release in late June 2008
The letter of 7th February 1995 to Mrs. K Yiannides, published below
[*Link], is dedicated to all of the fraudsters-club-recruits who never
created or maintained a family with children. Also to at least five of the
persons we name and expose, in our pages, as arrogant abusers of Mr Andrew
Yiannides' time and goodwill. Each one, although informed of much more than they should
have recognised of their own, >the fact that 'the serfs in our PSEUDOdemocracy are
faced with organised crime, namely : *BLUNT FRAUD ON & CORRUPTION OF, SOCIETY* -
through abuse of the Law Enforcement Agencies - they elected to suppress the realities
they, themselves were subjected to through abuse of the Courts and the Social Services
facilities, they were also informed of the fact that much more lay in the background 'as
part of an orchestrated scenario for and in which 'the mother' had been a star performer. ALL
ARE POINTED, from here [*Link] to
the HOUSE OF LORDS precedent case, which Mr Yiannides kept up his sleeves since 1975.
All the while, as maligned dreamers and stooges, all were indulging as converts to &
lovers of the facilities in place for the creation of the states first hinted at as 'plans
for the sons of men, on planet earth', by the craft-y and wily followers of the ploys
which humans (the sons of men) should have recognised as of the days when the craft-y ones
created and delivered to mankind the *Old Testament* and through it, the alleged creator
of all and everything, their own creation. [*Link from here to an explicit fax communication many received and
consider the polite request to one and all; use grey matter and work things out as to why
each and every one elected to ignore the issues / elements they were pointed to; access
also the table of the pages listed below [*Link]
and note that we will release >at the right time< what each of the offenders who
were afforded their last chance to state their reasons and justified grounds as to WHY
they elected to suppress the states imposed on them >namely the stipulation< for
the REWARDS from plundered budget funds, from the taxes imposed on the sucker-serfs<
they consciously accepted as blackmailed morons and agreed to keep quiet about such
JOIN the Community On Line and work with others for and in the necessary
challenges and exposures for the common good. Link [*L]
to Information Page
is drawn to the words of Jesus Christ, attributed to Him by the editors / creators of The Gospel
according to St. Luke. Access the words to the lawyers some 1700 / 2000 years ago as
disseminated to the humankind through the New Testament. Many the dignitaries over the
two millennia who expressed similar views on lawyers*. [*Link].
In this page we relate vile activities in which
converts-to & lovers / users of the facilities for rampant fraud on the taxpayers
engage through blunt abuse of the courts facilities. Link from
here to a typical case when a victim of the legal circles & courts, who had
already agreed to be party to the usual conditional rewards to victims of the abused court
facilities. The 'victim' (?) engaged with a known lover & user of fraudulent in intent
theatrical productions in the courts (care of an inexcusable application to court) in
order to afford an abuser of judicial chair occupation to generate an order 'for legal
costs award', to a firm of solicitors. The evidence we publish in this page relates to
attempts by fraudsters who sold themselves to the system of operations and WITH EVIL
INTENTIONS SET ABOUT TO CREATE FALSE RECORDS THAT COULD BE USED BY THE CRIMINALS OPERATING
OUT OF INLAND REVENUE OFFICES, the officers of which HAD BEEN PARTY TO ABUSE OF OFFICE
WHEN AN ACCOUNTANT WILFULLY FAILED TO SUBMIT AMENDED ACCOUNTS TO THE INSPECTOR OF TAXES
consequential to the strike out of an action founded and resting on arrogant fraudulent
misrepresentation to start with & fraudulent activities at and in the Royal Courts of
Andrew apologises to friends who joined him for the common cause at
concerned victims, for the developments after www.ning.com introduced NEW terms for the provision of the facility. Andrew
was informed that the existing material on line could be downloaded BUT the facility WAS
OBSTRUCTED by the very people ning.com NOTE PLEASE that URrights as a domain had
evidently been registered by 'unknown' as a DOT COM domain LET common sense
determine as to who & above all WHY?
|Key to Page & Site - List
Lovers of the system as is
Crocodile TEARS Fraudsters
Trojan Horses Peddlers
Page CHANGES - List
Page IMAGES - List
Page FOOTNOTE - List
Page Letter to CHARLATAN
Page QUOTES - List
OTHER Pages Quotes - List
What For&Who Else Involved
Site Letters TO - List
Site Letters FROM - List
Site IMAGES - List
Page IMAGES - List
Letter to a charlatan / agent
Charlatan; he indulged Proof
& Posting Out Of The Blue an Account & Compliments...
+ Account Credited with funds
Letters TO - List
1. April 2003 Frank Field MP
2. Dec. 1999 Prime Minister
3. Dec. 1998 Home Secretary
4. Mar. 2003 Law Society ++
5. August 2003 ECourtHR
6. ILfHRoUN Stamoulakatos N
7.'Open Minds' - Constanti, A
Letters FROM - List
1. Part- SOLICITOR To Client 2. Prime Minister Nov. 1999
3. CEO Haringey Council 2001
4. Haringey Council Dreamer
5. Police Promoting Just LIES
6. Norman Seeks Information
7. LCD Expose Police LIES
8. An Illiterate LCDpt. Officer
9. ECourtHR September 2003
10. Lord Chancellor's Dpt.
Page NEWS Articles - List
L.E.S by David Blunkett 2004
Daily Mail Free For All 2001
METRO-Cowboy Lawyers Met Target Lawyers - 1998
3Million For Invisible refugees
Site NEWS Articles - List
British Justice BLIND, DEAF...
Europe - Public Sector Fraud
House of Lords RULING
Letter to Prime Minister
L.E.S by David Blunkett
Haringey Investigate Fraud
D. Mail Free For All 2001
D. Express Boys Records
PM. Global Role For Britain
No Need to Raise TAXES
IMAGES - List
Letter to Prime Minister
PM Sends Subm. to H-Office
H-Office Junior Ignores P.M.
WPC Awarded Half Million
£100,000 Chasing Justice
Letter to Minister May 1997
Two Important Law Reports <>
Quotes -This Page
1.Facilities intended to assist the Organisers of fraud and theft of
2.The judiciary treat citizens as of the citizens are serfs....
3.Public Servants steal from and defraud their masters the citizens
who pay meet the cost of their salaries....
4.Judicial chair occupants as tools of the politicians, act in
contempt of the law, impose..
5.The Court Order is but a FORGERY if the most .....
Facebookers can connect with the creator of
this website IF victims of the abused court & police facilities from within any
PSEUDOdemocracy Access the creator at .com/yiandrew
IF proactive OR wishing to expose & challenge the offenders
|GUESS WHY the DEFAULTS & OBSTRUCTIONS *Page created April 2008*
||Page Revised: June 20, 2012 : Read of the reasons for this page*, *Link from here to and consider the evidence we publish.
reconstruction - ongoing additions and improvements
Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive
material: access instructions. The first step
for visitors to acquaint themselves with the extensive material should be to use the
SEARCH FOR facility. Just type in and word or combination of
words / issues that are of concern / interest - need information and our views about.
Remember that our views rest in factual experiences and research with evidence in support.
We urge visitors and in particular victims of the legal circles and the Law Enforcement
Agencies to access the introduction page to the Community on Line [*Link].
As part of the
reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been
implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the
date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in
the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or
new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@
The letter below covers elements that should be of interest to all victims
of the Divorce Industry and the abused court facilities for fraud aplenty, as covered in
other pages (many) at this web-site.
the letter to the police and to the theft of a bicycle at knife point. And the police who
had been operating to an agenda / scenario as of the previous day / evening, not
surprisingly failed to act as their public duties commanded of them; they simply stuck
to their agenda & script* [*L]
the letter to the unlikely event of forgetting the day's events, relates to the organised
creation of false records as arranged between the planners of the script for the day and
the used mother of the victim of whose bicycle was taken from him at knife-point.
