This page relates to the case Mr Andrew Yiannides was working at and upon which THE IMPORTANT update and the ADDENDA* [*Link] we were obliged to introduce in January 2002, rests. Details can be found at the top of the Updated Pages file. We are sure that visitors, readers and researchers will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons like Mrs Veronica Beryl Foden, who adopt and promote activities which they know are criminal in concept and intent. Such persons engage and participate in downright organised crimes* [*Link] that rest and are founded on securing assistance through deceit, fraudulent misrepresentations and arrogant fraudulent gains through abuse of trust. We refer to our exclusive page* [*Link] where we expose -as conscientious law abiding* [*Link] citizens- the element of constructively engineered and created *Confidentiality Between Fraudsters*; the confidentiality that relies on the age-old principle of 'Honour Among Thieves'; the confidentiality that is founded on the BEST OPEN SECRET, in an allegedly civilised society; the foundations we point to in an exclusive page; a page which fraudsters of Mrs. Veronica Beryl Foden's mentality shoved in the dark corners of their corrupted minds, as another product of the society that reared her. Below our submissions to government in February 2002 and thereafter to the media over an extended period. Odd it was not that in the course of working with and for the lousy actress, Andrew discovered that the city she hailed / hails from, in its Coat of Arms emphasis was / is given to the creation of the creators of all that is evil and has been ongoing for millennia, that Mr Yiannides knows of and recognised as a young teenager. [*Link from here to the basis for the aforesaid & from there follow the link to the lesson by example stated in the creation of the fraudsters who delivered to mankind their plans for the sons of men on planet earth]    

We refer, and we cover in the addenda we point to above, to issues that have been of concern to us for years. We have known for even longer of the facilities in place, and 'how stooges and planted mischief makers engage in activities 'for, with, and within the established formula* [*Link] of Crimes Incorporated United Kingdom Unlimited (CIUKU) Enterprises, operations.

The facsimile communications and letter we publish in this page cover part of the developments that arose out of the activities and convenient defaults attached to breaches that such persons engaged in with intent while presenting themselves as 'the innocent victims of those they were co-operating with while aiming to cause embarrassment and damages to persons they attached themselves to. Such persons engage in the creation of false instruments (the favourite tool of the organisers and controllers of the self-perpetuating cancerous growth industry, the legal system and court services) and misrepresentations, the foundations and corner-stone of CIUKU Enterprises.

Our facsimile to the last of the LIPS mob/crowd introduction, which we publish now, covers* [*Link] some of the highlights 'the crocodile tears victim of them all' was engaging in for over fifteen months. All the while she was indulging, as others of her ilk and introductions from the same crowd/mob had been. Playing at cat and mouse games with plenty of excuses for her failures to act as she had agreed (in the first instance) to do simply established that she had come along as a new understudy of the very same role as other tutored and used stooges dabbled in before her. Blaming all others, the persons in control of 'the legal system and the courts, promoting and thriving in such promotions, is the trade mark of the planted mischief maker and the person who aspires, if not already a member, to join 'the fraudsters' club'. [*Link from here to proof that one such person had been negotiating the reward he was looking forward to as one who was to engage in furtherance of the system of operations & one who fully intended to keep it all under his hat in accordance with the stipulated conditions from the agents of the criminals in control]

Andrew's letter to the Prime Minister was very clear. Although we were informed by the Prime Minister's private office, that the activities we reported TO the Prime Minister, were referred to the Home Secretary / Home Office (in their letter dated 29th November 1999) some junior in the post room at the Home Office, apparently / allegedly HAS MORE AUTHORITY in governing these islands than our elected Prime Minister. At least that is the impression we are led to believe, accept and lump it, as serfs of the Middle Ages. Such activities and notions from within an allegedly civilised modern democratic state that allegedly, rests, is managed and it is also allegedly run on principles of law and order.

The developments after our submissions to:

• The Treasury
• The Prime Minister
• The Home Office
• With copies and submissions to editors [*Link] of selected press and media controllers >none responded<

Produced some 'miraculous and coincidental developments' as Official Press Releases were circulated and promoted by the media. These varied from the gutsy proclamations by the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, through the concerns of the Ministers and the propositions by the Home Office / Secretary to 'train the allegedly non-existent and or incompetents who are in control of ALL police Authorities, in Fraud Investigation.

• We hand over to the police, FORGERIES that establish HOW thefts and misappropriation of funds belonging to third parties were 'otherwise planned for', by the staff and officers, alleged servants of the public, operating out of Haringey Council, as was / is the situation within other Local Authorities / Borough Councils.
• We point out, to police officers who purportedly were investigating the arrogant fraud on targeted 'serfs', that an initial FORGERY was subsequently used to create another two clones, and we hand true copies of the forgeries and a Section 9 Statement duly signed by the targeted victim of the frauds.
• We point out when and how the initial FORGERY, also HOW & WHY two clones were introduced, subsequently, by the staff and officers of Haringey Council.
• We emphasise as to HOW the THREE FALSE  INSTRUMENTS were promoted, used and relied upon by the tutored in theft and misappropriation of Housing Benefit funds, staff and officers operating out of Haringey Council, as was the case with staff and officers operating out of Enfield Council. [*Link from here to the explicit appeal that caused the Lord Chancellor to announce the Bill of Rights in 1997 & NOTE that the very realities and developments did not and do not exist as far as each and every one of the *fraudsters club recruits* we are exposing in our pages are concerned].
• We point out to the police, the creative accountancy schemes operated by Local Authority staff & officers. And we produce documented evidence ESTABLISHING INTENT & ORGANISED SYSTEMATIC FRAUD on .
• We provide other documented evidence to the police, establishing that CREATION AND PROMOTION OF FALSE INSTRUMENTS is part and parcel of the training and the activities of staff and officers who operate out of Local Authorities, the staff of which are entrusted with funds belonging to others, NOT THEIR EMPLOYERS who train and tutor them in the creation and the promotion of CIUKU Enterprises, operations.
• We point out that ALL RELY and even boasted of their reliance on abusers of public office who operate as alleged judicious persons by mere occupation of 'some judicial chair, at some bench in some local court'.
• We point out that staff and officers at local courts indulge in the creation and posting of false instruments, such as 'allegedly legitimate court orders' that lack accountability by the alleged authors of the false instruments, as covered in an explicit affidavit the police has site of and we published in our pages (not linked for general access).
• We point out to the police that such false instruments, as covered above, conveniently are posted late and or to collaborating in the scams local letting agents (persons - not lifeless limited liability legal entities that manage and run themselves by themselves in accordance with the logic -or lack of it- promoted by legal gurus trained in the CIUKU Enterprises mould.
• We point out to the police that the postings of false instruments by the local courts, to the collaborating persons who manage and run local letting agencies are also posted late in order to lead to another favourite ploy by the criminals who manage the courts' business.
• And we explain that the ploy is used solely and ONLY FOR THEFT OF PROPERTIES (including legal rights, such as the right to a fair hearing within the rules and regulations) and NOT THROUGH THE CREATED LEAVE TO APPEAL PLOY that the late posting of False Instruments (lacking accountability by the authors/creators) ARE INTENDED TO LEAD TO.
• The above ploy, naturally, FOR, BY AND AND WITH MEMBERS OF THE LEGAL CIRCLES AND PROFESSIONS, who feel free to walk into any court of law (allegedly), to advance any fabricated falsehood in order that they be rewarded with 'the costs of their labours and ingenuity'. The rewards either through Legal Aid Funding or through imposed charges for which the targeted victims / citizens then suffer the usual carnage of the lambs by the wolves. 
• We submit such facts and more and we deliver to the police documents and submissions they sign for. Conveniently among their number and their organisation no one knows how to handle the submissions and evidence and very conveniently they report and allege loss of or misplaced material. Replacement documents handed to a senior officer IGNORED AND NOT ACTED UPON, suffering from the very same 'invisible substance and state of non-existence.
• We can only hope that the Home Secretary will be able to find and caused to be trained better calibre personnel for the proposed new NATIONAL FRAUD SQUAD intended to tackle 'white collar fraud'.
• God, what else is there for 'mere mortals' to think of at such times. The 'miracles', in the areas we cover, are simply created FOR AND BY THE ADMINISTRATORS and CONTROLLERS OF LAW AND ORDER. They arrogantly INDULGE AND BENEFIT through abuse of and misconduct in public office. The criminal activities MANIFEST within the law enforcement agencies. Yet successive governments maintain the persons at THE EXPENSE OF THE BUDGET and ultimately the TAX-PAYERS, the VICTIMS OF THEM ALL.
• For years we play daft and we put up with charlatans like Norman Scarth et all, from within the LIPS crowd/mob. All too eager and like other organised groups of fraudsters, gearing to work as legal gurus in preparation for the new ploy/channel, the Lord Chancellor's new baby, the Legal Services Commission (NOTE: The LSC is controlled and managed by the same wolves, as the Legal Aid Board was, 'FOR ORGANISED FRAUD on the taxpayers and targeted 'serfs' / 'shitizens'. The organised fraud is exclusively covered and exposed in our pages, specifically through through reference to the practices and the arrangements in place for the Double Constructive Fraud [*Link]).
• Such persons are using the needs of the victims they are pointed to or target of their own as organised mobs. They simply WORK IN CONFORMITY with the arrangements in place'. They do so, because they approve of and endorse fraud, motivation (?) JUST THEIR LOVE FOR MORE OF THE SAME, the CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ON THE BUDGET, through the courts. That was precisely the objective of the fraudster, Veronica Beryl Foden, who was introduced by the LIPS crowd/mob, as yet another fraudster, to be testing our knowledge of the system, and OUR RESILIENCE & TENACITY. Reporting her and those she was working with and for, all along [*Link from here to an explicit Fax to the fraudster], to the relevant government department / officers, was the least we could do. However, we made sure that at the same time THE WORLD JURY WAS / IS BEING INFORMED.
• It now befalls all genuine challengers and victims and all leaders of organised groupings - The groups that are not guided and used by the type of charlatans and fraudsters who have been too busy suppressing facts and realities NOT TO MENTION THEIR EVIL ACTIVITIES BEHIND THE SCENES as agents of the creators and lovers of the system of operations in place. Another typical example of organised fraudsters, as the LIPS crowd/mob, being the UKMM (United Kingdom Men's Movement) who had the nerve to accept directions from persons who were in the know of 'what was in store for our founder) and wrote to Andrew with tongue in cheek to promote concocted scenarios WHILE EXPOSING THEIR PART IN INSTITUTIONALLY ORGANISED FRAUD & CORRUPTION.       

