h-rtitle.gif (7604 bytes)

Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note below the arrangements between the administrative, the judiciary and the media; read of the all-embracing guarantee in place, in contempt of all law : the root shall be pointed to.

WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read below:-

"The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State"

*Link from here to founder's tribulations in 1972-75 and marvel at the creativity of allegedly honourable officers of Justice and the Law in the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies

  • And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the affidavit which visitors can link to directly from here [*Link].
  • Link also from here to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts organised and processed to fruition while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of:-

'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy.

*Link from here to proof of the parts the police play in promotion and expansion of the criminal activities instigated, processed and imposed on society by the legal circles. Read of assertions by a typical hypocrite, none other than the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Robert Mark QPM, when he spoke of FALSE RECORDS / FORGERIES by the legal circles while delivering his famous Dimbleby Lecture on BBC-TV in November 1973, 15 months after he received true copy of THE FORGERY advanced and promoted by the licensed criminals : solicitors and barristers for their evil ends in the case that opened Andrew Yiannides' mental eyes to the realities of life in the United Kingdom, a typical PSEUDOdemocracy. Can anyone enlighten Andrew and the millions of victims of the legal circles WHY NO PROSECUTION of the solicitors & the barristers in 1972 or thereafter?.

  • With such a facility in place (the words we point to above) and arrogant abuse of public office, can anyone assert, or argue, that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts? (>Hence the c reation of www.jusaticeraped.org <)
  • ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm

*Link from here to the realities - in due course also a link to the warning (indirect but nonetheless very clear) for thinkers to recognise 

  • On 3rd March 2008 >someone's birthday< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other.
  • >>> IN THE MEANTIME we have been naming and shaming a number who know of and engage in much more than just approve wrongs imposed on Mr & Mrs Average, the millions of taxpayers, in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union created by politicians, without reference to the taxed for fraud sucker-serfs, allegedly for the benefit of the citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION, among other promotions.

Needless to say the case entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies.

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored and ignore all complaints and submissions by victims of the organised crimes we point to and expose in our pages, irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.

[*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions, covered in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' (>thinkers<) from animals.

Fraud in court  Council staff use Forgeries   Misconduct in Public Office. 2 cases relative to applicable law One Protocol says it ALL It betrays arrogant intentions Law Provides for THEFTS and it covers Judges too Judges' duties   TIME 4 CHANGE   & CHALLENGES Site CONTENTS - Table of Contents & ongoing work Your Rights & OBLIGATIONS to Society SITE SEARCH facility for any specific element / issue of concern to visitors / readers
COURTS : their Facilities Abused For ORGANISED CRIME : FRAUD Solicitor's Perjury & Victim Ignores it all Just like the Law Society always does Blackmailed or is it Just Conditioned & Subjugated Victims who join the club ? We name Lovers of blunt fraud through courts - Users of the facilities 4 illicit gains Local Authorities & FRAUD on 'serfs' the Taxpayers who are kept in the dark Police Party to & Endorsing Criminal Acts, Activities Arrogant Fraud FALSE Records & Contempt of Law by the legal Circles & Public Services The crafty ones & Vexatious Litigant PLOYS for the rewarded silent

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

family.uk-human-rights justiceraped.org dssfraud.htm confraud.htm dadscare.htm contract.htm converts.htm MensAid
solicitorsfromhell.co.uk chancellor.htm theyknow.htm solfraud.htm sheknows.htm 4deceit.htm convicti.htm forward.htm


*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

An explicit Affidavit [*L] plus exhibits and
     letters to a Chief Inspector of Police
          one to solicitors
[*L] and another to the Lord Chancellor [*L] evince
               ORGANISED CRIMES
(Access and read the letter to the police in September 2006 [*L])

Access & read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister : * I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link from here to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister forwarded / delegated submissions and evidence received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister / Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES

3rd March 2011 added link [*L] to the BBC-TV Dimbleby Lecture in 1973 as the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Robert Mark prepared & presented to the sucker-serfs

govolso.htm                KEY 
Page Changes 28 Jul 2005
hrbnrsml.gif (1162 bytes)
JOIN others On Line and work with such others for and in the necessary challenges and exposures for the common good. Link to Information Page

The visitor's attention is drawn to the words of Jesus Christ, attributed to Him by the editors / creators of The Gospel according to St. Luke. Access His words to the lawyers some 2000 years ago. Many the dignitaries over the two millennia who shared His views (*Link).

A complement slip
lsosscsf.jpg (15807 bytes)

A letter - copy of
lsoossr.jpg (50285 bytes)

Envelope posting date
		(12275 bytes)
No need to point to the obvious - A MONTH before posting the letter. So much for competency / ORGANISED DELAYS.

