twisted.htm      Page KEY  Page Changes 8 Sep. 2009

This Page is DEDICATED import.gif (1348 bytes)  HELP US TO HELP YOU Please (*Link to plea)
hrbnrsml.gif (1162 bytes)
JOIN others On Line and publish your Statement of Facts and the Evidence you have in support.

(Member's case at the European Court on Human Rights - paves the way TO PLEAD VIOLATIONS caused through abusive use of the courts in allegedly civilised Democratic States. Victims do not know that IT IS ALL ORGANISED by the very circles who have been arranging all of humanity's TRIBULATIONS  FOR THOUSANDS of years) Use your rights in law (link) and ACT, with others, against the offenders. Join them and chip in for the creation of the mass of evidence against abusers of public office : the abductors and rapists of Justice. You can then benefit from THE FACTS & THE EVIDENCE that you will help establish. It can all be used in any action, severally or jointly with others, as the case may be . Crimes against humanity are not ruled out when a large number of citizens can come up with evidence and as victims concur and or expand upon on the FACTS STATED & The VIOLATIONS PLEADED as LODGED at the ECoHR, already.
Key - PAGE ELEMENTS
INTRODUCTION to page
FALSE INSTRUMENTS
Case STRUCK OUT 
Contempt to EVIDENCE 
Contempt to LAW 
FORGERIES USED
Need to APPEAL - FRAUD
OBSTRUCTING Examination
Processes Posted LATE

Cases / Sites by Element

Contempt to Evidence
Haringey Police - and Housing Benefit Fraud
V. B. Foden - Mortgage

V. B. Foden - Divorce
V. B. Foden & Solicitors engage in FRAUD

Contempt to Law
Enfield Council & Local County Court
Hackney Council engage in Housing Benefit Fraud
Haringey Council engage in Housing Benefit Fraud
Haringey Police - H/B Fraud
Len Miskulin - Divorce
V. B. Foden - Mortgage
False Instruments
Len Miskulin - Divorce
P. Constantinou - Divorce
Forgery Used
V. B. Foden - Financial
Haringey Council-H/B Fraud
PERJURY - Used
V.B. Foden-Solicitor Case
Obstruct - Examination
P. Constantinou - Divorce
Obstructing Justice
Crown Prosecution Service
Court of Appeal - R.B.Del C
part 3     
Strike Out
Helen Patey - Assertions
Divorce Frauds Challenged
V. B. Foden - Plymouth
part 4     
 

 

 

 

Twisted Realities by dreamers  *Created August 2005*
undercon.gif (286 bytes) Site under reconstruction - *Page Revised: June 20, 2012*
Added links to from other pages to relevant material attached to the activities of converts to the system of operations

VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA [*L] we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY [*L]. Our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes [*L]. We refer to our exclusive page [*L] where we expose (as conscientious & law abiding [*L] citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET [*L]. 

Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material : access [*L] instructions.  The first step for visitors to acquaint  themselves with the extensive material should be to use the SEARCH* [*L] FOR facility. Just type in any word or combination of words / issues that are of concern / interest - need information and our views about. Remember that our views rest on factual experiences and research with evidence in support. We urge visitors and in particular victims of the legal circles and the Law Enforcement Agencies to access the introduction page to the Community on Line [*L].

For further clarification / information email: webmaster@

In the left margin window - the four top printed email images - relate to exchanges with Dr. Rita Pal, dating back to July 2004.   Release was warranted in August 2005 in view of the fact that Andrew was faced with a repeat performance, at the time, by a person whose mentality and attitude to the issue of the rampant constructive frauds, through abuse of the courts facilities, commanded the release. We add that Dr Rita Pal first made contact with Andrew well over five years ago (*Link). References in the email exchanges are made to an affiliate / a contact of Dr. Rita Pal, one Ashok Mahadjin. It was that person who, in the past, behaved in a similar manner, as the new person engaged in, in 2005, over the very issues that are raised in the email exchanges.

We hasten to add that Mr A Mahadjin. shared another common factor with Dr Rita Pal. Both were connected to and related with the great puke production machine, Mr James Todd the genius behind the VOMIT (Victims Of Masonic Ill Treatment) news-sheet. We beg to inform the uninitiated visitors, readers and new researchers, that VOMIT is circulated by its very creator. In our view Mr James Todd's work and contributions to VOMIT amount to nothing else but blunt repetitious scaremongering as part of an organised Subliminal Indoctrination Campaign for 'the serfs', the shitizens' of the United Kingdom. Others similarly engage and act; in our view, whether they realise it or not, their ranting simply fits in with the plans for planet earth of the master-minds behind the attempts, to impose the intended World Dictatorship, the New World Order. Behind the aforesaid plans the very same centres of power and organised groups / organisations who were involved in the last attempt, some sixty years earlier, when fascists were used as the leading figures.

We need add that in the first instance Dr Rita Pal expressed, from the onset, her admiration and gratitude to Mr James Todd, for the guidance and assistance she had been receiving from him, 'her guru', on the issues she was 'exposing' at *NHS*. In the second instance we got to know of Mr Ashok Mahadjin's connections with Mr James Todd within days of him contacting Andrew, the founder of human-rights. No sooner had the person contacted us, allegedly after discovering, on the Internet our pages, and we benefited from an email posting that included the 'new' contact, the craft-y one, as one of the recipients. Creator of the list of recipients, none other but the great pretender, Mr James Todd; among the recipients persons who were recognised by us as impostors and other operatives and promoters of the subliminal indoctrination ploys. All were engaging in incessant assertions, without any proof, about involvement of the Free Masons in the rampant fraud and corruption of Society.