The theft of
the bicycle scenario was called for, consequential to failures by the police who
arrested the victim of an assault, as planned and organised between the authors of the
script and the executor / actress who was used for the original plan, simply to create an
alleged assault by the party who was targeted for removal from the matrimonial home /
residence on alleged violence grounds.
activities and facilities (false records created) by the criminals who are in control in
pseudo-democracies. Through such the IMPOSED break up of families intended to lead to
fraudulent court proceedings in family courts, as covered in our pages. In the process,
innocent children used as pawns for the chess board of the legal games played by the legal
circles in the courts.
researchers should link* [*L] to an affidavit which the deponent,
although a person who benefited from the work and extensive assistance by Mr Andrew
Yiannides, she recklessly failed to execute the warranted deposition in excess of three
years. The deponent then delayed, for months, delivery of the affidavit to the victim of
the legal circles and public servants who engage in organised crime through abuse of the
Yet victims (!)
in the United Kingdom were / are seen to be working simply towards the creation and the
implementation of the intended alternative legal services, of which plans the Lord
Chancellor spoke when he was addressing the Home Affairs Select Committee in November
1999, in respect of the run-away cost for the Legal Aid facility.
pointed-to in this (and other affiliated pages) the visitor, the reader, the genuine
researcher and the concerned / interested taxpayer / citizen, should take on board. OF
SUCH ACTIVITIES the operations of Crimes Incorporated United Kingdom Unlimited
>>> CIUKU Enterprises <<< have been flourishing for centuries, if not
millennia. [*Link from here
to the words attributed to Jesus Christ by the creators / editors of the New Testament.
**Thereafter access from here the material facts and
the realities pointed to in the page where one reads of the connection to the issues
spoken of by Jesus Christ and the solicitor who engaged in the destruction of the business
of an old school friend. ***Readers need simply note that the solicitor Kypros
Nichola SET ABOUT USING A BLUNT FORGERY WHICH HE ENTERTAINED, as submitted by the
solicitors who were acting for the defendants who indulged in ARROGANT FRAUD at the
expense of his client : access from here the forgery created
and used by the legal circles in their quest for fraud aplenty on the targeted victim of
the initial fraud].
is founded and rests on the plans of the abductors and rapists of Democracy & Justice.
In the meantime their agents for ever busy promoting through SUBLIMINAL INDOCTRINATION
RANTING the pre-scripted *plans for sons of men* as 'organised by the creators of the
alleged creator of all and everything'. [*Link from here to an extract from the vile work of the creators of
the old testament rubbish, which Andrew Yiannides recognised and considered as such at a
Mrs Koula Yiannides
Seven Seas Chartering
7th Floor Berger House
36 / 38 Berkeley Square
London W1X 6AR
MY Ref. : 9F5YWAP
Your Ref. : Telephone call evening of 8th.
Thank you for initiating a telephone call last night through our
daughter. Whereas initially I was glad to have merited a call it was not long before you
begun to make your usual assertions and misrepresentations and causes and purposes of
You were irate, very angry and ….. And all
because I gave Chief Inspector Harris the two telephone numbers where he could contact
you; at work during working hours and in the evenings at home. YOU ELECTED TO OVERLOOK THE
REASON AND THE PURPOSE of that gentleman's interests in my/our family and the matters that
caused me to make complaints about the police in our area in the first place. Let me
neighbour attacks me, causing grievous bodily harm, simply because I parked a car in front
of the flat he lives - parking in front of our house occupied by another citizen's car. I
have to attend hospital for months because of injuries sustained as a result of that
attack. And our local police default to prosecute the criminal because HE IS ENGLISH and
I/we am/are not.
A builder contracts to do necessary work to the property our family benefits from
(investment for specific purposes) but he fails to act in accordance with that agreement.
He seeks to defraud me, threatens my life and properties and when the police (at Holloway)
are called they default to execute their duties properly. Encouraged by the police
failures to act in accordance with the law, THAT BUILDER COMES TO OUR HOUSE, THREATENS ME
to begin with and whilst I, the person who abhors physical violence, am telephoning the
police HE IS THREATENING YOU AND OUR CHILDREN TO BURN US ALIVE IN OUR SLEEP. You know what
followed and how I fought for my/our rights until eventually all those who were supporting
and aiding in the denial of rights to us, as a family. YOU KNOW that those, in charge of
JUSTICE, who had themselves denied rights to me/us were caused to review their tactics and
vile practices. YOU KNOW that a judgement for a substantial amount of money WE COULD DO
with was awarded to me against the fraudster ONE AND ALL WERE AIDING AND ABETTING. Money
is not as important to me as my family's well being and I did not proceed to execution of
that judgement because I am no fool. THE POLICE HAD YET AGAIN DEFAULTED TO TAKE ANY
APPROPRIATE ACTION against the fraudster and criminal one and all were assisting, aiding
and abetting again because that fraudster was/is English and I/we am/are not.
Our son's bicycle is taken at knife point from him (on a specific date I am sure
YOU will never forget without help from anyone); and the only step taken by the police was
by the initial w.p.c who attended our house in the presence of a neighbour and her son;
she simply took the details of the crime (time, place, what, how I SUPPOSE). Thereafter
nothing. AND YOU KNOW that our son takes to carrying knives himself because he feels, and
erroneously thinks, he is more secure and safe. I am the idiot who points out to him that
such possessions could and will lead to him being involved in more violent crime than
simple fights. YOU KNOW that last summer in the course of the last few days at school our
son is involved in a fight and he is alleged to have used a knife/piece of metal. You know
that at the beginning of the present school year, September 1994, we had to attend a
meeting at his school because of that incident. You know that our son asserted and claimed
in the presence of Miss Coghill (his teacher) that he did use a piece of metal and went on
to assert and claim "he believes he had no choice but to use whatever to protect
himself BECAUSE NO ONE CARES".
And you know that because he had earlier used that argument with me AND BECAUSE
all of you had declared the police never bothered to come to us in furtherance of any
investigation proper, for the violent crime OUR SON WAS THE VICTIM OF, I decided to take
matters further. YOU KNOW the police asserted and alleged they had allegedly visited YOU
on one date and OUR SON (in your presence) on another date. Both YOU and OUR SON had/have
been insisting no such visits took place and I am left with no option but to challenge
what are falsified police records. NOTHING UNUSUAL; remember the five Summonses I had to
fight after we were the victims of a hit and run accident because of a drunk driver? When
the police failed to investigate those CRIMES and subsequently charged me, THE VICTIM??
One's again our brilliant police were proving themselves what they stand for and how they
deal with crime in our area. Nothing had been done about our son and his bicycle; nothing
in respect of that violent crime; nothing but falsified records such as the ones that
produced FIVE SUMMONSES AGAINST THE VICTIM OF THE HIT AND RUN ACCIDENT!!! (and we are not
the only victims to be ignored, believe me).
AND A SENIOR POLICE OFFICER (from our local police station) who attends our house
brings along copies of records he asserts are the factual visits; the visits YOU AND OUR
SON ADAMANTLY STATE NEVER TOOK PLACE. It so happens that the two dates recorded are a
month or so apart; AND YOU (with the children) HAD GONE OVERSEAS FOR YOUR SUMMER VACATION
THAT YEAR. I point out to the senior officer the improbable visits because of your
(plural) absence out of the country. AND THE FOLLOWING MORNING HE HAS THE AUDACITY TO
TELEPHONE ME IN ORDER TO SUGGEST HE HAD MADE A MISTAKE. And he proposes a date a month
later for the second visit/meeting ignoring in the process the fact that I myself HAD BEEN
LOOKING AT AND REFERRING TO THE COPIES HE HAD BROUGHT ALONG THE PREVIOUS DAY. WHAT THAT
SENIOR POLICE OFFICER WAS PROPOSING ON THAT MORNING was the solicitors, the barristers and
the police themselves, favourite pastime: - Forgeries and falsified records in furtherance
of cover ups, in legal terms 'breaches of public duty', setting aside the law on forgeries
and falsification of records WITH INTENT to mislead and to deceive. And in this instance,
as with most, when forgeries are resorted to, the element of intent is paramount. If there
be no intent there is no need for such criminal activities.
And these cumulative failures (and with intent criminal activities) are
the subject matter of a long letter/document I sent to the Acting Chief Superintendent at
our local police station. THE VERY SAME POLICE STATION YOU YOURSELF USED when it suited
your premeditated plans and schemes. YOU KNOW HOW, WHAT AND WHEN and that there exists a
tape recording (made by the police themselves) which evinces more than enough as to
honesties and factualities, just as other evidence exist to cover other facts which none
can GO ON MISREPRESENTING AND OR USE FOR THE WRONG REASONS AND OR FOR THEIR ABHORRENT AND
VILE ACTIVITIES AT THE EXPENSE OF OTHERS.
