h-rtitle.gif (7604 bytes)

Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note below the arrangements between the administrative, the judiciary and the media; read of the all-embracing guarantee in place, in contempt of all law : the root shall be pointed to.

WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read below:-

"The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State"

*Link from here to founder's tribulations in 1972-75 and marvel at the creativity of allegedly honourable officers of Justice and the Law in the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies

  • And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the affidavit which visitors can link to directly from here [*Link].
  • Link also from here to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts organised and processed to fruition while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of:-

'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy.

*Link from here to proof of the parts the police play in promotion and expansion of the criminal activities instigated, processed and imposed on society by the legal circles. Read of assertions by a typical hypocrite, none other than the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Robert Mark QPM, when he spoke of FALSE RECORDS / FORGERIES by the legal circles while delivering his famous Dimbleby Lecture on BBC-TV in November 1973, 15 months after he received true copy of THE FORGERY advanced and promoted by the licensed criminals : solicitors and barristers for their evil ends in the case that opened Andrew Yiannides' mental eyes to the realities of life in the United Kingdom, a typical PSEUDOdemocracy. Can anyone enlighten Andrew and the millions of victims of the legal circles WHY NO PROSECUTION of the solicitors & the barristers in 1972 or thereafter?.

  • With such a facility in place (the words we point to above) and arrogant abuse of public office, can anyone assert, or argue, that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts? (>Hence the c reation of www.jusaticeraped.org <)
  • ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm

*Link from here to the realities - in due course also a link to the warning (indirect but nonetheless very clear) for thinkers to recognise 

  • On 3rd March 2008 >someone's birthday< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other.
  • >>> IN THE MEANTIME we have been naming and shaming a number who know of and engage in much more than just approve wrongs imposed on Mr & Mrs Average, the millions of taxpayers, in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union created by politicians, without reference to the taxed for fraud sucker-serfs, allegedly for the benefit of the citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION, among other promotions.

Needless to say the case entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies.

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored and ignore all complaints and submissions by victims of the organised crimes we point to and expose in our pages, irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.

[*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions, covered in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' (>thinkers<) from animals.

Fraud in court  Council staff use Forgeries   Misconduct in Public Office. 2 cases relative to applicable law One Protocol says it ALL It betrays arrogant intentions Law Provides for THEFTS and it covers Judges too Judges' duties   TIME 4 CHANGE   & CHALLENGES Site CONTENTS - Table of Contents & ongoing work Your Rights & OBLIGATIONS to Society SITE SEARCH facility for any specific element / issue of concern to visitors / readers
COURTS : their Facilities Abused For ORGANISED CRIME : FRAUD Solicitor's Perjury & Victim Ignores it all Just like the Law Society always does Blackmailed or is it Just Conditioned & Subjugated Victims who join the club ? We name Lovers of blunt fraud through courts - Users of the facilities 4 illicit gains Local Authorities & FRAUD on 'serfs' the Taxpayers who are kept in the dark Police Party to & Endorsing Criminal Acts, Activities Arrogant Fraud FALSE Records & Contempt of Law by the legal Circles & Public Services The crafty ones & Vexatious Litigant PLOYS for the rewarded silent

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

family.uk-human-rights justiceraped.org dssfraud.htm confraud.htm dadscare.htm contract.htm converts.htm MensAid
solicitorsfromhell.co.uk chancellor.htm theyknow.htm solfraud.htm sheknows.htm 4deceit.htm convicti.htm forward.htm


*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

An explicit Affidavit [*L] plus exhibits and
     letters to a Chief Inspector of Police
          one to solicitors
[*L] and another to the Lord Chancellor [*L] evince
               ORGANISED CRIMES
(Access and read the letter to the police in September 2006 [*L])

Access & read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister : * I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link from here to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister forwarded / delegated submissions and evidence received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister / Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES

3rd March 2011 added link [*L] to the BBC-TV Dimbleby Lecture in 1973 as the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Robert Mark prepared & presented to the sucker-serfs

submissions and evidence delivered FOR THE ATTENTION OF MINISTERS

someploy.htm               KEY PageChanges 30 July 2003

Some Ploy (a dust in your eyes venture) *Page created February 2000*

import.gif (1348 bytes)
HELP US TO HELP YOU Please (*Link to plea).
hrbnrsml.gif (1162 bytes) JOIN other Victims On Line. Publish your Statement of Facts and the Evidence you have. Use your rights in law (link) and ACT with others against the offenders. Join in joint actions if you have been fobbed off and have had your rights obstructed to and or denied by the abusers of the legal system. ACCESS & READ the explicit submissions to the Chief Executives of the Law Society and the Office for the Supervision of solicitors. Elect to ASSERT YOUR RIGHTS to challenge collectively the criminals who have been in control for millennia. READ the words attributed to Jesus Christ according to St. Luke. (Link to the quotes page).

Affiliated Sites For 'The CAMILA Project' DATA Collection & Activities 
lbduk.org (*Link to update)
ukfathers.co.uk (*Link)

All SERIOUS offers from webmasters who are  engaged in publication of web-pages, web-sites will be welcome. We look forward to adding your site to the above list and your readiness to co-operate in and for data collection.

LIST of leaders of groups and webmasters who REFUSED/FAILED to co-operate. The same also arrogantly FAILED / DEFAULTED to address the issue of Organised abuse of the courts FOR fraudulent conversion of private (citizen's) assets and the fraudulent distribution of taxpayers contributions to the national budget. Access the exclusive exposures where we point to and publish the EVIDENCE of the facilities in place FOR the creation of societies of fraudsters.
1. LIPS (*Site References)
2. UKMM (*Site References) 3. ELC (*Site References)
4. Families Need Fathers
5. Fathers 4 Justice
7. Contempt of Court (*emails)

We dedicate the image below to all of the charlatans who came along, as stooges and lovers of the rampant fraud through the courts. One & All indulged in many an act of fraudulent misrepresentation and EVIL ACTIVITIES as part of their contribution towards the maintenance of the system in place. We are to name every one of the idiots who were of opinion that they could make either the law to appear to be an ass or Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights to be as stupid as each was.
honprm6r.jpg (78961 bytes)
The above NOTICE was / is typical of the top cover sheets that were / are attached to letters specifically addressed to Ministers. The notice was intended for all senior Public  Servants to consider. Our experiences over 21 years by then, established that many have been and are followers of the EVIL TEACHINGS BY EXAMPLE STATED in the most vile of works ever to have been presented to the sons of men. [*Link to the most explicit and revealing lesson that no human = thinker, could possibly overlook, or accept as promoted by the followers of such evil ways].

KEY to page & site
Page CHANGES - List
Letters TO - List Page&Site Letters FROM List Page&Site
News ARTICLES - Page List
Page IMAGES - List
Human Rights Act Introduced
LAW Convention Rights
LAW European Union Rights
The page - ISSUES
This Page - QUOTES
Site QUOTES - page
VICTIM Let down by the H.O.
OTHER SITES - Short List

Euro Convention Rights
Article 6.1 Court Hearings
Article 6.2 Court Hearings
Article 6.3 Court Hearings
Article 8.1 Respect 4 Family
Article 8.2 Family Rights
Article 9  Free TO THINK +++
Article 10 Free to Share Info
Article 11 Free Join Assemble Article 13 About Officials
Article 14 No Discrimination
Article 38 Double FRAUD

Letters TO - List
1. April 2003 Frank Field MP
2. Dec. 1999 Prime Minister
3. Dec. 1998 Home Secretary
4. Mar. 2003 Law Society ++
5. August 2003 ECourtHR

Letters FROM - List
1. Part- SOLICITOR To Client 2. Prime Minister Nov. 1999
3. CEO Haringey Council 2001
4. Haringey Council Dreamer
5. Police Promoting Just LIES 
6. Norman Seeks Information
7. LCD Expose Police LIES
8. An Illiterate LCDpt. Officer
9. ECourtHR September 2003
10. Lord Chancellor's Dpt.