We highlight below some of the exchanges for visitors, readers, researchers to recognise what elements and type of persons are responsible for the ongoing CRIMES, that are imposed on the citizens in our country. We add and point to the simple fact that the Prime Minister did speak of ORGANISED CRIME when he addressed the House of Commons upon his return to the U.K. from the Summit of EU leaders, in June 2005. (*Link from here [*L] to the part of his speech)

  • "Do you approve of the Double Constructive Frauds on the taxpayers, through the courts?" (*Link)
  • '... use the same grey matter you used when you read the NEWSLETTER back in January 2001.... or refer matters to your guru, Mr James Todd...' (*Link)
  • '.... included in the list of SHAME (Sycophants Hypocrites Anti Morality Evilmongers)...' (*Link)
  • '... practices and traditions exported and instilled by colonialists, empire builders....' (*Link)
  • '... not to be farted about by bloated bellies... inflated ego tripping dead-brains.' (*Link)
  • '... defaults amount to 'endorsement, approval and participation'... in such antics if....' (*Link)
  • '.... ever took part in theatrics in any court that are not open to scrutiny by persons who....' (*Link) 
  • '.... the theatres they dare refer to as halls of justice.. the attached condition... is.... blunt blackmail.' (*Link) 
  • '... doctor you were ready to.... we were dealing with a split personality or a criminally insane / motivated person...' (*Link)
  • '.... done his best to convert the property he had helped himself into, to legal costs through the theatrics that ensued and....' (*Link)
  • '.... your considered opinions... which should include opinions on 'the blackmail element....' (*Link)
  • '.... read the whole message in the words to the lawyers, attributed to Jesus Christ by....' (*Link)
  • '.... the facilities for which foul mouthed Ashok was naive enough to anticipate of me to engage in...' (*Link)
  • '.... I decided that Norman Scarth was up to no good with his 'law centre activities in prison', especially after he enticed the one's suicidal R.K. to indulge at his invitation... behind....' (*Link)
  • '.... the content of the page.... if you cannot, because of some mental incapacity understand.... let someone write... and explain the reasons for your incapacity to grasp simple....' (*Link)
  • '.... you were recognised as just another front, part of the establishment... the operations of CIUKU Enterprises....' (*Link)
  • '.... I demand that you deal with it, IF you are not mentally, spiritually and morally blind....' (*Link)
  • '....
  • '....
  •  

The right to reply and to justify behaviour and the activities we cover in our pages, is assured to any one named. We will publish excuses & whatever is submitted to us. Legal argument that shall arise out of their submissions will be used as we apply ourselves to relevant issues in the cases they referred to us & we will cover their acts and all their defaults .

This page is dedicated to all abusers of our time and in particular to Dr Rita Pal, with whom the email exchanges we publish in this page. Her parts as an obstructer and evil-mongering person were noted from first contacts. She was directed to contact us, by James Todd, her mentor, the puke production machine of VOMIT repute. As a person who was concerned about the state of the National Health Service & what was ongoing within the confines of the institution, she promoted much. She had been proclaiming many problems and interference in her rights to state and expose matters she was familiar with, through the web-site she set up www.nhs.exposed.com. Apparently the servers in India, she informed us, were subjected to frequent and unwelcome interference. She was blaming it all on our government & she was pointed to the fact that we did not merit from such interference or attention, as she was promoting, about the website she set-up. She was invited to copy the existing nhs.exposed web-site to a free human-rights Community on Line web-site. Hence why she came to know of Andrew's work and how she received the NEWSLETTER she was reminded of in the course of the exchanges that exposed, for the umpteenth time, her many parts as an expert in multipersonality complexes / multiparts in theatrical scenarios that are concocted by the criminals who have been and ARE in control of pseudo-democracies for far too long, care of the type of hypocrites and shysters we expose. 

In other pages we cover some of the most common practices and defaults to which activities and failures 'the serfs' are exposed routinely, when they seek justice in modern pseudo-democracies.

In other pages we cover some of the most common elements that 'the serfs' are faced with, when they seek justice in pseudo-democracies.

In this page we point to persons, to practices and to elements that establish what powers and elements are used, also who and what type of persons in essence are responsible for the perpetuation of the activities which Jesus Christ was recorded by the editors / creators of the New Testament to have spoken to / addressed the lawyers of His days.

The email exchanges relate also to the issue of the blunt fraud created and imposed through the abused court facilities, as covered in our pages. Dr Rita Pal, had been exposing / was engaged in reporting wrong practices and misfeasance in the National Health Service (NHS). Dr Rita Pal had been asked, on far too many instances, to state where she stood on the arrangements in place [*L] FOR confidential rewards to the conditioned victims of the system of operations, the constructively engineered rampant fraud imposed through the courts.

Dr Rita Pall had been told umpteen times that the element of undisclosed settlements, as organised by the legal circles and directed / processed by judicial chair occupants, while fully aware of the fact that all and everything is created & generated through contempt of all law, was unacceptable to us, and so it should be to all taxpayers. It was made clear to Dr Rita Pall, that her failures to address the issue, did raise many questions; least of all, on what basis can the criminals who ARE in control, promote alleged Democratic governance and assert rule of law & order, as sold to the otherwise indoctrinated and misled citizens by the Hypocrites and Sycophants who ARE in control in all pseudo-democracies.

...

Listed below some typical examples attached to and arising out of blunt activities recklessly intended, by the Organisers and Managers of 'Crimes Incorporated United Kingdom Unlimited - (CIUKU) Enterprises', to defraud and cause damages to the citizens:

  • Hearings behind closed doors in breach of Article 6 of the European Convention and the most fundamental of principles clearly stipulating that JUSTICE SHOULD BE SEEN TO BE DONE IN OPEN COURTS.

  • Issuing court Orders and delivering judgements in contempt of the evidence presented to and argued before abusers of public office who purport to be acting as judicious persons while in occupation of judicial chairs. (Seen to be relying on charlatans and illiterates, other Public Servants, to promote the type of waffle you can link to from here).

  • Judicial chair occupants acting in contempt of the law applicable to the evidence and the issues / matters / events presented to and argued before them.

  • Judicial chair occupants, acting in breach of their Judicial Oaths through contempt of the law applicable to the evidence presented to them.

  • Judicial chair occupants entertaining all manner of unsupported assertions and allegations. More often that not they obstruct the other side, in the matters litigated before them. The citizens who ARE thus targeted, for any number of reasons, ARE DENIED THE RIGHT TO CHALLENGE THE ASSERTIONS / LIES / FALSE EVIDENCE, and such 'abuse of judicial chair occupancy' happens to be in contempt of the right to fair hearings and another fundamental principle, that of 'due process'.

  • Judicial chair occupants Striking Out actions and cases, properly and legitimately instigated, WITHOUT JUSTIFIABLE CAUSE OR REASONING in support of such abuse of office.

  • Judicial chair occupants, entering wrong judgements by denying due process to applicants, thereby setting the wheels in motion for 'need to appeal' their reckless attitude to the citizens who thereat have imposed upon them the necessity to appeal while in search of 'abducted justice'.

  • Court office staff deliberately delaying the issue and or posting of court orders, even posting such to wrong addresses WITH INTENT, thereby introducing the most common of frauds, by the legal circles, on 'the serfs' who are thus put on the road to the most common of 'obstructions and perversion of justice', the 'need for leave to appeal out of time'.

