- PAGE ELEMENTS
INTRODUCTION to page
Case STRUCK OUT
Contempt to EVIDENCE
Contempt to LAW
Need to APPEAL - FRAUD
Processes Posted LATE
/ Sites by Element
Haringey Police - and
Housing Benefit Fraud
V. B. Foden - Mortgage
V. B. Foden - Divorce
V. B. Foden & Solicitors engage in FRAUD
|Contempt to Law
Enfield Council & Local County Court
Hackney Council engage in Housing Benefit Fraud
Haringey Council engage in Housing Benefit Fraud
Haringey Police - H/B Fraud
Len Miskulin - Divorce
V. B. Foden - Mortgage
Len Miskulin - Divorce
P. Constantinou - Divorce
V. B. Foden - Financial
Haringey Council-H/B Fraud
V.B. Foden-Solicitor Case
|Obstruct - Examination
P. Constantinou - Divorce
Crown Prosecution Service
Court of Appeal - R.B.Del C
Helen Patey - Assertions
Divorce Frauds Challenged
V. B. Foden - Plymouth
|Twisted Realities by dreamers *Created August 2005*
||Site under reconstruction -
*Page Revised: June 20, 2012*
|Added links to from other pages
to relevant material attached to the activities of converts to the system of operations
ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA [*L]
we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to
REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY [*L].
Our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept
quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the
abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. You will find the addenda statement at
the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns
and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities
which they know are nothing but downright crimes [*L].
We refer to our exclusive page [*L]
where we expose (as conscientious & law abiding [*L]
citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST
OPEN SECRET [*L].
Guidelines on Navigating
through the extensive material : access [*L]
instructions. The first step for visitors to acquaint themselves with the
extensive material should be to use the SEARCH* [*L]
FOR facility. Just type in any word or combination of words / issues that are of concern /
interest - need information and our views about. Remember that our views rest on factual
experiences and research with evidence in support. We urge visitors and in particular
victims of the legal circles and the Law Enforcement Agencies to access the
introduction page to the Community on Line [*L].
clarification / information email: webmaster@
In the left margin window
- the four top printed email images - relate to exchanges with Dr. Rita Pal, dating back
to July 2004. Release was warranted in August 2005 in view of the fact that Andrew
was faced with a repeat performance, at the time, by a person whose mentality and attitude
to the issue of the rampant constructive frauds, through abuse of the courts facilities,
commanded the release. We add that Dr Rita Pal first made contact with Andrew well over
five years ago (*Link). References in the email exchanges are made to an affiliate / a
contact of Dr. Rita Pal, one Ashok Mahadjin. It was that person who, in the past, behaved
in a similar manner, as the new person engaged in, in 2005, over the very issues that are
raised in the email exchanges.
We hasten to add that Mr A Mahadjin. shared
another common factor with Dr Rita Pal. Both were connected to and related with the great
puke production machine, Mr James Todd the genius behind the VOMIT (Victims Of Masonic Ill Treatment) news-sheet. We beg to inform the uninitiated visitors, readers and new
researchers, that VOMIT is circulated by its very creator. In our view Mr James Todd's
work and contributions to VOMIT amount to nothing else but blunt repetitious
scaremongering as part of an organised Subliminal Indoctrination Campaign for 'the serfs',
the shitizens' of the United Kingdom. Others similarly engage and act; in our view,
whether they realise it or not, their ranting simply fits in with the plans for planet
earth of the master-minds behind the attempts, to impose the intended World Dictatorship,
the New World Order. Behind the aforesaid plans the very same centres of power and
organised groups / organisations who were involved in the last attempt, some sixty years
earlier, when fascists were used as the leading figures.
We need add that in the first instance Dr
Rita Pal expressed, from the onset, her admiration and gratitude to Mr James Todd, for the
guidance and assistance she had been receiving from him, 'her guru', on the issues she was
'exposing' at *NHS*. In the second instance we got to know of Mr Ashok Mahadjin's
connections with Mr James Todd within days of him contacting Andrew, the founder of
human-rights. No sooner had the person contacted us, allegedly after discovering, on the
Internet our pages, and we benefited from an email posting that included the 'new'
contact, the craft-y one, as one of the recipients. Creator of the list of recipients,
none other but the great pretender, Mr James Todd; among the recipients persons who were
recognised by us as impostors and other operatives and promoters of the subliminal
indoctrination ploys. All were engaging in incessant assertions, without any proof, about
involvement of the Free Masons in the rampant fraud and corruption of Society.
highlight below some of the exchanges for visitors, readers, researchers to recognise what
elements and type of persons are responsible for the ongoing CRIMES, that are imposed on
the citizens in our country. We add and point to the simple fact that the Prime Minister
did speak of ORGANISED CRIME when he addressed the House of Commons upon his return to the
U.K. from the Summit of EU leaders, in June 2005. (*Link from here [*L]
to the part of his speech)
- "Do you approve of
the Double Constructive Frauds on the taxpayers, through the courts?" (*Link)
- '... use the same grey
matter you used when you read the NEWSLETTER back in January 2001.... or refer matters to
your guru, Mr James Todd...' (*Link)
- '.... included in
the list of SHAME (Sycophants Hypocrites Anti Morality Evilmongers)...' (*Link)
- '... practices and
traditions exported and instilled by colonialists, empire builders....' (*Link)
- '... not to be farted
about by bloated bellies... inflated ego tripping dead-brains.' (*Link)
- '... defaults amount to
'endorsement, approval and participation'... in such antics if....' (*Link)
- '.... ever took part in
theatrics in any court that are not open to scrutiny by persons who....' (*Link)
- '.... the theatres they
dare refer to as halls of justice.. the attached condition... is.... blunt blackmail.' (*Link)
- '... doctor you were ready
to.... we were dealing with a split personality or a criminally insane / motivated
- '.... done his best to
convert the property he had helped himself into, to legal costs through the theatrics that
ensued and....' (*Link)
- '.... your considered
opinions... which should include opinions on 'the blackmail element....' (*Link)
- '.... read the whole
message in the words to the lawyers, attributed to Jesus Christ by....' (*Link)
- '.... the facilities for
which foul mouthed Ashok was naive enough to anticipate of me to engage in...' (*Link)
- '.... I decided that
Norman Scarth was up to no good with his 'law centre activities in prison', especially
after he enticed the one's suicidal R.K. to indulge at his invitation... behind....' (*Link)
- '.... the content of the
page.... if you cannot, because of some mental incapacity understand.... let someone
write... and explain the reasons for your incapacity to grasp simple....' (*Link)
- '.... you were recognised
as just another front, part of the establishment... the operations of CIUKU
- '.... I demand that you
deal with it, IF you are not mentally, spiritually and morally blind....' (*Link)
right to reply and to justify behaviour and the activities we cover in our pages, is
assured to any one named. We will publish excuses & whatever is submitted to us. Legal
argument that shall arise out of their submissions will be used as we apply ourselves to
relevant issues in the cases they referred to us & we will cover their acts and all
their defaults .
page is dedicated to all abusers of our time and in particular to
Dr Rita Pal, with whom the email exchanges we publish in this page. Her parts as an
obstructer and evil-mongering person were noted from first contacts. She was directed to
contact us, by James Todd, her mentor, the puke production machine of VOMIT repute. As a
person who was concerned about the state of the National Health Service & what was
ongoing within the confines of the institution, she promoted much. She had been
proclaiming many problems and interference in her rights to state and expose matters she
was familiar with, through the web-site she set up www.nhs.exposed.com. Apparently
the servers in India, she informed us, were subjected to frequent and unwelcome
interference. She was blaming it all on our government & she was pointed to the fact
that we did not merit from such interference or attention, as she was promoting, about the
website she set-up. She was invited to copy the existing nhs.exposed web-site to a free
human-rights Community on Line web-site. Hence why she came to know of Andrew's work and
how she received the NEWSLETTER she was reminded of in the course of the exchanges that
exposed, for the umpteenth time, her many parts as an expert in multipersonality complexes
/ multiparts in theatrical scenarios that are concocted by the criminals who have been and
ARE in control of pseudo-democracies for far too long, care of the type of hypocrites and
shysters we expose.
pages we cover some of the most common practices and defaults to which activities and
failures 'the serfs' are exposed routinely, when they seek justice in modern
In other pages we cover some of the most common elements that 'the
serfs' are faced with, when they seek justice in pseudo-democracies.
page we point to persons, to practices and to elements that establish what powers and
elements are used, also who and what type of persons in essence are responsible for the
perpetuation of the activities which Jesus Christ was recorded by the editors / creators
of the New Testament to have spoken to / addressed the lawyers of His days.
exchanges relate also to the issue of the blunt fraud created and imposed through the
abused court facilities, as covered in our pages. Dr Rita Pal, had been exposing / was
engaged in reporting wrong practices and misfeasance in the National Health Service (NHS).
Dr Rita Pal had been asked, on far too many instances, to state where she stood on the arrangements in place [*L] FOR confidential rewards to the
conditioned victims of the system of operations, the constructively engineered rampant
fraud imposed through the courts.
Pall had been told umpteen times that the element of undisclosed
settlements, as organised by the legal circles and directed / processed by judicial chair
occupants, while fully aware of the fact that all and everything is created &
generated through contempt of all law, was unacceptable to us, and so it should be to all
taxpayers. It was made clear to Dr Rita Pall, that her failures to address the issue, did
raise many questions; least of all, on what basis can the criminals who ARE in control,
promote alleged Democratic governance and assert rule of law & order, as sold to the
otherwise indoctrinated and misled citizens by the Hypocrites and Sycophants who ARE in
control in all pseudo-democracies.
below some typical examples attached to and arising out of blunt activities recklessly
intended, by the Organisers and Managers of 'Crimes Incorporated United Kingdom Unlimited
- (CIUKU) Enterprises', to defraud and cause damages to the citizens:
Hearings behind closed
doors in breach of Article 6 of the
European Convention and the most fundamental of principles clearly stipulating that
JUSTICE SHOULD BE SEEN TO BE DONE IN OPEN COURTS.
Issuing court Orders
and delivering judgements in contempt of the evidence
presented to and argued before abusers of public office who purport to be acting as judicious persons while in occupation of judicial chairs. (Seen to be relying on
charlatans and illiterates, other Public Servants, to promote the type of waffle you
can link to from here).
occupants acting in contempt of the law applicable to the
evidence and the issues / matters / events presented to and argued before them.
occupants, acting in breach of their Judicial Oaths through
contempt of the law applicable to the evidence presented to them.
occupants entertaining all manner of unsupported assertions and allegations. More often
that not they obstruct the other side, in the matters litigated before them. The citizens
who ARE thus targeted, for any number of reasons, ARE DENIED THE RIGHT TO CHALLENGE THE
ASSERTIONS / LIES / FALSE EVIDENCE, and such 'abuse of judicial chair occupancy' happens
to be in contempt of the right to fair hearings and another
fundamental principle, that of 'due process'.
occupants Striking Out actions and cases,
properly and legitimately instigated, WITHOUT JUSTIFIABLE CAUSE OR REASONING in support of
such abuse of office.
occupants, entering wrong judgements by denying due process to applicants, thereby setting
the wheels in motion for 'need to appeal' their
reckless attitude to the citizens who thereat have imposed upon them the necessity to
appeal while in search of 'abducted justice'.
Court office staff deliberately delaying the issue
and or posting of court orders, even posting such to
wrong addresses WITH INTENT, thereby introducing the most common of frauds, by the
legal circles, on 'the serfs' who are thus put on the road to the most common of
'obstructions and perversion of justice', the 'need for leave to appeal out of time'.
Delaying with intent -
Obstructing execution and delivery of Transcripts especially of misconducted court hearings(!),
proceedings before judicial chair occupants who act in breach of judicial oaths, and in
contempt of the evidence and the law. (NOTE: We will release evidence in respect of an invitation to court whereby the
alleged hearing was for an application to impose on the victims allegedly legitimate legal
costs, attached to and arising out of fraudulent court proceedings. The victims appeared
to be hell bent on following through with the constructive frauds in contempt of the law
and all ready to act as many of the lovers of the system who were introduced to us by *the
usual fraudsters club recruits* and *the maintenance engineers* who are running around
*promoting the system as is* and NOT CHALLENGING OR EXPOSING THE CRIMINAL IN INTENT
Officers of the Court (solicitors are), clerical staff and 'process servers', employed/retained
by the courts, making false statements [*L] as to
their parts in the processing and execution of the business of the courts.