We publish below the documents in HTML for we shall be including links from and to the text attached to and arising out of the content of the documents and some of the evidence that clarifies, qualifies and establishes the truth of the matters stated and covered in the documents.

In the column on the left we shall be publishing scanned thumbnails of the documents as posted and or as transmitted to the recipients. We are including relevant newspaper articles, the results of  Press Releases that came to life after the submissions to the government. The issue of billions for compensation because of errors or mistakes is not the same as THE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS WE COVER IN OUR PAGES and non-participating victims are subjected to. Enticing victims into the fold and THE FRAUDSTERS CLUB and rewards for keeping it all in the family closet as with the media barons and public servants makes for A STATE MANAGED BY CRIMINALS; persons whose main pre-occupation has been and is the torment and torture of citizens whose only mistake was to seek Justice in the theatres managed by fifth rate directors, the abductors and rapists of Justice.

17 November 1999

Re: My concerns unheeded; irresponsibly handled by your office and public servants.

I re-transmit my letters of 9^th August and 18 September as OPEN LETTERS, now. Defaults by public servants are unacceptable. Your office stated [*Link from here to letter confirming] that my communications were referred to the Home Office. I expected of the Home Secretary to issue instructions and or the government to act as it did following my letter of 18^th December 1998 [*Link to text in HTML for links to from the text]. I have no option but to withdraw confidential cover. My communications to you and the exchanges I had with the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng in May/July 1995 were succinctly put. My submissions to debates, in the course of the Festival of Rights, were also clear. In June 1997 publicity for a specific adoption.[*Link from here to press release]

I transmit copy of the letter of 30 September 1999 to the police at Haringey. It is time for all to take stock of the situation; the police must abandon the usual trick of cards, diversions. They set themselves on course for the long established operations, exemplified in the Stephen Lawrence sham. Citizens look to the police for investigations proper and prosecutions, no matter who the criminals are. Housing Benefit funds misappropriated and Haringey council staff promote / use and rely on Forgeries to justify their dishonest handling of funds belonging to another. The tenant, to whom they allege the funds were released, in the meantime, denies knowledge of the forgeries the council staff secured and adduced for joint scenarios. [*Link from here to the letter from the CEO, Gurbux Singh at Haringey]

The police failed to investigate and or act upon the information given to them. To this day they deliberately default to take my statement. They appear simply ready to shove crimes and skeletons in the family closet; they seek avoidance of the facts and the evidence WITH INTENT. The evidence to secure convictions exists, and the police play musical chairs. No one adduces proof that ALL Housing Benefit funds were actually paid to the tenants and agents. Council staff, however, engaged another council department, through which to contemplate use of the funds they misappropriated through a FORGERY. [*Link to a statement to Stephen Knight when he was researching his work for 'The Brotherhood' at about the time when the founder of human rights was discovering how high the fraud and the corruption in the UK].