  • Delaying with intent - Obstructing execution and delivery of Transcripts especially of misconducted court hearings(!), proceedings before judicial chair occupants who act in breach of judicial oaths, and in contempt of the evidence and the law. (NOTE: We will release evidence in respect of an invitation to court whereby the alleged hearing was for an application to impose on the victims allegedly legitimate legal costs, attached to and arising out of fraudulent court proceedings. The victims appeared to be hell bent on following through with the constructive frauds in contempt of the law and all ready to act as many of the lovers of the system who were introduced to us by *the usual fraudsters club recruits* and *the maintenance engineers* who are running around *promoting the system as is* and NOT CHALLENGING OR EXPOSING THE CRIMINAL IN INTENT ACTIVITIES, APPROPRIATELY).

  • Officers of the Court (solicitors are), clerical staff and 'process servers', employed/retained by the courts, making false statements [*L] as to their parts in the processing and execution of the business of the courts.


Dear Rita
Cease all pretence.
You know perfectly well that you simply received THE LAST INVITATION to state whether you approve or not of the ARRANGEMENTS IN PLACE.
>
I repeat for the last time:
"DO YOU APPROVE OF THE DOUBLE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS on Mr & Mrs Average (the taxpayers) through the courts?"
>
Just access and read the page you were pointed to hundreds of times:
http://www.uk-human-rights.org/confraud.htm
>
Simply use the same grey matter that you used when YOU READ THE NEWSLETTER, back in January 2001 [*Link from here [*L] to extract from her first email below, at the time]. If you cannot understand it, refer it your guru, Mr James Todd (just another who shoved his head in the sand, a pseudo-expert on the fraud everywhere). He might be able to explain it all to you. IF you cannot read clearly, see clearly or think clearly, because of mental blindness, deafness etc., just state so.
>
You will be included in the list of SHAME (Sycophants, Hypocrites, Anti Morality Evilmongers), unless you can produce evidence that any state of mental incapacity pre-existed the first invitations for you to address the arrogantly blunt facility that entices so many (stooges) into the world of corrupted legal and court services -----> proceedings.
>
Proceedings, mind you, such as you profess participation in, without ANY EVIDENCE out there in the open. REMEMBER ----> Justice TO BE SEEN TO BE DONE and not to be farted about by bloated bellies (hot air) or inflated ego tripping dead brains.
>
At human-rights YOU, and all day-dreaming charlatans CAN READ OF THE FACTS STATED (with fair comment) & SEE THE EVIDENCE. Where be such proof about 'your parts in whatever you were boasting of and about not long ago? You, my dear, are invited to make such events (if genuine and factual) public, JUST AS YOU ARE challenged to state your views on the issue of the *a*r*r*a*n*g*e*m*e*n*t*s* (*F*O*R* DOUBLE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS, AT ---> IN ----> and THROUGH THE COURTS) in the public domain BECAUSE I will be publishing it all. Your convenient defaults amount to 'endorsement, approval & PARTICIPATION IN such ANTICS (if you ever took or propose taking part in theatrics) IN ANY courts, that ARE NOT OPEN TO SCRUTINY by persons who refused  to be party to such activities.
>
You claim to have had successes in the theatres they dare refer to as halls of justice. Surely you are not beyond comprehension of the simple reality arising out of the CONFIDENTIALITY STIPULATION (for settlement under the table) and the attached condition that in plain English is nothing short of blunt blackmail? I refer to the very element that produced / led to your own mental state. It all LEADS TO THE CONVENIENT FAILURES by many, including the great pretender (Norman Scarth) who, like his similarly disposed chums, failed to state anywhere the facts of life in the courts - the legal services. All of them (LIPS crowd/mob and affiliates), in the meantime, wishing to play at law as alleged legal experts.
>
As a doctor you were ready and prepared to attend to the needs of 'the fraudsters club recruit' Norman, the great impostor. Whether you and any other were to deduce that we were dealing with a split personality or a criminally insane, motivated person ----> who was gearing up and aiming for more theatrical presentations in the courts, is neither here nor there.
>
Any one with common sense should have recognised that he had done his best to convert the property he had helped himself into, to legal costs through the theatrics that ensued care of the many suppressed truths and the promotion of a great many LIES. Anyone with some *common sense* could / can conclude that he secured residence at / in the property under false pretences, just as he set about to secure, from me, the copy of the letter which he later elected to use for HIS EVIL PLANS with others. Can you not recognise that BY DEFACING THE COPY FIRST, dear doctor, he simply established HIS EVIL, dishonourable and deceitful WAYS along with those who were harbouring, with him, their evil plans for my work and me?
>
Pretend no more, and come back with YOUR CONSIDERED OPINIONS which should include opinions on 'the blackmail element' = condition(?) attached to the second constructive fraud through the courts. I refer to the arrangements for COMPENSATION TO THOSE who succumb to the blackmail stipulation. Such stooges are not content to just satisfy their greed for greens; they simply keep it in the family (they join) and THEY GO ABOUT INTERFERING in the work of those who object to the arrangements in place and ARE EXPOSING IT ALL to the world ----> as you darn well know.
>
I am referring to VICTIMS(?) OF ABUSERS OF JUDICIAL CHAIR OCCUPANCY, to those who change sides because of 'the arrangements in place'. They do nothing about the ACTIVITIES IN & TROUGH THE COURTS, just like Norman Scarth & Co. He, like many other charlatans, set off to complain about it all, all the way to the ECoHR. And THEN they developed a taste for 'the green staff' and he, of an allegedly honourable disposition to law and 'the shitizens' (just like the judicial chair occupants) indulging in sadomasochistic theatrics, in which his like-minded chums love to dabble in and promote. You should READ THE WHOLE MESSAGE, in the words to the lawyers, attributed to Jesus Christ by the editors of the New Testament, in the Gospel according to St. Luke.
>
I refer to the facilities for which foul mouthed Ashok was naive enough to anticipate of me to engage in, as he was preparing for, too. Funny how Ashok turned up soon after I decided that Norman Scarth was up to no good with his 'law centre activities in prison', especially after he enticed the once suicidal R.K. to indulge (at his invitation) in activities behind my back without any reference to me about his/their plan to INTERFERE IN MY WORK.
>
Just read the content of the page /confraud.htm and if you cannot do so because of some mental incapacity to understand what it covers, let someone who can understand (English) write to me and explain the reasons for your incapacity to grasp such simple realisations. Need I to remind you of the situation that arose AFTER you contacted me? Have you forgotten HOW OTHERS set about 'to influence and were expecting of me to change / remove sated facts and realisations in the pages at human-rights? Such persons (idiots in reality) overlooking the fact that THE ELEMENTS that apparently(!) bothered them(?) happened, also, to be the facts of life (in our country) as seen by the editor of a popular national newspaper?
>
Can the last paragraph above, and the events that I now remind you of, NOT BE SUFFICIENT PROOF that you were recognised as just another front, part of the (establishment) operations of CIUKU Enterprises?
>
Remember: N R He In Oh Law-was = One Begins With Logic ---> "If the power of clear thought and vision be the anti-depressant drug of all time, there would be no need for the couch type pseudo-medics".
(*Link to the alternative)
>
Do not forget to address the facts covered in the page you have elected to be 'mentally blind to' for well over two years now. I DEMAND that you deal with it IF YOU ARE NOT MENTALLY - SPIRITUALLY - MORALLY BLIND.
>
Andrew Yiannides
*human-rights* (NGO)
London - UK
22 July 2004
===================================================================================
In Message <013a01c46e3f$d543ec90$7bd64e@D5505Q0J>, Dr Rita Pal <rita.pal_poet-ess@tiscali.co.uk> writes:

>> Andrew
>> Having read this material twice. I hAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU ARE SAYING.
>> Rita
---------- Original Message --------------
From: "Andrew Yiannides" <andrew@human-rights.demon.co.uk>
To: "Dr Rita Pal" <rita.pal_poet_ess@tiscali.co.uk>
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 12:29 AM
Subject: Important Enquiry Commanding Attention

>>
>>Rita

>>This is posted only to and for you to consider, apropos, bearing in mind all past exchanges between us,
>>inclusive of the childish attempt to use some stranger (and a doctor?) to cause me to change my tactical assaults on the abductors and >>rapists of Justice, the Goddess. The big question is at the bottom of this posting. Please consider it as 'a concerned citizen' (if you are a >>genuine one, a challenger of the rampant fraud & corruption).

>>I responded to you last month, with MY VIEWS about 'the honours bestowed upon Dr Adoko (one of the many to benefit from the right) >>TO KEEP QUIET -----> with official blessings!. I should have informed you, also, of the fact that he showed his true colours within weeks >>of our first meeting* [*Link from here to the page where we reveal much] and after my undertaking to promote his book and the >>exposures contained within his work. Conveniently the book / work was removed from circulation and there were NO OPEN >>CHALLENGES & EXPOSURES, by a person who went as far as to write THE book about it all.......

>>I WAS SUPPOSED TO IGNORE THE ELEMENT OF BALANCE OF PROBABILITY and why he just lost his voice and vitality, about the >>burning issues that caused him to write and publish the book in the first instance..... "Pull the other one, Dr. Adoko", the Cockneys say.

>>Not long ago Rita you set about making fun of me and mocking my work. You were doing so IN COLLABORATION with some of the >>most evil persons who were sent along to act the very lousy roles they assumed / were assigned to by their masters, the string pulling >>puppeteers, the criminals who are in control of the 'shitizens' who are subjected to the whims of the corrupters, the corrupt AND THE >>CORRUPTED (as the actors were and remain, so long as they keep their heads in the sand over the issue of the DOUBLE >>CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS through the courts*. [*Link from here to the page where we reveal how one of the many affiliates of Dr Rita Pal engaged, with another, in reckless abuse of the courts facilities simply for the creation of additional awards to solicitors care of the aimed-for court order. *In the same page linked to from here, we reveal a hint the other dreamer, Mr. Johan Michael Richard Foenander benefited from, which hint he either failed to take on board or simply ignored as a participant in the organised constructive frauds instigated and processed through abuse of the courts' facilities]

>>As with all others you were asked to address the issues covered at and exposed in the exclusive page:
>>http://www.uk-human-rights.org/confraud.htm

>>Like all others you defaulted and failed to comply, with the concerns of A TAXPAYER & A GENUINE OBJECTOR TO THE RAMPANT >>FRAUD & CORRUPTION THROUGH THE COURTS. It therefore follows that ALL defaulters (those who failed and fail to access the >>page) WHO FAILED & FAIL (to apply themselves to the disclosed / exposed facts) TO EXPRESS ANY VIEWS on the arrangements >>(including the blackmail element) just appear to endorse it all as lovers and USERS OF the arrangements in place. I do not mean just >>users, as victims who elected to capitulate to blackmail by keeping quiet and doing nothing and FAILING TO ACT AS THE LAW >>PROVIDES (emphasis on properly whether you like it or not) ABOUT SUCH CRIMES.

>>Note please that I have published in an explicit page the last exchanges I had with Paul when he exhibited (for the last time) his true >>colours about the issue of links to and from his human-rights web-site. I added to those exchanges, also, exchanges with a person who >>came along as a victim, set about to abuse my time and goodwill, indulged in other activities behind the scenes and when caught in a >>net that I cast, she came back with some idiotic scripts and scenarios. As usual I had gone FISHING and in the net Paul too. The two of >>them came out of the woods with plenty of waffle and childish assertions that exposed what had been behind that scenario.

>>I have not released the above page yet, because I am also preparing ancillary pages about other actors and known to me fraudsters club >>recruits & hopefuls who are ready, willing and allegedly capable of (and legally qualified experts) to work with/for others (targeted victims) >>FOR the creation of the double constructive frauds. Johan Foenander, who has been engaging in such activities DID write about such >>matters in connection with his mentor, the Hussein fellow, and his letter to Geoffrey Scriven IS PUBLISHED at human-rights.

>>I QUOTE BELOW from your email of 21st Feb. 2001, (written) at 13:38:47 +0000
>>***
"Andrew
>>I wonder if you would do me a favour. We were all dead impressed with what you wrote in your newsletter. Would you do us the honour
>>of writing a piece for us . *** (there exist, of course, more and other postings by/from you).
>>We both know what followed (archived email exchanges) and how the attempts to 'interfere with' or influence my work at and for
>>*human-rights*. Nothing but stooges and charlatans at work 'doing their masters bidding', fail when they target someone who added a >>fourth dimension to the famous adage of Abraham Lincoln's, "...and there are some people you can never fool....." by extension = 'as to >>your real aims / purposes.... for befriending them'. (AY 1956).