KEY to Page & Site - List
Page CHANGES - List
RIGHTS In Legal Terms
CRIME PAYS - confirmed 

Public Agents To ACCOUNT
- Introduction.
LETTERS TO - Link to List
LETTERS FROM - Link to List
1. This Page
2. Site-Pages Intro. - List
3. Other Sites- Introducing
4. Quotes - A-Z  Index

5. No Waffle - No Falsehoods
6. Personalities - Quotes
7. Press Media  - Hypocrites
8. Institutionalised FRAUD
9. Local Authorities Fraud
10. 12.3 Billion Compensation & An Affidavit Years Ahead
11. Public Servants Instigate Fraud - Rampant Corruption
12. Relying On Local Courts

14. Police & False Information








Government's Office of the Legal Services Ombudsman *Page Created 15th July 2005
undercon.gif (286 bytes) Page Revised on June 20, 2012
Site under reconstruction - ongoing additions and improvements.

Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.
Visitors / readers please USE the SEARCH facility for any element or word & combination of words for links to pages / list where access to such material can be gained.

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY. Our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. 

On the left and below the images of:

  • An envelope,
  • A compliment slip and
  • Copy of a letter from OLSO to the Office for the Supervision of Solicitors.

For access to the sad conclusions covering the role of the OSS in our allegedly civilised society where the rule of Law & Order is alleged to run supreme, visitors are requested to access an explicit letter. It was settled for a victim of a solicitor, one of the thousands of solicitors in England & Wales who merit and qualify for annual Practice Certificates. The Law Society's Governing body awards such instruments to accomplished members of the organised frauds on the citizens, Mr & Mrs Average, as their many victims experience and relate. (*F1)

The letter was sent to the Chief Executives of the Law Society and the Office for the Supervision of Solicitors. It was not long before a leading figure at the OSS 'retired'. (*F2)

We trust that visitors / researchers / victims of the legal circles and the system as operated by Public(!) Servants(?) accessed the statement relative to the acknowledgement of the element of FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM. All should consider the most recent statements from government. The Prime Minister's address to Parliament, when he returned to London from the Summit / meeting of the leaders of the member states of the European Union, in Holland (June 2005), can be accessed from here. The Prime Minister's reference to ORGANISED CRIME should not be overlooked. Anyone who is familiar with the facts stated and exposed in the public domain - on the Internet - can recognise that the Prime Minister did not pick the element / factor out of a hat.

We reproduce, below, email exchanges with an OLSO member of staff consequential to email exchanges with a victim of the vile practices.

In message <9B304790E5106948BBFDCE24A0F92E0D1B1446@DCASMANEXC01. COURTSERVICE.GSI.GOV.UK>, "Pierce, Matthew" <Matthew.Peirce@OLSO.GSI.GOV.UK> writes

>Dear Mr Yiannides
>Thank you for your email dated 18 August 2005.
>* We did not receive anything from you on 3rd August.

Copy-paste below as stated in my other posting /
Dear Ms Griffiths

Thank you for the invitation.

Kindly access the URLs / pages below and note the facts stated. The submissions, the challenges and THE EXPOSURES in the pages no Public(!) Servant(?) could possibly ignore. The concluding state / reality, naturally, only and IF PUBLIC SERVANTS ARE SERVING CONSCIENTIOUSLY their Masters - the taxpayers, the serfs who are called upon to meet the salaries of ALL public servants, through taxes:

1. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/oss.htm#letter
2. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/solicitors.htm#letter
3. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/olso.htm
4. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/govolso.htm

Number 4 is a new, to be (NOW) released, page where three images evince the fact that:
(a) It became necessary to contact OLSO because of the usual defaults and blunt omissions, by the operators of the protection racket at the OSS.
(b) The date between letter and posting raises a simple question:
(c) The content of the letter points to the reckless contempt FOR the citizens being defrauded of their rights (both in law and other properties such as assets) by the licensed (annual practice certificates) who ACT IN CONTEMPT OF LAW as self assured and invincible con men. The simple fact is that they all rely on the invisible services of judicial chair occupants. The last invariably absolve and even assist them (solicitors / legal circles) in the theft and transfer of assets through FALSE INSTRUMENTS (Court orders lacking accountability by the authors/creators : indictable offences).

NOTE: For an explanation to the two concluding words of the above paragraph, the legal position, ACCESS PLEASE:
5. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/lawcompi.htm#brief
In the page the references to 'accounting FOR SOMETHING, such as the grounds for misrepresentations as for instance in court orders. The last, invariably FAILING TO ACCOUNT FOR THE LAW APPLICABLE and or THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED / at hand in court. FRAUDULENTLY CREATED & INTENDED INSTRUMENTS for the theft and transfer of targeted assets, ALWAYS the motivating forces.

Returning to the newly released EVIDENCE in the page /govolso.htm please note that I was acting under a Power of Attorney Instrument.

Among the evidence presented / delivered to one fraud of a legal genie, one Mr Minaides (solicitor), was a Bill of Charges. I refer to an invoice which another licensed (by the Law Society) fraudster was CAUSED TO PRESENT (in and for the usual denial of rights to properties - such as the paperwork attached to alleged work executed for clients by solicitors) thereafter to seek reliance on the usual 'lien on the papers, waffle' while in contempt of the provisions for 'ongoing litigation / obstructing justice, etc.