Attachments: 2 earlier letters and the Fax to the police dated 30 September 1999 as covered in the text.

October 2002, submissions to the 'London Evening Standard'.

http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk   <<< web-site closed March 2006

To who it may concern - PRIORITY ISSUES

I transmit also the two-page FAX transmission to the Treasury on 22^nd February 2002, after I caught an alleged victim of the legal system 'in cohoots with the persons she was accusing of the devastation of her life'. That alleged victim was working for 'the compensation rewards (not award) under the table that we cover in the exclusive page …co.uk/confraud.htm [*Link from here to page] at human-rights. Another, genuine victim, was being assisted to challenge 'the abuse of the facilities the legal system operators indulge in freely'. The latter's case was later registered at the ECoHR. The stated facts and the violations pleaded as argued by us are but the tip of the iceberg [*Link from here to submitted pleadings].

Andrew Yiannides NDD., ACFI., ATI., FNAAAS.
webmaster@uk-human-rights.org

Remember:-
"Do for, by and with yourself that which satisfies you, so long as that which
you do, does not infringe upon and or violate the rights of any other". (AY ©)

To who it may concern - PRIORITY ISSUES

Attached copy-paste of an email sent to the treasury covering the most unacceptable of institutionalised - organised FRAUD. The practices covered are unacceptable and most certainly cannot continue as non-events. No sooner had an explicit affidavit been lodged at a county court because of abuse of 'the court facilities' for fraudulent conversion of housing benefit funds (covered in the National Scandal pages) and the Bill of Rights was announced, in 1997.

We expect of the government that promised in 1995 to deal with the "Fraud In The Legal System" to attend to the issues raised in the posting and the facts covered in our pages. We expect justice to be delivered here, at home, to our own citizens in keeping with the well-known adage "Charity/JUSTICE begins at home".

We expect of the media to deal with the issues and to publish the facts and the realities. We expect editors to tell the truth and to cease covering the rampant fraud and corruption that is organised through and by public servants and bodies. We expect of all to note the assured arrogance of public servants who assert that 'their activities will and can be sanctioned through the relevant courts'. We cover such 'boasting' in our pages and any concerned civil servant or reporter is invited to seek any additional information after visiting our pages.

Andrew Yiannides
* human-rights * NGO
London - UK
22 February 2002

The e-mail to the Treasury: -

"Further to my enquiry earlier today I wish to re-iterate that through abuse of public office billions of tax revenue is wasted through the scheme covered at:

http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/confraud.htm <<<< New URL embedded in link

Through an ongoing case that I have been following very closely, for over 15 months now, I can furnish all necessary information to a senior officer. However I MUST EMPHASISE that most DEFINITELY I am not prepared to deal with any person attached to and or operating out of the Lord Chancellor's department and office, the den of it all. Access also:

http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/thefacts.htm#Exhibit_3 <<<< NEW URLembedded in link

There were other instances when solicitors and COUNTY COURT staff and OFFICERS, purportedly acting as public servants were doing so, WITHIN THE LAW. The latter, allegedly, as judicious persons and not just as judicial chair occupants. All, contemptuous of the law, indulging in rampant fraud with the police playing footsie when the crimes, INCLUDING FORGERIES, were reported to 'such public servants' who are operating, allegedly within our law and order founded, alleged, democracy'.

I would appreciate confirmation upon receipt and beg to refer you to the NATIONAL SCANDAL pages at human-rights. There the free-for-all, through abuse of the Housing Benefit funds is covered. From 800 million to over 4.5 billion. Within 3 years the miraculous re-calculation and or re-appraisal of the blunt corruption at and through the local authorities and publicly funded organisations.

The explicit page / file covering the abuse of the courts' facilities by those who are meant to administer parliament's and other law, commands immediate attention. In the meantime consider carefully the four quotes in our HomePage. The conclusion in 1972/1975 was confirmed in 1984/1986 and better still through two high profile fraud cases that raise many questions as to the selective application of facilities at the disposal of the 'incompetent' (to put it mildly) in control of it all.

Sincerely

Andrew Yiannides
*human-rights* NGO
London - UK
21 February 2002

PS. I have been researching the corruption and fraudulent abuse of the courts' facilities for over 30 years, and in the circumstances treat this communication accordingly. In 1995, through submissions to the Prime Minister-in-waiting, I qualified from an appropriate response covering "The FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM". At least three alleged victims who were co-operating in the *confraud.htm* scenarios targeted me and my work and two others attempted to draw me in such vile scenarios.

Copy of the letter from the government in waiting with attached promises will be sent presently to the Prime Minister as a reminder and as an antecedent to publication of the succinct letter on the Internet.

When the National Health service and Education are crying out for funds the billions wasted through fraud and salaries on and for incompetent police forces, whose main pre-occupation is TO CREATE TANGENT EXERCISES as the Lawrence murder Inquiry (to and for which the author of this communication made explicit submissions) the state should ensure that ALL ABUSE AND FRAUD, when reported, by concerned citizens, is dealt with, expeditiously and DILIGENTLY. Access also:

http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/natinscan.htm#where_the_will_the_way

and consider carefully the succinct letter to the Home Secretary, at the time. More material can and will be published in due course for it is time to cease treating Mr and Mrs Average as the old age pensioner in the same page.

--

webmaster@human-rights.demon.co.uk (NOTE: change of email address as link creates)

Remember:
"Do for, by and with yourself that which satisfies you, so long as that which
you do, does  not infringe upon and or violate the rights of any other". (AY ©)

To who it may concern - PRIORITY ISSUES

Attached copy-paste of an email sent to the treasury covering the most unacceptable of institutionalised - organised FRAUD. The practices covered are unacceptable and most certainly cannot continue as non-events. No sooner had an explicit affidavit been lodged at a county court because of abuse of 'the court facilities' for fraudulent conversion of housing benefit funds (covered in the National Scandal pages) and the Bill of Rights was announced, in 1997. (*F2)

We expect of the government that promised in 1995 to deal with the "Fraud In The Legal System" to attend to the issues raised in the posting and the facts covered in our pages. We expect justice to be delivered here, at home, to our own citizens in keeping with the well-known adage "Charity/JUSTICE begins at home".

We expect of the media to deal with the issues and to publish the facts and the realities. We expect editors to tell the truth and to cease covering the rampant fraud and corruption that is organised through and by public servants and bodies. We expect of all to note the assured arrogance of public servants who assert that 'their activities will and can be sanctioned through the relevant courts'. We cover such 'boasting' in our pages and any concerned civil servant or reporter is invited to seek any additional information after visiting our pages.

Andrew Yiannides
* human-rights * NGO
London - UK
22 February 2002

The e-mail to the Treasury: -

"Further to my enquiry earlier today I wish to re-iterate that through abuse of public office billions of tax revenue is wasted through the scheme covered at:

http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/confraud.htm <<<<< New URL embedded in Link

Through an ongoing case that I have been following very closely, for over 15 months now, I can furnish all necessary information to a senior officer. However I MUST EMPHASISE that most DEFINITELY I am not prepared to deal with any person attached to and or operating out of the Lord Chancellor's department and office, the den of it all. Access also:

http://www.human-rights.demon.uk.uk/thefacts.htm#Exhibit_3 <<<< New URL embedded in link

There were other instances when solicitors and COUNTY COURT staff and OFFICERS, purportedly acting as public servants were doing so, WITHIN THE LAW. The latter, allegedly, as judicious persons and not just as judicial chair occupants. All, contemptuous of the law, indulging in rampant fraud with the police playing footsie when the crimes, INCLUDING FORGERIES, were reported to 'such public servants' who are operating, allegedly within our law and order founded, alleged, democracy'.

I would appreciate confirmation upon receipt and beg to refer you to the NATIONAL SCANDAL pages at human-rights. There the free-for-all, through abuse of the Housing Benefit funds is covered. From 800 million to over 4.5 billion. Within 3 years the miraculous re-calculation and or re-appraisal of the blunt corruption at and through the local authorities and publicly funded organisations.