Cease all pretence.
You know perfectly well that you simply received THE LAST INVITATION to state whether you
approve or not of the ARRANGEMENTS IN PLACE.
I repeat for the last time:
"DO YOU APPROVE OF THE DOUBLE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS on Mr & Mrs Average (the
taxpayers) through the courts?"
Just access and read the page you were pointed to hundreds of times:
Simply use the same grey matter that you used when YOU READ THE
NEWSLETTER, back in January 2001 [*Link from here [*L]
to extract from her first email below, at the time]. If you cannot understand it,
refer it your guru, Mr James Todd (just another who shoved his head in the sand, a
pseudo-expert on the fraud everywhere). He might be able to explain it all to you. IF
you cannot read clearly, see clearly or think clearly, because of mental blindness,
deafness etc., just state so.
You will be included in the list of SHAME (Sycophants,
Hypocrites, Anti Morality Evilmongers),
unless you can produce evidence that any state of mental incapacity pre-existed the first
invitations for you to address the arrogantly blunt facility that entices so many
(stooges) into the world of corrupted legal and court services -----> proceedings.
Proceedings, mind you, such as you profess participation in, without
ANY EVIDENCE out there in the open. REMEMBER ----> Justice TO BE SEEN TO BE DONE and
not to be farted about by bloated bellies (hot air) or inflated ego tripping dead brains.
At human-rights YOU, and all day-dreaming charlatans CAN READ OF
THE FACTS STATED (with fair comment) & SEE THE EVIDENCE. Where be such proof about
'your parts in whatever you were boasting of and about not long ago? You, my dear, are
invited to make such events (if genuine and factual) public, JUST AS YOU ARE challenged to
state your views on the issue of the *a*r*r*a*n*g*e*m*e*n*t*s* (*F*O*R* DOUBLE
CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS, AT ---> IN ----> and THROUGH THE COURTS) in the public domain
BECAUSE I will be publishing it all. Your convenient defaults amount to 'endorsement,
approval & PARTICIPATION IN such ANTICS (if you ever took or propose taking part in
theatrics) IN ANY courts, that ARE NOT OPEN TO SCRUTINY by persons who refused to be
party to such activities.
You claim to have had successes in the theatres they dare refer to as
halls of justice. Surely you are not beyond comprehension of the simple reality arising
out of the CONFIDENTIALITY STIPULATION (for settlement under the table) and the attached
condition that in plain English is nothing short of blunt blackmail? I refer to the very
element that produced / led to your own mental state. It all LEADS TO THE CONVENIENT
FAILURES by many, including the great pretender (Norman Scarth) who, like his similarly
disposed chums, failed to state anywhere the facts of life in the courts - the legal
services. All of them (LIPS crowd/mob and affiliates), in the meantime, wishing to play at
law as alleged legal experts.
As a doctor you were ready and prepared to attend to the needs of 'the
fraudsters club recruit' Norman, the great impostor. Whether you and any other were to
deduce that we were dealing with a split personality or a criminally insane, motivated
person ----> who was gearing up and aiming for more theatrical presentations in the
courts, is neither here nor there.
Any one with common sense should have recognised that he had done his
best to convert the property he had helped himself into, to legal costs through the
theatrics that ensued care of the many suppressed truths and the promotion of a great many
LIES. Anyone with some *common sense* could / can conclude that he secured residence at /
in the property under false pretences, just as he set about to secure, from me, the copy
of the letter which he later elected to use for HIS EVIL PLANS with others. Can you not
recognise that BY DEFACING THE COPY FIRST, dear doctor, he simply established HIS EVIL,
dishonourable and deceitful WAYS along with those who were harbouring, with him, their
evil plans for my work and me?
Pretend no more, and come back with YOUR CONSIDERED OPINIONS which
should include opinions on 'the blackmail element' = condition(?) attached to the second
constructive fraud through the courts. I refer to the arrangements for COMPENSATION TO
THOSE who succumb to the blackmail stipulation. Such stooges are not content to just
satisfy their greed for greens; they simply keep it in the family (they join) and THEY GO
ABOUT INTERFERING in the work of those who object to the arrangements in place and ARE
EXPOSING IT ALL to the world ----> as you darn well know.
I am referring to VICTIMS(?) OF ABUSERS OF JUDICIAL CHAIR
OCCUPANCY, to those who change sides because of 'the arrangements in place'. They do
nothing about the ACTIVITIES IN & TROUGH THE COURTS, just like Norman Scarth & Co.
He, like many other charlatans, set off to complain about it all, all the way to the
ECoHR. And THEN they developed a taste for 'the green staff' and he, of an allegedly
honourable disposition to law and 'the shitizens' (just like the judicial chair occupants)
indulging in sadomasochistic theatrics, in which his like-minded chums love to dabble in
and promote. You should READ THE WHOLE MESSAGE, in the words to the lawyers, attributed to
Jesus Christ by the editors of the New Testament, in the Gospel according to St. Luke.
I refer to the facilities for which foul mouthed Ashok was naive
enough to anticipate of me to engage in, as he was preparing for, too. Funny how Ashok
turned up soon after I decided that Norman Scarth was up to no good with his 'law centre
activities in prison', especially after he enticed the once suicidal R.K. to indulge (at
his invitation) in activities behind my back without any reference to me about his/their
plan to INTERFERE IN MY WORK.
Just read the content of the page /confraud.htm and if you cannot do so
because of some mental incapacity to understand what it covers, let someone who can
understand (English) write to me and explain the reasons for your incapacity to grasp such
simple realisations. Need I to remind you of the situation that arose AFTER you contacted
me? Have you forgotten HOW OTHERS set about 'to influence and were expecting of me to
change / remove sated facts and realisations in the pages at human-rights? Such persons
(idiots in reality) overlooking the fact that THE ELEMENTS that apparently(!) bothered
them(?) happened, also, to be the facts of life (in our country) as seen by the editor of
a popular national newspaper?
Can the last paragraph above, and the events that I now remind you
of, NOT BE SUFFICIENT PROOF that you were recognised as just another front, part of the
(establishment) operations of CIUKU Enterprises?
Remember: N R He In Oh Law-was = One Begins With Logic ---> "If the power of clear
thought and vision be the anti-depressant drug of all time, there would be no need for the
couch type pseudo-medics". (*Link
to the alternative)
Do not forget to address the facts covered in the page you have
elected to be 'mentally blind to' for well over two years now. I DEMAND that you deal with
it IF YOU ARE NOT MENTALLY - SPIRITUALLY - MORALLY BLIND.
London - UK
22 July 2004
In Message <013a01c46e3f$d543ec90$7bd64e@D5505Q0J>, Dr Rita Pal
>> Having read this material twice. I hAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU ARE SAYING.
---------- Original Message
From: "Andrew Yiannides" <email@example.com>
To: "Dr Rita Pal" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 12:29 AM
Subject: Important Enquiry Commanding Attention
>>This is posted only to and for you to consider, apropos, bearing in mind all past
exchanges between us,
>>inclusive of the childish attempt to use some stranger (and a doctor?) to cause me
to change my tactical assaults on the abductors and >>rapists of Justice, the
Goddess. The big question is at the bottom of this posting. Please consider it as 'a
concerned citizen' (if you are a >>genuine one, a challenger of the rampant fraud
to you last month, with MY VIEWS about 'the honours bestowed upon Dr Adoko (one of the
many to benefit from the right) >>TO KEEP QUIET -----> with official blessings!.
I should have informed you, also, of the fact that he showed his true colours within
weeks >>of our first meeting* [*Link
from here to the page where we reveal much] and after my undertaking to promote his book and
the >>exposures contained within his work. Conveniently the book / work was removed
from circulation and there were NO OPEN >>CHALLENGES & EXPOSURES, by a person
who went as far as to write THE book about it all.......
>>I WAS SUPPOSED TO
IGNORE THE ELEMENT OF BALANCE OF PROBABILITY and why he just lost his voice and vitality,
about the >>burning issues that caused him to write and publish the book in the first
instance..... "Pull the other one, Dr. Adoko", the Cockneys say.
>>Not long ago
Rita you set about making fun of me and mocking my work. You were doing so IN
COLLABORATION with some of the >>most evil persons who were sent along to act the
very lousy roles they assumed / were assigned to by their masters, the string pulling
>>puppeteers, the criminals who are in control of the 'shitizens' who are subjected
to the whims of the corrupters, the corrupt AND THE >>CORRUPTED (as the actors were
and remain, so long as they keep their heads in the sand over the issue of the DOUBLE
>>CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS through the courts*. [*Link from here to the
page where we reveal how one of the many affiliates of Dr Rita Pal engaged, with another,
in reckless abuse of the courts facilities simply for the creation of additional awards to
solicitors care of the aimed-for court order. *In the same page linked to from here, we reveal a hint the other dreamer, Mr.
Johan Michael Richard Foenander benefited from, which hint he either failed to take on
board or simply ignored as a participant in the organised constructive frauds instigated
and processed through abuse of the courts' facilities]
>>As with all others
you were asked to address the issues covered at and exposed in the exclusive page:
>>Like all others you
defaulted and failed to comply, with the concerns of A TAXPAYER & A GENUINE OBJECTOR
TO THE RAMPANT >>FRAUD & CORRUPTION THROUGH THE COURTS. It therefore follows that ALL
defaulters (those who failed and fail to access the >>page) WHO FAILED & FAIL (to apply themselves to
the disclosed / exposed facts) TO EXPRESS ANY VIEWS on the arrangements >>(including the
blackmail element) just appear to endorse it all as lovers and USERS OF the arrangements
in place. I do not mean just >>users, as victims who elected to capitulate to
blackmail by keeping quiet and doing nothing and FAILING TO ACT AS THE LAW >>PROVIDES
(emphasis on properly whether you like it or not) ABOUT SUCH CRIMES.
>>Note please that I
have published in an explicit page the last exchanges I had with Paul when he exhibited
(for the last time) his true >>colours about the issue of links to and from his
human-rights web-site. I added to those exchanges, also, exchanges with a person who >>came along as a
victim, set about to abuse my time and goodwill, indulged in other activities behind the
scenes and when caught in a >>net that I cast, she came back with some idiotic scripts and
scenarios. As usual I had gone FISHING and in the net Paul too. The two of >>them came out
of the woods with plenty of waffle and childish assertions that exposed what had been
behind that scenario.
>>I have not released
the above page yet, because I am also preparing ancillary pages about other actors and
known to me fraudsters club >>recruits & hopefuls who are ready, willing and allegedly
capable of (and legally qualified experts) to work with/for others (targeted victims) >>FOR the
creation of the double constructive frauds. Johan Foenander, who has been engaging in such
activities DID write about such >>matters in connection with his mentor, the Hussein
fellow, and his letter to Geoffrey Scriven IS PUBLISHED at human-rights.
>>I QUOTE BELOW from your email of 21st Feb. 2001, (written) at 13:38:47
>>I wonder if you would do me a favour. We were all dead impressed with what you
wrote in your newsletter. Would you do us the honour >>of writing a piece for us . *** (there exist, of
course, more and other postings by/from you).
>>We both know what followed (archived email exchanges) and how the attempts to
'interfere with' or influence my work at and for >>*human-rights*. Nothing but stooges and charlatans
at work 'doing their masters bidding', fail when they target someone who added a >>fourth
dimension to the famous adage of Abraham Lincoln's, "...and there are some people you
can never fool....." by extension = 'as to >>your real aims / purposes.... for befriending them'.
>>I HEREBY REQUEST,
for the last time, that you access the CONFIDENTIALITY
from which *con* (look it up in a dictionary)
from which *fraud* (do I need to refer you to
con + fraud = page/file name.
>>page and that you come back
with any opinions and views, as a taxpayer, IF YOU EVER PAID TAXES in the UK and or as a
taxpayer >>in any other country where such practices and traditions were instilled
and exported by the colonialists - empire builders and the >>followers of 'the teachings by example stated' in
the most vile of published works that I ever read.
>>Consider the following:
>>"What makes it most effective for the forces of destruction is that people
who don't think are persuaded that they do. Nothing is more >>closed than a closed mind that thinks it's open and
nothing is more manipulated than a manipulated mind that thinks it's free. It is the >>ultimate
illusion, and yet I meet people like that every day".
>>David Icke from 'The Robot's Rebellion'. 1994.
Andrew Yiannides - Founder / President
human-rights organisation (NGO)
Protecting & Promoting Hum Rights World Wide
Go to: http://www.members.human-rights.org
the Community on Line - Help Rescue 'JUSTICE & DEMOCRACY'.
To find out HOW & WHY the Bill of Rights was rashly announced, in 1997, by the Lord
Chancellor (United Kingdom Government) access:
The media are part of THE CREEPING DICTATORSHIP in pseudo-democracies.
|4 images below - exchanges
with Dr Rita Pal. Her moods and changes in attitude give away more than enough as to her
priorities and her real personality / character.
Full text of the email can be accessed from here (HTML) for links to
The email below was posted
to the recipients on 10 September 2005 after it became clear that their
plans were not in conformity with 'OUR AIMS'. One of them appeared to be playing along
with the offending abusers of the courts facilities for theft of family silver, through
the long established practices that we expose in our exclusive page: http://www.uk-human-rights.org/confraud.htm
We are to release evidence of the blunt contempt of the law and a
theatrical production Andrew was invited along to witness (!) as far as the organisers
were concerned. Andrew, however, fully intended TO OBSERVE & NOTE WHAT WAS TO BE
INDULGED IN ADDITION TO THAT WHICH ALREADY HAD GONE BY. A new page will be created and the
email below will be transferred there to join exchanges with one of the recipients and a
transcript of the attempts in June 2005, at Barnet County Court.
The explicit EMAIL:
Dear Louka & Hara
The following SHOULD SET THE RECORDS STRAIGHT and make it absolutely clear that initiators
/ innovators DO NOT FALL FOR any diversionary tactical ploys from any quarters.
One of the most talked about and ACCEPTABLE PRINCIPLES in all of legal history, happens to
be the issue of PRECEDENT LAW - either enacted or as interpreted / created as a RESULT OF
COURT HEARINGS when equity comes into play ON THE BASIS OF THE ESTABLISHED - PROVEN AS
ACCEPTED 'THE TRUE FACTS IN THE CASE' (that result with / in a precedent ruling).
Historically, when DEALING WITH STOOGES & CRAFT-Y agents of the controllers of the
naive who were / are sent along to play at law with me, I always re-act / act on the basis
of my first 'logical conclusion' whereby I declared to my teacher, Mr Shohmelian (at the
English School, in Cyprus in 1953) that 'The law can't be a ass but a person who believes
such a promotion, IS'.
Whenever, therefore, when persons came / come along while of opinion that they were / are
cats (as catty as their mentors and gurus who direct and instruct them) who are to play
with a mouse, THEN nothing is ignored and EVERYTHING IS NOTED. The nets are cast as soon
as the situation provides the reason for 'caution'.
I refer to just one example, that of Mrs Veronica Beryl Foden, from Plymouth. She was
introduced by one of the sidekicks of the great James Todd (first reason for caution) and
an accomplished go-between used by the LIPS (Litigants In Person Society) crowd/mob. She
(Mrs. V. B. Foden) set off with the Free Masons jargon from the word go in the cafeteria
at the RCJ, after the hearing I attended (as an observer from the gallery) she provided
the second reason for caution. She informed me of the strike out of the case she
instigated against the solicitors who organised everything for her (with the rest of the
followers of the Great Architect as I explained to her, since she alluded to the Free
Masons like so many others whom the puke production machine and his affiliates use for
their own ends) AND BECAUSE she was seeking my assistance for THE APPEAL SHE INSTIGATED
& LODGED (of her own) at her local County Court, seeking AN ORDER to re-instate the
(struck out) case back to the court's list at Plymouth County Court, I decided to RELEASE
TO HER an important PRECEDENT CASE.
I ensured that we got rid of the go-between, first, because I DID NOT WANT ANY OTHER to
know of that move, for the particular precedent case could / can be used to stop dead in
their tracks ANY ONE (Attorney General and all other abusers of the courts' facilities
with such a 'convenient tool as the Section 42 jargon). I explained to her that any one
who was likely or might use the S42 could be blocked. I did not refer to the S42 orders
for what they amount to: 'An arranged facility for cover' to those who are declared
Vexatious Litigants. I did NOT disclose to her that through such orders a provision FOR
cover to the stooges who go for the cash under the table AND DUST in the eyes of those
whom 'the participating fraudsters' FOOL', as happened in a number of prominent Litigants
In Person Society fraudsters 'cases' and 'states for promotional waffle'. Such craft-y
asses being branded 'Vexatious Litigants' - otherwise known a Section 42 Order victims(?),
Beneficiaries IS THE WORD. Such gifts to and for the lovers of the constructive frauds,
that are BANKROLLED BY THE TAXPAYERS. It is all made clear in the exclusive page that
covers *the arrangements in place, FOR KEEPING QUIET ABOUT THE VERY ACTIVITIES in and
through the courts*. Whereas every participant SHOULD KNOW that it all amounts, no more no
less to NOTHING BUT INSTITUTIONALLY ORGANISED FRAUDS ON THE TAXPAYERS & CORRUPTION OF
SOCIETY, no one appears to give a darn about the fact that the stooges / asses (who go for
it and accept cash under the table) act as 'the blackmailed who succumb, through greed for
greens and silver to PARTICIPATION IN THE PLUNDERING OF THE BUDGET (tax input) WITH THE
FRAUDSTERS WHO ABUSE THE COURTS' FACILITIES' for and with criminal intentions. And that
stooge (Mrs V.B.F), as a member of the elitist fraudsters club (LIPS crowd/mob) simply
rushed out to pass on the information (the precedent case information and details released
to her) within 3 days. Little did she know that she had SCORED TWO GOALS FOR ME:
Would the system's operators proceed with such Orders (S 42) through more theatrical
productions at the RCJ for the benefit of more stooges who would be playing at and
indulging in such parts as Mr Geoffrey Harold Scriven had been party to in February 2000
when a number of associates (who will be listed in the convicti.htm page when this
revelation is published) party to and IN ON THE IDIOTIC PLOY at the time?