Koulla I make no apologies for doing what I had to do. If you feel that
the police have infringed on your time, remember you did call on them when it suited your
purposes. In this instance I suggest you discuss the issues and my reasons / reasoning (as
stated in this letter) with those you rely upon for guidance. AS I stated on the telephone
the senior police officer who telephoned you at the office is FROM ANOTHER POLICE AREA.
His brief is to investigate my (should have been OUR) complaint against the local police
in the first instance and as he stated on Monday ONLY IN RESPECT OF THE COMPLAINT COVERING
THE FALSE RECORDS AS TO THE ALLEGED MEETINGS WITH YOU AND OUR SON AND THE SUBSEQUENT
ATTEMPT TO AMEND AND FALSIFY FALSE RECORDS.
If in the circumstances you feel that our son's future merited and
merits no consideration YOU BETTER THINK AGAIN. Unlike you I abhor violence and I do not
believe in taking the law in my own hands. Remember it was your sister, you and another
who were arrested by the police for getting involved in the fighting at the casino in
Leicester some years ago. I did not get involved. Furthermore I do not seek to achieve my
goals through devious and dishonest activities NOR BY VIOLENCE as you appear to have been
brought up to believe. I informed you of dishonesties and other acts I detested in the
past and my early years, and you know full well why I changed the spelling of my surname.
I may have believed C.K. Joannides was unlike his father, his youngest brother and or his
eldest sister. I had to find out, whether he was the honest person he had been claiming he
was. (I did suspect he was in collusion with his father and youngest brother in the
devious and dishonest activities I told you of when we first met, but I never accused him
of such involvement, over the years, as you are well aware). I did what I had to do,
therefore, in the only way open to me since one and all were prepared and WILLING TO
PERPETRATE THE LIES AND THE FRAUDS THEY WERE USED TO. Worse still, everyone seemed content
and hell bent to perpetuate HIS CONDITION; and that is why I even contacted a psychiatrist
to help me make up my mind as to how we could get to the truth about his allegations as to
the undisclosed and secret bank account that caused him the loss of his position with
BACS. Believe me I am dealing with those issues and the aspects of his state of mind just
as I am dealing with other aspects such as I deal with in the matter of the fraudster
builder and those who aided and abetted him. I may not be lucky in the job hunting area
BUT I AM NOT killing and or wasting my time and wasting away. All in good time. You may
resent my honesty and sticking to the rules but I have no intention of joining the
dishonest and criminals just as I told the County Court Judge on 29th October
1992 when I was asked if it was my intention to join the legal profession after the
publication of my book. THAT conversation was on the very day you had a big argument with
our son after you took the children to see your dream house in Leytonstone, while YOU WERE
IGNORING THE NEEDS OF THE ONE YOU EXPECTED FROM ME, just as you were ignoring mine and the
facts and circumstances around us. Remember Koulla? You expected of me to get further into
debts over the house renovations whilst your holiday breaks were more important whilst I
did not know how I would be able to meet existing Visa account liabilities, etc. But then
ONLY I CARED and CARE about tomorrow, all you know is today and NOW. What about our son's
to-morrows as a result of the route HE ALONE CHOSE with obvious support from you. USE
VIOLENCE; FIGHT (as in the casino at Leicester) and you sought to make of me something you
know I was and | am not.
How on earth can you justify your mentality and attitude when you deal
with imaginary situations and not the facts. Such as your reasons for objecting to me
giving your office telephone number to the police. THE POLICE WHO ARE NOW INVESTIGATING
THE FAILURE OF OUR LOCAL POLICE TO INVESTIGATE THE VIOLENT CRIME OF WHICH OUR SON WAS THE
VICTIM AND THEIR SUBSEQUENT ATTEMPTS AT AND WITH FALSIFIED RECORDS. I can but congratulate
your logic for using the fact the police telephoned you at work. Why create imaginary
scenarios Koulla? Or just another issue for argument? When will it end? When will you deal
with the facts and the truths such as I enumerate in this letter, AND CO-OPERATE FOR A
CHANGE? Or is this to be another case when I have but to surmise that perfect you has to
tell me off? THANKS.
Love Andreas YIANNIDES
I did give the police your evening / flat telephone number; the choice where and when they
contact you was theirs. Any subsequent need to meet with you and take your statement(s) is
and should be subject to mutual agreement. Ones again I apologise you have to meet with
the police, but as I stated above you did not object to such meetings when it suited your
Victims, readers, researchers and students
of the New World Order Code of Ethics can access from here
the page where we publish a letter from the Inspector who 'conveniently was removed from
the case warranting and commanding investigation as to WHY THE POLICE LIED & FAILED TO
ACT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THEIR RETAINERS, IN RESPECT OF THE CRIME MR ANDREW
YIANNIDES' SON, TEENAGER ALEXANDROS KIMON YIANNIDES, WAS THE VICTIM OF. All should be
prepared to read of the commitment by Chief Inspector Harris and ponder as to 'the
reasons', WHY THE MOTHER OF THE VICTIM CONVENIENTLY WAS NOT PREPARED TO CO-OPERATE AND
SUBMIT / PROVIDE THE NECESSARY STATEMENTS TO THE POLICE. (*F)
The right to reply and to justify behaviour and activities covered
in our pages, is assured to any one named. We will publish excuses & whatever
submitted to us with any legal argument arising thereof.
This page is dedicated to all abusers of our
time and in particular to evil-mongering fraudsters, such as Mr. Johan Michael Richard
Foenander and his soul mates from within the LIPS crowd-mob. Also, to all other charlatans
who allegedly care or are concerned about 'the serfs', they draw in their nets.... simply
FOR MORE OF THE SAME. Agents of the UKMM, in 1998, wrote to Andrew, the founder of the Non
Governmental Organisation *human-rights*, while of opinion that they were addressing
an idiot, as others direct / cause them to believe. Their unsolicited invitation to
Andrew, caused him to contact the leaders of the UKMM. They were asked to furnish specific
information. They received letters to that effect later but typically, they failed to
comply, like all other charlatans and ostriches, when confronted with legitimate demands
or pointed to the realities. With such persons, allegedly leading / serving the victims of
Institutionalised Fraud & Corruption, as a solicitor
wrote of to a client who needs enemies?
|And in 2001 along came 2 other lovers of the
system as is, Mr Patrick Cullinane of the IBRG & Ms Marisa Sarda, a 'crafty genius'
and product of the LIPS crowd/mob. With foul intentions the two set about to create FALSE
RECORDS ABOUT Mr Andrew Yiannides, in respect of his work; false promotions of their own
making for use by abusers of public office, who, as transpired later, had indulged in much
more than fraudulent demands from a targeted 'serf' who dared to challenge the criminal
activities of the protected and persons who could / can afford to secure the invisible
services of the criminals who were / are in control of the legal system and the court
services, part of Crimes Incorporated United Kingdom Unlimited (CIUKU) Enterprises.
Carbon Copy (cc) to Patrick stipulates the last entry.
- The three pages, on the left are of a FAX / letter
which Ms Marisa Sarda sent to Mr.Patrick Cullinane, a victim of the Inland Revenue.
- Most interesting the fact that the authoress of an intended
FALSE INSTRUMENT (created by agents / or tutored stooges who operate as lovers of the
system as is) failed to send/deliver the same instrument to the person it was being
- Anyone who knows of the whereabouts of the authoress should
contact her and ask her one SIMPLE QUESTION: "Why did she fail to fax her
response to the person she allegedly was responding to?"
- At the same time the maligned & crafty (both) should
also state THEIR PERSONAL REASONS as to why they set about to create the false records
they wilfully intended to suppress from the target of their fraudulent activities.
Reference to the date of the above letter
assists in recognising why the allegedly destroyed FAX was resurrected in 2004 by
Mr. P. Cullinane.
|The date and time when
transmission of the four images (3 above and one on the left) can
be seen at the top of all pages. Mr Patrick Cullinane, received copy of the above
'response by Ms Marisa Sarda to Mr Yiannides within 48 hours of Mr Yiannides
communicating, to her, his concerns relative to matters SHE INSTIGATED. She INSTRUCTED Mr.
