injurious to society. Whatever is not forbidden by law, may not be prevented, and no one may be constrained to do what it does not prescribe.
  • 6. Law is the expression of the general will; all citizens have the right to concur personally, or through their representatives, in its formation; it must be the same for all, whether it protects or punishes. All citizens, being equal before it, are equally admissible to all public offices, positions, and employment, according to their capacity, and without other distinction than that of virtues and talents.
  • 7. No man may be accused, arrested, or detained except in the cases determined by law, and according to the forms prescribed thereby. Whoever solicits, expedites, or executes arbitrary orders, or has them executed, must be punished; but every citizen summoned or apprehended in pursuance of the law must obey immediately; he renders himself culpable by resistance.
  • 8. The law is to establish only penalties that are absolutely and obviously necessary; and no one may be punished except by virtue of a law established and promulgated prior to the offence and legally applied.
  • 9. Since every man is presumed innocent until declared guilty, if arrest be deemed indispensable, all unnecessary severity for securing the person of the accused must be severely repressed by law.
  • 10. No one is to be disquieted because of his opinions, even religious, provided their manifestation does not disturb the public order established by law.
  • 11. Free communication of ideas and opinions is one of the most precious of the rights of man. Consequently, every citizen may speak, write, and print freely, subject to responsibility for the abuse of such liberty in the eases determined by law.
  • 12. The guarantee of the rights of man and citizen necessitates a public force; such a force, therefore, is instituted for the advantage of all and not for the particular benefit of those to whom it is entrusted.
  • 13. For the maintenance of the public force and for the expenses of administration a common tax is indispensable; it must be assessed equally on all citizens in proportion to their means.
  • 14. Citizens have the right to ascertain, by themselves or through their representatives, the necessity of the public tax, to consent to it freely, to supervise its use, and to determine its quota, assessment, payment, and duration.
  • 15. Society has the right to require of every public agent an accounting of his administration.
  • 16. Every society in which the guarantee of rights is not assured or the separation of powers not determined has no constitution at all.
  • 17. Since property is a sacred and inviolable right, no one may be deprived thereof unless a legally established public necessity obviously requires it, and upon condition of a just and previous indemnity.

Consider the above in the context of our founder's proclamation on true Democracy and do not fail to note the obvious : Society, CITIZENS  HAVE THE RIGHT TO REQUIRE OF EVERY PUBLIC AGENT AN ACCOUNTING OF HIS / HER ADMINISTRATION.

We add:

  • When the representatives of the citizens
  • fail in their public duties and
  • assume the right to dictate to, instead of serving, the citizens,
  • then
  • the citizens can and should "take the law in their own hands" and
  • the citizens can "use it in accordance with the provisions the representatives put in place".
  • There is no need for
  • violence,
  • abuse of body and
  • misuse of mind.
  • There is no need for revolution and bloodshed.

THE CITIZENS HAVE THE MEANS TO EXPOSE AND CALL TO BOOK ALL PUBLIC SERVANTS WHO ARE STILL DREAMING OF SERFDOM DAYS.

  • It is time for public servants to cease behaving as Lords and Masters.
  • It is time for them to 'humbly serve their employers, the citizens' AS THE LAW PROVIDES.

THE CITIZENS HAVE THE WORLD JURY TO RELY UPON FOR DELIVERY OF JUSTICE OUT OF THE BONDS HER ABDUCTORS AND RAPISTS HAVE BEEN HOLDING HER ALONG WITH DEMOCRACY.

  • It would appear that
  • the media barons and their stooges
  • know not the true meaning of either.
  • Through defaults and omissions to publish and
  • deal with the facts,
  • the realities and
  • the truth
  • THEY helped develop that which they expect of us to deliver to our children.
  • THEY WERE AND WILL REMAIN DREAMERS
  • SO LONG AS THEY MAINTAIN THEIR SILENCE AND
  • AS LONG AS THEY IGNORE THE VICTIMS OF THEIR OWN MAKING.

Andrew Yiannides
Founder *human-rights* (NGO)
London - United Kingdom
August 2002

Below the Case as STATED / PLEADED at the European Court for Human Rights.
  • Everything was pleaded in the stated facts but one element was deliberately not pointed to in the violations, as pleaded for professionals whose prime duty is to apply FACTS & EVENTS STATED - established / proven, to applicable law.
  • Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the facility for citizens : human-rights.org had his own plans for abusers of Public office.
  • The facilities on the Internet and the Community on Line were never intended for serfs or for 'the sold to the system as is' fraudsters and dreaming charlatans.
  • Link please to the explicit letter/FAX to the court (in the main window / frame of the page you are linked to from here - it is not the letter, in this page, to the Court Manager in Plymouth - UK ) (ECoHR) and note the court's immediate response (in the margin / left window).
  • In due course we will disclose what was / has been in line for ALL abusers of public office and all SOLD TO THE SYSTEM charlatans, dreaming fraudsters and conniving shysters who contacted Mr Yiannides of their own steam or as contacted thereafter and directed, as controlled and or as blackmailed stooges.
  • USE OF THE LAW as is, was and remains the spring board FOR HUMAN-RIGHTS. (Never overlook the fact that the law is no ass).
  • The media barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes they retain and control had and have their plans for the sons of men.
  • Mr Yiannides (one of the sons of men targeted) has had his own plans for 'humans' and not the type of zombies and morons who were sent along through whom to prove NOT WHO, but WHAT ELEMENTS ARE USED BY THE CRIMINALS WHO HAVE BEEN IN CONTROL FOR FAR TOO LONG in allegedly democratic states that allegedly are founded and resting on principles of law and order.

*Link from here to the STATEMENT OF FACTS settled for another victim of the abused courts facilities in the the United Kingdom as lodged at the European Court for Human Rights - Strasbourg.

Link to:   Lord Chancellor's Dpt.    Judges Schooled on racial issues
Link to:- The CAMILA Project   h-r Home Page   Judges independent of, FREE to ignore The LAW
Link to:- Typical Response from Lord Chancellor  The LAW   Frank Cunningham-case

 

The creator of this website was inviting victims to access URrights & join him there with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office until the providers of the facilities >ning.com< introduced new terms and conditions for the provision of the facilities. Access from here and read of the imposed states by the brains behind ning.com and consider only one element "WHY OBSTRUCT & HINDER THE DOWNLOAD of the existing material at URrights.ning.com >the intellectual properties of the creator of that presence on the Internet and those who joined him there? Read below of the unacceptable conduct and behaviour by the reckless abusers of trust, who set out to obstruct and blackmail the creator of URrights.ning

Persons who are genuinely concerned and object to the ways they were / are being treated by alleged servants of the publicand the law >in any PSEUDOdemocracy, or whatever states / conditions they are subjected to< by abusers of public facilities and public office >as we cover in our web-pages< should contact webmaster@human-rights.org for information relevant to the creation of similar facilities for INFOrmation on URrights, for facilities for URrights EUrope and for a NETwork of URrights activists.

  • APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility (ning.com) Andrew Yiannides created and used the portal to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers who joined with him to expose and challenge the arrogant and blunt abuse of public services in all allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.

  • The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for ning.com to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.

  • HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the ning.com servers THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were contemptuously ignored.

  • Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for ning.com

  • In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from ning.com to existing members.

  • EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

.org/1999dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org/actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
  • Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
  • All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegdely reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
  • Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
  • Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
  • Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
  • The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
  • Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
  • All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s)

> MOST IMPORTANT <
On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org/ (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter,
Access also http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/ (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE.It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the European Court for Human Rights* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR], arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
鼯font> Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster
...