>>I HEREBY REQUEST, for the last time, that you access the CONFIDENTIALITY
from which *con* (look it up in a dictionary)
>>BETWEEN FRAUDSTERS
from which *fraud* (do I need to refer you to a dictionary?)
con + fraud = page/file name.
>>page and that you come back with any opinions and views, as a taxpayer, IF YOU EVER PAID TAXES in the UK and or as a taxpayer >>in any other country where such practices and traditions were instilled and exported by the colonialists - empire builders and the >>followers of 'the teachings by example stated' in the most vile of published works that I ever read.
--
>>webmaster
>>Consider the following:
>>"What makes it most effective for the forces of destruction is that people who don't think are persuaded that they do. Nothing is more
>>closed than a closed mind that thinks it's open and nothing is more manipulated than a manipulated mind that thinks it's free. It is the >>ultimate illusion, and yet I meet people like that every day".
>>David Icke from 'The Robot's Rebellion'. 1994.

=================================================
Andrew Yiannides - Founder / President
human-rights organisation (NGO)
Protecting & Promoting Hum Rights World Wide
Go to: http://www.members.human-rights.org and JOIN
the Community on Line - Help Rescue 'JUSTICE & DEMOCRACY'.
To find out HOW & WHY the Bill of Rights was rashly announced, in 1997, by the Lord Chancellor (United Kingdom Government) access:
http://www.government.uk-human-rights.org/Local/Enfield/Council/attempts.htm
STOP DREAMING:
The media are part of THE CREEPING DICTATORSHIP in pseudo-democracies.

4 images below - exchanges with Dr Rita Pal. Her moods and changes in attitude give away more than enough as to her priorities and her real personality / character.

Printed email:-   Page1
rpal041r.jpg (78482 bytes)
Full text of the email can be accessed from here (HTML) for links to and from.  

Page2
rpal042r.jpg (84479 bytes)
xxx

Page3
rpal043r.jpg (77474 bytes)
xxx

Page4
rpal044r.jpg (65159 bytes)
xxx

Page5
lhs05p1r.jpg (91812 bytes)
xxx

Page6
lhs05p2r.jpg (96997 bytes)
xxx
Page6
lhs05p3o.jpg (97472 bytes)
xxx
xxxxx
lhs05p4r.jpg (75613 bytes)
xxx

..


The email below was posted to the recipients on 10 September 2005 after it became clear that their plans were not in conformity with 'OUR AIMS'. One of them appeared to be playing along with the offending abusers of the courts facilities for theft of family silver, through the long established practices that we expose in our exclusive page: http://www.uk-human-rights.org/confraud.htm

We are to release evidence of the blunt contempt of the law and a theatrical production Andrew was invited along to witness (!) as far as the organisers were concerned. Andrew, however, fully intended TO OBSERVE & NOTE WHAT WAS TO BE INDULGED IN ADDITION TO THAT WHICH ALREADY HAD GONE BY. A new page will be created and the email below will be transferred there to join exchanges with one of the recipients and a transcript of the attempts in June 2005, at Barnet County Court.    

The explicit EMAIL:

Dear Louka & Hara
>
The following SHOULD SET THE RECORDS STRAIGHT and make it absolutely clear that initiators / innovators DO NOT FALL FOR any diversionary tactical ploys from any quarters.
>
One of the most talked about and ACCEPTABLE PRINCIPLES in all of legal history, happens to be the issue of PRECEDENT LAW - either enacted or as interpreted / created as a RESULT OF COURT HEARINGS when equity comes into play ON THE BASIS OF THE ESTABLISHED - PROVEN AS ACCEPTED 'THE TRUE FACTS IN THE CASE' (that result with / in a precedent ruling).
>
Historically, when DEALING WITH STOOGES & CRAFT-Y agents of the controllers of the naive who were / are sent along to play at law with me, I always re-act / act on the basis of my first 'logical conclusion' whereby I declared to my teacher, Mr Shohmelian (at the English School, in Cyprus in 1953) that 'The law can't be a ass but a person who believes such a promotion, IS'.
>
Whenever, therefore, when persons came / come along while of opinion that they were / are cats (as catty as their mentors and gurus who direct and instruct them) who are to play with a mouse, THEN nothing is ignored and EVERYTHING IS NOTED. The nets are cast as soon as the situation provides the reason for 'caution'.
>
I refer to just one example, that of Mrs Veronica Beryl Foden, from Plymouth. She was introduced by one of the sidekicks of the great James Todd (first reason for caution) and an accomplished go-between used by the LIPS (Litigants In Person Society) crowd/mob. She (Mrs. V. B. Foden) set off with the Free Masons jargon from the word go in the cafeteria at the RCJ, after the hearing I attended (as an observer from the gallery) she provided the second reason for caution. She informed me of the strike out of the case she instigated against the solicitors who organised everything for her (with the rest of the followers of the Great Architect as I explained to her, since she alluded to the Free Masons like so many others whom the puke production machine and his affiliates use for their own ends) AND BECAUSE she was seeking my assistance for THE APPEAL SHE INSTIGATED & LODGED (of her own) at her local County Court, seeking AN ORDER to re-instate the (struck out) case back to the court's list at Plymouth County Court, I decided to RELEASE TO HER an important PRECEDENT CASE.
>
I ensured that we got rid of the go-between, first, because I DID NOT WANT ANY OTHER to know of that move, for the particular precedent case could / can be used to stop dead in their tracks ANY ONE (Attorney General and all other abusers of the courts' facilities with such a 'convenient tool as the Section 42 jargon). I explained to her that any one who was likely or might use the S42 could be blocked. I did not refer to the S42 orders for what they amount to: 'An arranged facility for cover' to those who are declared Vexatious Litigants. I did NOT disclose to her that through such orders a provision FOR cover to the stooges who go for the cash under the table AND DUST in the eyes of those whom 'the participating fraudsters' FOOL', as happened in a number of prominent Litigants In Person Society fraudsters 'cases' and 'states for promotional waffle'. Such craft-y asses being branded 'Vexatious Litigants' - otherwise known a Section 42 Order victims(?), my foot!.
>
Beneficiaries IS THE WORD. Such gifts to and for the lovers of the constructive frauds, that are BANKROLLED BY THE TAXPAYERS. It is all made clear in the exclusive page that covers *the arrangements in place, FOR KEEPING QUIET ABOUT THE VERY ACTIVITIES in and through the courts*. Whereas every participant SHOULD KNOW that it all amounts, no more no less to NOTHING BUT INSTITUTIONALLY ORGANISED FRAUDS ON THE TAXPAYERS & CORRUPTION OF SOCIETY, no one appears to give a darn about the fact that the stooges / asses (who go for it and accept cash under the table) act as 'the blackmailed who succumb, through greed for greens and silver to PARTICIPATION IN THE PLUNDERING OF THE BUDGET (tax input) WITH THE FRAUDSTERS WHO ABUSE THE COURTS' FACILITIES' for and with criminal intentions. And that stooge (Mrs V.B.F), as a member of the elitist fraudsters club (LIPS crowd/mob) simply rushed out to pass on the information (the precedent case information and details released to her) within 3 days. Little did she know that she had SCORED TWO GOALS FOR ME:
>
A.
Would the system's operators proceed with such Orders (S 42) through more theatrical productions at the RCJ for the benefit of more stooges who would be playing at and indulging in such parts as Mr Geoffrey Harold Scriven had been party to in February 2000 when a number of associates (who will be listed in the convicti.htm page when this revelation is published) party to and IN ON THE IDIOTIC PLOY at the time?
>
B.
EXPOSED HER TRUE COLOURS as a lover of the arrangements in place, because as we went along she established that she had NO INTENTION TO EVER REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TAXPAYERS = publish it all or anything of true value, in the public domain. Oh yes, she often would come in with the usual: "The police do not bother / care; my MP does not give a damn because he is of a legal background (I never bothered to check if he was/is); the papers do not give a monkey's either; even the local ITV company are not interested".
>
HOWEVER, she solidly established why she came along, from the word go. She simply did so in order to use and put pressure to bear, on the organisers of the fraudulent activities through the courts, FOR A BETTER REWARD, than was being contemplated or had been pre-arranged AS THE CASE WAS WITH Mr. Johan Michael Foenander : do access and read the letter from his solicitors (Antons) with the warranted fair comment, as published (at uk-human-rights.org) within my rights in national and international law, as a 'CITIZEN (not a shitizen or stooge / sold to the devil idiot) AND AS ALL CITIZENS HAVE THE RIGHT TO DO.
>
In so far as I was concerned, she came along PRECISELY FOR THE VERY SAME REASONS & BENEFITS, that Mr. Johan Michael Foenander (the other LIPS crowd/mob fraudster) was sent along by Mr. Peter Hayward (who directed him to contact me) ALMOST TWO MONTHS AFTER HIS (JMF) SOLICITORS HAD TURNED DOWN the offer from one of the solicitors who had been party to the fraudulent activities by a number of solicitors, as covered in THE APPEAL you should access and read at:
I. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/corruptcourts.htm
THE
VERY LETTER PROVES that negotiations & settlement offers were / had been in process, as PUBLISHED at uk-human-rights.org which FACT & REALITY YOU NEVER TOOK ON BOARD as if a non-event, treating it just like you did with: *The CAMERAS IN COURTS - NEWS FLASH*, copy of which you received a few days ago.
>
No need to emphasise the fact that as of the initial give-away activity of her (Mrs V. B. Foden) passing on the details of the precedent case, all other attempts and childish stupidities that she engaged in were duly noted.  Steps were taken (at all material times) to put more bullets in the gun that I cleaned and oiled with its sights aimed straight at her and those she was working with and for. I did and have not spent 33 years plus (since the attempt to INFLUENCE ME to abandon my legitimate case) researching and investigating the causes and reasons WHY AFTER 2000 years 'the sons of men' are being taken for a ride by CRIMINALS WHO ENGAGE IN THEIR KIND OF LAW. Do refer to the words of the Master to the lawyers of His Days, in the quotes page.
>
What follows gets juicier as we move on.
>
1. The above, Mrs. V. B. Foden was, to all intents and purposes, an innocent, naive and gullible person. She 'apparently' RELIED ON SOLICITORS to arrange, for her, her life. Yet, she had been a top ranking person with extensive management services to / with a major public company. She, apparently FAILED(?) to ensure that the agreement and arrangements with her father / parents were DULY RECORDED in any agreements proper. That PERSON, evidently came along to play at law with me (OBVIOUSLY as a stooge and guided idiot). She ONLY CAME ALONG for the purpose stated above (better offers) JUST FOR THE CASH UNDER THE TABLE (and that made her a WILLING PLAYMATE & AN ACCESSORY & ABETTOR to the arrangements in place by and with her NEW PLAYMATES in the corrupt world / society of the law-makers and administrators. I refer to the reward under the table FOR PERSONS WHO act as perfect specimens of Sado-masochists (do seek clarifications from a professional, good psychologist). Such idiots have been KEEPING IT ALL IN THE FAMILY CLOSET..... (the issue of the constructive frauds). In case you fail to recognise THE FACTS STATED & COVERED as INDISPUTABLE arrangements FOR *fraud on the taxpayers*, you need to go back to basics on simple law. In the even that you DO RECOGNISE THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER, (the illegality of the activities) you only have to consider the most important element, and that happens to be THE FACT THAT SUCH FRAUDSTERS NOT ONLY ENDORSED AND APPROVED THE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ON THE TAXPAYERS, they are actually engaging in such activities as alleged legal experts. Among the list of the recipients in the cc group KNOWN TO ME FRAUDSTERS of the most obnoxious and evil mentality imaginable. No ifs no buts about it all. PERIOD.
>
2. Through that person's 'experiences' as arranged by the controllers of it all, the followers of the teachings by examples stated in the most vile of works, the 'Old Testament', are seen to be at work. And in it, the very element which, a few years ago, I 'had to' ask a friend NOT TO DISCLOSE TO ANY ONE when I took him into my confidence after the criminals who organised my life behind the scenes and used many devices and even my two younger brothers (both of them as dishonest and deceitful as the sperm provider who fathered the three of us and the our two sisters was) in order to bring about the break up of the family that I created. THROUGH THE AFORESAID FACILITY (covered in the protocols by the N.W.O / the Wise ones of Zionism = whosoever drafted them) THE ASSAULT ON MY ASSETS AND PROPERTIES, including rights in law assured, YET VIOLATED and acted in contempt thereof by fraudsters who abuse public office 'as judicial chair occupants and or Law Enforcement Agents'.
>
I did so (request of the friend) at the time when I pointed him to a few examples, in the O.T. which matters persuaded him to start reading (not rushing through) the 'Old Testament' with an open mind. I did ask of him to cast aside all of 'the rubbish sold and promoted to the naive and gullible serfs' by the Rabbis, the Priests and the Imams about that evil work.
>
3. The evidence in Mrs V. B. Foden's case establishes, without any shred of doubt, the arrangements by the legal circles, FOR THE DIFFERENT TONGUES as covered in the Old Testament, in the extract reproduced from it and to which I point. You should write to the stupid woman and ask her about the details of the arrangements with her parents and AFTER she responds to you, OR if she fails to respond, just go back with a simple additional question:
*** WAS / IS SHE NOT a Standard Bearer for the British Legion and has she not extensive links to the British Navy, both of the entities very well known INSTITUTIONS?***
>
In respect of the concluding question above, just consider the simple statement in the page:
II. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/convicti.htm#Coat
ABOUT FOUNDING FATHERS,
the founders of the new world...... rubbish.
>
The continent of America was very well known to the Greeks and had it not been for the evil suppression of far too many truths, and the THEFT OF THE GNOSIS by the evil ones who even abused Christianity for their evil ends, the world, planet earth and 'the sons of men' would not be in the sorry state they are now.....
III. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/humraped.htm#disclose
&
All, simply care of the criminals in control and naturally the very stooges who love to kiss the feet (and more than that too) of the criminals who have been and are in control 'of the sons of men' for far too long.
>
The choice for you now is VERY SIMPLE, but do note that as I made very clear last year, as of and from 1st January 2005, I was and I am not prepared to waste my time with persons who are of opinion that they can just fail / negate to FULLY REPORT THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES & ALL ATTEMPTS (directed at their well being) BY ALLEGED PUBLIC SERVANTS YET EXPECT OF ME TO BE EITHER PATIENT WITH SUCH CHARLATANS AND CRAFT-Y STOOGES. You only have to access the page where I am exposing and dealing with the activities of an alleged Free Mason basher, Mr Paul Talbot-Jenkins at:
http://www.uk-human-rights.org/actors.htm#refer
&
IV. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/theproof.htm#request
>
DUE REFERENCE TO THE ACTIVITIES of the person (not ignoring the wilful and maligned defaults, most important in matters pertaining to his craft-y parts) IS WARRANTED. As you should note, he adopted the role of 'the all-knowing, and a well informed, gifted one. He indulged as a person who was of opinion that he could, with other charlatans of similar dispositions and mentality, fool around with rights of others, behind their backs. He failed to realise that he was recognised to have been one of the craft-y ones who were anticipating of me to be intimidated and or scared into submission, when solicitors and his chum James Todd The Great, Puke Production Machine, set about to assault me while of opinion that I would simply interfere with the rights of the charlatan to publish parts only of the truth of the matter and what happened to him after the legal circles went to town and *through abuse of the courts facilities were hoping to cause him and his wife to divorce*. In the meantime as an accomplished 'fraudsters club recruit' he had been expecting of me to afford him an opportunity to institute proceedings against me for interfering with his rights to tell / publish the (even half truths only) that do not cover even half of the story..... because of his other interests and preferences... work it out for yourself if you are gifted with some grey matter and recognise that I AM NO GAME for charlatans.
>
May the Force of Good be With You
&
That which the evil ones indulge in, befall them and
their partners in Crimes Incorporated UK Unlimited.
--
webmaster
human-rights organisation protecting and promoting
Human Rights World Wide
Go to: http://www.uk-human-rights.org/comonlin.htm
JOIN other challengers On Line - Help Rescue 'Justice'
Remember: " The cost to the good citizens (Q: R U ?)
for their indifference, in public affairs, (Q: U R ?)
is to be ruled by evil men". (Q: U Do not Object ?)
Wise Counsel by PLATO, Greece (428 - 347 BC)

You read, in our pages, of the 'arrangements in place for the constructive frauds on the 'serfs', through the provisions of Article 38 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Consider, therefore, why there exist among those who

  • visit the newsgroups,
  • blow their trumpets about 'the system',
  • proclaim their disaffection and
  • 'disgust at the practices' in the courts,
  • assert personal knowledge and experiences,
  • YET FAILED AND OR FAIL TO PUBLISH ANY EVIDENCE
  • in ANY WEB-SITE, through which to
  • inform and prove to
  • Mr and Mrs Average of that which they profess knowledge of!!!
  • WHO BUT THE REAL SHYSTERS, are party to the above fraud on YOU, Mr and Mrs Average?

Go To: http://www.uk-human-rights.org/comonlin.htm and consider stating the facts of your own experiences in a personal web-pages / web-site. Join with others and work together in exposing and challenging all offending Public(!) Servants(?) who misconduct in public office.

JOIN the COMMUNITY ON LINE if you have been cheated out of your rights, by the legal circles and or were denied protection, under the law, by the police.

If you have the evidence against the offenders, you can publish it in your personal web-site as your rights in law provide. Be not fooled by planted mischief-makers and read of the directives from THE authority (Link)

Every citizen is duty bound to report crime and if the police ignored or ignore you, USE YOUR RIGHTS, EXPOSE THE OFFENDERS who ignore the law.

Visit the Stephen Lawrence page (*Link) and note how Parliament provided for your rights. Yet, our Law Enforcement Agencies simply ignore such provisions, and act as contemptuous of your rights as a member of the *human-rights.org * Community On Line * has pleaded and lodged at the European Court on Human Rights. Through defaults and omissions, the police / authorities fail (Link) to protect you and in fact they actually torment and torture you, the victims.

READ OF SUCH PROVISIONS and exercise your rights!  Challenge and EXPOSE THE VILE OFFENDERS, who endorse and promote crime through defaults and omissions in the purported exercise of their public duties, AS YOUR SERVANTS.

Remember:

"Do for, by and with yourself that which satisfies you so long as that which you do does not infringe upon and or violates the rights of any other". © AY 1972

BE GUIDED BY AUTHORITIES WHO DEFINED YOUR RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS AS DERIVED FROM AND DEFINED AS : "THE CONVENTION IN LEGAL TERMS".

The development of and FOR THE RIGHTS OF CITIZENS, in modern times begun with the Magna Carta, in Europe. Below, in as simple as can be defined, the principles of rights and freedoms, clarified by Mark Janis, (fellow) Richard Kay (professor) and Anthony Bradley (professor).

  • 1. Men are born and remain free and equal in rights; social distinctions may be based only upon general usefulness.
  • 2. The aim of every political association is the preservation of the natural and inalienable rights of man; these rights are liberty, property, security, and resistance to oppression.
  • 3. The source of all sovereignty resides essentially in the nation; no group, no individual may exercise authority not emanating expressly therefrom.
  • 4. Liberty consists of the power to do whatever is not injurious to others; thus the enjoyment of the natural rights of every man has for its limits only those that assure other members of society the enjoyment of those same rights; such limits may be determined only by law.
  • 5. The law has the right to forbid only actions which are injurious to society. Whatever is not forbidden by law, may not be prevented, and no one may be constrained to do what it does not prescribe.
  • 6. Law is the expression of the general will; all citizens have the right to concur personally, or through their representatives, in its formation; it must be the same for all, whether it protects or punishes. All citizens, being equal before it, are equally admissible to all public offices, positions, and employment, according to their capacity, and without other distinction than that of virtues and talents.
  • 7. No man may be accused, arrested, or detained except in the cases determined by law, and according to the forms prescribed thereby. Whoever solicits, expedites, or executes arbitrary orders, or has them executed, must be punished; but every citizen summoned or apprehended in pursuance of the law must obey immediately; he renders himself culpable by resistance.
  • 8. The law is to establish only penalties that are absolutely and obviously necessary; and no one may be punished except by virtue of a law established and promulgated prior to the offence and legally applied.
  • 9. Since every man is presumed innocent until declared guilty, if arrest be deemed indispensable, all unnecessary severity for securing the person of the accused must be severely repressed by law.
  • 10. No one is to be disquieted because of his opinions, even religious, provided their manifestation does not disturb the public order established by law.
  • 11. Free communication of ideas and opinions is one of the most precious of the rights of man. Consequently, every citizen may speak, write, and print freely, subject to responsibility for the abuse of such liberty in the eases determined by law.
  • 12. The guarantee of the rights of man and citizen necessitates a public force; such a force, therefore, is instituted for the advantage of all and not for the particular benefit of those to whom it is entrusted.
  • 13. For the maintenance of the public force and for the expenses of administration a common tax is indispensable; it must be assessed equally on all citizens in proportion to their means.
  • 14. Citizens have the right to ascertain, by themselves or through their representatives, the necessity of the public tax, to consent to it freely, to supervise its use, and to determine its quota, assessment, payment, and duration.
  • 15. Society has the right to require of every public agent an accounting of his administration.
  • 16. Every society in which the guarantee of rights is not assured or the separation of powers not determined has no constitution at all.
  • 17. Since property is a sacred and inviolable right, no one may be deprived thereof unless a legally established public necessity obviously requires it, and upon condition of a just and previous indemnity.

Consider the above in the context of our founder's proclamation on true Democracy and do not fail to note the obvious : Society, CITIZENS  HAVE THE RIGHT TO REQUIRE OF EVERY PUBLIC AGENT AN ACCOUNTING OF HIS / HER ADMINISTRATION.

We add:

  • When the representatives of the citizens
  • fail in their public duties and
  • assume the right to dictate to, instead of serving, the citizens,
  • then
  • the citizens can and should "take the law in their own hands" and
  • the citizens can "use it in accordance with the provisions the representatives put in place".
  • There is no need for
  • violence,
  • abuse of body and
  • misuse of mind.
  • There is no need for revolution and bloodshed.

THE CITIZENS HAVE THE MEANS TO EXPOSE AND CALL TO BOOK ALL PUBLIC SERVANTS WHO ARE STILL DREAMING OF SERFDOM DAYS.

  • It is time for public servants to cease behaving as Lords and Masters.
  • It is time for them to 'humbly serve their employers, the citizens' AS THE LAW PROVIDES.

THE CITIZENS HAVE THE WORLD JURY TO RELY UPON FOR DELIVERY OF JUSTICE OUT OF THE BONDS HER ABDUCTORS AND RAPISTS HAVE BEEN HOLDING HER ALONG WITH DEMOCRACY.

  • It would appear that
  • the media barons and their stooges
  • know not the true meaning of either.
  • Through defaults and omissions to publish and
  • deal with the facts,
  • the realities and
  • the truth
  • THEY helped develop that which they expect of us to deliver to our children.
  • THEY WERE AND WILL REMAIN DREAMERS
  • SO LONG AS THEY MAINTAIN THEIR SILENCE AND
  • CARRY ON IGNORING THE VICTIMS OF THEIR OWN MAKING.

Andrew Yiannides
Founder *human-rights* (NGO)
London - United Kingdom
August 2002


*Link from here to the Case as STATED / PLEADED at the European Court for Human Rights.

  • Everything was pleaded in the stated facts but one element was deliberately not pointed to in the violations, as pleaded for professionals whose prime duty is to apply FACTS & EVENTS STATED - acknowledged as PROVEN, to applicable law.
  • Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the facility for citizens : human-rights.org had his own plans for the abusers of Public office.
  • The facilities on the Internet and the Community on Line were never intended for serfs or for 'the sold to the system as is' fraudsters and dreaming charlatans.
  • Link from here [*L] please to the explicit letter/FAX to the court (in the main window / frame of the page you are linked to from here) (ECoHR) and note the court's immediate response (in the margin / left window).
  • In due course we will disclose what was / has been in line for ALL abusers of public office and all SOLD TO THE SYSTEM charlatans, dreaming fraudsters and conniving shysters who contacted Mr Yiannides of their own steam or as contacted thereafter and directed, as controlled and or as blackmailed stooges.
  • USE OF THE LAW as is, was and remains the spring board FOR HUMAN-RIGHTS. (Never overlook the fact that the law is no ass).
  • The media barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes they retain and control had and have their plans for the sons of men.
  • Mr Yiannides (one of the sons of men targeted) has had his own plans for 'humans' and not the type of zombies and morons who were sent along through whom to prove NOT WHO, but WHAT ELEMENTS ARE USED BY THE CRIMINALS WHO HAVE BEEN IN CONTROL FOR FAR TOO LONG in allegedly democratic states that allegedly are founded and resting on principles of law and order.

FOOTNOTES
Footnote eXtra: In October 2010, the coalition's Attorney General, in an interview published by 'COUNSEL' specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves from cases of (small-fry) fraud and asserted that he was making that element his department's priority. IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT FRAUD, and IF IT WILL DEAL with the criminals who abuse public office, especially when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course. Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003 [*Link from here to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers that the y, the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law"].
While there, above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us [*Link to our explicit submissions to (a)  the Prime Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) the Home Secretary. WE acted so after we had secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew Yiannides]. Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998 [*Link* [*L] from here to the letter] and note the results evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do [*Link [*L] from here to the evidence we point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob].
    1.    xxxx  
   2.    xxxx  
   3.    xxxx  
   4.    xxxx  
   5.    xxxx

... Link to:   Lord Chancellor's Dpt.    Judges Schooled on racial issues Link to:-  Typical Response from Lord Chancellor  The LAW   Frank Cunningham-case Link to:- The CAMILA Project   h-r Home Page   Judges independent of, FREE to ignore The LAW Back to HomePage