Page NEWS Articles - List
1. L.E.S by David Blunkett 
2. D. Mail Free For All 2001
3. CHANGES - List

Site NEWS Articles - List
1. L.E.S by David Blunkett 
2. D. Mail Free For All 2001

3. D. Express Boys Records
4. PM. Global Role For Britain
5. No Need to Raise TAXES

6.The Times-Plato Not Prozac

Page IMAGES - List
1. LES by David Blunkett 
2. CHANGES - List
3. House of Lords RULING
4. Letter to Prime Minister
5. PM Sends Submits. to H/O

Quotes -This  Page
1. Democracy Is In Mortal Danger, so long as...
2. Days of the Blind Deaf and Dumb Media Are Over
3. Most
abused & Breached  piece of legislation by.....
4. The INTERNET is here and so is Freedom Of Information & Exchange of Ideas.

1. Added Letter to MP
2. Added Law Reports
3. Edited Introduction
4. Added Ab. Lincoln's Quote
5.  Importance of Publication
6. Added Articles 13 & 14
7.20 April 2005: IMPORTANT ANSWER to the question posed under Article 13.

Page  ISSUES - List
1. Implementing security and rights assured in law.
2. Members of Parliament and  other Public(!) Servants(?).   Their retainers command other than the defaults and omissions they indulge in.
3. Democracy IS in mortal danger.
4. Home Secretary Acted
5. HOW the dictatorship through the back door has been and is being imposed in all pseudo-democracies : The  ANSWER and ploys used.

The Human Rights Act was announced in 1997 
hra97cr.jpg (42343 bytes)  The PREFACE & two heads  hra97inr.jpg (58885 bytes)
When the Act was introduced the promotional & information literature that the government made available to the public, the two Ministers responsible for the application of the law did get their heads together. The preface page from the leaflet HRG1 10/2000, above, set the scene. It implied that the rights of the citizens took precedent and the infighting' between the two Ministries was to be relegated. (*Link to the introduction to this page where we applied ourselves to more than the infighting).

1. This Page - a letter
2. Letter by a Fraudster
3. A Conscious Fraudster
4. A Conniving Dreamer 
5. Dr A. Adoko of same mind
6. xxx

BELOW SOME OF THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES  Organised By Public Servants & THE LEGAL CIRCLES. Everything is permissible when it leads to theft of Properties & Denial of Rights, that the Courts impose on 'the serfs' (List)
2. Housing Benefit FRAUD
3. Ditto with False Instrument
4. Ditto with Blunt Forgeries
5. Ditto Using Refugees
6. Ditto Relying on Judges 
7. Ditto Daily Mail Acted after
8. Using Asylum Seekers
9. xxxx


undercon.gif (286 bytes) Released in July 2007. Last Revised on June 22, 2012 : *Link from here to the House of Lords ruling (released March 2008) relative to activities and failings by solicitors when their Lordships deliberated on law applicable to activities we cover in our pages.
Site under re-construction for better navigation and co-ordination of material facts covered in different pages

VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY; our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess.  You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. 

Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.  In the alternative IF looking for any specific issue/issues USE the search facility.

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

The Dust in Your Eyes - Ploy - was but an obvious attempt by a sold to the system as is Front Line Maintenance Engineer [*Link from here to the letter from his solicitors to another solicitor months earlier]

The dreamer and charlatan was fully aware of the facts covered in other pages, some of which we repeat in this page for obvious reasons.

The author of the letter we release in HTML text format, below, was none other than the craft-y one who even had the audacity to allude to Masons in his letter to Mr. Geoffrey Harold Scriven while ALL, from within the LIPS crowd/mob, were of opinion that they could impress everybody with their fraudulent misrepresentations as allegedly concerned citizens; pardon we meant 'shitizens' [*Link to the letter below & note the author's grasp of the legal position].

The author of the letter and some of the star performers from within the LIPS crowd / mob HAD ESTABLISHED, BEYOND ANY DOUBT THEIR TRUE COLOURS AS OF THE DAY WHEN THE AUTHOR FAILED TO BRING ALONG THE DOCUMENTS WARRANTED AS EXHIBITS TO THE AFFIDAVIT WHICH THE FRAUDSTER SOUGHT FROM Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights. Andrew had witnessed more than enough of the activities in which the author engaged with others, associates and affiliates of the LIPS crowd / mob, all of whom engaging in the usual antics from and by lovers of the constructive frauds through the courts.

The rest of the mob, established their own true colours on the day of the theatrical production in February 2000, when the promoted and 'prepared material' WAS SHOVED IN THE CORRUPTED MINDS OF THE CHARLATANS WHO CONTRIVED & CREATED IT ALL, *as FRAUDSTERS who set themselves up to operate as alleged legal gurus*.

In reality the taxpaying suckers in a pseudo-democracy -where the truth of any matter is suppressed and buried in the corrupted minds of fraudsters & the type of Intellectual Prostitutes that John Swainton spoke of in the course of his retirement speech- are subjected to 'more of the same' by the users of sucker-victims they were / are pointed to, OR sucker-victims who are drawn to such groups care of the promotions afforded -to the front line operatives- by the media barons and the persons they retain and maintain (*F7) for the plans of the abductors and rapists of Democracy, for 'the ill-informed and conditioned serfs' of planet earth. [*Link from here to long existing plans by the creators of it all]

In 1996 the letter below was confirmed received by the Home Secretary's staff. Read it, consider...
  • also for the implementation of all law, national and international, that relates to any RIGHTS ASSURED to the citizens under the law through application of law to facts established.
  • Rights secured through Acts of Parliament and Security Guaranteed Under International Treaties and Accords, assigned to public servants who are retained by the state in order TO SERVE the citizens and the law, without discrimination under any pretext.
  • Rights and Security to person should be applied to all citizens, by Public Servants; indeed their retainers and the law command that they do so and not as they determine through defaults, omissions and as operating executives of CIUKU Enterprises, or secretive organisations. [*Link from here to a Court of Appeal case when a police officer failed to exercise his public duties]
  • Duties and obligations under the law should be adhered to by all other citizens, on the basic tenet that no one shall violate the rights of any other.
hslmc96r.jpg (55630 bytes)

The attempts by Lord Irvine, the ex Lord Chancellor, to create a Super Ministry WAS OF DANGER TO DEMOCRACY and especially so, when he was in charge of persons who were/are of opinion that they were appointed to judicial chair occupation, by 'their God' to act as modern day 'Lords and Masters' of 'the serfs', in this one's great nation.

We are in no doubt that such is the case in other lands, too. So long as our judges are free and shall remain free to indulge and practice their corrupted law, unsupervised, unchecked, uncontrolled and acting, as they please, in breach of the laws of our Parliament and in violation of human rights, Democracy is in mortal danger.

The days of public servants relying on the BLIND DEAF AND DUMB MEDIA ARE OVER. The days when ALL relied on BLIND DEAF AND DUMB officers within the law enforcement agencies are also over. This is the age of FREE exchange of information and THE DISSEMINATION OF *unadulterated* FACTS OF LIFE within all states, so long as their citizens are free to exercise AS WE DO, their basic human-rights that ARE GUARANTEED under the European Convention on Human Rights . (ECoHR [*Link from here to the introduction of the Human Rights Act  & *Link from here to HOW and under what circumstances the government was caused to announce the introduction of the Act in 1997

Article 6.1.  "In the determination of his civil rights and obligations (*FX) or of any criminal charges against him, EVERYONE is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal .... judgement shall be pronounced publicly but the press and public may be excluded from all or part of the trial (hearing) in the interest of morals, public order or national security in a democratic society ...interests of juveniles... protection of the private life of the parties... where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice." and under

Article 6.2.  "EVERYONE charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law." and under

Article 6.3. "EVERYONE..... has the following minimum rights (a) to be informed promptly.... in detail ... nature and cause of charges against him .... (b) adequate time,... facilities.. to prepare his defence.... (c) to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing free legal assistance in the interests of justice if he has not sufficient means to pay... (d) to examine of have examined witnesses against him ..to obtain attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him;    and (e)  to have the free assistance of an interpreter if he cannot understand or speak the language use in court."

Article 8.1.  "EVERYONE has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.