The explicit page / file covering the abuse of the courts' facilities by those who are meant to administer parliament's and other law, commands immediate attention. In the meantime consider carefully the four quotes in our HomePage. The conclusion in 1972/1975 was confirmed in 1984/1986 and better still through two high profile fraud cases that raise many questions as to the selective application of facilities at the disposal of the 'incompetent' (to put it mildly) in control of it all.

Sincerely

Andrew Yiannides
*human-rights* NGO
London - UK
21 February 2002

PS. I have been researching the corruption and fraudulent abuse of the courts' facilities for over 30 years, and in the circumstances treat this communication accordingly. In 1995, through submissions to the Prime Minister-in-waiting, I qualified from an appropriate response covering "The FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM". At least three alleged victims who were co-operating in the *confraud.htm* scenarios targeted me and my work and two others attempted to draw me in such vile scenarios.

Copy of the letter from the government in waiting with attached promises will be sent presently to the Prime Minister as a reminder and as an antecedent to publication of the succinct letter on the Internet.

When the National Health service and Education are crying out for funds the billions wasted through fraud and salaries on and for incompetent police forces, whose main pre-occupation is TO CREATE TANGENT EXERCISES as the Lawrence murder Inquiry (to and for which the author of this communication made explicit submissions) the state should ensure that ALL ABUSE AND FRAUD, when reported, by concerned citizens, is dealt with, expeditiously and DILIGENTLY. Access also:

http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/natinscan.htm#where_the_will_the_way <<<< New URL embedded in link

and consider carefully the succinct letter to the Home Secretary, at the time. More material can and will be published in due course for it is time to cease treating Mr and Mrs Average as the old age pensioner in the same page.

--

webmaster@human-rights.demon.co.uk (NOTE: As of March 2007 change of email address / link creates new email address)

Remember:
"Do for, by and with yourself alone, that which satisfies and pleases you, so long
as you do not infringe upon and or violate the rights of any other".

Below, Mr Andrew Yiannides's submissions to the abuser of his time. Like others who were introduced by the LIPS crowd/mob she benefited from much which she secured under false pretences. Throughout she defaulted to act as had been agreed and warranted (*F1). She failed to respond to a number of communications that were called for, following her part in vile attempts to create and use / rely on a false instrument. She took part in the attempt and she was seen to have been willing and prepared to partake in such activities in addition to the numerous and 'convenient defaults & omissions' that she 'engaged in'. Some are covered in the document which she received but, like an ostrich, she ignored it all by shoving her head in the sand; typical of such arrogant fraudsters, 'who are relying on the criminals who use them for the institutionally organised fraud on the taxpayers, to ******* them' (*Hint - cryptic).

*Link from here to the exclusive page where we expose her parts and those she was co-operating with, as a typical fraudsters-club-recruit / hopeful and as a maintenance engineer of the system as is.

Dear Beryl

From the onset I made very clear the way forward. Ever since it has been chasing, chasing, chasing and appeal, appeal, appeal, EXCEPT:

READ the letter from an Old Age Pensioner below and 
think of others such as the targeted citizens who challenged appropriately the attempts of 'public servants to steal from them their rights to their legal properties' [*Link to]

The creator of this website was inviting victims to access URrights & join him there with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office until the providers of the facilities >ning.com< introduced new terms and conditions for the provision of the facilities. Access from here and read of the imposed states by the brains behind ning.com and consider only one element "WHY OBSTRUCT & HINDER THE DOWNLOAD of the existing material at URrights.ning.com >the intellectual properties of the creator of that presence on the Internet and those who joined him there? Read below of the unacceptable conduct and behaviour by the reckless abusers of trust, who set out to obstruct and blackmail the creator of URrights.ning

Persons who are genuinely concerned and object to the ways they were / are being treated by alleged servants of the publicand the law >in any PSEUDOdemocracy, or whatever states / conditions they are subjected to< by abusers of public facilities and public office >as we cover in our web-pages< should contact webmaster@human-rights.org for information relevant to the creation of similar facilities for INFOrmation on URrights, for facilities for URrights EUrope and for a NETwork of URrights activists.

• APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility (ning.com) Andrew Yiannides created and used the portal to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers who joined with him to expose and challenge the arrogant and blunt abuse of public services in all allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.

• The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for ning.com to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.

• HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the ning.com servers THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were contemptuously ignored.

• Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for ning.com

• In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from ning.com to existing members.

• EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

• Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
• All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegdely reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
• Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
• Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
• Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
• The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
• Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
• All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s). 

> MOST IMPORTANT <
On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.