The Bill of Charges, by the other genie, a Master Mind in constructive Frauds through fraudulent invitations (created or promoted - is irrelevant) by another who was / is licensed by the Law Society; one Mr Kypros Nicolas. He and the team under his control / command created conditions THROUGH DECEPTIONS & MISREPRESENTATIONS in collaboration with a member of a family VIA instructions (stated on the created invoice) to transfer a property to a third party (family member) and the alleged instructions given, apparently, on behalf of the deceived (client) by a person who HAD NO AUTHORITY and had not even, at any point in time, been granted any Power of Attorney status. Such issues the offending solicitor could never be excused from, as a qualified in law expert. BUT as a licensed, by the Law Society, practitioner he could ALWAYS LOOK TO THE REST OF THE ORGANISERS OF FRAUD & CORRUPTION through the legal circles and the courts to exonerate him.

In the above instance one refers to Mr Minaides, to the Law Society, to its protection racket clone the OSS and to the staff and officers at the Office of the Legal Services Ombudsman.

The catalogue of insults to intelligence, honour and integrity by persons who ARE LICENSED to act outside the law were:
Assertions by Mr Minaides who HAD THE AUDACITY to allege to the OSS that he had been waiting for Mr A. Yiannides (yours truly, me) to deliver to him proof of the allegations that covered the references to instructions to transfer a property. (NOTE: The 'transfer' scenario / script smacks of the lessons learned by examples stated in the most vile of works ever to be presented to 'the sons of men' and I can point you, forward a link to the material at human-rights, where you and the department can read of the plans as covered in the Old Testament).
The NERVE OF THE FRAUDSTERS AT THE OSS, (who were, to all intents and purposes, in charge of the alleged investigation of the activities by the licensed fraudsters / criminals *solicitors*) TO ASSERT THAT THE COPY OF EXTRACTS FROM RECORDINGS (two recorders used on the day) WHEREBY THE PROOF OF HANDING OVER THE EVIDENCE TO THE LICENSED FRAUDSTER, Mr Minaides, in the presence of my mother and sister. And the author of a letter from the OSS had the audacity to assert that the copy of extracts from the recorded conversation / exchanges with Mr Minaides (delivered to the OSS) were in Greek!

The simple question that arose out of that STUPID ASSERTION could not be anything but:
*** "Did the author and promoter of such an arrogant absurdity expect of anyone to take an old woman to someone who would be speaking to and listening to her complaints in some foreign (to her) language..... THROUGH AN INTERPRETER, thereby creating a Pandora Box scenario? ***
Of course the exchanges were in Greek, with a person of Greek origins / background. THUS WAS REMOVED THE ELEMENT OF ANY MISREPRESENTATION TO THE COMPLAINANT (my mother) ON THE BASIS OF WRONG TRANSLATION by whosoever was assisting / interpreting / translating to her ..... in which case the scapegoats would have been either my sister or yours truly (me) and or even both.

Alas, it would appear that in their efforts to create an excellent organisation out of the need for a body such as the OSS, the Law Society could not spare a few coppers to create / make a transcript of the exchanges in Greek and thereafter have a translation from Greek to English of the transcript. In the meantime hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of pounds were / are USED FOR ALL MANNER OF WAFFLE THROUGH WHICH TO AFFORD (temporary) PROTECTION COVER TO THE CRIMINALS whom the Law Society LICENSES TO PRACTICE LAW, year in, year out ..... in their long established ways.

Incidentally, the instigator and or the one who encouraged all, and TOOK PART in the fraud on the old lady (his client) was the very fraudster who promoted and USED A FORGERY (which others submitted to him) decades earlier in order to corrupt and pervert justice with the blessings of judges such as the two Lord Justices who were ready and at hand to provide their services for the intended FRAUD ON THE CITIZEN, in contempt of the law.

Through such activities the creation of 'pecuniary advantages' AFFORDED TO THE CRIMINALS IN THE LEGAL CIRCLES / SERVICES by persons WHO SIT IN JUDICIAL CHAIRS (all the way to the Court of Appeal - if you please). Such activities in order to deny rights and the protection (as provided by and under) of the law. Through such activities the intended thefts and plunder of assets, care of and THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES.

The evidence of the aforesaid FORGERY and other FORGERIES USED BY LEGAL CIRCLES & PUBLIC SERVANTS can be accessed in the pages at human-rights. No wonder IF the aforesaid realities concern or shock you, you and other Public(!) Servants(?) will be contacting me and YOU WILL BE SEEKING additional information, for reference to your 'managers / overlords' for guidance as to how to deal with your newly acquired knowledge of the commission of crimes by the legal circles. I am most anxious and 'looking forward to see / note how you perform as a SERVANT OF THE PUBLIC and 'The Law'.