Patrick Cullinane to ask Mr. Yiannides 'how much he charges persons he assists in and with
their cases at court'. Other priorities had been attended to (presence at Sheffield Crown
Court for the last week of Mr. Norman Scarth's trial) Mr. Yiannides raised issue with her
by repeating what Mr Patrick Cullinane had been instructed to seek information about. What
she received had been read and approved as truly representative of the scenario from
concept to the day the letter was written and transmitted to her. Upon receipt of the
purported copy to Mr. P Cullinane, he visited Mr Yiannides 'to express his anger at being
implicated in the very matters he HAD ACCEPTED instructions from her to deal with. His
failure to permit Mr Yiannides to read and make a copy of that which angered him was most
revealing. Denying to the 'intended' (as recorded) recipient copy of and access to the
content was most offensive, especially when Mr P. Cullinane carried on denying to Mr.
Yiannides a copy and access to the content because, he asserted, it was his property.
Anyone who is in contact with Mr. Cullinane can simply ask "WHY the
obstructions"? Access to the content of the letter FAX, by the intended
recipient.could not be denied, for it was ongoing in contempt of the provisions of various
Data Protection Acts. Essential PROTECTION FROM FALSE RECORDS (such were and remain the
allegations recorded in the letter) IS PARAMOUNT IN RESPECT OF ANYTHING CREATED &
MAINTAINED ABOUT THE CITIZENS of the United Kingdom.
|07. 03 .
04 SUN 16:46 FAX 0208 428 8644 IBRG (CJC) f~001
FROM Marisa Sarda
I would like to clarify a few points,
concerning the fax you have send me the other day. I should not have to be doing this but
there is a 3rd party involved & for Patrick’s sake I am taking my valuable
time to do this.
I do not know what you want me to apologise
for, I shall put the record straight:
1) I have met you at the meeting with Lips, a meeting
that nobody has seen anything like it by lack of professionalism.
2) On that day, you came to my house with Terry Ewing, you
wanted to know about my case & I gave you a leaflet where my case is explained on a
nut shell for everybody to understand, not just for victims. The leaflet has the objective
to tell Mr & Mrs average what can happen to them.
3) Some time still in 1998 you contacted me several times
asking me for my case. I have said that you have already got it. You said to me that
you wanted to put my case on the Internet together with other cases similar. I have said
what you have was enough because I firmly believe that the more that you put the less
that people read it.
You went on to say & you have said several times that you
wanted to have a website & that it cost money that everybody should chip in, I think
that you have said EVERYBODY COULD PUT £ 80. You can cruc1fze me if you want, but that is
the true. If at later date you have more victims & you thought you could bring
down the cost. I do not remember you saying that, because if you remember every time you
call, you talk & talk & talk & it is me who has to say " please say what
you call for".
4. Up to the 3rd of May I did not know how other pressure
groups organise themselves, but I am always very sceptical of people who need money to do
things, because it puts them in a position of vulnerability that if they need money sooner
or later the group is going to be infiltrated & rubbished by the opposition. I
particularly have extremely powerful & rich enemies to whom money is not an object
& to devalue my case by putting other cases not so serious in the same "
wash it DEVALUES THE SERIOUSNESS & suffering that we are going through. This I thought
before. I this I still think.
It is never my intention to upset anyone.
It has been you who has been calling me & after I had my EDP1 ( which people of weight
said I HAVE CHANNELLED MY CASE IN THE RIGHT PATHS ) you have tried to persuade me again
this year to join another group of several victims like myself. To this I have said that
if we were to organise something, I SHALL DO IT ON MY TERMS. You then called me
"HITLER this is very hard to understand, that I want what you want. We both want to
organise something & WE BOTH WANT TO HAVE CONTROL OF OUR CASES.
On the day when we spoke ion the phone when
you were at Norman’s I have told you that I was at the H o C on the 4th I
wanted people who have cases of serious grievances. I was in London, I have
made several calls, I only managed to leave a message on Ebert’s machine & David
Brown I have met personally & he said he was going to go with some evidence I could
not get hold of Patrick, I have left a message with Richard O’Mahoney that if Patrick
was engaged Richard could take to the H o C the cases published in the
On the 4th I was on my own. It
did not matter because I had some cases on file from newspaper cuts similar to mine. I
took that with me.
You were upset that I have not been in
touch telling you the time of the meeting. One should think that if you really wanted to
go, you could call the House, ask for Andy King’s secretary & ask at what time we
If you remember, on the 8th of Dec 1999 we
went to No 10 to serve Petitions. We went from all over the country, you did not bother to
turn up. There was some people who commented (I am not going to tell you who) that since
you were in London you could have made the effort.
THIS ARE THE FACTS, I WISH YOU HAVE CHOSEN
A BETTER TIME TO TAKE MY TIME.
What we all have to do, is to establish
what is a Campaign & what is a pressure group. A campaign could go on & on like
Liberty for 10 years. A pressure group (like Fairshares) does not just say what is wrong,
THEY ALSO TELL THE GOVERNMENT HOW T0 PUT IT RIGHT. We were organised, we wrote
letters at the same time to have more impact, we lobby the H o C & the H o L & the
law for splitting the pensions in divorce came about our efforts.
I remember it well, when I wrote to Andrew
Dinsmore with the names of the judges who acted wrongly on my case. I spread news around
that Dinsmore was collecting information. Nothing happened, his secretary told me that it
was only 3 THREE OF US WHO WROTE. This is why they did not take it seriously. I checked
with Norman & Geoffrey, they said they wrote, but if you remember you did not want to
put the names of the judges who had done you wrong. You refuse to follow anybody’s
ideas, but you expect everybody to say how high when you say jump".
1Solidarity must come from all sides, not
just from others to you. If you think that what you are doing is best, good luck to you,
but anybody who is a real victim, encourages others to try different angles & hope
that one of these days somebody, ANYBODY SHALL OPEN THE FLOODGATES FOR OTHERS.
I do not expect to change you, you
can not expect to change me. What I have said it is the true & if you still want to
blackmail me that you are going to go on into a character assassination, well, that is
your choice. Do not be surprised if at this time you devalue my efforts, you are also
If you were so eager to know the whole of
my case, it is very simple NO DISCLOSURE. You can ask Roger Jones, Sheela Wootton, Eva
Adshed, Patrick or others who have bothered to turn up that I had said to Justice Jacob
'SOME DISCLOSURE', I had said 'SOME' 6 tines in 1 hearing.
If you look at the internet, the LIPS in
America are organised & they passed a law that FRAUDULENT BILLING ON THE PART OF THE
LAWYERS IS FRAUD UNDER THE CONSUMER ACT. They put cases in a nut shell of some 200 words
THAT PEOPLE READ. You must think back when we had a normal lift that we did not have the
time to go through people’s problems if they needed 20 or 30 pages to say what is wrong.
As to anybody who is a real victim, I wish
you well with your campaign & I trust you will get there.
|Yet another crafty one, who had come along a
couple of years earlier. He had other ideas, plans and schemes for Mr Yiannides and his
work. He proved to have been just another dreamer who failed to consider the simple fact
that by failing to use his rights (as a victim (?)), while promoting opinions and
assertions about the media editors and barons, he was simply exposing his true colours
through his convenient defaults and failures. Just another convert-to & lover of the
system as is. He set about inviting & contemplating to suck Mr Andrew Yiannides into
the world of the fraudsters-club-recruits.
from the text below to the images of the actual communications
|10 April 2003
Mr Andy Constanti
Open Minds (Foundation?)
35 Helston Court
London - N15 5HF
My Ref. 10ACACDO
Your Ref. Convenient Defaults
Cc To Whom It May Concern
RECORDED DELIVERY plus 2nd
posting using Proof of Posting Service
REMEMBER : 'Εν Αρχή Ην Ο
Λόγος' – Ηράκλητος : 'One Begins With LOGIC' -
Dear Mr Constanti
Re: Your Convenient Defaults & Omissions attached
to YOUR(?) personal agendas
I refer you to my communication of February
20th 2003. You initially asserted and alleged that it was not delivered by the
postal services. You subsequently received the succinctly stated matters by fax. Your
convenient defaults and omissions had been and were being noted, over a long period of
time. Your elusive tactics, especially following the local Scrutiny Panel public meeting
last September (2002) were and have been most intriguing.