Article 8.2.  "THERE SHALL BE NO interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right ..except in accordance with the law .. necessary in a democratic society..  interests of national security... public safety... economic well being of the country... the prevention of disorder or crime... the protection of health or morals or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others." This is the most abused and breached piece of legislation by the organisers and managers of the CIUKU Enterprises:-

  • Our Masters and Lords seek to, and impose many a criminal act 'on the serfs and taxpayers'.
  • They do so through breaches of national & international law.
  • By relying upon, and using the 'subordinates created by the state'.
  • Those subordinates, as Public Servants, are also independent of the law - criminals'.
  • They are assured, by the controllers of it all, that 'No prosecutions are ever likely to be instigated, against them'.
  • Just AS IN THE NATIONAL SCANDAL scenarios - Forgeries used for the theft of funds belonging to third parties with plenty of FALSE INSTRUMENTS that lack accountability, as issued by persons in judicial office. [*Link to use of the information which the fraudster benefited from in the course of the extensive exchanges with Mr Andrew Yiannides. *Link the evidence when the solicitors who had been acting and representing the fraudster were caught in attempts to convert rents owing to a private landlord to legal costs through abuse of the Legal Aid facilities and abuse of the courts processes]
  • Officers of Law bluntly endorsing and promoting the criminal activities of public servants.
  • Collectively acting in contempt of the law as authorised and licensed, by our representatives in government, to act so, for the implementation of CRIMES INTENDED thus LEADING TO THE NEW CODE OF MORALS, hatched up in secret sessions by the abductors of Democracy, attended by the MEDIA barons and their editors.
  • The theft and misappropriation of Housing Benefit funds.
  • Criminal activities in pursuit of organised multiple frauds on the public at large.
  • Forgeries used and no prosecutions because of the plan and the funds needed in order to create a melting pot.
  • All through arrogant interference in the affairs of other countries.
  • Criminals who steal from their masters (the citizens / taxpayers) in allegedly civilised states, resting and founded allegedly on principles of law and order.
  • Public SERVANTS indulging in blunt crime at the expense of their employers, Mr & Mrs Average.
  • And they dare determine how other countries and nations should run their own societies and affairs.
  • Our Lords and Masters wishing to play Godfather to the world.
  • They are not simply interfering in other countries.
  • As part of their master plan, THEY ARE BREAKING UP FAMILIES THROUGH ORGANISED FRAUDULENT ACTIVITIES in their own countries.(*Link to site for connection to family issues).
  • Plenty of breaches of national law and gross violations of international treaties and accords. [*Link to PLEADED VIOLATIONS as lodged at the European Court of Human Rights]
  • Criminal activities by the very guardians of 'the Law', OUR SERVANTS, who are retained by our representatives in government, persons who are 'elected, care of the media barons, 'through frauds'.
  • OUR AGENTS acting and operating in government and states, which they misrepresent as alleged Democracies that, allegedly, rest and are founded on law and order. Public servants, acting, as ABSOLUTE DICTATORS, in contempt of all law and the rights of the citizens.
  • They do it all through the media barons and their stooges, with plenty of theatre, from 'intellectual prostitutes'.

To the well known quote by Abraham Lincoln we add, for the benefit of the abductors of Justice and Democracy, our founder's 'addenda', the fourth, dimension below:

  • "You can fool all of the people for some of the time".
  • "You can fool some of the people for all of the time".
  • "You cannot fool all of the people, all of the time".
  • We add "AND there are some people YOU can never fool at any time".

Article 9.  "EVERYONE has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion..."

Article 10.  "EVERYONE has the right to FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION.... to HOLD OPINIONS...TO RECEIVE AND IMPART INFORMATION AND IDEAS without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers..... (with provisions attached to ) maintaining the authority AND IMPARTIALITY of the judiciary".

Article 11.  "EVERYONE has the right of freedom of peaceful assembly and to freedom of  ASSOCIATION with others.... rights to form and join ... for the protection of HIS INTERESTS".

Article 13.  "EVERYONE whose rights and freedoms as set forth in this Convention are violated SHALL have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation HAS BEEN committed by persons acting in an OFFICIAL CAPACITY."

Article 13 is VERY CLEAR. WHERE IS THE NATIONAL AUTHORITY THAT LOOKS INTO THE VIOLATIONS judges in the United Kingdom endorse, entertain AND INSTIGATE of their own?  The question is simple and the Lord Chancellor with the Home Secretary should co-operate and produce the formula under which the citizens CAN challenge activities that blatantly breach national law and VIOLATE Human Rights. Converting the properties of others to alleged legal costs attached to fraudulent court proceedings is the worst anathema the United Kingdom is plagued with. One could not expect a clearer and more succinct a situation of abuses of court 'facilities' than in the Geoffrey Harold Scriven's cases. WE have other cases on file. Where is the authority to investigate and prosecute the offenders?
(Answer: SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS HAVE BEEN ACTING IN CONTEMPT of the provision, allegedly signed for by OUR REPRESENTATIVES IN GOVERNMENT, as our agents on behalf of the Head of State, the king / queen. We now ask you to READ OF THE, undisclosed & unpublicised, ARRANGEMENTS IN PLACE, whereby judicial chair occupants ARE USED in order to impose the state of dictatorships that the founder of human-rights.org first spoke and wrote of, over 33 years ago. Such has been the case in ALL  pseudo-democracies where Intellectual Prostitutes* (*Link to definition) are maintained by the invisible string pullers (of puppets) and manipulators (of muppets) in order to misinform the ill-educated 'serfs' and 'shitizens', NON-THINKERS who ARE SUBJECTED to permanent brain washing and subliminal indoctrination as organised by the evil ones who have been in control of ALL pseudo-democracies for centuries and NOW SEEK TOTAL CONTROL OF PLANET EARTH).  

Article 14.  "The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in this Convention shall be secured without discrimination on any grounds such as sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or other status."

Question : WHO responsible for the police?  Answer : The Home Secretary.

And we have charlatans and mischief makers promoting whatever is concocted by the managers & controllers of CIUKU Enterprises, as pre-ordained 'for the serfs' and targeted citizens. [*Link from here to an example from and about an alleged victim and how he acted and behaved towards us. The documented evidence ESTABLISHES that he was more than just plain selfish, for IF HE WAS GENUINE he would have co-operated IN ORDER TO CHALLENGE &  EXPOSE FRAUDSTERS].

The letter on the right is dedicated to the fraud of a Christian(!) Mr Johan Michael Richard Foenander [*Link relative to the Christian church he attended regularly]. He was of opinion that he could secure a statement, from Mr Andrew Yiannides, with half truths and suppression of the core elements, relative to the activities he was noted to have been an overzealous & participating fraudster who was working with and for the imposition of the constructive frauds on the taxpayers which  we cover in an exclusive page. Others were noted to be working towards the implementation of blunt and arrogant constructive frauds, on the taxpayers, through the courts.

An interesting letter....
metcom0r.jpg (42989 bytes)
from the police....
ffwpaxef.jpg (127365 bytes)
Through Press Releases we were being informed that the Minister was acting.

We have been pointing to the billions PLUNDERED through abuser of the court facilities

We did not press for the meeting we requested of the Minister and or his senior staff. Later we were told he was caused to resign his post and duties.

Years later we follow up on what we put in place at the right time. Through our pages we point to the billions paid out through blunt abuse of the courts facilities; arrogant transfer of tax revenue to the criminals in control of the legal system. The government spends millions on advertisements seeking information from ordinary citizens about petty fraudsters, YET THE BILLIONS are ignored even by the victims of the legal circles.... because they are guided by the agents of the legal circles to go for the cash under the table & KEEP IT ALL in the family closet they will be welcome in by the controllers & managers of CIUKU Enterprises, the organisers of it all. 

ffwsrdrf.gif (475007 bytes)
The Prime Minister also acted in accordance with his duties to the citizens, to the law and his conscious
pmlen99r.jpg (33033 bytes)

We thanked the Prime Minister. (Refer to the letter on the right).