EXPOSED HER TRUE COLOURS as a lover of the arrangements in place, because as we went along
she established that she had NO INTENTION TO EVER REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TAXPAYERS =
publish it all or anything of true value, in the public domain. Oh yes, she often would
come in with the usual: "The police do not bother / care; my MP does not give a damn
because he is of a legal background (I never bothered to check if he was/is); the papers
do not give a monkey's either; even the local ITV company are not interested".
HOWEVER, she solidly established why she came along, from the word go. She simply did so
in order to use and put pressure to bear, on the organisers of the fraudulent activities
through the courts, FOR A BETTER REWARD, than was being contemplated or had been
pre-arranged AS THE CASE WAS WITH Mr. Johan Michael Foenander : do access and read the
letter from his solicitors (Antons) with the warranted fair comment, as published (at
uk-human-rights.org) within my rights in national and international law, as a 'CITIZEN
(not a shitizen or stooge / sold to the devil idiot) AND AS ALL CITIZENS HAVE THE RIGHT TO
In so far as I was concerned, she came along PRECISELY FOR THE VERY SAME REASONS &
BENEFITS, that Mr. Johan Michael Foenander (the other LIPS crowd/mob fraudster) was sent
along by Mr. Peter Hayward (who directed him to contact me) ALMOST TWO MONTHS AFTER HIS
(JMF) SOLICITORS HAD TURNED DOWN the offer from one of the solicitors who had been party
to the fraudulent activities by a number of solicitors, as covered in THE APPEAL you
should access and read at:
VERY LETTER PROVES that negotiations & settlement offers were / had been in process,
as PUBLISHED at uk-human-rights.org which FACT & REALITY YOU NEVER TOOK ON BOARD as if
a non-event, treating it just like you did with: *The CAMERAS IN COURTS - NEWS FLASH*,
copy of which you received a few days ago.
No need to emphasise the fact that as of the initial give-away activity of her (Mrs V. B.
Foden) passing on the details of the precedent case, all other attempts and childish
stupidities that she engaged in were duly noted. Steps were taken (at all material
times) to put more bullets in the gun that I cleaned and oiled with its sights aimed
straight at her and those she was working with and for. I did and have not spent 33 years
plus (since the attempt to INFLUENCE ME to abandon my legitimate case) researching and
investigating the causes and reasons WHY AFTER 2000 years 'the sons of men' are being
taken for a ride by CRIMINALS WHO ENGAGE IN THEIR KIND OF LAW. Do refer to the words of
the Master to the lawyers of His Days, in the quotes page.
What follows gets juicier as we move on.
1. The above, Mrs. V. B. Foden was, to all intents and purposes, an
innocent, naive and gullible person. She 'apparently' RELIED ON SOLICITORS to arrange, for
her, her life. Yet, she had been a top ranking person with extensive management services
to / with a major public company. She, apparently FAILED(?) to ensure that the agreement
and arrangements with her father / parents were DULY RECORDED in any agreements proper.
That PERSON, evidently came along to play at law with me (OBVIOUSLY as a stooge and guided
idiot). She ONLY CAME ALONG for the purpose stated above (better offers) JUST FOR THE CASH
UNDER THE TABLE (and that made her a WILLING PLAYMATE & AN ACCESSORY & ABETTOR to
the arrangements in place by and with her NEW PLAYMATES in the corrupt world / society of
the law-makers and administrators. I refer to the reward under the table FOR PERSONS WHO
act as perfect specimens of Sado-masochists (do seek clarifications from a professional,
good psychologist). Such idiots have been KEEPING IT ALL IN THE FAMILY CLOSET..... (the
issue of the constructive frauds). In case you fail to recognise THE FACTS STATED &
COVERED as INDISPUTABLE arrangements FOR *fraud on the taxpayers*, you need to go back to
basics on simple law. In the even that you DO RECOGNISE THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER, (the
illegality of the activities) you only have to consider the most important element, and
that happens to be THE FACT THAT SUCH FRAUDSTERS NOT ONLY ENDORSED AND APPROVED THE
CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ON THE TAXPAYERS, they are actually engaging in such activities as
alleged legal experts. Among the list of the recipients in the cc group KNOWN TO ME
FRAUDSTERS of the most obnoxious and evil mentality imaginable. No ifs no buts about it
2. Through that person's 'experiences' as arranged by the controllers of
it all, the followers of the teachings by examples stated in the most vile of works, the
'Old Testament', are seen to be at work. And in it, the very element which, a few years
ago, I 'had to' ask a friend NOT TO DISCLOSE TO ANY ONE when I took him into my confidence
after the criminals who organised my life behind the scenes and used many devices and even
my two younger brothers (both of them as dishonest and deceitful as the sperm provider who
fathered the three of us and the our two sisters was) in order to bring about the break up
of the family that I created. THROUGH THE AFORESAID FACILITY (covered in the protocols by
the N.W.O / the Wise ones of Zionism = whosoever drafted them) THE ASSAULT ON MY ASSETS
AND PROPERTIES, including rights in law assured, YET VIOLATED and acted in contempt
thereof by fraudsters who abuse public office 'as judicial chair occupants and or Law
I did so (request of the friend) at the time when I pointed him to a few examples, in the
O.T. which matters persuaded him to start reading (not rushing through) the 'Old
Testament' with an open mind. I did ask of him to cast aside all of 'the rubbish sold and
promoted to the naive and gullible serfs' by the Rabbis, the Priests and the Imams about
that evil work.
3. The evidence in Mrs V. B. Foden's case establishes, without any shred
of doubt, the arrangements by the legal circles, FOR THE DIFFERENT TONGUES as covered in
the Old Testament, in the extract reproduced from it and to which I point. You should
write to the stupid woman and ask her about the details of the arrangements with her
parents and AFTER she responds to you, OR if she fails to respond, just go back with a
simple additional question:
*** WAS / IS SHE NOT a Standard Bearer for the British Legion and has she not extensive
links to the British Navy, both of the entities very well known INSTITUTIONS?***
In respect of the concluding question above, just consider the simple statement in the
ABOUT FOUNDING FATHERS,
the founders of the new world...... rubbish.
The continent of America was very well known to the Greeks and had it not been for the
evil suppression of far too many truths, and the THEFT OF THE GNOSIS by the evil ones who
even abused Christianity for their evil ends, the world, planet earth and 'the sons of
men' would not be in the sorry state they are now.....
All, simply care of the criminals in control and naturally the very stooges who love to
kiss the feet (and more than that too) of the criminals who have been and are in control
'of the sons of men' for far too long.
The choice for you now is VERY SIMPLE, but do note that as I made very clear last year, as
of and from 1st January 2005, I was and I am not prepared to waste my time with persons
who are of opinion that they can just fail / negate to FULLY REPORT THE CRIMINAL
ACTIVITIES & ALL ATTEMPTS (directed at their well being) BY ALLEGED PUBLIC SERVANTS
YET EXPECT OF ME TO BE EITHER PATIENT WITH SUCH CHARLATANS AND CRAFT-Y STOOGES. You only
have to access the page where I am exposing and dealing with the activities of an alleged
Free Mason basher, Mr Paul Talbot-Jenkins at:
DUE REFERENCE TO THE ACTIVITIES of the person (not ignoring the wilful and maligned
defaults, most important in matters pertaining to his craft-y parts) IS WARRANTED. As you
should note, he adopted the role of 'the all-knowing, and a well informed, gifted one. He
indulged as a person who was of opinion that he could, with other charlatans of similar
dispositions and mentality, fool around with rights of others, behind their backs. He
failed to realise that he was recognised to have been one of the craft-y ones who were
anticipating of me to be intimidated and or scared into submission, when solicitors and
his chum James Todd The Great, Puke Production Machine, set about to assault me while of
opinion that I would simply interfere with the rights of the charlatan to publish parts
only of the truth of the matter and what happened to him after the legal circles went to
town and *through abuse of the courts facilities were hoping to cause him and his wife to
divorce*. In the meantime as an accomplished 'fraudsters club recruit' he had been
expecting of me to afford him an opportunity to institute proceedings against me for
interfering with his rights to tell / publish the (even half truths only) that do not
cover even half of the story..... because of his other interests and preferences... work
it out for yourself if you are gifted with some grey matter and recognise that I AM NO
GAME for charlatans.
May the Force of Good be With You
That which the evil ones indulge in, befall them and
their partners in Crimes Incorporated UK Unlimited.
human-rights organisation protecting and promoting
Human Rights World Wide
Go to: http://www.uk-human-rights.org/comonlin.htm
JOIN other challengers On Line - Help Rescue 'Justice'
Remember: " The cost to the good citizens (Q: R U ?)
for their indifference, in public affairs, (Q: U R ?)
is to be ruled by evil men". (Q: U Do not Object ?)
Wise Counsel by PLATO, Greece (428 - 347 BC)
|You read, in our pages, of the 'arrangements in place for the
constructive frauds on the 'serfs', through the provisions
of Article 38 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Consider, therefore, why
there exist among those who
blow their trumpets about
proclaim their disaffection
'disgust at the practices' in
assert personal knowledge and
YET FAILED AND OR FAIL TO
PUBLISH ANY EVIDENCE
in ANY WEB-SITE, through
inform and prove to
Mr and Mrs Average of that
which they profess knowledge of!!!
WHO BUT THE REAL SHYSTERS,
are party to the above fraud on YOU, Mr and Mrs Average?
http://www.uk-human-rights.org/comonlin.htm and consider stating the facts of your
own experiences in a personal web-pages / web-site. Join with others and work together in
exposing and challenging all offending Public(!) Servants(?) who misconduct in public
JOIN the COMMUNITY
ON LINE if you have been cheated out of your rights, by the legal circles and or were
denied protection, under the law, by the police.
If you have the
evidence against the offenders, you can publish it in your personal web-site as your
rights in law provide. Be not fooled by planted mischief-makers and read of the directives
from THE authority (Link)
Every citizen is
duty bound to report crime and if the police ignored or ignore you, USE YOUR RIGHTS,
EXPOSE THE OFFENDERS who ignore the law.
Stephen Lawrence page (*Link) and note how Parliament provided for your rights. Yet, our
Law Enforcement Agencies simply ignore such provisions, and act as contemptuous of your
rights as a member of the *human-rights.org * Community On Line * has pleaded and lodged
at the European Court on Human Rights. Through defaults and omissions, the police /
authorities fail (Link)
to protect you and in fact they actually torment and torture you, the victims.
READ OF SUCH
PROVISIONS and exercise your rights! Challenge and EXPOSE THE VILE OFFENDERS, who
endorse and promote crime through defaults and omissions in the purported exercise of
their public duties, AS YOUR SERVANTS.
"Do for, by and with yourself
that which satisfies you so long as that which you do does not infringe upon and or
violates the rights of any other". © AY 1972
BE GUIDED BY
AUTHORITIES WHO DEFINED YOUR RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS AS DERIVED FROM AND DEFINED AS :
"THE CONVENTION IN LEGAL TERMS".
The development of
and FOR THE RIGHTS OF CITIZENS, in modern times begun with the Magna
Carta, in Europe. Below, in as simple as can be defined, the principles of rights and
freedoms, clarified by Mark Janis, (fellow) Richard Kay (professor) and Anthony Bradley
- 1. Men are born and remain free and equal in rights;
social distinctions may be based only upon general usefulness.
- 2. The aim of every political association is the
preservation of the natural and inalienable rights of man; these rights are liberty,
property, security, and resistance to oppression.
- 3. The source of all sovereignty resides essentially
in the nation; no group, no individual may exercise authority not emanating expressly
- 4. Liberty consists of the power to do whatever is not
injurious to others; thus the enjoyment of the natural rights of every man has for its
limits only those that assure other members of society the enjoyment of those same rights;
such limits may be determined only by law.
- 5. The law has the right to forbid only actions which
are injurious to society. Whatever is not forbidden by law, may not be prevented, and no
one may be constrained to do what it does not prescribe.
- 6. Law is the expression of the general will; all
citizens have the right to concur personally, or through their representatives, in its
formation; it must be the same for all, whether it protects or punishes. All citizens,
being equal before it, are equally admissible to all public offices, positions, and
employment, according to their capacity, and without other distinction than that of
virtues and talents.
- 7. No man may be accused, arrested, or detained except
in the cases determined by law, and according to the forms prescribed thereby. Whoever
solicits, expedites, or executes arbitrary orders, or has them executed, must be punished;
but every citizen summoned or apprehended in pursuance of the law must obey immediately;
he renders himself culpable by resistance.
- 8. The law is to establish only penalties that are
absolutely and obviously necessary; and no one may be punished except by virtue of a law
established and promulgated prior to the offence and legally applied.
- 9. Since every man is presumed innocent until declared
guilty, if arrest be deemed indispensable, all unnecessary severity for securing the
person of the accused must be severely repressed by law.
- 10. No one is to be disquieted because of his
opinions, even religious, provided their manifestation does not disturb the public order
established by law.
- 11. Free communication of ideas and opinions is one
of the most precious of the rights of man. Consequently, every citizen may speak, write,
and print freely, subject to responsibility for the abuse of such liberty in the eases
determined by law.
- 12. The guarantee of the rights of man and citizen
necessitates a public force; such a force, therefore, is instituted for the advantage of
all and not for the particular benefit of those to whom it is entrusted.
- 13. For the maintenance of the public force and for
the expenses of administration a common tax is indispensable; it must be assessed equally
on all citizens in proportion to their means.
- 14. Citizens have the right to ascertain, by
themselves or through their representatives, the necessity of the public tax, to consent
to it freely, to supervise its use, and to determine its quota, assessment, payment, and
- 15. Society has the right to require of every public
agent an accounting of his administration.
- 16. Every society in which the guarantee of rights is
not assured or the separation of powers not determined has no constitution at all.
- 17. Since property is a sacred and inviolable right,
no one may be deprived thereof unless a legally established public necessity obviously
requires it, and upon condition of a just and previous indemnity.
Consider the above
in the context of our founder's proclamation on true Democracy and do not fail to note the
obvious : Society,
CITIZENS HAVE THE RIGHT TO REQUIRE OF EVERY PUBLIC AGENT AN ACCOUNTING OF HIS / HER
- When the representatives of the
- fail in their public duties
- assume the right to dictate
to, instead of serving, the citizens,
- the citizens can and should
"take the law in their own hands" and
- the citizens can "use it
in accordance with the provisions the representatives put in place".
- There is no need for
- abuse of body and
- misuse of mind.
- There is no need for
revolution and bloodshed.
THE CITIZENS HAVE
THE MEANS TO EXPOSE AND CALL TO BOOK ALL PUBLIC SERVANTS WHO ARE STILL DREAMING OF SERFDOM
- It is time for public servants to
cease behaving as Lords and Masters.
- It is time for them to
'humbly serve their employers, the citizens' AS THE LAW PROVIDES.
THE CITIZENS HAVE
THE WORLD JURY TO RELY UPON FOR DELIVERY OF JUSTICE OUT OF THE BONDS HER ABDUCTORS AND
RAPISTS HAVE BEEN HOLDING HER ALONG WITH DEMOCRACY.
- It would appear that
- the media barons and their
- know not the true meaning of
- Through defaults and
omissions to publish and
- deal with the facts,
- the realities and
- the truth
- THEY helped develop that
which they expect of us to deliver to our children.
- THEY WERE AND WILL REMAIN
- SO LONG AS THEY MAINTAIN
THEIR SILENCE AND
- CARRY ON IGNORING THE VICTIMS
OF THEIR OWN MAKING.
Founder *human-rights* (NGO)
London - United Kingdom
*Link from here to the
Case as STATED / PLEADED at the European Court for Human Rights. Everything was pleaded in the
stated facts but one element was deliberately not pointed to in the violations, as pleaded
for professionals whose prime duty is to apply FACTS & EVENTS STATED - acknowledged as
PROVEN, to applicable law.
Mr Andrew Yiannides, the
founder of the facility for citizens : human-rights.org had his own plans for the abusers
of Public office.
The facilities on the
Internet and the Community on Line were never intended for serfs or for 'the sold to the
system as is' fraudsters and dreaming charlatans.
here [*L] please to the explicit letter/FAX to the court (in the main window / frame of the page you are
linked to from here) (ECoHR) and note
the court's immediate response (in the margin / left window).
In due course we will
disclose what was / has been in line for ALL abusers of public office and all SOLD TO THE
SYSTEM charlatans, dreaming fraudsters and conniving
shysters who contacted Mr Yiannides of their own steam or as contacted thereafter and
directed, as controlled and or as blackmailed stooges.
USE OF THE LAW as is, was and
remains the spring board FOR HUMAN-RIGHTS. (Never overlook the fact that the law is no
The media barons and the
Intellectual Prostitutes they retain and control had and have their plans for the sons of
Mr Yiannides (one of the sons
of men targeted) has had his own plans for 'humans' and not the type of zombies and morons
who were sent along through whom to prove NOT WHO, but WHAT ELEMENTS ARE USED BY THE
CRIMINALS WHO HAVE BEEN IN CONTROL FOR FAR TOO LONG in allegedly democratic states that
allegedly are founded and resting on principles of law and order.
In October 2010, the coalition's Attorney General, in an interview
published by 'COUNSEL' specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves
from cases of (small-fry) fraud and asserted that he was
making that element his department's priority. IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the
coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT
FRAUD, and IF IT WILL DEAL with the criminals who abuse public office, especially
when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course.
Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard,
as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003 [*Link from here
to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the
arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers
that the y, the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law"].
While there, above it, the explicit letter to
ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged
victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the
Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters
submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public
office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance.
It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly
in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among
such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions
by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of
alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us [*Link to our explicit submissions to (a) the Prime
Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) the Home Secretary. WE acted so after we had
secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only
interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD
THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were
intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew
Yiannides]. Access please the
letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998 [*Link*
[*L] from here to the letter] and note the results
evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching
its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the
job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do [*Link [*L] from here to the evidence we
point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who
were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS
crowd / mob].
... Link to: Lord Chancellor's Dpt. Judges Schooled on racial issues Link to:- Typical Response from Lord Chancellor The LAW Frank
Cunningham-case Link to:- The CAMILA Project h-r Home Page Judges independent of, FREE to ignore The
LAW Back to HomePage