I refer you to your call last Saturday, in
order ‘to enlighten(?) me(!) and to show to me the article in the day’s Daily Mirror,
about the use of mobile phones. The latest ‘pronouncements’, apparently, following
research and studies on EMF radiation! The following should put things in perspective and
cause any reasonable person to surmise accordingly, as to the realities you and others
wish to shove under the carpets and or the family closets of the maligned and evil of the
society we live in:
- I DO NOT NEED TO REMIND YOU that when you first sought
introduction to me, and to my work, YOU WERE USING A MOBILE PHONE!
- DO I NEED TO REMIND YOU of the simple fact that, at the same
time, IT WAS YOUR INTENTION to raise issue over alleged EMF radiation bombardments
directed at your mother and you, allegedly, through the ceiling from the flat above your
mother’s and your residence?
- DO I NEED TO REMIND you of the attempt, the night when you
telephoned for me to call round in order to confirm, for myself, the noises ‘from the
equipment in the flat above’ used for the creation of the alleged direct bombardment of
- AND, WHAT OF the fact THAT AS I WAS MAKING MY WAY TO YOUR
DOOR the neighbour who, allegedly, was responsible for the asserted bombardments,
approached me (at that late hour) in order to point me to the empty / vacant flat
adjoining your residence, in order to enlighten(!) me(?) by asserting that the noises (EMF
Radiation bombardment equipment(?)) were emanating from THAT FLAT?
- DO I NEED TO REMIND YOU that I SIMPLY POINTED OUT TO THAT
VOLUNTEER, (who just ‘conveniently happened to be there’ at the right time(!))
that the noise she was referring to was coming from a faulty / inoperative fluorescent
light housing on the wall across the passage?
- DO I NEED TO REMIND YOU that I had to point you to the
simple fact that ‘big shot YOU, was using the latest gadget? I refer of course to YOUR
- DO I NEED TO REMIND YOU that I had to point out to you, on
three occasions, that my sister, my mother and I were being bombarded with EMF radiation
because of thousand-fold of transmissions FROM AND BY MOBILE PHONE MASTS? I referred of
course to the proliferation of such masts, ALL OVER THE PLACE, because of YOUR CHOICE and
use of the technology!
- DO I NEED TO REMIND YOU of the fact that, even though we
were no admirers of OR USERS, LIKE YOU, of the latest technology and gadgets, you carried
on ignoring my concerns? It was a simple case of ‘reckless use of the technology, by a
person who was complaining about its use in direct bombardments! It was a case OF
CONSCIOUS and voluntary APPLICATION of the very technology, straight into the ear drum and
the skull of an alleged victim who ‘just conveniently ignored my observations’ as of
no relevance to such a person, as YOU!
- DO I NEED TO REMIND YOU of the simple fact that my sister
HAD TO point out to you that you had ignored my requests TO CEASE USING A MOBILE PHONE,
while raising complaints about EMF radiation? It never occurred to you or you failed to
realise that you were not dealing with some ‘naïve’, gullible moron! However, AFTER
my sister pointed out to you the simple reality, YOU CEASED USING a mobile phone, at
least, in our presence!
I do not propose to delve on any other of
the numerous reasons and causes for concern as regards your perpetual duplicity of
purpose and scenarios. Such matters I leave for some later date. Right now I AM MOST
INTRIGUED by your persistent failures to act honourably and in a manner befitting your
alleged concerns about rampant fraud within the financial sectors and the legal system.
YOU WERE AFFORDED PLENTY OF OPPORTUNITIES to read of the results of the research and my
work going back to well over three decades. You were afforded the opportunities to SEE
SOME OF THE EVIDENCE that substantiates and qualifies that, what I state happens to
be the truth.
Following on from the above realities, I
remind you that while evidence exists, facilities have been put in place to support any
allegations, from and by any GENUINE VICTIMS! ONLY A FOOL OR OTHERWISE MOTIVATED
CHARLATAN carries on waffling and pretending WHILE RUBBING SHOULDERS with those he or
she complains of. You were, in fact, pointed to a number of such ‘wily and crafty’
(tutored by others in the background) persons. LIKE SOME OF THE CHARLATANS & STOOGES,
who crossed my path, over the years, you too, were made aware of the facilities that
exist FOR PURE, UNADULTERATED JUSTICE & DEMOCRACY. You were given more than enough
information and plenty of opportunities to either act as each occasion commanded, or to
come clean. You failed, abysmally, to stand behind your words as an alleged victim /
I did not and I do not care to know as to
who directed you to seek contact with me and or to search for ‘The CAMILA Project’ on
the Internet. The simple fact is that the person who introduced you to me KNEW that what
was being published on the Internet, by me, was under the Non Governmental Organisation
banner Human-Rights.Org and NOT ‘under ‘The CAMILA Project’. Interesting that
another who sought contact with me always refers to me and to my work as ‘The CAMILA
Project’. Most intriguing that others who were directed to contact me and or to invite
me to ‘join their movement’, they addressed their invitations to me as to ‘The
Born of the above realities, THE
FIRST CONCLUSION & COMMON FACTOR, Mr Constanti. The SECOND REALISATION IS MORE
IMPORTANT, though. It happens to be the very simple factor of seeking to work, with, and
from within the system. The crafty and wily NOT WISHING TO CHALLENGE OR EXPOSE OPENLY,
provided of course that they are in possession of genuine case-history / evidence /
material. We then come to the conclusion that such persons also prefer to work within the
existing framework (as with others that I spoke of to you FROM THE ONSET and I produced
evidence). The mentalities of such persons MOST PRONOUNCED THROUGH & BECAUSE OF
THEIR ‘VERY CONVENIENT’ DEFAULTS & OMISSIONS. Such persons CONSCIOUSLY
INDULGING THEMSELVES in contempt of the fact that they are pointed to such realisations.
What we have are alleged victims, who simply exhibit signs of sheer Sadists and
Masochists. SADISTS because, apparently, they love to know of the fact that thousands of
victims, out there, are being defrauded or tormented by the abusers of public office.
MASOCHISTS, naturally, because they themselves love being tormented by the very abusers
they do not wish to challenge or expose openly! Heaven forbid, why should they act in any
manner that is likely to lead to changes and deprivation of their right to relish in their
With the above realities in mind, I turn to the alternative route, the approach you made, in terms of finances, budget, premises,
staff etc. It was simply a case, of assuming that, like you, I was after power over others
and or for funds that most are conditioned to use as a means of measure for success! It
was simply a case of assuming that I could be treated as A NAÏVE AND SELFISH / EGOCENTRIC
OR SOLD OUT SOUL AS ALL STOOGES sent along my path were and happen to be. I need not
remind you of the fact that I downloaded and produced to you a printout of clearly defined
ministerial duties and responsibilities that were published by the Home Office on the
Internet. I attach copy as a reminder. I suggest that you consider the date when the
material was downloaded. Consider the fact that you were shown a true copy of the letter
from the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng and consider the simple fact that ‘The CAMILA Project’
search/reference to, by you, was a give-away BECAUSE the *human-rights* (NGO) HomePages
had been on line for well over two years!
Besides the above copy (Home Office Ministerial duties) I attach a letter
dated 1st November 1999 (some nine months after you made contact with me). I
suggest that you read that letter to the Chief Executive (then) of / at Haringey Council.
I do not have to point out, to you, the fact that MANY ISSUES / IRREGULARITIES AND
CRIMINAL OFFENCES ARE COVERED, leading up to the complicity of the police and the staff
and officers of / at the local County Court. READ IT ALL, DIGEST IT AND CONSIDER MY
DEMANDS FOR YOU TO CLARIFY YOUR MENTALITY, below.
I HEREBY DEMAND that you either justify your most recent and offensive
attitude (for over seven months, your convenient defaults now) in respect of your
persistent failures to confirm the undertaking by and from Commander Stephen James, last
September. The undertaking that the criminal matters, placed before his subordinates, over
a long period of time, were to be acted upon has been ignored, apparently, both by the
police and EVIDENTLY BY *Y*O*U* AN ALLEGED VICTIM OF THE PRACTICES!
We both know that Mr Singh, was rewarded and recommended for higher
pastures after his ‘excellent performance as architect and or protector of the ‘organised
disorganisation’ of the wing of CIUKU Enterprises known as Haringey Council, a Local
Authority. We both know what followed after he showed his true spirit and colours in the
course of a cricket match, later!
YOUR TRUE SPIRIT & COLOURS APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN EXPOSED, *a*g*a*i*n*
because of your reckless and or wilful repetitious defaults and omissions. I need not
remind you, yet again, that as such your attitude amounted and amounts to nothing short
of obstructions to justice FOR THE CITIZENS! Such attitudes and mentalities by and
from an allegedly ‘concerned for others’ alleged victim! An alleged victim who,
nonetheless, has been and is seen to be ‘working towards the maintenance of the existing
practices, while claiming to be ‘working as an insider who joined ‘the ruling party’
in order to bring about changes ‘on his own’, like others that I referred and
As of your first defaults and omissions I qualified that human
relationships (ανθρώπινες ανταλλαγές) is a two-way traffic and you
have established through your repetitious and convenient defaults to be nothing but an
egocentric and arrogantly motivated, for personal reasons and undeclared agendas,
individual. If you do not wish to co-operate for and in respect of the work called for and
warranted in order to cause the police to act AS PUBLIC SERVANTS, you should state so, *p*e*r*i*o*d*.
You EITHER co-operate in causing the police and others, to cease behaving as the
demigods they are of opinion that they are, OR you acknowledge that you have other and
undeclared agendas to serve than the ones you declared, initially. ABANDONING your
asserted goals, each time the opportunities arose, for you, to further your allegedly
intended aims was noted, time after time.
The concluding words above leading to: "…. hence the maligned
obstructions to and for others TO PROCEED AS THE LAW PROVIDES".
ENCL. 1. ONE A4 page / Internet Home Office Ministerial
- THREE A4 pages / Copy letter to G Singh Esq. Haringey Council Nov. 1st, 1999
- TWO-page letter ref. 8JFCAOHB to Haringey Council Housing & Social Services 8th
June 2001. (Work for a victim who acted as I (*human-rights*) required of him)
|The images, above, are of the four pages of the explicit letter that was
delivered to the dreamer of a stooge / directed / used / arrogant abuser and illustrious
liberty taker.The letter in HTML format is in the window, below. Note please that use of HTML assists in the creation of
kinks to and from. (*Link to the
text, content of the letter)
|The text below is in HTML format for links to and
from page images, also to other material
Mr Nicholas Stamoulakatos
London - N17 9YH
My Ref: 12AJNNEI
Your Ref: Bulletins / Fears / Inexcusable Misrepresentations
Dear Mr. Stamoulakatos & Miss Tambor
Re: ‘Perpetual misrepresentations and attempts to IMPOSE
I enclose my letters of (see-attached list) and the relevant
copy-attachments referred thereto. I forward these now that you are 'back to your normal
working, environment'. In putting together my concerns and thoughts I bear in mind your
suggestions / invitation / proposition that I should take an interest / over the case that
caused me to write to you in no uncertain terms. I refer of course to the attempts to
implicate me for the umpteenth time in matters that were and remain the creations of
fertile imaginings and false accounts by the authors.
I refer you to my extensive communication of 12 April 2002. I was
caused to settle (as briefly as was possible at the time) and to forward copies of that
long communication to both of you personally (using the proof of posting facility) and to
the ILFHR-UN using the Recorded Delivery facility. THE EVER PRESENT attempts to impose
on and for me concocted fabrications about my person, since I was introduced to you, were
and remain unacceptable. Mr Stamoulakatos ever since you sought contact, through
suspect quarters (*F2), with
someone who would be in a position to translate 'your books' from Greek to English, the
machinations never ceased. The attempts to impose 'your plans for / on me', have been an
endless tirade of wild schemes to which there appears to be no end.
MY LETTER LAST YEAR, to which I refer you, appears
to have merited no consideration, by you. I made it very clear that I objected to the
attempts to implicate me in a claim for alleged liabilities founded on fictitious work and
allegedly, contracted retainers. MY OBJECTIONS TO THE FABRICATIONS WERE VERY CLEAR and
your submissions to Edmonton County Court and in particular to DJ Silverman
intriguingly clear (*F3). Nonetheless you carry on as if you were and have been addressing an illiterate in law and
or a person who is prone to partake in fraudulent claims and or activities. Can you
please write back and justify such activities? You should send also a copy of your
explanations to your favourite court and judge, as you did last year. The judiciary, are of opinion that the citizens in the United Kingdom are
serfs of the Middle Ages and many a promoter of such mentalities still dwell in that era,
Mr Stamoulakatos. Such Public(!) Servants(?) who defraud their
Masters of their properties (including their rights in law) are being exposed on the
Internet for and because of the criminal indulgences the SERVANTS OF THE CITIZENS
appear to relish in unchecked, unsupervised and uncontrolled by a non-elected Minister who
is in charge of the 'free to act, as they please (and or as used by the state and
politicians) judicial chair occupants, through
contempt of all law; acting as dictators and the tools of politicians via the much
revered 'independence of the judiciary' promotions, when in fact it is clear that the
promoters know that they mean 'independent of the restraints of law' - licensed
criminals', in a pseudo-democracy. You should refer to THE
APPEAL that is published by *human-rights* on the Internet, covering aspects of how
the manna providers steal with the help of such criminals from the citizens who pay taxes
for the cost of retaining criminals as their servants at and in law. The copies of the
letters that I enclose, to:
- The Chief Executive and to
- The Social Services Department at Haringey Council, with
- The other attached copies of communications
ARE NOT NEWSPAPER CUTTINGS but intellectual property covering facts,
realities and the law applicable to factual scenarios from within the Borough of Haringey.
I refer you to your recent communications ALL FOUNDED AND RESTING ON YOUR
(End of Page 1 text - Link to image) - (Below
start of Page 2)
what MIGHT BE DONE to you during medical examinations and tests at the
North Middlesex Hospital. In one of your communications, you WRONGLY ASSERTED that I had
been at the same hospital and that I had stayed in after the tests for three days. YOU,
Mr. Stamoulakatos, had been told very clearly that I had to undergo similar tests at St.
Bartholomew's Hospital in central London. I clarified that I had gone to the hospital (for
the investigative tests) one late afternoon and stayed overnight. I qualified that the
tests were carried out the following day and that I was awake, throughout, watching
everything on a VDU (TV screen) because local anaesthetic was used. I further clarified
that I stayed in hospital for that night as well (just over one day by then) and that I
was released/allowed to go home, the following morning. THE SCENARIO that you elected to
create and to misrepresent to the North Middlesex Hospital authorities / officials was
just another figment of the type of theatrics and UNTRUTHS THAT EMANATE FROM YOUR QUARTERS
RELENTLESSLY. Where on earth, and HOW did the North Middlesex Hospital feature in the
events that I spoke of, to you, in respect of similar tests, to/for me at the BARTS, as
the hospital is known for short?
I am obligated to address the melodramas and the fears you relentlessly
promoted in your recent communications to the North Middlesex Hospital and to many others.
I ELECTED NOT TO address the issues there and then, as I was perfectly entitled to do in
view of the untruths that you promoted about my person, for the umpteenth time. I did so
BECAUSE I DID NOT WISH TO ADD TO YOUR DISTRESS AND WORRIES / CONCERNS about the
'possibilities' you were alluding to.
HOWEVER, you must compare my considerate approach with your attitude
towards the circumstances that you witnessed and got to KNOW OF in late 1996 and early
- With a contract on my life,
- With my mother's heart condition and her health in a deteriorating state and in
- WITH A BEREAVED SISTER, whose daughter was caused to take her
own life, because of her father's mentality and his lack of consideration FOR HER
- With that very same 'male chauvinist Scrooge of a penny pinching animal'
seeking to have my sister certified as mentally disturbed / unbalanced.
- And the very same Scrooge of a man behind the 'whatever it takes, get rid of him' (
Όσα, Όσα ) contract on my life. (Aiding advising and abetting him in all of
these YVA : see AoAO)
ALL YOU COULD MANAGE / ARRANGE / COME UP WITH (as a Human Rights
Activist and challenger of the evil-mongering, that you speak of in private ONLY,
including court appearances under the same guise) was for you TO MAKE FUN OF ME AND TO
IGNORE IT ALL. (Human Rights?)
To the above lack of interest and or concerns by/from you and the
organisation that you lead', I must add the fact that you were MOCKING ME, just like the
police about THE VERY REAL CONTRACT ON MY LIFE. It was not a case of imaginary lethal
injections or possible arranged accidents, as you were promoting recently about your
person and YOUR FEARS, but a very real contract on my life, with a witness to it all, in
existence. WITH THE POLICE LAUGHING AT AND MOCKING ME INSTEAD OF INVESTIGATING THE
COMMISSION FOR A MURDER, ALL you contributed at the time was to make fun of me! And you
did so, simply because of my fears and sentiments about the tragic loss of a life, that of
my niece, and my concerns for my sister and what the penny-pinching chauvinist was
planning for my sister.
Out of necessity, I have to remind you that it was WHEN I BECAME AWARE
that the Scrooge of a man who had been boasting that he could buy any service (the police
in his palm, etc.) was benefiting from 'Lack of any issued or served Summons'. Such
assertions by the Magistrates Clerk, EVEN THOUGH A HEARING DATE HAD BEEN FIXED by the
Criminals in Control of Haringey / Highgate Magistrates Courts! That my niece was caused
to take her own life (by the generous buyer of services from and by criminals' was not
enough for 'cold blooded and cool thinking you', naturally! All was noted, however.
TO CAP IT ALL UP, when a new hearing had been arranged, Wendy turned up
late, WELL AFTER THE CONCLUSION OF THE ADJOURNED HEARING, with an excuse that you were
held up in another case/hearing/court. So much for your interest in the serious issues you
- No Summons ISSUED ?
- No Summons SERVED ?
- And the court HAD invited the victims, to their theatres !
You must have recognised that it was a case of 'further indulgence and
to have fun at and with the victims. Just like you mocking me because of my fears for my
life and what the male chauvinist man my sister married might proceed to do to her, had
his contract on my life materialised. (Human Rights?)
(End of Page 2 text - Link to image) - (Below
start of Page 3)
I never asked for any proof of 'the other hearing' because by then I
had enough about your plans for me, especially with the never ending attempts to implicate
me in other plans than the work for translation of non existent books which you had/have
been talking of as work that has been ready for PUBLICATION (at least in Greek) ever since
you sought contact with a person to translate(?) the works(!).
YOU caused me to get in touch with the Inland
Revenue not long after I was introduced to you, Mr Stamoulakatos. I did so because of
an indulgence you embarked upon WITHOUT ANY REFERENCE TO ME, even though it entailed use
of my residential address. YOUR PLANS FOR THE TRANSLATOR TO BE TAKEN IN (and for a song
/ ride) FAILED. You should have recognised then and have known of it, ever since, that
I am no fool or some 'mug' who can be made to fall in any trap because of 'financial
gains' through fraudulent schemes and promotions, such as you have relentlessly been
'giving birth to via imaginary scenarios'.
- I never contacted you for the publication of any of your non-existent works / books.
- I simply contacted you for 'your asserted needs' for someone to translate from Greek to
English, such books as I WOULD ENDORSE AND APPROVE OF, as I qualified at the time and in
letters ever since.
- NO BOOKS - were ever referred to or handed over to me, to read, approve of and endorse
'for translation' with any possible input from me, SHOULD I HAVE AGREED to enter into such
an agreement with you, as co-author'.
YOU KNOW WHY I ASKED FOR THE CONSTITUTION
/ Articles of Association of the ILFHR-UN. You know that it turned out that it was a
joke of a laughable translation from Greek to English, as I read through it. You should or
MUST HAVE RECOGNISED that I WAS NO SIMPLETON who would ever be likely to ENTERTAIN SUCH
RIDICULOUS PLANS, AS YOU CONCOCTED FOR AND ATTEMPTED TO IMPLICATE ME IN. The simple
fact that an alleged Human Rights Organisation IMPOSES, through its Constitution /
Articles of Association, A DICTATORIAL REGIME, is an insult to humanity. IMPOSING on
the naïve, the gullible AND THE VULNERABLE, who join such a set up and sign away THEIR
'RIGHT TO DISSENT', was and remains the most vile of insults to any intelligent person who
knows of and values his rights from within any Democratic State. Your Socialist /
Communist Ideals, and background, may have been of influence on you, when you first set
about drafting such a constitution / Articles of Association. That factor alone was the
only reason why I looked upon that vile and CONTEMPTUOUS OF HUMAN RIGHTS LAW and breaches
/ violation AS SHEER STUPIDITY. Yes, stupidity and I choose to I allow myself the same
freedoms and liberties as you have been doing for years. ANYONE who approved the
ILFHR-UN Articles of Association and Constitution AND ANYONE WHO ENDORSES SUCH PROCLIVITY
has no rights to refer to himself or themselves as Human Rights activists and or
Your activities behind the scenes, as of the onset, disclosed and
exposed much. Only a dreamer could have come up with the invitation and the contract that
you concocted in the first instance, without any proofs of any works or books, in Greek,
from and by you. Proof of such works, was and remained for years YOUR FIRST PRIORITY, if
you genuinely sought contact with me for such translation. Producing, to me, such work was
ALSO WARRANTED UNDER MY PRE-CONDITIONS to any agreement with you IF I WAS TO UNDERTAKE
and contract for such work with you.
You even ATTEMPTED to 'engage me' in your plans TO IMPOSE ON ME, a
contract which I rejected outright. YOU KNOW PERFECTLY WELL that I did so, because it was
a case of YOU seeking to IMPOSE ON ME the role of a publisher and distributor, in contempt
of the offer that I had agreed to call upon you and to discuss with you; simply
TRANSLATION….. TRANSLATION…. TRANSLATION.
Following receipt of my letter of 12 April 2002 (to which I refer you)
you wrote a letter to DJ Silverman at your favourite, local court about my person and the
implications were obvious. I may have chosen to ignore the obvious, because of the
questionable manner and the false assertions that were being put forward about my person
in respect of the alleged claims for damages and alleged translation work. I suggest that
you consider carefully the letters which I had no choice but to write to Mr Andy Constanti
(dated 10th and 20th April 2003) and to the letter that I wrote to and for you
in Greek. Both of my letters to Mr A. Constanti are very clear in what they are intended
to convey to that charlatan and abuser of my time. I suggest that you consider very
carefully ALL OF THE ISSUES RAISED through the letter in Greek to you Mr Stamoulakatos. Do
not fail to note that I WAS ABLE TO WORK OUT where he came from and WHAT HIS PLANS (with
those who directed him to me) WERE. (Human Rights?)
You should consider ALL OF THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES POINTED TO:
(End of Page 3 text - Link to image) - (Below
start of Page 4)
- Through the two letters to Mr A Constanti, you should recognise that he simply 'set
about to obstruct justice' and my rights and duties under the law! Such vile acts on top
of all the abuse of my time and all of the other liberties he indulged in, while
benefiting from much by way of guidance and assistance in the many problems he 'was
facing' and had been referring to me. I need not remind you that he was NOT THE ONLY GREEK
who sought to promote / sell a Trojan Horse to a person of Greek background. There was the
introduction for and by the Loonies (that is how the legal professions refer to the
Litigants) In Person Society, plans for victims of THE TRIAD: Legal / Judicial / Police
- By considering very carefully the clearly stated facts to the Chief Executive Officer at
Haringey Council, in my letter of 1st November 1999. Gurbux Singh Esq. was
responsible for 'THE BLUNTLY ORGANISED DISORGANISATION' and the fraudulent conversions of
Housing Benefit funds. Nothing but sheer constructive frauds through pre-arranged
'CREATIVE ACCOUNTANCY SCAMS'. You MUST consider the fact that I exposed and I am exposing
it all on the Internet. I caused the issues to be brought out into the open (local press)
AFTER I WROTE TO THE HOME SECRETARY in December 1998.
- BY ARRANGING to visit an Internet café, where you SHOULD ACCESS the letter to the Home Secretary (in 1998) AND POSSIBLY RECOGNISE the
big difference between the 21st century and the Middle Ages where you are still
roaming and meandering.
- BY CONSIDERING the submissions to the criminals at Haringey Council who sunk their heads
in the sand, like ostriches, after receiving the letter dated 8th June 2001. I
SETTLED the legal arguments 'for the intended victims' and Mr. P. Nicolaou signed and
ensured it was delivered to the dreamers / criminals. READ IT and CONSIDER THAT IT WAS
INTENDED TO BE A LESSON IN LAW and that it was put on the table of the CRIMINALS IN
CONTROL OF THE SOCIAL SERVICES and the LEGAL DEPARTMENT, at Haringey Council. Then
consider my suggestions to you in the letter in Greek about 'the asylum creators and their
partners in crime. I refer, of course, to those who welcome 'the created' asylum' seekers
and THEN provide manna through thefts of the properties and the rights in law of targeted
citizens, from within an alleged democratic state that allegedly rests and is founded on
principles of law and order. (Human Rights?)
I hereby invite you to justify the alleged 'retained for and to remain
as translator' in your letter to DJ Silverman. I am exposing the aforesaid judicial chair
occupant, on the Internet. The stated facts, through the published appeal IN THE ONLY TRUE
AND OPEN COURT IN THE WORLD are very clear. The legal arguments are founded and rest
solidly on the stated facts, on the breached and violated rights in law, but most of all
on documented evidence that many shoved in the dark corners of their perverted minds.
I hereby invite you to justify the implied assertion that the atrocious
English used in the 'work' publication / yearbook / promotional work for the ILFHR-UN -
come 'The Abduction of Abdullah Ocalan' was / is remotely connected to any alleged
translation work by me.
I pointed you to the realities and the facts AS THESE ARE DEVELOPING
NOW. I gave to you a copy of my letter to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP - ex Minister and
you should consider attending / going to an Internet café for access to ALL OF THE
MATERIAL POINTED TO the MP through the text of the letter. Then, I expect of any
genuine challenger and exponent of the law on human rights to cease all ostrich acts and
to act for and in the interest of the 'serfs'.
I conclude by pointing you to the words of Heraklitos which the
creators/editors of the Gospel according to St. John set off with. The Greek, gentleman
who was introduced by the Loonies In Person Society, when asked if he had any books in his
collection about the work of Heraklitos, came up with a beauty of a 'mbourda', "I
was never interested and have no interest in sculptors and sculpture". I would
have expected such an answer from Mr Andy Constanti who grew up in the United Kingdom, but
not from somebody, who was born, grew up and was educated in Greece, at least to College
ENCL. As text and attached list.
Back to letter images
And in 2004, reminders
as in the facsimile below the crafty one received.
Fax: (for UK: 0044) From UK: 0870-0541301 (Not
applicable after March 2006)
Non Governmental Organisation
Creators of the human-rights.org
www based Community on Line
||Andy Constanti - OPEN
||Andrew Yiannides -
Human-Rights Org. London
the REAL CRIMINALS are covered up.
||THREE - including this cover
||CoL Re: FRAUD & SOCIETY'S CORRUPTION
||¨ For Review
||¨ Please ACT -
||¨ Please REPLY
||¨ Please RECYCLE
Dear Mr Constanti
I refer you to the news that made it to and
was reported in all local FREE papers, covering the issue of a Haringey COUNCIL MANAGER
who was convicted of FRAUD. There is NO DOUBT IN MY MIND that the news reached your ever
so inquisitive person.
- The disturbing, to me, issue arising out of the reporting
was and remain the words used by the Executive Councillor for Housing, Clr Isidoros
Diakides. As you should recall, and must have recorded, the very Clr chaired the meeting
in September 2002 when the police Commander UNDERTOOK & PROMISED to deal with the
criminals who were engaging in the rampant conversion / theft of Housing Benefit funds.
The Clr, the police and you, were fully aware of the facts / practices and SAW / RECEIVED
documented evidence in respect of *THE FREE-FOR-ALL* as I COINED the practices. You know
why I did so and that it was because of WHO WERE INVOLVED and who were benefiting from the
rampant fraud and corrupt practices.
- The issue of 'WHY & WHO responsible FOR THE PERPETUATION
OF THE STATE OF AFFAIRS' did not and does not rest with the Clr or the police as I
explained to you on many instances. And as YOU KNOW from personal experiences, bearing in
mind what you initially sought contact with me for, yet 'set-about to promote other
interests', it is not what people say but what they do that counts.
I transmit with this FAX an explicit
communication covering historical facts which the editor of the paper, to whom it was
addressed, published but WITH two deliberate changes that indicate wilful actions intended
to mislead the readers. The original has since been transmitted to a Hellenic organisation
in the USA for the simple reason that second and third generations of Hellenes, even the
present generations in HELLAS itself are not aware of and deliberately kept in the dark
about. I am transmitting 'the article' only because of your regular references to Evagoras
Pallikarides and his poem that you used so often in your exchanges with me and to
politicians in the United Kingdom.
I have published a page at human-rights and
THE CONTENT MIGHT INTEREST YOU and any genuine thinking and not indoctrinated (because of
associations/teachings followed) or conditioned (like Pavlovian dogs) pseudo-humans.
Andrew Yiannides NDD., ACFI., ATI. FNAAAS
In October 2010, the coalition's Attorney General, in an interview
published by 'COUNSEL' specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves
from cases of (small-fry) fraud and asserted that he was
making that element his department's priority* [*Link from here to
the evidence]. IT
REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY WILL
IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT FRAUD, and IF IT WILL DEAL with the criminals who abuse
public office, especially when faced with appropriate submissions and claims
that will be delivered in due course. Visitors/readers are urged to read the
article published in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David
Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003 [*Link
from here to the article we reproduce in another webpage
and consider "Why tolerate the arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the
audacity to assert to the lawmakers that the y, the lawmakers have nothing to do with the
law"]. While there, above it,
the explicit letter to ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days
earlier. ALL alleged victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the
letter was sent to the Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies
of other letters submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official
appointees to public office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is
of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when
called upon properly in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other
'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that
led to the right actions by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about
exposing one of the most evil of alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever
contacted us [*Link to our explicit
submissions to (a) the Prime Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) the Home
Secretary. WE acted so after we had secured more than enough evidence about the parts of
an alleged victim whose only interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING
QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts
in blunt attempts that were intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess
about with, Mr Andrew Yiannides].
Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998 [*Link*
[*L] from here to the letter] and note the results
evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching
its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the
job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do [*Link [*L] from here to the evidence we
point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who
were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS
crowd / mob].
no one has ever bothered to consider the relevant factors that apply to such scenarios. No
one APPEARS TO CARE, irrespective of the words of many a dignitary (*Link).
2. The suspect quarters were
from within the family of the youngest brother of Mr. Andrew Yiannides. The very person,
Mr Savvas Kyriacou Joannides, had been involved in many deceitful activities and
the fact that the very solicitor, Mr Kypros Nicolas, did engage in the promotion of
the FORGERY (*Link to the forgery ) for perversion and corruption of justice made the
solicitor an ideal partner for all intended frauds on any targeted persons, including
relatives / family members. Hence the very reason why junior was using the very solicitor
for both his own and the solicitors dishonest ends and goals.
Visitors/Readers/Researchers can link from here to an appeal that arose at the time
when we were looking into the Housing Benefit CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS & CREATIVE ACCOUNTS
BY LOCAL AUTHORITIES (Local Government / Councils in the United Kingdom). The very
District Judge, DJ Silverman, we are exposing in our pages. In the past Mr Nicholas
Stamoulakatos was complaining of and about the very DJ Silverman. Suddenly DJ Silverman
merits a personal letter from the conniving Nicholas Stamoulakatos, an alleged human
rights activist / promoter and an alleged defender of the screwed and stitched up victims
of the legal system. The intentions of the author were and remain most clear. 'We failed
to entice Mr. A Yiannides in the plan for fraud on the Insurers BUT WE WILL PROVIDE FALSE
INSTRUMENTS, LATER, FOR ALLEGED TRANSLATION WORK. (We will introduce such in due course as
evidence whereby the alleged retainers for alleged Internet Consultancy Services, by Mr
Yiannides to the ILfHRoUN shall / can be used accordingly).
4. Reference is made above in the
matter for the warranted investigation in the matter of false records by the police in
respect of the theft of a bicycle AT KNIFE POINT and the mather of the teenager / victim
of the crime, NOT WISHING TO BE HARASSED BY THE INSPECTOR who was appointed to investigate
the false reocrds. Reference is also made to the issue 'they simply stuck to their agenda
and script' and the facts which the slected few (of the alleged victim-challengers) were
made aware of, will be rteleased in due course >at the right time<..
Back to Home Page -
Table of Contents