In view of the above, do YOU THINK that your office and department is or can be placed in a position that COULD CAUSE ANY INVESTIGATOR from the lowest of the low in the police forces (created and retained for MORE FRAUDULENT CONVERSION OF THE FAMILY SILVER - state funding through tax revenues) TO INVESTIGATE PROPERLY & BRING ABOUT PROSECUTIONS OF SUCH CRIMINALS?

Are you and the department you represent capable of emulating the Servants of the Public in Greece, who did bring about prosecutions of abusers of the courts facilities and public office? Or is your office and the department too busy and preoccupied with the delivery of inexcusable and unfounded assertions to the naive and gullible who turn for help but are treated as 'serfs' without rights to protection from crime and criminals? Not using the adjectives warranted and attached to the performance of the fraudsters who are RETAINED, TRAINED & USED for such activities by the Law Society (as the police appear to be by the state) does not necessarily imply oversight on my part.

Incidentally, as an employed person you, yourself, and members of your immediate family must be paying taxes. Do, therefore, refer to the EXCLUSIVE MATERIAL & REVELATIONS covering the most scandalous and foul of practices, you could ever imagine, let alone read of AS ARRANGEMENTS IN PLACE FOR RAMPANT CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS:

6. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/confraud.htm

Do YOU, personally approve of the facility FOR REWARDING PERSONS TO KEEP QUIET ABOUT THE PRACTICES, in pseudo-democracies, especially as endorsed and CREATED BY THE COURTS?

I interject below, to your invitation.

Andrew Yiannides
*human-rights* (NGO)
London - UK

Your response is considered due and owing to ALL TAXPAYERS. Copy of this posting is forwarded also to Mr R. Fernando. It will be posted to other victims of the legal circles / courts and in due course will be added to the material in the new (to be released) page /govolso.htm.

In message <6692B9809E76D144B67BA8BFCCD5D3AF0102AC0A@dcasmanexc01>, "Griffiths, Linda" <Linda.Griffiths@OLSO.GSI.GOV.UK> writes
>Dear Mr Yiannides
>Thank you for your email.
>If you want to make a complaint to this Office
The complaint, naturally contained to the performance of the OSS, WHEN in fact the true practices of both OSS & OLSO were / are anything but that of serving the citizens WITHIN & UNDER THE LAW. Do refer to the page:
7. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/yourrights.htm
Look up the heading from an article / law report PLUS the provisions under Article 29 of the Combined Treaties of the European Union. Clearly stated the provisions for protection and security (of rights and peace of mind) as well as protection FROM FRAUD & CORRUPTION, states that ARE assured 'allegedly' in our pseudo-democracy, where the Intellectual Prostitutes within the media, are busy promoting where a Lord goes for the needs of the animal (food for example) in him because (presumably) the very needs of the animal are not catered for, at home.
> you can complete an application form
Does the form provide for and COVER the CRIMINAL IN INTENT ACTIVITIES related, and pointed to, above?
>on our website at www.olso.org .
As stated above, 'Thank you for the invitation'. I am attending to your suggestion THROUGH THE SUBMISSIONS ABOVE and I look forward to anything you could NOW ADD or expand upon in respect of the GROSS ABUSE OF TIME & EFFORTS / WORK that was called for in the instance that related to the complaint that was shoved with the rest of the skeletons in the family closet which the OSS and its predecessor keep extending / expanding year in year out.
>Yours sincerely
>Linda Griffiths
>Support Team Leader