However, some junior in the post room at the Home Office assumed that he had higher authority than the elected. Established practices as organised by CIUKU Enterprises. Public(!) Servants(?) So long as MP's  the Media Barons and all who dangle on the strings of the puppeteers ignore it all, it should be all right; so CIUKU rules provide. After all, ALL LAW IS PUBLISHED IN invisible ink for the sighted & not in Braille for the blind. No one, therefore can read ANY Act of Parliament or Articles that Government's subscribe to, under International Treaties & Accords.
NOTHING but arrogant contempt for the law by alleged servants of it.

ltpmd99f.jpg (103179 bytes)

BUT as can be deduced from the letter the right, a junior at the Home Office (post room) indulged. Noting but the usual invisible services and waffle created by the lowest of the low of Public(!) Servants(?). A person retained by CIUKU Enterprises, operating as an invisible services fraud of a public servant APPARENTLY IS BETTER EQUIPPED THAN THE PRIME MINISTER and his personal team/advisers at 10 Downing Street. Marvel at the waffle from a button pushing automaton:

Visitors are urged to access the background to it all (*Link) and recognise WHY IN OUR LETTER to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, ex-Minister, we did point to 'the facility for gross dereliction of Public Office through DELEGATION TO UNSUPERVISED JUNIORS. And along come fraudsters club recruits promoting such rubbish as the above letter (*Link to a challenge that was warranted after such a charlatan denied us the right to a copy of the rubbish he was promoting).     

hold99f.jpg (37484 bytes)

ABOVE EVIDENCE of letters and exchanges with Central Government in respect of the arrogant abuse of Public Office FOR the imposition of the RAMPANT FRAUD on the citizens through abuse of the courts facilities. BELOW a list of sites and pages where references to the law and such reports to government and public servants - From Police to Ministers / Members of Parliament. In our pages a challenge to assertions and proposed illegal activities by the UK section at the ECoHR when they were caused to abandon proposed activities.

Below a House of Lords ruling that could not possibly have ignored the principles covered in domestic and in international Law.
  • Conventions, Treaties &  Accords, our representatives in governments introduce and or subscribed to, ON BEHALF OF THE CITIZENS, from time to time. Such realisations from within an alleged Democracy.
  • An alleged Democracy that is sold to the world by the abductors, of the very Goddess, the media barons with their stooges, the editors acting as blind deaf and dumb monkeys or as the Intellectual Prostitutes that an insider spoke of, when he was moving out of the firing line.
  • The offenders attend conspiratorial & secret meetings with self-appointed Gods who have no scruples or an ounce of morals among them. All preach to others that which they, as sycophants and hypocrites, do not adhere to. [Link]
  • We refer and draw attention to the simple fact that IN ESSENCE only the whole, of any publication, evinces THE PURPOSE &  INTENT OR  the AUTHOR OF and or CONTRIBUTORS TO the publication.
  • That aside, the MORE IMPORTANT ELEMENT (for victims of the free-for-all as practised in the courts and by the courts' service, is the issue of CONTEMPT FOR STATUTORY LAW covering the criminal activities, indulged into or entertained by judicial chair occupants.
holprahf.jpg (292977 bytes)
  • Reference to 'THE WHOLE' IS COVERED in the Court of Appeal report in the lower part of the scan, of 'The Times' Law Report. DO NOTE the words:- ".....in a reference by the Home Secretary under.....".
  • DO refer to the four letters ( images) we publish in the exclusive page / file where 'promoters of the practices from within  the Law Enforcement Agencies are exposed.
  • The promoters DO NOT CHALLENGE the criminal activities and they decline or FAIL to provide copies of any letters they PROJECT and promote with blunt intent and in contempt of the law.
  • They do so WITH INTENT in order that victims swallow and lump the promotions and practices as a fait accompli situation.
  • They do so only as supporters of and FOR THE PERPETUATION OF THE VERY CANCEROUS GROWTH INDUSTRY they started off, as complaining victims of.
  • The promoters just revert to crocodile tears and as lousy actors they expose the plans they serve after joining THE FRAUDSTERS' CLUB.
  • We point you to the 4 letters you should read and request that you consider THE FACT that the PROMOTED, by alleged victims, ASSERTIONS from the police, were denied by the Lord Chancellor's Office.
  • Read the introduction to and the letters we publish for your benefit.
  • The rampant fraud in and through the legal system / courts / Law Enforcement Agencies, rests on such activities.
  • Consider the validity of the fourth quote in our Home Page, in view of the arrangements in place by the judiciary (amounting to invisible services to criminals and or policy undeclared in an alleged democracy).
  • The words are as clear and as blunt as can be, gracing most of our pages because of the implications no one could possibly ignore. The (Link).


Below in HTML (for links to and from) the letter, in 2003, that CAUSED the government to act. Read it, access the facts and the evidence pointed to the Member of Parliament (ex-Minister) and then read the article, by the Home Secretary, we reproduce below.

THE FULL TEXT OF THE LETTER to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP

29th April 2003

The Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP
House of Commons
London - SW1A 0AA

My Ref: A03EATTP
Your Ref: ‘Think /Do the unthinkable’ brief.


Dear Sir
Re: Human Rights and the duties of Ministers / MPs in a Democratic State

I beg to refer you to:
My letter of 18th December 1998, published in the public domain at:

(a) http://www.human-rights.org/natinscan.htm#page_1

The above letter was posted to the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, Home Secretary at the time. On that occasion it was noted that the government acted promptly.

The stated facts of life, relative to our pseudo-democracy, as covered in our pages, are clear. The realities and realisations to the point. Included, in the stated facts, references to letters that I was caused to send, to you, in connection with the rampant fraud and corruption covered in our pages. The Free-For-All organised, always, by Public(!) Servants(?). Crimes seen to be endorsed and acquiesced, through blunt defaults from and by other public(!) Servants(?). The latter retained and maintained by other Public(!) Servants(?) to serve the citizens by applying their presumed knowledge of law to the facts known or stated to them and or raised with / brought to the attention of such Public(!) Servants(?).

The references to the letters that were sent to you can be accessed in the same page/web-site file at:

(b) http://www.uk-human-rights.org/natinscan.htm#Ostrich acts

I will appreciate an acknowledgement to this letter, by return post. A response proper, as soon as possible, is deemed essential because of the serious issues that my enquiries, now, and the matters that my communications, past and present, raised and raise with you. Indeed, others in public office, during, before and after my original submissions to you, personally, received substantial information and documented evidence in support of my submissions.

Please note that as part of the preparations for the publication of the facts of life, in the public domain, and the raising of the issues of ‘who are responsible for the rampant fraud and corruption through contempt of all law, as Public(!) Servants(?) indulge’, an explicit practice and ploy is pointed to by me, in the pages published by and at *human-rights*.

In respect of other facts, realities and convenient arrangements (pointed to by me at *human-rights*) I wish to enquire of you, if you are aware or were informed of the fact that the victims of the ‘Arms to, and for, Iraq’ fiasco: including the costly theatrical productions (court presentations), the torment and torture (through the court proceedings / charges / allegations) imposed on the victims of Public(!) Servants(?) received compensation, not long ago, running into millions of pounds sterling? ALL AT THE EXPENSE OF THE PUBLIC PURSE – the taxpayer : Mr & Mrs Average!

The succinct and explicit realities covered in the page:

(c) http://www.uk-human-rights.org/confraud.htm

and the fundamental realities / practices covered in the other explicit page:

(d) http://www.uk-human-rights.org/chaldep1.htm

led to the submissions last year to:

  1. The Treasury
  2. The Prime Minister
  3. The Home Secretary

And the submissions are covered at:

(e) http://www.uk-human-rights.org/theyknow.htm

I am preparing for the release and publication, in the public domain, of the acknowledgement by the government in waiting in 1995, relative to THE SERIOUS ISSUE OF FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM. I feel it my duty to draw your attention to the aforesaid facts. You were acting for the government you represent, at the time of my submissions to you. It is, therefore, incumbent upon me to enquire of you and to seek assistance, from a Minister who was caused to resign, in order that I may present a clearer picture on the issue of the melting pot. The criminal activities, by persons who ‘arrange world events’ through secret meetings and undeclared by government policies, lead to the citizens being defrauded of their properties and their rights in law. The activities also lead to the taxing of Mr & Mrs Average for the experiments in social restructuring by non-elected ‘criminally motivated / trained / tutored’ individuals, who abuse public office.

I need only remind you that the victims of such public(!) servants(?) have families and offspring to care for. The citizens also have the inalienable right to plan for their futures and those of their children. The criminal activities that we cover in our pages, endorsed and acquiesced, as these are through the courts, amount to nothing short of ‘crimes against humanity’. When an elected government turns a blind eye and or ears to the evidence that no one can shove in his/her private or family closets, nor shove it all under the carpets of the salons that the offending public(!) servants(?) frequent, the issue of:

WHEN WILL THE GOVERNMENT that made promises in 1995 (*Link) put an end to the abuse / use of the courts for the imposition of ‘the creeping dictatorship’, that I recognised as long ago as 1972/1975? The background and the evidence to/for the conclusions, then, is published at:

(f) http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/courts.htm

The false instrument published in the page, was made even falser after the criminals ‘goofed’. It was created / procured years after the events that led to the institution of court proceedings. The architects (legal circles) with the defaulting public(!) servants(?), (the police and judicial chair abusers) established beyond any doubt the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts. The Lords & Masters mentalities towards the citizens (‘subjects’ to the whims of the corrupters of societies) whom the offending public(!) servants(?) treat as serfs of the Middle Ages, was also born out of those events. I draw your personal attention to the fact that Lord Jeffrey Archer ended up behind bars while the architect and promoter of a false instrument FOR THE PERVERSION & CORRUPTION OF JUSTICE was rewarded with silk and subsequently appointed to ‘judicial chair occupancy’. With criminals in judicial chairs how can any government that knows of or becomes aware of ‘the facilities at / through the courts for RAMPANT FRAUD AND CRIMES ENDORSED BY THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES justify or assert ‘government founded and resting on law and order’?

Your response proper on the issue of the submissions that were ignored by your office / private staff (you?) are deemed essential. In the event that some subordinate or junior may be presumed responsible for suppression of my letters to you, I request that you access the page:

(g) http://www.uk-human-rights.org/background.htm

There, the questions (in red): "WHO governs ? And How ?"

Also: Is the answer "Through Juniors and dereliction of Public Duty ?"

Andrew Yiannides
Founder / President
human-rights.org (NGO)

READ BELOW the article that was published within days in the London Evening Standard.

  • Consider our submissions above to the MP, Frank Field Esq. ex-Minister who had been caused to resign years ago.
  • The first letter we pointed to above should also be read by ALL who access this site.
  • Every considerate human (thinking and feeling animal) should then consider WHERE BE THE DELIVERY OF JUSTICE to the British people, the taxpayers as we have been demanding for decades?
  • Can any housewife who does not keep a clean home, ever really assert or assume the right 'to clean up another's home'?.

FOOD FOR THOUGHT, dear Members of Parliament. Cease all manifestations inherent in puppets and act as the representatives of the citizens and not as the manipulated 'slaves of the operators who organise and control CIUKU Enterprises.  

Evening Standard Monday, 12 May 2003 Page 11

The Home Secretary has irked the judiciary by seeking stricter sentences for murder. Here he insists that courts must take more notice of the public

I won't give in

to the judges 

By David Blunkett

Home Secretary

MY announcement of new sentences for murders – so that life means life – provoked the latest wave of media coverage on my so-called war on the judges". I can see why. It is easy to caricature any disagreement as the hot-tempered working-class Sheffield boy taking on an icy-cool retired judge pontificating from his Surrey drawing room.

Yet I am not "at war" with judges, barristers or the rest of the legal profession. I believe strongly in a politically independent judiciary, the rule of law and due process. But I also believe in Parliament and a healthy democracy where people vote in elections because their vote can make a difference to the world they live in, through the politicians they elect. Surely it is possible to have a strong and lively debate about how Parliament and the judiciary fit together without it always being portrayed as a brawling slanging match?

This is not some dry debate in Westminster. Confidence in our criminal justice system is at an all-time low. Public respect for judges, politicians and lawyers alike is equally low. Up and down the country the experience of victims and witnesses is too often a poor one where they are treated as bit-players in a system which sees process as being more important than justice, where technicalities are more important than the truth.

When politicians make these points we are not seeking to wind up the legal profession for the sake of it. We are doing our job and speaking up for the public we serve. There are no newspaper editors, columnists or opinion formers living in my inner-city Sheffield constituency. If I don't speak about the experiences of my constituents and millions like them, they have no voice at all in the public arena.

I WANT to improve this situation and to get reform in the criminal justice system that brings the legal profession with us. To do this, we need a long hard look at the constitutional relationship between Parliament and the judges and be clear how it has changed.

This relationship has changed beyond all recognition over the past 30 years, thanks to the use of judicial review - the process by which an individual can ask the court to overturn the effect or implementation of a law on their individual circumstance. Judges now routinely use judicial review to rewrite the effects of a law that Parliament has passed.

This isn't just my view, it is endorsed by some of the most distinguished legal minds in the country. Professor Sir William Wade - the author of Administrative Law – has written: "The judges have established judicial review as an almost boundless jurisdiction over almost every kind of governmental activity". Lord Beloff QC has said that the activities of the judiciary have infringed the sovereignty of Parliament".

Lord Beloff also points out that in the 1950s, judicial review was confined to fewer than 100 cases a year relating to maladministration of government.

Now, there are thousands of cases every year in every field of commerce; construction, aviation, and IT, all inviting lawyers and judges to find ever more ingenious ways of getting what they want from the law Parliament has passed.

Added to this have been a rash of high-profile cases brought under the 1998 Human Rights Act which incorporated the European Convention on Human Rights into British law.

I believe most of these cases would have ended up in Strasbourg anyway, if we had not taken the step of building the ECHR into our legal system. But it has undoubtedly encouraged some in the legal profession to see a further way of rendering ineffective laws they don't like.

In my area, the impact of judicial review has been most visible in several high profile asylum cases on fast-track claims at the Oakington centre and cash payments for late claimants.

In both cases, the Home Office eventually won the legal arguments but not before a major tussle which resulted in plenty of premature headlines about our reforms being squashed.

These perceptions are vital to the health of our democracy. If people believe that Parliament has no power or influence and that whatever promises we make will eventually fail, how can we persuade people to vote, stand for elections and be involved in democracy?

People have to believe that Parliament genuinely speaks for them if they are to vote, and this can't be done if large parts of the legal system believe that it can seek to undo Acts of Parliament without any consequences for the health of our democracy.

This is not the same as saying that public opinion, however raw, should become law which is the way some commentators have interpreted my murder sentencing principles. Parliament's lawmaking process is usually a year of intense deliberation over finely worded, complicated pieces of legislation. This is the job of work which MPs and peers do, day in, day out.

We have to move away from a stand-off mentality in which parts of the legal profession respond to politicians with a "what's it to do with you?" attitude. I honestly believe that most lawyers and judges do want to see justice, not just procedural Pyrrhic victories.

I want that, too, as well as a system where judges can interpret the laws which have been clearly set out by a democratically elected Parliament.

At the moment, we all too often have the worst of all worlds in which Parliament deliberates for months over laws which are then systematically undermined by overly aggressive judicial review decisions. There is a way forward here. The legal profession must embrace reform of the criminal justice system, not carp from the sidelines. Like most people, I respond better to an honest dialogue than to being shouted at.

A better relationship between the judges, barristers and politicians has to recognise our mandate as public representatives and not treat public opinion as something inherently disdainful which has no role in the formulation of law.

We all have to pause and draw breath at the scale and scope of judicial review and interpretations of the Human Rights Act if we are not to have spat after spat about the consequences.

A mature, clear legal system is one of the foundations of a democratic society. We all have a responsibility not to destroy the ground all of us want to stand on.

We have to move away from a stand-off mentality
in which parts of the legal profession
respond to politicians with
`What's it to do with you?'
[*Link to Footnote - realities & realisations]

© Associated Newspapers UK
London Evening Standard – May 2003

The above article should be considered in conjunction with the submissions and challenges, from Andrew Yiannides, to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, ex Minister. All taxpayers, victims, or not, of the abused courts facilities, victims also of the legal and public services should be pointed to the realities covered in our exclusive page. The time has come for the apathetic serfs to be awakened from the lethargy they have been afflicted with for decades. It is time for 'awakened citizens to consider and use their rights and obligations under the law'. And it is time for the damaged and defrauded to cease treating payments from taxpayers contributions to the national budget as alleged rights, while they are aware that the REWARDS TO PERSONS WHO AGREE TO COVER UP THE CRIMINALS WHO ABUSE PUBLIC OFFICE & THE COURTS FACILITIES RENDER THEM ACCESSORIES & ABETTORS TO THE ACTS OF ORGANISED CRIMES & CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES.

Link to:  the Declaration - to challenge public servants Link to:  Citizens Rights - Assured in Law 
Link to:  OUR AIMS (Statement of Intent) Link to:   The Divorce Industry CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS
Link to:  G H Scriven page: Some Realities Link to:   Confidentiality Between Fraudsters - the FACTS
Below the impressive promotion of material facts and realities within the United Kingdom, as covered in an explicit letter from one 'victim' to another, both of whom were recognised converts to and maintenance engineers of the organised constructive frauds through abuse of the courts' facilities, we cover and point to in the exclusive page both and all of their affiliates / associates elected to shun / bury in the sand where they buried their heads.
  • More to the point such material facts WERE / ARE NOT INTENDED FOR THE SUCKER-SHITIZENS to know of. All care of the media Barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes they retain and maintain, as covered in the words of John Swainton when he was moving out of the firing line - retiring. Above all, as organised and arranged by victim-converts who fell / fall in love with the facilities in place, for fraud aplenty, on the taxpayers, through abuse of the courts' facilities. [*Link from here to a typical scenario / court hearing when the victims were noted to have been conscious parties to the created costs orders through fraudulent court proceedings].
  • The citizens, nonetheless are called upon to pay taxes for the creation of a Society of Fraudsters, as the corrupted and sold to the system of operations [ *For centuries / millennia ongoing when one considers the words attributed to Jesus Christ in the Gospel according to St. Luke] which realities the author of the explicit letter we publish below was caused to recognise as *the facts of life within an allegedly civilised democracy*.
  • Suppression of such truth happens to be the priority of the organisers of it all and the converted / corrupted stooges we point to.
  • The dreaming fraudster failed to recognise the simple fact that he and his associates were and are the bricks used to build the walls of first defence, by the builders of such societies.
  • We released on 3rd March 2008 an explicit House of Lords Precedent Case, dating back to 1939-1940. Mr Andrew Yiannides -the founder of human-rights* and proponent of the human-rights.org Community on Line- spent almost 16 years by then looking into and researching the activities of the LIPS crowd/mob and those of their affiliates / associates. The managers, organisers and controllers of the mob contacted Mr Yiannides in May 1992, miraculously (a give-away sign) within days of Mr Andrew Yiannides lodging, at Bow County Court, an explicit Appeal. The appeal was called for and warranted in 'The Breeding Grounds - case', which appeal *victims, readers and researchers can link to from here in order to acquaint themselves with the foul activities that alleged servants of the public and the law engaged in, while in pursuit of the usual impositions on Mr & Mrs Average by the Law Enforcement Agencies (police & courts). Of such activities and practices in all pseudo-democracies where the New World Order Code of Ethics has been Reigning Supreme for decades. All planned by the creators of the most vile of works ever to have been presented to mankind and promoted for centuries / millennia by the agents of the creation arrogantly promoting and imposing the creators' evil plans for mankind.
  • All VISITORS WHO access the explicit House of Lords Precedent Case should take on board the fact that their Lordships addressed and deliberated on much more than just abuse of trust and erratic / reckless misuse of the courts facilities by solicitors and their subordinates. Their Lordships were most specific on matters attached to the issue of CONSPIRACY, to the issue of DECEPTION, to the issue of suppressing the truth and LIES and specifically to the issue of deliberate SUPPRESSION OF THE TRUTH by KEEPING QUIET ABOUT MATTERS KNOWN TO HAVE CAUSED DAMAGES TO ANY OTHER.
  • And here we have persons who were aware and through personal experiences & contacts knew and know of hundreds of such victims, of thousands and millions world wide; of persons who were / are subjected to the the New World Order Code of Ethics, created and being imposed  on 'the taxpayers whom all treat as serfs of the Middle Ages. Such activities by alleged Servants of the Law and the public with the type of persons we name and expose (arrogant lovers of it all) while misrepresenting themselves as alleged victim-challengers AFTER GOING FOR & ADOPTING THE ARRANGEMENTS IN PLACE, which we cover in our exclusive page, the page not one of the named fraudsters-club-recruits ever addressed. One and all like the fraudster-shysters they all were / are, each time they were asked to address the realities we point to and have been exposing for years they all rushed / rush back to the caves they congregate in with their associates and affiliates, other promoters and lovers of the system of operations in all pseudodemocracies Mr Andrew Yiannides recognised decades ago 
To Geoffrey H Scriven

( Private and Confidential )
The author, his mentors and his affiliates should read carefully the provisions under Article 6 of the European Convention On Human Rights without skipping *OBLIGATIONS*

Date 20th January 2000

From J. Foenander


Dear Geoffrey,

I am supplying you with several documents proving your case of facts, not scandalising the Courts, your case is proof of yours and other peoples factual statements, evidence in support of their claims, and other documents that have come into our hands (*F1) proving that either the Judiciary were, are practising a money laundering act by means of terrorism (*F2), or that there has been an infiltration of a Mafia operating within the Judiciary (F3), behind the scenes coercing the Judges, masters and other legal institutes of Great Britain and Europe (*F4) in a money laundering process by acts of terrorism (*F5).

Enclosed herewith is a expanded index relating to the documents supplied herewith.

  1. 'Mail on Sunday' Report dated 4th October 1992. Consisting of 5 pages proving that Mr S A Hussein of Knollys Road Streatham London SW16 was and is a known fraudster and criminal involved with banking and business fraud going back several years. (*F6)
  2.                                                       ( After this see what came next. )

  3. Picture of that same fraudster with the Ex-Lord Chancellor Lord McKay and several members of Pakistani Barristers at a function held in London. Is this a Pakistani Masons meeting or what.??
  4. Since this picture was taken see evidence below proving that this man carried on acts of fraud, With assured protection by the legal infrastructure of Great Britain which includes Judges, Barristers, solicitors, the Attorney General, the Treasury Solicitors office, the CID, the CPS, the DPP, the OSS, the DTI, the Social Security office, the housing benefit agency, the VAT office and the Inland revenue, all of whom have been notified and issued proof by my self, the police and two independent investigation specialist as shown by Mr Malcolm Glynn’s reports dated 11th & 24th June 1999, and Mr Albert Barnes of Barnes & Barnes consultants dated 12th January 1998 enclosed herewith.) this is proof of the legal infrastructure using known criminals in practices of money laundering by acts of terrorism and fraud on the general public, permitting the solicitors to use Mr Hussein who was given offices in their premises to mislead clients, to take money’s from clients, permitting Mr Hussein to make out write and legal Aid applications on behalf of the solicitors for clients, attend High Courts and County Courts on behalf of solicitors who were charging clients for their services.

  5. Copy of Messrs Desmond Pye Partnership solicitors letter to me Mr J. M. Foenander dated 18th August 1995. Enclosed bill of costs clearly showing agents fee paid to Mr Hussein £310.00 attached is copies of cheques paid to them and cash drawn and paid to Mr Hussein on the next day for taking out a writ against the barrister and solicitors who had acted for me before District Judge Maple in the Divorce Registry in July 1995.
  6. Copy of writ taken out by Mr Hussein acting as a Barrister clearly showing his handwriting, against Bond Lewis & Co. solicitors and Mr Flori O’Donoghue counsel and pages of his handwriting on sections of the statement of claim, and the amended statement of claim.
  7. Copy of letter dated 28th March 1995, from Mr S Hussein working for Messrs David Gouldman & Co. solicitors sent to Mr J Foenander with Mr Mr Hussein's signature for proof that he was working for them asking for more monies to be paid on account.
  8. Copy of another letter from Mr Hussein working for Messrs David Gouldman & Co. solicitors to Mr J Foenander dated 24th May 1995.
  9. Copy of another letter dated 23rd June 1995, form Messrs David Gouldman & Co. solicitors to Mr J Foenander proving that Mr Hussein worked for them and had conduct of his cases.
  10. Copies of 5 letters from Messrs Lawford & Co. solicitors Mr J Foenander's ex-wife solicitors to Mr S Hussein working for Messrs David Gouldman & Co. solicitors, proving again that they had all agreed to permit a Fraudster to conduct cases for solicitors in order to extract funds from clients. Letters dated 10/4/95 to 18/5/95.
  11. Copies of 2 Letters from Messrs Lawford & Co. solicitors to Mr Sayeed Hussein of Southcombe & Co. solicitors.
  12. Copy of letter dated 6th June 1995 from Messrs David Gouldman & Co. solicitors to Mr Sayeed Hussein of Southcombe & Co. solicitors.
  13. Copies of 2 Letters from Messrs Lawford & Co. solicitors to Mr J Foenander dated 20/9/95 see letters above self explanatory of work carried out by the solicitors using a fraudster and charging clients for his services.
  14. Copy of 8 separate peoples signatures proving Mr S A Hussein had introduced himself as a Barrister and taken their cases to the various firms of solicitors and had conduct of their cases.
  15. Copy of a Letter the Supreme Court Group Administrator’s Office to Mr Sayeed Hussein of 6 Knolly’s Road London SW16 proving that they had caught him forging and swearing a affidavit in someone else'’ name. ( This is Forgery and Perjury gone unpunished by Law. )
  16. Copy of letter dated 2/3/98 from Mr Colin Francis Nevill proving that Mr Hussein had introduced himself as a barrister and taken monies from him and his sister and made out writs for them against their families, while working for Messrs David Gouldman & Co. solicitors. Copy of writ enclosed herewith dated 4/4/95.
  17. Copy of letter dated 13th August 1995 from Mr J M Foenander to Mr S Hussein of Southcombe & Co. solicitors, consisting of two pages.
  18. Copy of letter dated 14th August 1995 from Mr S Hussein to Mr J Foenander clearly admitting taking money from client.
  19. Copy of letter 10th August 1995 from Mr J Foenander to Mr R Southcombe solicitors sent recorded delivery, clearly marked private and confidential.
  20. Copy of letter dated 11th August 1995 reply to above letter signed Southcombe & Co. Which Mr Southcombe said he had not seen and not replied to, proving that Mr Hussein had opened a private and confidential letter to solicitors and replied to it.
  21. Copy of Barnes & Barnes consultants report dated 12th January 1998 on Mr S A Hussein of 6 Knollys Road London SW16,. Proving he is still conducting fraudulent acts of deceiving clients and solicitors alike.
  22. Copy of Mr Malcolm Glynn's reports dated dated 11th & 24th June 1999 issue to the Attorney Generals office, the Treasury solicitors Office, the OSS, the CID, and the DTI seeking a section 42 & 43 vexatious litigant Order, also showing that we have enough evidence for criminal proceedings to be brought against Mr S A Hussein. ( Please note nothing has been done by any Legal bodies because of the serious implications and compensation that will have to be awarded to clients. )
  23. I have all correspondence between myself and the police, various solicitors, my barristers, the OSS, several clients and solicitors that have been involved, with Mr S Hussein and their affidavits and evidence supplied to the police, who have stated that they have handed the file to the CPS, who in turn have refused to take any action. This is proof of the protection offered to Mr S Hussein by the Legal System for acts of money Laundering by acts of terrorism.
  24. Copy of letter dated 5th November 1995, from Mr A Hussein the son of Mr S A Hussein given to the police, proving that his father takes action against everyone that befriends his family.
  25. Copy of a letter dated 26th October 1999 from Mr J M R Foenander to his solicitors Messrs Antons solicitors clearly showing that there has been fraudulent applications by Mr S Hussein and also fraudulent Judgements obtained without service on solicitors or client, also showing that solicitors had not followed client's instructions and or reported the matter to the police.

Enclosed is pages 84, 97 & 333 of the guide to the professional Conduct of solicitors Chapter 16.07 Money Laundering and solicitors duty of disclosure by statutory provisions relating to Money Laundering, see the Criminal Justice Act 1993. All highlighted for your reference.

Pages 71 & 72 sections 3.06 & 3.07 practice rules responsibility of solicitors reference to section 41-43 of the solicitors act.

Page 42. Solicitors Act 1974. Page 404, solicitors seek to deceive client and courts.

Page 45. Unqualified persons not to act as solicitors, section 20. And unqualified person not to pretend to be a solicitor, unqualified person not to prepare certain instruments.

All other information regarding solicitors aiding and abetting criminals by permitting them to make applications for Legal Aid, and representing clients in court, several other witness statements including solicitors used and then sued by the criminals, criminal taking client files from solicitors office and then using information to blackmail clients and solicitors can and will be made available for any police or Court proceedings.

Geoffrey if you want to come down for any other information please do not hesitate, this information means that they will have to abandon any proceedings against you, and they will have to rewrite the section 42 vexatious litigants rules to permit solicitors to use criminals in money laundering Acts.

Yours sincerely

[*Link from here to the exclusive page where we relate and point to the organised fraud and corruption through abuse of the courts' facilities]

NOTE the elements the fraudsters' club recruit, was pointing to, above, through reference to Page 45 (third paragraph from the last up). Then consider the simple fact that Mr J. M. R. Foenander was party to and had agreed to use the application one Lew(is) / Lou Foley settled and prepared for him to lodge at court, in respect of a dead case. We refer to the author's action against solicitors, the application by Mr Foley (a declared a Vexatious Litigant - evincing his status as an accomplished member of the fraudsters' club, the club we cover and point to in our exclusive page) after the action against the solicitors had been struck out!!! Do not overlook the fact that the application as drafted & settled by its creator, Mr Lew(is) / Lou Foley was for and in respect of A DEAD ACTION; the application, therefore, was simply intended to lead to a dismissal & additional costs awards to the legal circles, to persons who were acting on instructions from the insolvent Solicitors Indemnity Fund. Needless to say the author of the above letter conveniently elected to ignore the Vexatious Litigant Order (the facility exposing the parts and roles of such parties / persons in the bluntly organised rampant fraud through the courts) the state on record in respect of the creator of the application, which Mr Johan M. R. Foenander adopted as his chosen way forward, well AFTER he had indicated, through his solicitors Antons of Haringey, that the negotiations at the European Court of Human Rights were almost complete / finalised. [*Link from here to the solicitor's letter confirming the imminent settlement through the ECoHR]       

It is imperative that the reader / visitor realises that the issue here is very simple, when applied to ANY GENUINE DEMOCRATIC STATE. The citizens elect persons they wish to represent them in government. The REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CITIZENS (do access the words of Oliver Cromwell when he dismissed the deputies of the people) THEN CREATE LAW recorded as Acts of Parliament. The very Acts and Statutory Instruments (the latter are issued by Ministers) are intended TO PROTECT THE CITIZENS FROM CRIME & CRIMINALS and to assure / guarantee to citizens THEIR RIGHTS (do access a simple compilation of the most fundamental). THE LEGAL PROFESSIONS AND THE COURTS / JUDICIARY are meant TO SERVE THE CITIZENS BY APPLYING THEIR KNOWLEDGE OF THE LAW, in accordance with the facts stated and proven as true and relevant to any case and complaint raised in the first instance or before a court of law. What the Home Secretary was projecting through reference to the arrogance of the servants of the law was his (the Home Secretary's) failure TO ASSERT & POINT OUT THAT THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE TAXPAYERS / CITIZENS MAKE THE LAW, which law the legal circles are meant to be serving, NOT ACTING IN CONTEMPT OF IT ALL. The aforesaid with our compliments to all Intellectual Prostitutes and Media Barons; also to EACH & EVERY FRAUDSTERS CLUB RECRUIT we are naming and exposing; to all WHO CONTACTED US in order to prove that they were/are lovers of it all simply seeking benefit as the sold to the rampant fraud on the taxpayers morons each proved to have been WORKING FOR. Such fraudsters using and converting new victims they are pointed to to act as they did & do. The scenarios they engaged and engage in, reminiscent of the type of scripts that Sayeed Hussein, Johan Michael Richard Foenander, Lou Foley, Norman Scarth and Geoffrey Harold Scrivens, etc., engaging in.  
   1.   For burial and suppression by us, as we work in tandem with the media barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes they retain and maintain. THE TAXPAYERS in OUR allegedly civilised democracy need not to know what we are made of and what we are up to, while asserting and proclaiming to be challenging the fraud we ARE familiar with and parties to. [*The uninitiated visitor, reader and researcher MUST ACCESS the exclusive page where the plans of the abductors and rapists of Democracy & Justice are laid bare, by us]
   2.   Typical assertions without stating the foundations for such an opinion. HOWEVER, it simply happens to be arrogant abuse of judicial chair occupation and blunt contempt for all law. The 'serfs' are simply subjected to THEFT OF THEIR ASSETS & PROPERTIES (properties includes rights assured in law, incidentally) AND THE PRACTICES ARE INDICTABLE OFFENCES as covered and provided for by Parliament through Sections of The Theft Acts. Let no one assert that the judiciary are NOT SUBJECT TO THE SAME LAW AS EVERY OTHER CITIZEN. Let no one discard the principle 'No one Is Above The Law' in the trash cans of his or her corrupted mind.
[*Link to the brief clarification and pointers to parts of the actual Acts of Parliament qualifying THE FOUNDATIONS OF OUR EXPRESS VIEWS & OPINIONS that REST ON THE FACTS, THE PRACTICES & THE LAW. The arrogant and FRAUDULENT ABUSE OF THE COURTS PROCESSES & FACILITIES, to which the unsuspecting and naive 'serfs' fall victims of, ARE covered by law. Let no 'shitizen and or shyster of the mentality of the author of the above letter or associates & affiliates of such persons engage you in the type of operations & activities in the courts, such as we were invited to attend AND OBSERVED, mislead or simply entice & use you in the more of the same scenarios we noted as in the instance when Mr Johan M R Foenander engaged with one Lou Foley simply for the creation of more legal costs to be paid out of public funds THROUGH HIM & THE NEW FIRM OF SOLICITORS HE RETAINED FOR THE DISTRIBUTION OF TARGETED FAMILY SILVER...... the money laundering part of the operations the author was writing of and about, to Mr Geoffrey Harold Scriven. The latter simply elected or was coerced / caused to join the same club and he was also the subject of plenty of misinformation by the lap dogs the media barons retain and maintain for such services to the ill-educated, the naive, the gullible and the conditioned 'serfs' who are subjected to such arrogant CRIMES AGAINST THE CITIZENS of this one's great nation].
   3.   Remarkable! The author asserts to be fully conversant with THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES HE WAS A PARTY TO, as initiated and organised with and by the chap who introduced him to *the system of operations*. The author engaged in and co-operated with another
[*Link to proof - his own words, recorded by him] IN & FOR THE SUPPRESSION / DISCARDING TO THE TRASH CANS 'THE APPEAL', the ONLY AVENUE OPEN TO HIM for legitimate and within proper use of the courts processes and facilities set about to impress an observer and researcher of the activities he (the author of the letter) and the alleged expert who settled and prepared for lodging at the court of an application WITHOUT PROCEEDING TO AN APPEAL in respect of an action that HAD BEEN STRUCK OUT. Only a moron and idiot of the lowest degree could not recognise that the application as PREPARED & LODGED AT COURT BY TWO CHARLATANS was intended to lead to more legal costs awards to the other side, the solicitors who had been benefiting from such fraudulent abuse of the courts facilities for far too long. [*Link to the truth of the matter and the implications that were born of 'the application settled by one Lou Foley which the fraud of an alleged victim was ready and eager to lodge at court. He had by then, in any event established beyond any doubt that HE HAD BEEN & WAS PARTY TO THE ORGANISED CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ON THE TAXPAYERS through abuse of the courts facilities and processes. No one can overlook or accept any other argument and or proposition as to WHY he retained a new firm of solicitors who simply engaged in the money-laundering activities in which THE AUTHOR OF THE LETTER WAS PARTY TO & THE ENERGY OF THE ENGINE DRIVING THE STOLEN FAMILY SILVER FOR DELIVERY TO THE REST OF THE CRIMINALS who had been parties to the abuse of the courts facilities as of the first instance]
   4.   The audacity of the author of the letter knows no boundaries. The only act of coercion he darn well knew and knows is covered in the exclusive page which he, his affiliates, associates and like minded fraudsters failed to address 'as alleged legal gurus'. Just ONE WORD EXPOSES fraudsters of the author's mentality and aptitude to law', just as the word exposes the organisers of the system of operations. The word : 'confidential' relative to the arrangements between co-conspirators in the acts of theft and transfer of taxpayers assets and contributions to the national budget, to abusers of the legal system THROUGH CONTEMPT OF ALL LAW.
[*Link to the author's parts in such criminal activities that are evinced in a letter one of his solicitors wrote to another solicitor, months before he was sent along to play at law with such other fraudsters as he was rubbing shoulders with, as an alleged victim of the legal circles and the abusers of judicial chair occupation]
   5.   Acts of terrorism? Big words for a convert to and lover of the rewards under the table! HYPOCRISY taken to new heights and fraudulent intentions exposed when one considers the simple fact that the shyster / convert to and lover of the rampant fraud of the constructive frauds through the courts, as with the rest of the fraudsters he had been rubbing shoulders with HE SUPPRESSED THE VERY EVIDENCE HE WAS ALLUDING TO IN HIS LETTER. The allegedly conversant with the law fraudster may well have used the veil and cloak of 'Private and Confidential' without due consideration to the simple fact that criminals who conspire to SUPPRESS KNOWLEDGE OF, not just participation in, CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES cannot rely on protection from prosecution as 'accessories and ABETTORS TO ACT OF CRIMES AGAINST THE TAXPAYERS'. The author should shove the aforesaid down the throat of his mentor and then shove his head back in the caves from which he emerged as an alleged victim of that which he endorsed and set about to promulgate and 'use for more of the same' constructive frauds on the taxpayers.
   6.   Just the usual half-baked potatoes; touching the circumference AND EVADING the core element : THE ARROGANT FRAUD & CORRUPTION AS ORGANISED & OPERATED by the abductors of Democracy (the politicians and the media Barons) as arranged within ALL pseudo-democracies. All care of the media Barons through the Intellectual Prostitutes they retain and maintain, and for far too long promoting and selling to the ill-educated, to the non-thinking & conditioned serfs (like Pavlov's dogs) as if the genuine article.
[*Link to a letter which the editor of 'The Times' did not publish at a time when education was the big issue at government level. In the same page another letter of the times on the very subject. AND in the same page another letter from a third citizen on the very issue of education almost a decade on]
   7.   *Link from here to the image of an article in the Law Supplement of the prestigious 'The Times', when promotion of the group of fraudsters club recruits who were & are operating as alleged legal gurus, USING the conditioned victims they were / are pointed to or are drawn to such groups who are operating as covered in this page. Nothing but suppression of the facts of life within the courts and the Law Enforcement Agencies and plenty of misrepresentations and irrelevant applications to courts FOR THE CREATION & PROMOTION OF SCRIPTS & SCENARIOS AS COVERED IN THIS PAGE and other pages.
[*Link to facts stated when the author of the above letter, Mr Johan Richard Foenander engaged with a known to us *fraudsters club recruit* for the creation of legal costs charges for addition to the existing fraudulently created costs charges he was referring to in his letter to Mr Scriven as the product of crime and MONEY LAUNDERING THROUGH THE COURTS].
   8.   xxx
   9.   xxxxxx


To Home Page  Back to Page KEY  

The creator of this website was inviting victims to access URrights & join him there with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office until the providers of the facilities >ning.com< introduced new terms and conditions for the provision of the facilities. Access from here and read of the imposed states by the brains behind ning.com and consider only one element "WHY OBSTRUCT & HINDER THE DOWNLOAD of the existing material at URrights.ning.com >the intellectual properties of the creator of that presence on the Internet and those who joined him there? Read below of the unacceptable conduct and behaviour by the reckless abusers of trust, who set out to obstruct and blackmail the creator of URrights.ning

Persons who are genuinely concerned and object to the ways they were / are being treated by alleged servants of the publicand the law >in any PSEUDOdemocracy, or whatever states / conditions they are subjected to< by abusers of public facilities and public office >as we cover in our web-pages< should contact webmaster@human-rights.org for information relevant to the creation of similar facilities for INFOrmation on URrights, for facilities for URrights EUrope and for a NETwork of URrights activists.

  • APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility (ning.com) Andrew Yiannides created and used the portal to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers who joined with him to expose and challenge the arrogant and blunt abuse of public services in all allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.

  • The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for ning.com to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.

  • HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the ning.com servers THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were contemptuously ignored.

  • Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for ning.com

  • In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from ning.com to existing members.

  • EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

.org/1999dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org/actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
  • Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
  • All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegdely reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
  • Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
  • Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
  • Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
  • The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
  • Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
  • All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s)

On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org/ (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter,
Access also http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/ (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE.It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the European Court for Human Rights* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR], arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
鼯font> Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster