Changes 19 Oct. 2006
HELP US TO HELP YOU Please (*Link to plea). JOIN others On Line and publish your Statement
of Facts (Member's case at the European Court on Human
Rights - paves the way TO PLEAD VIOLATIONS caused through abusive use of the courts in
allegedly Democratic States. ALL IS organised by the very circles who have been arranging
all of humanity's tribulations FOR THOUSANDS OF YEARS) and
the Evidence you have. Use your rights in law (link)
and ACT, as / or with others, against the offenders.
Join them and chip in for the creation of the mass of evidence against the abductors and
rapists of Justice. You can then benefit from THE FACTS and evidence that you will help
establish. It can all be used in any action, severally or jointly with others, as the case
may be . Crimes against humanity are not ruled out when
a large number of citizens can come up with evidence and as victims concur and or expand
the FACTS STATED & The VIOLATIONS PLEADED as LODGED at the ECoHR, already.
The visitor's attention is drawn to the
words of Jesus Christ, attributed to Him by the editors / creators of The Gospel according
to St. Luke. Access His words to the lawyers some 2000 years ago. Many the dignitaries
over the two millennia who shared His views (*Link).
Letter from the Prime
Minister's private office, evincing Recognition of the elements reported. November 1999
Letter to the Prime Minister
thanking him for referring submissions he received from Andrew Yiannides to the RIGHT
Minister / MINISTRY. December
Below the arrogance
of some junior pen-pusher at the Home Office. The person presumably was / is better
equipped in law, and THE RIGHTS OF THE CITIZENS, than the Prime Minister!
They received copy of Andrew's letter to the Prime Minister (above)
wherein clear references to the CRIMES reported.
Notice from a hearing intended for 12
NOTE the absence of a date
Below Order STRIKING OUT
the dreams of the users of the petitioner for the usual.
Visitors - Readers of the facts covered in this page are requested to access the two
challenges as settled, by us and submitted to the abusers of the courts' facilities, which
facilities we hasten to point out many an alleged victim of the legal circles have been
working against us, as lovers of it all because they aim to maintain the rampant
constructive frauds in place, FOR THEIR OWN FRAUDULENT ENDS.
to Page & Site - List
Page CHANGES - List
RIGHTS In Legal Terms
FRAUD : Definitions
CRIME PAYS - confirmed
FRAUDSTERS CLUB - List
Public Agents To ACCOUNT
The ISSUES - Introduction.
LETTERS TO - Link to List
LETTERS FROM - Link to List
Other SITES EXPOSING
1. This Page
2. Site-Pages Intro. - List
3. Other Sites- Introducing
4. Quotes - A-Z Index
5. No Waffle - No Falsehoods
6. Personalities - Quotes
7. Press Media - Hypocrites
8. Institutionalised FRAUD
9. Local Authorities Fraud
10. 12.3 Billion Compensation & An Affidavit Years Ahead
11. Public Servants Instigate Fraud -
12. Relying On Local Courts
13. BENEFIT FREE FOR ALL
14. Police & False Information
Industry - List
WHY INDUSTRY - Reasons
1. EU Public Sector FRAUD
2. TAXES for Compensation
3. Lawyers Appalling Service
4. Page link to MEDIA Page
5. AWARDS to INSIDERS
YEARS ON, 2007 the Daily Mail / the media decide to address
the very issues the editor contemptuously carried on ignoring just as the case was
with the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD with the very same circles organising it all, while
the sucker-serfs were & are kept in the dark, care of followers &
promoters of the teachings and the HINTS RECORDED by the creators and
promoters of the Old Testament = RUBBISH* [*Link from here
|Flickers of HOPE?
SOLICITORS & FRAUD - Link to their arrogance
|*Page Created: October 2004*
visitors / readers should access the page where we point to Parliament's Law and how the
courts facilities are abused by the criminals who are in control of our courts and in
most, if not all, pseudo-democracies. The link from this paragraph
should be of particular interest to MOST MEN VICTIMS OF THE DIVORCE INDUSTRY, the flagship
of CIUKU Enterprises.
||Site under reconstruction - ongoing additions and improvements
|Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.
As part of the
reconstruction process all new pages and pages where changes and additions have been
implemented, are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes.
The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include
new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in
other pages. For further clarification
- Visitors who missed or failed to notice and read the question and the revealing facility, at the top of
the page, should do so before proceeding further. [*Link from here to the undisclosed
facility for denial of rights & access to Justice, as arranged by alleged Public(!)
Servants(?) and the judiciary who indulge as they please and as we cover in our pages]
- The arrangements by judicial chair
occupants, TO DENY JUSTICE to the serfs', in a pseudo-democracy, very clear indeed. [*Link to Footnote].
- The very
elements establish fraud on the citizens and qualify why the founder of human-rights
determined as he did over three decades ago. [*Link to conclusions as of 1972]
- Other Public Servants also, busy
at obstructing Justice. One Claire Soroczynski, retained by the Home Office, apparently
determined that she was/is better equipped in law than the Prime Minister. [*Link to the letter]
- The letter from the Prime
Minster's private office indicative of possible action by the government as in 1998.[*L*Link to
letter and subsequent press reports
- Andrew's letter to the Prime
Minister, re-iterating the foundations for the earlier submissions to the Prime Minister
was also received by the Home Office. [*Link
from here to the letter]
- Officers at Charring Cross police
station, also indulged in similar promotions via 'a lover / promoter of the system as is'. [*Link]
- The Lord Chancellor's office /
Department denounced the promotions stated above = falsehoods. [*Link from here
to letters exposing the promoter & subliminal indoctrination operative who was all too
happy to brandishing the false instrument the letter from the police].
- Other lovers of the system
as is, noted to be acting as blind, deaf and dumb monkeys while acting as subliminal
indoctrination operatives and as users / maintenance engineers of the system as is. [*Link from here
to a letter from such a person].
Instrument Intended to Mislead = Indictable offence especially when pecuniary advantage
for third parties to benefit from, is the objective of the creators. [*Link from here to
relevant Law and THE OBVIOUS CONTEMPT FOR PARLIAMENT'S LAW BY BOTH BRANCHES OF LAW
ENFORCEMENT, in our allegedly civilised Democratic State, which is what the media Barons
and through the Intellectual Prostitutes they retain and maintain proclaim our country,
the United Kingdom, to be].
- The document below is published in
the interest of all victims of the divorce industry everywhere; men
and women alike.
- They all should thank the likes of
the 'fraudsters' club recruits', the asses who fell for and love the carrot dangling at
the end of the tunnel.
- Adoption of 'the
system as is', for 'more of the same' was and happens to be their goal.
- Many are
running around offering 'legal assistance and advice to victims of the legal circles, but
ONLY FOR THE REWARDS UNDER THE TABLE FACILITY; rewards for sucker-victims who agree to
suppress (not to speak of) the criminal activities instigated & processed through
abuse of the courts' facilities, as covered in this page.
- This page, the
realities and the evidence we point to >>> IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN<<<, does
not exist as far as 'the authorities and all of the fraudsters-club-recruits, we name and expose in our pages, are concerned.
- They aim
only for the perpetuation of the constructive frauds through abuse of the courts
facilities. Servicing the practices as maintenance engineers, working for and leading to
the second fraud on the taxpayers is their objective [*Link from here
to the arrangements in place which we expose in our exclusive page, which page EVERY
SINGLE ONE WE NAME & EXPOSE AS LOVERS OF THE SYSTEM AS IS, contemptuously cast aside
and have been ignoring for years instead of pointing all TAXPAYERS, they were / are in
touch with or to persons who contact them].
such persons in the pre-scripted scenarios, perpetuation of the practices could have been
impossible. [*Link from here to the plans for such morons]
- The bait,
through the facility exclusively exposed by human-rights simply ignored by the media
barons, who retain Intellectual Prostitutes for subliminal indoctrination of the ill
educated serfs, as planned by the media barons and their affiliates / their partners in
crime against humanity. [*Link from here to a page where we
introduce & point to the seriously concerned victims, readers and researchers to the
roots of it all].
indeed the 30 pieces of silver that betrayed a Master.... more silver and the naive are
coerced to demand: "Let Barrabas go, crucify the Nazarene".[*Link from here to the ploy used to entice & convert
morons from victims to lovers of the constructive frauds through the abused courts'
- Silver, yet
again, and the ill-educated, asses fall for 'the reward', for the carrot dangling at the
end of the tunnel. [*Link
from here to the exclusive page where we relate & cover the
bluntly organised constructive frauds through abuse of the courts' facilities].
- *Access from here the words attributed to Jesus Christ by the
creators / editors of the New Testament in the quotes page. Recognise that for at
least 1700 years the same evil forces and the practices as organised and arranged by the
criminals in control of all PSEUDOdemocracies set in motion centuries ago. [*Link from
here to the FOOTNOTE where we name some known lovers of the system as is. We refer
to persons who fell for, adopted and are using the arrangements in place for pecuniary
advantage, participation in the distribution of stolen funds from the budget, as covered
in our exclusive page which each and every person we name & expose never bothered to
address, despite the fact that one & all claim to have been victims of fraudulent
court proceedings. All were / are seen and known to be acting exactly as the licensed
professionals they were / are complaining about. Such persons were / are not content to
have submitted to invitations to be party to the double constructive frauds on the
taxpayers, they ARE RUNNING AROUND, asserting to be challengers of the system when in
fact they are USERS AND MAINTENANCE ENGINEERS OF IT ALL. WARNING: Such persons may
have been victims to start with BUT THE MOMENT THEY AGREE TO SIGN UP TO CONFIDENTIAL
SETTLEMENT AT THE TAXPAYERS EXPENSE they enter the world of the double constructive fraud
on all taxpayers. While their acceptance of such terms for settlement may well be alleged
to be compensation, IT IS NOTHING OF THE SORT when the evidence points TO ARROGANT AND
BLUNT CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES with myriads of FALSE INSTRUMENTS, used for the building blocks
of the society such fraudsters fight tooth and nail to maintain].
- *Access from here the page where we apply known historical facts and
truths suppressed, by the criminals who have been in control, for over 2000 years. In
the page we cover also other creations by the very circles over the last couple or so
the left margin / panel and below we publish and release images of
some of the documents that establish the practices and HOW the abusers of the courts
facilities indulged, initially. Subsequently they were caused to abandon their plans for
just another male, a man, a discarded husband, an irrelevant father. The arrangements,
always created by the followers of the teachings from the most vile of works ever to have
been presented to mankind. The followers of 'the teachings by examples stated' busy
creating societies that rest and are founded on fraud and corruption through deceptions
aplenty and fraudulent misrepresentations leading to and founded on false declarations
& instruments as created with fraudulent intentions.
of some of the documents, establishing the truth of the FACTS stated.
- The users of the Eves plan and present to, and through,
the courts any deficient and or fraudulent demands.
- And the targeted victim of the abusers of the court's
facilities is informed that NO RIGHT TO CHALLENGE OR EXAMINE THE FRAUDS IS TO BE PERMITTED
without leave of the offending abuser of judicial chair occupation / the court's
- Many the examples of such obstructions and other RIGHTS
THAT ARE ASSURED in law, national and international.
- The most common example, that of the right to receive /
have / benefit from access to transcripts of 'alleged hearings proper' before judicial
chair occupants / masters of ceremonies'. [*Links to: (a) image of request
for transcript ignored, evincing contempt for the provisions and the rights
assured(!), (b) demands made of abusers of the courts'
facilities, who then set themselves on track for further denial of rights and contempt for
all law applicable, in the usual manner].
| Link to fair comment and links to
other instances of such abusive misconduct.
The content of the above Order proves that the right to challenge
any assertions and or fraudulent misrepresentations was to be subject to the whims of an
abuser of judicial chair occupation. Under such abuse the need to seek leave to appeal,
etc., the abuse of public office / the courts' facilities SIMPLY PROVES THAT ASSETS WERE
TARGETED FOR CONVERSION TO ALLEGEDLY LEGITIMATE LEGAL COSTS. We point to 'the very
awakening which only citizens who use their rights, challenge AND EXPOSE, can expect
benefit and changes from the usual criminal, in intent, abuse of the courts' facilities.
We expose and challenge(d) it all FOR THE TARGETED VICTIM, as we report(ed) / PUBLISH(ED)
IN THIS & OTHER PAGES.
In the meantime allegedly concerned leaders
of sucker-victims as blind, as deaf and as dumb as their fraudulent intentions dictate to
such evil persons. Many the alleged gurus and leaders of sucker-victims who were made
aware of the positive elements that SHOULD BE USED TO CHALLENGE ABUSERS OF TRUST &
PUBLIC OFFICE, but all ignored the positive avenues and carried / carry on PROMOTING THE
NEGATIVES INTENDED TO SUBJUGATE THE NAIVE & GULLIBLE THEY TARGET THROUGH THE FAVOURITE
PLOY ORGANISED BY THE ABDUCTORS & RAPISTS OF DEMOCRACY & JUSTICE : BLUNT
SUBLIMINAL INDOCTRINATION TACTICS.
Below an Order dated 20th May 2004; it relates to costs imposed on the
- The order on the right, evinces Summarily assessed costs
which abusers of the courts facilities set about imposing on the irrelevant 'serf', the
male, the discarded husband, a father, the son of some man.
- Impositions, on the targeted male, as arranged and
organised through the courts, from within an allegedly civilised Democracy and Christian
- Visitors / readers / researchers are urged to consider
also the generous living allowances that HAD BEEN IMPOSED by the abuser of judicial
- Reference to the second challenge and the wind of fresh
air in the form of the directive by the Court of Appeal IS A MUST. [We pointed to the very element in the challenges we
settled for the victim, to submit to those who were noted to have abused the courts'
|3. The images of the three-page letter below was transmitted to the
solicitors who were acting for, and in reality using, with others, the Eve for the usual
plans of their God, for 'the sons (children) of men'. The text in HTML for links to and
from, is published in the newsletters.htm page [*Link from here to the text / page].
|4. The image
of the Order on the right, below, was issued by the very District Judge who
entertained all manner of expectations, by the solicitors who were using the Eve.
- All and everything part of the run of the mill
manifestations by the legal circles attached to the vile practices from within our courts.
- The order was issued consequential to the challenges and the
submissions, we settled for the targeted victim and released in the public domain.
- We pointed to the facts covered by Statutory Provisions [*Link] which, we did not point out to all charlatans and fraudsters club
recruits who were sent along, or were introduced to us by the agents of the offending circles, such as the LIPS crowd/mob.
- We refer to such persons as 'the
maintenance engineers of the system as is' & 'the sold to the carrot at the end
of the tunnel asses'.
- All were recognised from the word go; all
acting as blind, deaf and dumb monkeys and as contemptuous of the law as the legal
- None with any defence and all exposing
themselves through their convenient defaults and failures.
STRIKING OUT the dreams of the users of the petitioner for the usual
fraudulent impositions on the targeted, 'sons of men'.
- The users of Eve planned and presented to
& through the court all manner of deficient and or fraudulent demands.
- The targeted victim of the abusers of the courts facilities was informed that NO RIGHT
TO CHALLENGE OR EXAMINE THE FRAUDS WAS TO BE PERMITTED without leave of the offending
abuser of the court's facilities.
- Many the examples of such obstructions to RIGHTS ASSURED in law, national and
- The most common example that of the right to
transcripts of 'alleged hearings proper' before judicial chair occupants / masters of
|[*Links to:[*La] image of request for transcript ignored,
evincing contempt for the provisions and the rights assured(!), [*Lb]
demands made of abusers of the courts facilities, who then set themselves on track for
further denial of rights and contempt for all law applicable, in the usual manner
>>all in all PROOF of the arrogant assertions that the courts are free to deny
justice to the serfs, the shitizens in the UK]
|5. Below image
of the Order that was issued by the very District Judge who entertained all manner
of expectations (part of the run of the mill practices in our courts) consequential to the
challenges and submissions, we publish, in this page.
- On the right copy of the order
dated 8 September 2004, evincing the vacating of an intended hearing FOR & IN THE
USUAL ACTIVITIES, the discharge of the Interim Third Party Debt Order in the interest of
the bank that was bankrolling the expectations of the Eve who was being used by the
participants who had set their targets on the residential property and the discarded
husband / father / male, in the usual manner and through the usual criminal activities.
- Also evinced is the fact that an
application for a Third Party Debt Order was treated as dismissed.
- The Order of 14th September 2004
evinces the fact that the users of the Eve, in the instance at hand, were to amend their
petition and among other issues, the element of WITHDRAWAL OF THE ANCILLARY RELIEF
APPLICATION.... "if the Eve was to be so advised...".
- In the meantime alleged leaders of
the victims of the divorce industry, allegedly concerned Victim-Men, who allegedly object
to the conditions imposed on them and other men-victims, simply ignore such realties
and realisations.... because their only interest has been and remains the use of the
victims who are introduced to them, or are simply honed and prepared for the usual
'assistance' from such quarters, FOR MORE OF THE SAME FRAUD through abuse of the courts .
The right to reply and to justify behaviour and or activities
covered in our pages, is assured to any one named. We will publish excuses and whatever is
submitted to us alongside any legal argument that can arise thereof, as the law provides.
This page is
dedicated to all charlatans who allegedly care or are concerned about the state of affairs
in the family courts, yet they have made it their business to mislead the victims they
target and contact on instructions from others. *Access from
here the proof in support of the conclusion to refer to recognised shysters as
fraudsters club recruits. Such was the case when the leaders of the UKMM acted on
directions from others, the LIPS crowd/mob managers/controllers, to contact the founder of
human-rights with a fictitious scenario BUT THEY FAILED TO COME CLEAN. Years later the
very persons conveniently failed to take any interest in the facts reported to them in
respect of blunt abuse of office by staff and officers at the Child Support Agency, who
were caught in acts of fraud against a woman and her child. Her ex enjoying all the
luxuries which the criminals who manage and abuse the legal system offer, while other men
were / are taking their own lives because of arrogant and selective abuse of facilities by
the very reckless abusers of public office and facilities. The offending public servants,
eventually offering to the defrauded, wronged woman (mother & child) to make good the
damages they caused using public funds (taxpayers contributions to the national budget)
while failing to act against the person they were letting off the hook for years.
* Information FOR victims who
wish to co-operate by
EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *
- A targeted person contacts
human-rights and we challenge the activities he was the victim of. [*Link from here to
- The stated facts, compelling evidence as to the
practices in and through the courts.
- The destruction of families through the divorce
industry, at its best.
- The flagship of CIUKU Enterprises, seen to have
been manifest in the case at hand.
- We know that the persons we address with the
compelling evidence will use common sense, as we suggest.
- The targeted victim, not likely to be fooled the
likes of alleged men-movements and divorce / family courts alleged expert 'McKenzie
friends' because he was afforded the opportunity to read of and saw enough evidence about
such side-kicks of the corrupted legal services facilities for abuse of the courts
processes, 'in contempt of the law'.
Precedent cases are
stated, in our challenges. No one ever likely to publicise the true facts, including 'the
converted to fraud and corruption aplenty' victims(?). We refer to persons known to have
gone for the carrot, as the explicit letters we publish in our pages, evince. Such persons
simply engaging as 'fraudsters club recruits' and acting as maintenance engineers, users
of the arrangements for fraud on the taxpayers through misrepresentation aplenty. [Links to Page Footnote *F1 *F2
30 October 2004
Mx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx
XX Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx
My Ref: O30RCFHR
Your Ref: Attached 'REALITIES / PRACTICES'
By Recorded Delivery Postal Service to be signed for
Dear Xx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxx
Re: Enclosed Draft Proposals for Family Conference
Attached hereto copy of the above as requested of me, to undertake, by
your father, Mr Panayiotis Constantinou.
1. Mr Constantinou desires
that the family should meet in private in order to proceed as per attached draft
proposals. I wish to emphasise the fact that Mr Constantinou's choice of action is in line
with the directions of their Lordships, at the Court of Appeal (RCJ) in July 2004. The
directions of their Lordships were/are indicative of the changes sweeping the courts and
the legal circles away from the practices of old.
2. I hasten to clarify that the closing statement of the above
paragraph rests and is founded on facts and realities that attach and were/are born of
practices such as the few precedent cases referred to or covered in the pages at
uk-human-rights.org or affiliated Community on Line web-sites. In order that I may assist
your understanding and comprehension of the realities referred to, I briefly state the
core elements in:
Hudson. A couple are purchasing a new home in a well sought after Postal Area in West
London. The financial arrangements are through the husband's bankers (a mortgage
facility). The bank's legal team / managers advise the wife (mother of two youngsters)
that before signing the mortgage deed she should seek 'independent legal advice'. The
bank's agents qualifying that, IN THE EVENT that the husband's business goes wrong and the
mortgage repayments cease being met, as per mortgage agreement, THE BANK WILL TAKE
POSSESSION of the residential property, thereby rendering the family homeless.
Consequential to that intimidation the wife seeks 'independent' advice and guidance on the
legal position, founded and resting on the conditions and terms of the mortgage contract
the bank presented to the wife. As a result of such 'independent' advise as the wife
benefited from, confirming the risks she would be taking if she signed the mortgage
agreement she refused to proceed as the couple had initiated 'together'. Needless to say
there followed disagreements and arguments between the husband-wife 'team' leading to a
divorce, with ensuing psychological problems and complications with the youngsters. The
developments necessitating expensive private treatment and leading to the collapse of the
husband's business, BECAUSE OF LUCK OF CONCENTRATION & THE TIME TAKEN AWAY FROM THE
BUSINESS IN ORDER TO ATTEND to 'the legal problems', etc. The end result transfer of many
an asset through conversion to legal costs because of the charges by the legal circles and
finally ALL ON SOCIAL SECURITY. (*F1 IMPORTANT footnote
Foenander. A wife abandons her husband and infant child in the council flat the couple
shared, called 'home'. She did so in order to go and live with the new love in her life.
The husband and an elder brother chip in and together they purchase their own residential
property. They did so in order that the three of them and their retired mother (who was
the guardian of the elder brother, because of an existing condition that could render him
vulnerable due to his 'far too trusting nature') to live together. It goes
without saying that the retired mother was looking after the infant, raising her
grandchild with the kind of love that only direct blood line parentage is gifted with, by
nature. UNDER THE PRETEXT of wishing to visit and see 'the child', over Christmas, the
'wife' visits the family (mother sons and grandchild, remember) at their residence.
Thereafter 'the child's mother' persuades 'the father' to accept her back because she
apparently wished to care for and raise the child she gave birth to and abandoned because
of her passion / love for another man. The 'father' accepts the 'mother' back even though
pregnant with the other man's child whom he also accepted and was raising / raised as his
own. However, not long after moving into the residential property, the 'wife' persuades
the 'husband' to get / cause / coerce his brother to move out of the residential property
he partly owned (remember half owner with his interests registered in his mother's name,
as his guardian). All BECAUSE the 'wife' asserts that she cannot feel comfortable in the
house with her brother-in-law. The second child is born to the 'mother' and it is accepted
and raised as part of the family by the 'husband'. Later the 'mother' with 'her family'
(the children) moves out of the residential property because of a relationship with
another man (not sure if the natural father of the second child). IT WAS ONLY NATURAL THAT
DIVORCE PROCEEDINGS were to follow. Nothing but the usual scenarios with many public
servants party to the scripts and creations. Attached to and arising out of it all, the
usual legal costs and charges to 'targeted assets and properties'. Needless to say all
through use/abuse of the courts facilities and abuse of the legal system, as operated by
the legal circles. MANY THE CHANGES OF SOLICITORS by the 'father' because of defaults
omissions and downright contempt to/for his rights by solicitors who allegedly were acting
for and in his own interests. Many the problems he, 'the husband/father', was faced with
and ALL through abuse of the courts' facilities. Part of, and one of the ensuing scenarios
the challenges through a warranted, appropriate appeal, qualifying and clarifying the
causes, as settled and published, by human-rights, on the Internet at:
where (at the web-site) more material facts attached to
the scenarios born out of the practices in and through the courts / the legal system, as
operated by the legal circles with the blessings or the acquiescing of it all by public
Scriven. The husband, a successful businessman is buying into an ongoing business, a
Limited Liability Company. Some event or happening (not disclosed to the author of this
'record') related to the business causes the businessman to raise questions / objections
and as a result the 'wife' is approached / contacted and advised (by third parties) to
take steps to safeguard 'her personal interests'. RESULT: DIVORCE PROCEEDINGS through
which 'the targeted for punishment trouble-maker finds himself in perpetual 'litigation
conducted in the usual manner and with the tongue in cheek mentalities that were/are part
and parcel of the modus operandi of the users and administrators of the legal system and
the courts. (Some of the scripts and scenarios
that were born of the practices are recorded / published at:
where brief coverage of the challenges, that
arose in that 'case' and links to relevant material in other pages. However, there was/is
more to it and what followed simply part of the usual conversion of
challengers/complainants and PLENTY OF THEATRICAL SCENARIOS
care of the organisers and managers in control of it all).
The above, by way of
introduction to THE DIVORCE INDUSTRY at, in and through the courts, 'the legal system' as
far as men goes. There exist, however, examples of women who were targeted for such
'treatment' at, in and through the courts. The cases should cause even simpletons to
recognise the fact that there exist other forces behind 'family breakdown and
destruction'. The facts and realities stated and covered by the woman 'victim' in a
human-rights.org Community on Line web-site very simply are indicative of the practices
and the way the facilities of the courts were/are being used for rampant theft of targeted
assets.(*F5). A typical case where the free-for-all manifests its self in and for blunt
conversion of assets and targeted properties, through allegedly legitimate legal costs;
the legal costs charges, in such typical cases rest and are founded on arrogant and
reckless abuse of the courts facilities, all the way to the European Court of Human
Rights. The FACTS STATED, the VIOLATIONS PLEADED, and the legal arguments as submitted to
the ECoHR in the Petition were born of and rest on the activities 'the targeted woman' was
subjected to. COMPELLING READING for persons who wish to educate themselves in areas where
they may be flung, in and at the mercy of the abusers of the Legal System and the
facilities of the courts. The PETITION TO THE ECoHR can be accessed at:
case that can be accessed on the Internet, part of the research and investigations
attached to the practices and the free-for-all THROUGH THE LEGAL SYSTEM & THE COURTS,
covers issues of blunt and arrogant CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS through abuse of the legal system
and the courts. A FORGERY, by a financial institution (Building Society) and FALSE
INSTRUMENTS APLENTY by one and all including court officers (solicitors and judicial chair
occupants). The aforesaid noted and seen to be with the blessings of all, including the
police and even the Member of Parliament representing 'the woman' used for the conversion
of assets and properties through abuse of PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES including
Legal Aid Certificates for inexcusable and unjustified theatrical productions. THREE
PROPERTIES systematically converted to legal costs / charges, allegedly legitimate, care
of the managers of the Legal Aid Facility, persons who issue Legal Aid Certificates as
organised by and or with barristers, even Queen's Counsel. The worse part of the scenarios
that were instigated and organised by the Legal Circles, the authors of THAT EPIC: 'Three
Generations Flung at Each Other's Throats'. Even worse, the victim seen to be party to
many scripts in attempts that were intended to discredit the work of the researcher /
challenger to whom she turned for help 'under false pretences' as subsequent events
established. The aforesaid woman, victim(?) indulging herself as a typical tutored and
sold to the evil-mongering activities in, at and through the courts; a typical 'fraudsters
club recruit' whose greed for greens (money) was overriding the criminal activities she
was 'conscious party' to. That victim's commitment to be party to propagation of 'the
system as is', as an active/pro-active 'actress' seen to have been her only goal,
IRRELEVANT OF THE LAWS WHICH SHE RECOGNISED AND KNEW TO HAVE BEEN / BE BREACHED &
ACTED IN CONTEMPT OF, by one and all participants. For a brief introduction to the parts
of that actress and the facts / realities attached to blunt constructive frauds by the
legal circles, for which the taxpayers meet the costs, access to the page:
DO NOTE that this page is a must. An introduction to the SYNOPSIS being prepared in
advance of the release of the full particulars in that 'victims' case and her parts as 'an
accomplished fraudsters club recruit', visit to the page:
can prove to be of help in recognising the means of destruction that the naïve and
gullible fall prey to.
above examples are typical of the scenarios and the consequential end results which ALL
FAMILY MEMBERS will be asked to consider and address at the requested FAMILY CONFERENCE -
MEETING. The Draft Proposals, were prepared by Mr Yiannides, the founder of human-rights*
and in his opinion nothing could give all greater pleasure than to know they all
contributed to the formulation of an agreed agenda for the future of all without
violations or infringements. And, better still, no impositions by abusers of trust and
public office. The requested 'gathering and meeting of all members is an absolute must
(even if it be the last act you partake in, as a family) FOR & IN YOUR OWN INTERESTS
& PEACE OF MIND; for each and every one. Your own futures are very personal and
precious for any of you to allow or permit others to take over and impose their type of
scenarios, such as you are pointed to above. You should access and read, the facts and
realities as concerned and 'thinking humans' and as taxpayers. Let no one use or
manipulate you for his or her own ends. You should decide your future with help and
assistance, if you must. You should seek guidance, SHOULD YOU FAIL TO REACH AMICABLE
ARRANGEMENTS. Application of plain common sense must prevail, when attending to discuss
all aspects, AS A FAMILY, in the presence of someone who is committed to fair airing of
ALL VIEWS; that is and should be the objective of all. The requested 'gathering of the
family' is intended to lead to understanding and commitments by all participating 'humans'
(thinkers). It is intended for persons who seek and aim for just and meritorious treatment
in their relationships with one another, and to other humans (third parties) for such
should always be your goal.
4. I copy from a flyer,
for a book published by the author (no other prepared to publish the work/expose), the
following, covering elements you most probably are aware of already or you will read when
you access the material you are pointed to on the Internet.
"A true story of theatrical success, unfaithful love and legal disaster - a
nightmarish and hilarious picture of lawyers ' stupidity, cupidity and dishonesty".
"A young actor/playwright, a nobody from nowhere, met a beautiful aspiring model.
They fell in love, married; he wrote 'There's a Girl in My Soup'. It was a
familiar, intoxicating rags-to-riches story until it all went wrong. They divorced".
"Frisby, in despair at what his own lawyers achieved for him, sacks them all and
takes on the entire system on his own. We are plunged into the world of solicitors,
barristers and judges, all seen from the unique viewpoint of someone representing himself
in a mincing machine that is our legal system - a litigant-in-person".
"Frisby becomes involved in FOURTEEN APPALLING & EXTRAORDINARY YEARS of
litigation. He tells a story of our legal system and the professionals who run it that
makes any fictional courtroom drama seem dull. He becomes entangled in a web of legal
DOUBLE-DEALING & INHUMANITY, when, tape recorder concealed, he turns in his former
advisers. The breadth and depth of bungling and dishonesty that Frisby meets will leave
you breathless. However, remarkably, among all setbacks, he wins three full High Court
hearings against his professional adversaries".
"This book is a powerful argument, not only for the removal of lawyers from the
painful process of divorce, but for reform or policing of our legal profession, FROM THE
JUDGES DOWNWARD. Frisby goes for the jugular and names powerful names in this brilliant
expose that make you laugh, marvel, seethe with indignation, and weep."
And from the actual work / book
above 'Outrageous Fortune'
the closing words from a father to his
"Finally, darling Dominic,
now that I have dumped all this on you, is truth a curative? Well, yes, I think it is. And
more. It's a necessity at times. And this, for me, anyway, is one of those times. For you
there is nothing to cure. Now that you know all that I can tell you of the story, having
asked for so long, I am sure you can put it behind you, like Satan. That was our life.
It's been your turn for some while now. You have made so many important decisions (without
any pushing from me) and the creative career you have chosen is about as good a choice as
you could have managed. There are such extremes of joy and pressure and anguish in front
of you that will make life rich; I couldn't be happier for you.
Just think; you might have chosen to be a lawyer.
With the above I trust that I have been able to convey to
you two things:
One: That you should all do your best to accommodate the idea of
the proposed family meeting / conference in order that you can all use your maturity of
thought and care for the future without impositions from any other.
Two: That you can attend to the developments and situation, as
it evolved, without allowing others to create problems or impose their plans for you, as
individuals 'to be at Each others throats until for ever' as they systematically do.
My Best Wishes to All
Founder *human-rights* (NGO)
ENCL. As text (Draft Proposal, Ref: FDFSPFMS) [*Link
from here to image]
In October 2010, the coalition's Attorney General, in an interview
published by 'COUNSEL' specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves
from cases of (small-fry) fraud and asserted that he was
making that element his department's priority* [*Link from here to
the evidence]. IT
REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY WILL
IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT FRAUD, and IF IT WILL DEAL with the criminals who abuse
public office, especially when faced with appropriate submissions and claims
that will be delivered in due course. Visitors/readers are urged to read the
article published in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David
Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003 [*Link
from here to the article we reproduce in another webpage
and consider "Why tolerate the arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the
audacity to assert to the lawmakers that the y, the lawmakers have nothing to do with the
While there, above it, the explicit letter to
ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged
victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the
Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters
submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public
office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance.
It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly
in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among
such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions
by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of
alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us [*Link to our explicit submissions to (a) the Prime
Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) the Home Secretary. WE acted so after we had
secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only
interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD
THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were
intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew
Yiannides]. Access please the
letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998 [*Link*
[*L] from here to the letter] and note the results
evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching
its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the
job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do [*Link [*L] from here to the evidence we
point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who
were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS
crowd / mob].
1. In our pages you can access the
explicit appeal that Mr Andrew Yiannides settled for and in Mr Foenander's case, when the
legal circles were homing in and were going to repossess the residential property he
acquired with financial contributions and assistance from his elder brother, Frederick.
The stated facts were / are fully documented and indisputable; however, the fraudster who
was sent along to test Andrew's resolve and grasp of the rampant fraud through the courts
via abuse of Public Office (by persons who parade themselves as 'judges' who know the law)
never intended to proceed with the challenges set in motion via the appeal. One only has
to access and read of his solicitor's response to another solicitor; there the arrogant
undertone is clear: *Access from here the proof the
establishes the mentality and attitude of the legal circles, as a whole >>> "Get
lost, our client does not want your offer BECAUSE THE TAXPAYERS ARE FOOTING THE BILL FOR
THE DAMAGES WE & THE JUDGES CAUSED TO HIM".<<< The appeal was
called for some three months after the fraudster exhibited his readiness to promote a firm
of solicitors whom he retained ONLY TO DISTRIBUTE FUNDS TO THOSE WHO ENGAGED IN
CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS with others in 'his divorce' case. For information where the funds
came from the visitor should access the explicit letter we publish in our pages. [*Link
from here to the letter is in the left margin of the
relevant page where more damming evidence is published, about such charlatans and
fraudsters club recruits, PERSONS WHO ACT AS MAINTENANCE ENGINEERS OF THE SYSTEM AS IS].
2. Evidently no one
has ever bothered to consider the relevant factors that apply to
such scenarios. No one APPEARS concerned, irrespective of the words of many a dignitary.
[*Links to the words of: (a) Jesus Christ),
(b) An eminent French Jurist, (c) William Shakespeare, (d) Charles Dickens].
3. Visitors can
link to a couple of typical scenarios. (a) A victim of the legal circles is made an offer
by one of the solicitors who had been party to the fraudulent use of the courts'
facilities. He is not content to accept stolen funds (taxpayers contributions to the
Treasury) he also accepts a retainer to interfere in the ongoing work of genuine
challengers, the person he contacted for help(?). A letter, from solicitors, evincing the
preference for stolen money is published [*Link] in our
pages. The 'victim' interfering in the background; access the evidence in another page [*Link]. Evidence that he was fully aware what the
activities at, in and through courts amounted to in law covered in a letter [*Link] he wrote to another victim, the latter party to
changed scenarios and direction, too. (b) Another victim who accepted a retainer to mess
about with the work of the person she turned to for help and assistance is exposed in our
pages. She, engaged in far too many convenient defaults AND PROMOTED, relentlessly, the
powers of the abusers of public office. She engaged also in convenient suppression of
material facts and evidence and she was seen to be working hand in hand with the criminals
who have been in control of the legal system, who, through abuse of it AND CO-OPERATION [*Link] from fraudsters of her mentality (towards other citizens
and the taxpayers, besides her contempt for the law) the abductors and rapists of Justice
(the Goddess) have been imposing their corrupted societies for millennia [*Link] in pseudo-democracies.
4. Mr Bryan Hudson was one of the victims of the Divorce Industry who attended
an extraordinary meeting of the Litigants In Person Society (LIPS crowd/mob) in November
1999. Very emotively he presented his case to those who were invited along to the show
that was chaired and directed NOT by the usual managers/controllers of the mob, but by Ms
Suson Foscey More the founder of Campaign for a Fair Hearing and the person who took
up in Mr Geoffrey Harold Scriven's case the issue of SECRET BRIEFINGS in the course of
court proceedings (more in due course). It was blatantly obvious that the meeting had been
arranged in order to inform the gathered 'lambs' of the arrangements that the string
pullers / manipulators of the muppets / puppets ALREADY MADE in connection with the
management team of the suckers who were / had been / would be drawn to the net / hooks of
the LIPS mob. Mr Hudson later forwarded a brief statement of 'facts such as he spoke of at
the gathering' by FAX. However it was not long before he contacted Mr. Yiannides to ask
that the facts and document be not made public because as he alleged the police were still
investigating the issues he complained of and some media editors (Intellectual
Prostitutes) had taken up (for the usual half-baked potatoes that we know of) and
xxxx [*Link to brief case history above - in this page].
5. We list here
material which readers can access in our pages and re-iterate that we can include here
links to other web-sites where citizens are publishing such facts which they support with
the essential evidence. (a) /corruptcourts.htm (b) /chaldep1.htm (c) /2lipstalk.htm