Your support to the victims, in line with the words of Ms Abraham in the annual report 1998/1999, is deemed to be assured 'in the service of and FOR the client-victims, the CITIZENS and none other'.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Andrew Yiannides [mailto:andrew@human-rights.demon.co.uk]
>Sent: 21 May 2005 10:12
>To: rfernando@bankofny.com
>Cc: stephen.mcvey@gordonslegal.com; lso@olso.gsi.gov.uk
>Subject: Re: bad solicitors / law soc
>In message
> rfernando@bankofny.com writes
>>I made the following complaint below about my ex-wife's solicitor to the
>>Law Society in October 2004. In April 2005 I was told that the complaint
>>had been transferred to a legal firm called Gordon's in Bradford. I was
>>also told that they would contact me for additional information to
>>support my complaint.
>>However, I received a letter from the Law Society yesterday saying that
>>the case was closed.
>>I believe that the response given is unacceptable for the following
>> No one had contacted me for information to support my complaint.
>> I have copies of letters from Darlington and Parkinson saying that
>> the matters such as the Decree Nisi and Financial Hearings would be
>> dealt with shortly, which they did not keep to. The Law Society's
>> response was that Solicitors are acting on Client's Instructions and
>> have no professional duty to progress the proceedings as swiftly as
>> possible. Therefore, they should not have sent out false letters
>> promising to act within a time frame which they did not keep to. The
>> contents of these letters should be examined.
>> I also complained about the Financial Disclosures prepared by
>> Darlington and Parkinson, which the Law Society responded with the
>> same reason that they are acting in the Clients interest, and it is
>> not misconduct, if the details are incorrect. This is not acceptable
>> as the the issue of Disclosures were raised in the FDA and FDR
>> Hearings so Darlington and Parkinson were fully aware of the Accounts
>> in question. The Financial Documents were totally prepared by their
>> barrister which is obvious from the questions asked, such as whether
>> I had an interest in my father's home which my ex-wife would have
>> known I did not. They raised over 100 question as a means to disguise
>> the incomplete disclosures. They also threatened to drag the financial
>> proceedings out into a full blown hearing which the Judge advised
>> against as it would have cost over £30,000. The current laws have been
>> clarified to stop lawyers from making fraudulent disclosures, but
>> lawyers are still acting illegally.
>Access http://www.uk-human-rights.org/solfraud.htm
>NOTE that it was a case of the usual practices BUT they all backed of
>because of the TWO CHALLENGES. It was not a case of just lawyers BUT A
>CASE of an abuser of judicial chair occupation..... one who HAD NO RIGHT
>to act as he did..... it was a District Judge NOT A CIRCUIT JUDGE..
>Access also: http://www.uk-human-rights.org/len.htm
>NOTE that it was also a District Judge who set about entering orders as
>THE LEGAL CIRCLES PLEASED but when the court Managers etc. was
>challenged they were passing the hot potato from one to another until it
>was a case of the same fraud of a judge took the case on board AND ACTED
>IN CONTEMPT OF ALL FACTS & LAW. Mind you, the targeted victim in that
>case I do not think he contacted me because he wanted to challenge the
>offenders / abusers of the courts facilities BUT BECAUSE he and those
>who were using him were still (there had been other cases before) trying
>to find out how far I was to go and how much I knew about their ways
>etc. In the page there are hints already about the other shenanigans and
>others who were used to frustrate and obstruct the work that we set out
>to do with the victim himself ignoring very important elements and
>failing to act as he should. Fuller and better particulars will be
>covered later. I am seeking some clarification on a number of issues (in
>particular convenient defaults and omissions (by him) that were noted
>accordingly by me.
>SHOULD you go to: http://www.lbduk.org
>You will find the first challenges that were settled for the victim, by me, at
>the site. He had the best of both worlds at his finger tips and very
>soundly on his side. It was a case of heads I win / tails you lose. It
>was not a case of the courts just failing to proceed as we had prepared
>for the solicitors and the courts to get a few, we described, kicks up
>that he was to benefit from..... Food for thought when you consider all
>the other defaults.
>> They also state that I can take legal action against my solicitors,
>> my ex-wife, and should also contact the Legal Aid Services Commission
>> and the CSA regarding the false disclosures and costs and dragging
>> out the case.
>One has to look at ALL THE EVIDENCE at hand and determine WHO was at
>fault and who set about deliberately to create the type of scenarios you
>are being told were/are possible.
>> This is not acceptable as I spent over 4 years in Court
>> regarding the Divorce, Children's and Financial Hearings,and had
>> incurred astronomical costs resulting in me being bankrupt.
>Intriguing. YOUR RECORDS - case documents could establish the most
>likely scenario that can be considered and possibly used,
>>In addition I have recently been told by the School that my youngest
>>child (age 7) is being labelled as being in the autistic spectrum as he
>>has serious learning difficulties such as delayed speech,
>Access: http://www.uk-human-rights.org/media.htm
>In the page an article about boys not doing well in their studies ....
>not as good as the girls. I challenged the Intellectual Prostitute who
>wrote that article and his editor to get in touch with me in order to
>point them out into areas they (and others were failing to look or
>consider AS THE CAUSES for such 'developments'). In a recent letter to
>the Mail on Sunday I mentioned in passing the relevance of factors the
>Intellectual Prostitutes fail to consider.
>>and is being disapplied from sitting his SAT's tests. He is on a special needs
>>program due to his low level of understanding and has produced test
>>results in the first / bottom percentile. None of this information has
>>been disclosed to me, and I have not been forwarded any information
>>regarding psychological tests etc.
>In our pages a letter to the editor of 'The Times' at a very particular
>time pointed out to certain realities. He failed to publish it FOR
>OBVIOUS REASONS. Controlling the flow of true information IS THE NAME OF
>THE GAME and when victims of the system DO NOT CREATE THEIR OWN FREE
>FLOW OF INFORMATION (stated facts in the public domain) THEY, the
>victims appear to be cutting their own throats. There are A FEW THOUSAND
>OF THE VICTIMS who could work together and turn the tables upside
>down... teach those who rely on those who abuse public office IN ORDER
>TO IMPOSE THEIR EVIL WORLD on 'the serfs' / 'the shitizens' and the very
>issue should have been and be THE WAY TO CHALLENGE THE OPERATIVES /
>>It is important that my son is given the correct medical
>Are you sure that the boy is NOT suffering from some psychological
>trauma because of the broken family links ?
>Access: http://www.uk-human-rights.org/forward.htm
>NOTE what has been on the up and up AND the elements involved. IT IS NOT
>DRUGS which are simply created in order to subjugate the sensitive 'sons
>of men' and turn them into zombies / robots / 'serfs' who are subjected
>to the whims of the corrupters, the corrupt and the corrupted.
>> attention so that his difficulties can be addressed properly. It is also
>>important to have regular yearly tests to determine his progress. My
>>ex-wife has adopted the attitude of denying he has serious problems,
>presumably because her motherly instincts tell her what the root of the
>problem is.
>>and had not told me anything about his educational and social problems.
>You might consider such issues WITH AND ALONGSIDE THE ARTICLE
>about boys that I point you to and what I am explaining above.
>>I have not been given any advice about how to look after him. It is
>>important that I am informed how as a non-resident parent I can make the
>>limited time with my children a better experience all round, to enhance the
>>quality of time spent together,
>If and when the root of certain problems ARE SUPPRESSED by the persons
>involved, because it is NOT within their power to change anything / remove the
>problem / obstacles to better human relationships HOW ON EARTH DO YOU
>IMAGINE YOU CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE to such a person's feelings about
>SITUATIONS that ARE IMPOSED by others ?
>>and to provide me, and my ex-wife, with a productive solution
>>to the issues we face.
>>Please could you review the above, to determine / advise whether
>> I should take the Law Society to Court.
>A NUMBER OF SOLICITORS (in the take = offering invisible services under
>the table DID NOTHING FOR MY SISTER) and since the Law Society issues
>'annual practice certificates' to such fraudsters the full facts about
>'the serfs' their rights AS ASSURED IN LAW, the law society will be
>receiving an appropriate challenge in due course.
>WHERE ARE YOU BASED? Id we meet and you can furnish additional
>information we might come up with something that will be appropriate. I
>need only add that I have been researching and looking into the elements
>that have kept the system of operations going for a possible 2000 years
>going when one considers the words of Christ to the lawyers. Access the
>words in the page: http://www.uk-human-rights.org/quotes.htm
>>Thank you
>>Rohan Fernando
>>Financial Disclosures
>>My ex-wife and her solicitors did not make a full disclosure about her
>>bank accounts in the Financial Hearings during our recent divorce.
>>This issue was raised in statements for the FDA and the FDR
>>appointments, with evidence of bank statements and account
>>numbers not disclosed, but no suitable responses were provided.
>>My ex-wife was represented by Elizabeth Kornat of Darlington
>>&Parkinson Family Solicitors, and was paid for by legal aid. However
>>the firm dragged the case out for an excessive amount of time and
>>accrued large fees accordingly, which will be paid for by
>>charges offset against the former matrimonial home. Although
>>Darlington Parkinson has written several letters confirming that they would
>>keep to the Court Schedules, they, they did not do this and
>>delayed the proceedings several times.
>>This resulted in me accruing Lawyers Bills of over £35,000 for legal
>>services on my side alone, which I could not continue to
>>afford, and subsequently was forced to withdraw my application to see
>>my Children for overnight visits. In addition my ex-wife's
>>solicitors, Darlington & Parkinson would also have accrued fees of
>>tens of thousands of pounds on their side.
>>Darlington and Parkinson also delayed the agreement of a Consensual
>>Order between myself and my ex-wife, by demanding that I pay
>>£1,100towards my ex-wife's legal fees, although I was responsible
>>foraying my own lawyers for their services, and my wife was on
>>legal aid.
>>Children's Act Application
>>My Application for Access to see the Children was dragged out for two
>>years from Feb 2001- Dec 2003 before I was allowed any
>>Contact at all. I was originally allowed Supervised Contact for three
>>months which was eventually changed to Sunday Visits
>>between 10-6pm.My ex-wife and her solicitors refused to allow me to be
>>be granted
>>overnight visits unless I submitted a hair follicle test to the
>>I was forced to withdraw my application as the Case cost me
>>about£24,000 legal fees, which I could no longer afford to maintain.
>>The Children have been badly damaged by the situation, and my youngest
>>Child (aged 8) is being labelled as autistic by his school
>>because he is badly behind in his development. For example he is being
>>dis-applied from sitting his SAT exams this year, and is
>>on a special needs program at school. His test results are also in the
>>first/bottom percentile for his age group.
>>Divorce Application
>>The Decree Nisi and Divorce were also dragged out for two and a half
>>years although Elizabeth Kornat sent out letters that the
>>matter would be progressed in December 2002 and August 2003, she
>>ignored the issue until October 2003, until after the Children's
>>Act and Financial Hearings
>>I also feel that they should be investigated for legal harassment as
>>the Divorce and Court Proceeding are now complete, but they
>>are still pestering me to pay the £1,100 towards my ex-wife's legal
>>fees, even though I had to pay £35,000 towards my own
>>In addition to the above, Elizabeth Kornat failed to keep to the SFLA
>>policies of adopting a constructive and non-confrontational
>>approach as a way of resolving differences, or advise, negotiate and
>>conduct matters so as to help settle differences as quickly
>>as possible and reach agreement.
>>The information in this e-mail, and any attachment therein, is
>>confidential and for use by the addressee only. If you are not the
>>intended recipient, please return the e-mail to the sender and delete
>>it from your computer. Although the Bank of New York attempts to sweep
>>e-mail and attachments for viruses, it does not guarantee that either
>>are virus-free and accepts no liability for any damage sustained as a
>>result of viruses.
human-rights organisation protecting and promoting
Human Rights World Wide
Go to: http://www.uk-human-rights.org/comonlin.htm
JOIN other challengers On Line - Help Rescue 'Justice'
Remember: " The cost to the good citizens (Q: R U ?)
for their indifference, in public affairs, (Q: U R ?)
is to be ruled by evil men". (Q: U Do not Object ?)
Wise Counsel by PLATO, Greece (428 - 347 BC)
human-rights organisation
protecting and promoting Human Rights World Wide
Go to: http://www.members.human-rights.org/tap.htm
Work with others for the common welfare - Help Restore 'Democracy'.
Montesquieu, Charles Louis : "When I go to a country, I do not look whether
there are good laws, but whether those there are enforced, for good laws are
everywhere". (French Jurist, 1689-1755)

The right to reply and to justify behaviour and activities covered in our pages, is assured to any one named. We will publish excuses & whatever is submitted to us by persons named in our pages. We will use our rights and publish also any legal argument that may arise out of any submissions we receive. 

This page and the above documents are dedicated to all victims of the legal circles and in particular to the victims of the SOLICITORS & the O.S.S set-up. The latter was created and is maintained by the Law Society, the overlords of the latter retaining and appointing to the former, persons whose prime duty has been to Offer Security to the Solicitors and their future well-being through plenty of false assertions, fraudulent misrepresentations, criminal in intent activities and reckless defaults, all of which amount to contempt of all existing law, that applies to the practices and the activities of the legal circles. Under its charter the Law Society and the persons it retains to oversee the activities of its members, the only element that prevails, is that of 'the protection rackets one expects and encounters within every sinister and criminal environment. We covered the role of the O.S.S, in the only way that can do justice to the victims of the legal circles by reflecting and recounting the experiences of the public through the practices and reckless misrepresentations promoted by the staff and officers of the Law Society and the OSS. An explicit letter was settled for one of the many victims who came along with and for other plans than those they presented to us. Visitors should read the explicit letter that was sent to the Chief Executives of both the Law Society and the Office for the Supervision of Solicitors, by the 'victim' who failed to publish evidence of the challenges and subsequently elected to engage in a Houdini escape act..... to foreign destinations.

The letter above relates to a typical case that smacks of the lessons learned (and adopted) from the most vile of works ever presented to 'the sons of men'. The experts at the Office for the Supervision of Solicitors determined to shove it all in the family closet, with the rest of the millions of skeletons. The images in the left - margin panel above should suffice as to 'the REAL ROLE of the O.L.S.O in the scheme of things when it comes to serving 'the serfs', 'the citizens', 'the sons of men'.

  • Below will be published a brief statement of the facts and events that gave rise to the complaints.
  • It will cover the activities of the experts, persons who are licensed to act in contempt of the law.
  • It will expose the rampant DENIAL OF RIGHTS to the defrauded 'serfs', the citizens.
  • It will point to the facts covered in the exclusive page where we reveal the arrangements in place for the taxpayers to meet the cost of the rampant CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS THROUGH THE COURTS, care of the legal circles who indulge freely and 'the fraudsters club recruits' that we point to in the exclusive page.

Below extract from 'The Breeding Grounds - case':

  • When attending Court, on a subsequent date, to exchange documents (in accordance with the Appeal Judge's directions) I went prepared with other legal documents I had prepared (more revelations).
  • A new District Judge was on the bench. The new District Judge (had read all of my communications; so I was informed) used the occasion to enter Judgement for me and took into account the Counter-Claim, the evidence I had prepared, and considered also the time lost in pursuit of my rightful claims through the Court, in respect of the initial and subsequent causes of action that had been pleaded and claimed by me (*F1), in the first instance (part and parcel with the defence).
  • When I was asked, of the hours involved in the preparation of all the paperwork and the other documented evidence, I stated that the paperwork was dictated and necessary because of my interest in a Judicial System that ruined my business and almost destroyed me as a person, years earlier.
  • I explained that the 'legal experts freely adduced and used FORGERIES FOR THE PERVERSION OF JUSTICE. Such criminal activities were indulged into by the legal circles, "barristers" and "solicitors", with "the blessings and conscious acquiescence, of their criminal activities, by High Court Judiciary", all the way to the Court of Appeal : "The Jewel in the Crown - Case".
  • I was asked if my work and research was likely to lead me to a career in law and I stated that it was not my wish to rub shoulders with criminals, but to expose them. That is why I spent years in researching and studying law and court procedures expending in the process time and money since it had become apparent it was the only way to move forward in a Democracy when something is wrong.
  • IT IS THE ONLY WAY OPEN to force those responsible (in our instance the Houses of Parliament) to act in order to protect the public, the victims of a judicial system where individuals feel free to indulge in order to create income generating conditions for themselves and their circles, through abuses of the Courts' processes whilst denying and corrupting justice.
  • I pointed out to the District Judge that the forgeries, I had referred to, took place in the High Court before the 1981 Forgeries and Counterfeit Act; (NOTE: Criminal activities are not subject to Limitations) in other words at a time when the 1913 Forgeries Act was in force.
  • The earlier Act had provisions for forgeries at Court and on Court documents as well as books of records (such indulgences did take place) and I had such evidence.
  • The Lord Chancellor's Department,
  • the Police, (various police stations area Commanders)
  • Scotland Yard Fraud Squad
  • and their Complaints Department;
  • also the Director of Public Prosecutions,
  • Abuses of the Courts processes had come to light, I informed the District Judge, in the Mary Winch Affair and in my work I had come across a case wherein those in charge of it had attempted to similarly indulge (dispossess a person from his home, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE LEGAL AID FACILITIES. (see copy telegram attached).
  • CONSCIOUS if not deliberate obstruction, denial and perversion of Justice.
  • Abuses of the Court’s processes had also come to light in the Judith Ward case.
  • FORGERIES had come to light in the I.R.A ‘bombers’ case who were imprisoned because of scientifically proven FORGERIES (false / falsified records) by the police.

In this instance

Footnote eXtra: In October 2010, the coalition's Attorney General, in an interview published by 'COUNSEL' specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves from cases of (small-fry) fraud and asserted that he was making that element his department's priority. IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY, WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT FRAUD. IF IT WILL DEAL APPROPRIATELY with the criminals who abuse public office, especially when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course. Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003 [*Link from here to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers that the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law"]. While there, above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us [*Link to our explicit submissions to (a)  the Prime Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) the Home Secretary. WE acted so after we had secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew Yiannides]. Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998 [*Link* [*L] from here to the letter] and note the results evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do [*Link [*L] from here to the evidence we point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob].
   1.   The letter we point to, from here, was acknowledged by the Law Society and interested parties can contact us for additional information. One significant development soon after the letters were received was the fact a Senior Officer at the Office for the Supervision of Solicitors (OSS) resigned with the usual Golden handshake rewards 'for serving the system as established and running for centuries'.  
2.    Evidently no one has EVER BOTHERED to consider the relevant factors that apply to such scenarios. No one APPEARS TO BE CONCERNED (all Public Servants apparently just Part & Parcel of the Organised Crimes Against Humanity in an 'alleged civilised', Democratic State).Such disinterest irrespective of the words of many a dignitary, including the words of Jesus Christ to the lawyers of his day, as included in 'The Gospel According to St. Luke' by the editors of the New Testament. (*Link to a quote from the French Jurist C.L. Montesquieu NOTE: His very words HINT at the services on offer by judicial chair occupants, ALL IN CONTEMPT OF THE LAW).  
    3.   Evidence  


Link to:- The LAW   Frank Cunningham-case Judges Schooled on racial issues Lord Chancellor's Dpt.
Link to:- Typical Response from Lord Chancellor Judges independent of, FREE to ignore The LAW The CAMILA Project

 To h-r Home Page  

The creator of this website was inviting victims to access URrights & join him there with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office until the providers of the facilities >ning.com< introduced new terms and conditions for the provision of the facilities. Access from here and read of the imposed states by the brains behind ning.com and consider only one element "WHY OBSTRUCT & HINDER THE DOWNLOAD of the existing material at URrights.ning.com >the intellectual properties of the creator of that presence on the Internet and those who joined him there? Read below of the unacceptable conduct and behaviour by the reckless abusers of trust, who set out to obstruct and blackmail the creator of URrights.ning

Persons who are genuinely concerned and object to the ways they were / are being treated by alleged servants of the publicand the law >in any PSEUDOdemocracy, or whatever states / conditions they are subjected to< by abusers of public facilities and public office >as we cover in our web-pages< should contact webmaster@human-rights.org for information relevant to the creation of similar facilities for INFOrmation on URrights, for facilities for URrights EUrope and for a NETwork of URrights activists.

  • APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility (ning.com) Andrew Yiannides created and used the portal to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers who joined with him to expose and challenge the arrogant and blunt abuse of public services in all allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.

  • The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for ning.com to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.

  • HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the ning.com servers THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were contemptuously ignored.

  • Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for ning.com

  • In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from ning.com to existing members.

  • EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

.org/1999dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org/actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
  • Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
  • All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegdely reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
  • Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
  • Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
  • Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
  • The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
  • Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
  • All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s)

On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org/ (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter,
Access also http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/ (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE.It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the European Court for Human Rights* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR], arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
鼯font> Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster