I do address you (above) as you signed your communication (below) and not out of
familiarity. I never ignored your arrogant command NOT to be put in the embarrassing
position of HAVING TO DEAL with the realities of life, Mr B. Worrall.
This REPLY is treated as a group REPLY and it will be used for other
purposes, in view of the issues that I cover and raise below. I trust that you will, FOR
ONCE, address issues that you are pointed to, and, that you do not engage in your usual
'ostrich acts' and 'Can't see it - Can't be bothered' tactics'.
Your objections, to the material you assert to be false or erratic, are noted.
In the circumstances, and in line with our declared policy, these exchanges will be
published in the public domain, our pages.
We are to do so BECAUSE THE POLICY IS GENUINE. It is unlike that of and from the puke
production machine Mr James Todd.
We are sure that you are familiar with his promise and undertaking at the top of his
regular 'VOMIT' * promotions of the state as is *, that reach many by fax and are
published, also, on the Internet pages and in the newsgroups.
Your posting, observations/comments will be published TOGETHER with the response and the
CHALLENGES BELOW in an explicit and PROMINENT page. The page will deal with the issues
OPENLY and it will be for the jury at large, the citizens - whom persons of your mentality
and selfish arrogance treat as 'serfs. Or as 'shitizens' to be used for 'personal plans'
alone, and NOT AS EQUALS UNDER THE LAW - to consider, by themselves, as to the true and
REAL intentions of the parties, yourselves and my person.
Your ARROGANCE is beyond belief.
You pretend innocent when you darn well know that YOU WERE and got involved in plenty of
misinformation, WILFUL & MALIGNED SUPPRESSION OF THE REALITIES that YOU & YOUR
affiliates and associates allege that YOU are (?) concerned about.
In the past you naively and ARROGANTLY asserted that you do NOT wish to receive any
postings covering such matters as YOU ALLEGEDLY (and your affiliates / associates, also,
allege) ARE CONCERNED WITH OR ABOUT.
You are simply reminded that your wishes were respected.
NOW, CAN YOU PLEASE, forward to me any details of ANY POSTINGS ANYWHERE (at any time) and
in particular to those whom you and your affiliates TARGET (also on instructions from
third parties / other persons who target, and allegedly organise and guide / help those
whom they target) in connection with the FACTS COVERED BELOW?
I am particularly interested in, and look forward to receiving, your views on the
following POSITIVE ASSAULTS ON THE ABUSERS of public office and facilities, judges /
courts. In case you miss the point, I am referring to 'Public (!) Servants (?) who are
maintained by successive governments ((other Public (!) Servants (?)) in an allegedly
Any one 'gifted with some grey matter' should / can recognise that I am referring to
pseudo-democracy, in reality, THANKS to the media barons and persons LIKE YOU, who, with
intent suppress information from 'the serfs', the TAXPAYERS.
I am referring above to those public (!) servants (?) WHO DEFRAUD PEOPLE OF THEIR ASSETS *
on top of their legal rights *, SYSTEMATICALLY:
1. The 'heads I win and tails you loose' pleadings in Len Miskulin's
Anyone gifted with some grey matter should have recognised that it was all DIRECTED AT THE
LEGAL CIRCLES and the 'Eve' whom they were using in that instance, as in millions of other
Inform me please of:-
(a) Your knowledge and understanding of the equality of the sexes under
Article 14, since you are an alleged expert on the provisions of the European Convention
FOR Human Rights. (I bear in mind your posting to me AFTER Dave Ellison pointed to the
In case you forgot, you came in FROM THE COLD, with your part in the case of parents and
chastising / punishing their own children - the right to discipline and instil 'obedience
to rules' such as TELLING IT AS IT IS - 'the truth').
(b) Inform me also of your knowledge and understanding of the BASIC
TENETS and provisions under the various Partnerships Acts.
2. Again in Len Miskulin's case, let me have details of any postings and
references to those you were / are allegedly assisting.
I am referring to persons whom you are guiding IN & FOR THEIR RIGHTS & DUTIES, as
provided by law.
I relate the aforesaid to and in respect of * the CHALLENGES * in connection with the hot
potato that was born of the transfer of Len's case from the Royal Courts of Justice to
some junior, who then indulged by issuing an allegedly legitimate court Order.
Do access the letters published and pointed to, in our pages.
Frankly I could not care less if Dave Ellison or Len Miskulin were to use and promote the
challenges, simply and because of other give-away signs, early on in the contacts /
relationship with the * lbduk * 'leaders'.
In case you missed the page / material, the evidence of the challenges is at:
(NOTE: In the event that it be asserted that you were not made aware of
the challenges, IT SURE SAYS ENOUGH ABOUT YOU and your attitude towards the needs of 'the
serfs' you target, not to mention THE PERSON (or persons) who drew your attention to the
material in the human-rights pages).
3. MOST IMPORTANT OF ALL, I am most anxious to find out IF EVER you
informed those whom you allegedly care and are concerned about (the victim men of) the
divorce industry. Yes * industry *, because that is what it is in essence, and the
flagship of Crimes Incorporated United Kingdom Unlimited - CIUKU Enterprises - as
maintained by persons of YOUR mentality, care of YOUR wilful suppression of FACTS and or,
if knowledgeable of applicable law, your reckless suppression of the rights of those whom
you allegedly care about, and not use for other purposes.
I refer (draw your attention) to the issue of the suicides among
the men who ARE TARGETED and ruined by the fraudsters who have been managing the
so-called Child Support Agency*. [*Link from here to a
YOU DID RECEIVE INFORMATION and I did * cause * Len Miskulin to publish an explicit
document (copy of records from the CSA) at the lbduk.org web-site. THAT DOCUMENT was
secured by human-rights when I used a woman (girl AFTER she turned 18) for a number of
reasons you could NEVER fathom out.
Through the specific document that Len Miskulin published at * lbduk.org *, the CSA and
its officers / staff exposed their convenient invisible services to a person (others who
can afford invisible services are known to have benefited) who WAS NEVER TARGETED &
Even though he (that father) should have been, the simple fact happens to be that he was
not 'persecuted / prosecuted'. That father could afford to pay towards the maintenance of
his only child, but YOU Mr Barry Worrall, as a taxpayer, although you were made aware of
the fact that the mother and child were SUBSIDISED THROUGH Family Income Supplement, you
All the while that 'well connected 'father / man / male' was 'conveniently never
persecuted and the victims of denial of rights were, BOTH FEMALE / WOMEN, supported -
through imposed TAX contributions.(on Mr & Mrs. Average).
Despite the aforesaid FACTS, you, as an allegedly concerned person about the WRONGS
IMPOSED ON MEN (even the organisation you are part of makes an issue of the discrimination
AGAINST MEN) nonetheless YOU COULD NOT CARE LESS and wilfully suppressed such realities
from 'the men' you allegedly assist and guide.
There is much more that I could point out and demand explanations from a 'generous with
his silence person of your mentality' but I refrain from doing so at this point in time.
I refrain, because the three issues above, if NOT ATTENDED TO BY YOU now, will carry on
pointing to YOUR REAL INTENTIONS ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF THE MEN YOU ALLEGEDLY are concerned
Should that prove to be the case, AFTER you receive this response, it shall be safely
assumed that it is all because none of the victim-men you assist, never paid taxes towards
the maintenance of fraudsters and criminals in public office.
ABOVE ALL, it will be a sure indication that you do not give a damn about the billions
paid out in 'alleged' compensation as covered in the page that YOU NEVER ADDRESSED as an
allegedly concerned citizen, and never mind if male, female, transsexual or
otherwise...... just as a taxpayer.
I challenge and dare you to access and give us your expert and considered views on the
arrangements in place for THE CONSECUTIVE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS THROUGH THE COURTS. I refer
to the page:
I interject below.
In message <007301c58be8$3dbc95d0$0201a8c0@barryworrall>, Barry Worrall writes :
> Dear webmaster,
> I've just read your pages at :
Surprised I am *N*O*T* (spelled out for you).
> The UKMM, myself and Ian Kelly are
referred to in derogatory terms, which we do not agree with.
The truth is never agreeable to defaulters and persons who fail those whom they allegedly
are concerned about. The evidence will be released and 'the serfs' you have been
MISLEADING will be afforded the opportunity to make up their own minds. The present
invitations and challenges (above) happen to be * the way for you * to 'reconsider your
mentality and attitude:
Explain your reckless suppression of FACTS & REALITIES in the courts as opposed to the
relentless NEGATIVES which persons of your mentality PROMOTE RELENTLESSLY, which leads to
the well-founded conclusion of: "Subliminal Indoctrination Operatives At Work'.
Set yourself on record and on track as a genuinely concerned person instead of an abuser
of trust and or 'a security sift / thrifty with the truth, actor'.
> Your website is very unclear as to what it is you are
Mr Barry Worrall, it is NOT a case of any particular complaint. BUT It is a case of
introduction to THE FACTS, to THE REALITIES, to the PRACTICES AND to the OPERATIVES and
MAINTENANCE ENGINEERS (such as you) of 'the system as is'.
apart from corruption, etc., and plenty of it as part of INSTITUTIONALLY ORGANISED
ACTIVITIES that are directed at * the sons of MEN *.
> We also are concerned for such matters.
> It appears you may have contacted UKMM
No Mr. Barry Worrall. Persons from the UKMM * contacted ME out of the blue *. The two that
I spoke to, at the time, were / are the one's mentioned in the pages at the site and now,
in your posting.
> at some point
WHEN OTHERS directed the audacious UKMM self-assured non-thinkers to contact me with a
fictitious scenario as background.
> but been disappointed
I was not in any way interested in the INVITATION that reached me out of the blue,
A. The allegedly concerned organisers of 'the serfs and suckers' they
were / are misleading WERE NOT ANYWHERE except in their private little world of mischief
and 'invisible support services' FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM AS IS.
B. I, personally had been MAKING HEADWAY in the public domain and on the
Internet, where victims could / can learn about their rights and THE POSITIVE RESULTS
ABOUT WORK FOR THE RIGHTS OF * THE SONS OF MEN * (humans = *thinkers*, as opposed to the
evil ones; those who came down and are running around causing men to FALL FOR the
different and 'personal interests' that maintain the 'different tongues ploy' in place
ever since the creators of the creator concocted that scenario and such scripts *for the
sons of men*.
> with the result.
Dream on, audacious and arrogant Mr Barry Worrall. I did NOT FALL to the naive invitation
BECAUSE I was out there, IN THE OPEN, on the Internet. Above all, I did not wish to
relate, let alone have anything to do with charlatans. Besides, the way that the dreamers
addressed their communication and * invitation to me * GAVE MORE THAN THE TRUE COLOURS OF
THE ORGANISERS / MANAGERS OF UKMM, away.
The only way they could have come to know of what was afoot (for this son of a man) was
from or via the managers and organisers of the Litigants In Person Society.
ONLY * that bunch of maintenance engineers of the system as is * had my address recorded,
as the UKMM used when addressing their invitation, to me. And that record of, at and by
the LIPS crowd/mob as of the time WHEN the LIPS crowd/mob managers CONTACTED ME.....
because of the flyer (allegedly) by 'The CAMILA Project'.
You should access the *.org/camilahp.htm* page and after you have considered the
propositions (which matters allegedly drew the charlatans leading / using 'the serfs' they
target, to my person and work) AND I REQUEST THAT YOU FURNISH ME WITH ANY INFORMATION that
can establish you EVER cared or did anything about such matters.
The simple fact is that the LIPS charlatans who CONTACTED ME, because allegedly they were
to co-operate (with my proposals) in the scheme and plans FOR THE VICTIMS of
INSTITUTIONALLY ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH THE COURTS, never acted as they asserted when they
contacted me, back in 1992. (There will be more revelations about their evil and maligned
activities in due course).
> We have little resources,
And I heard of 'a legacy', a few thousand pounds that was never accounted for by the
managers and controllers of the UKMM / MANKIND twin / clone enterprising activities. I
refer to any activities that allegedly were/are directed at helping the victims of
Institutionally Organised Fraud & CORRUPTION OF SOCIETIES.
Do NOTE THE PLURAL because everywhere, where the Western 'culture and civilisation' in
pseudo-democratic states of governance prevails, SO IT IS 'for the sons of men'.
> and this probably explains your disappointment.
Believe me, there was NO CHANCE for DISAPPOINTMENT and after-effects because the targeted
'serf' was no sucker or mug. Those who gave 'advance information' to the UKMM were already
under investigation (by me) and I HAD BEEN LOOKING INTO THE ACTIVITIES OF SUCH GROUPS AND
THEIR MANAGERS since 1992.
I set myself on that track soon after the LIPS crowd/mobsters established (through their
defaults and activities) their true colours and THEIR AIMS FOR THE VICTIMS OF THE FRAUD
THROUGH THE COURTS.
Odd it was not that they (and all other groups and managers of groups) never consider(ed)
one simple factor: "What elements behind the response from the government in waiting
(opposition / New Labour) in 1995, to an *idiot* (?) WHOM YOU & YOUR COLLEAGUES
erroneously assumed that you could assist in what WAS TO BE GOING HIS WAY IN THE FUTURE.
(NOTE: Soon you, and all others who allegedly have been and are
concerned, about the wrongs imposed on humans, (thinkers, not just 'the serfs and
shitizens') will be learning of and accessing WHAT 'this son of a man' was up to and
collating for over 33 years, now)
>However we do not wish to be referred to as
You might perhaps oblige me and furnish me with PROOF that you ever did ANYTHING POSITIVE
towards the essential need to cause 'the organisers of the constructively engineered
FRAUDS THROUGH THE COURTS', to reconsider their evil activities.
ABOVE ALL, prove your alleged concerns about corruption by addressing the practices and
the elements EXPOSED EXCLUSIVELY by me at:
Incidentally, I do not expect of you to address the PRACTICES
EXPOSED (in the page) as an alleged leader / manager of the affairs of the men-victims
that you and your set-up target.
BUT I DO EXPECT OF YOU TO ADDRESS THE ISSUES AS A TAXPAYER, if you ever paid taxes, an
element that you can access in our pages, AND IN DUE COURSE you will be reading of what
activities are organised through that 'public services' sector.
In the meantime I suggest that you access:
Consider the rights of citizens in a truly civilised DEMOCRATICALLY RUN STATE OF
>Will you tell us you are, and remove the statements
about UKMM from the website.
WHY should I behave as you do?
How dare you seek of me to BURY THE REALITIES and the truths, LIKE YOU and those who
affiliate / associate with the UKMM do?
Furnish me with any proof that you have ever informed 'the serfs', whom you allegedly are
assisting about their rights as I ask of you to do. Do not overlook the challenge to state
your understanding and comprehension of Article 14 and the Partnerships Acts. Furnish me.
also, with ANY proof that you EVER:
1. CONSIDERED the Provisions under the Theft Acts, as pointed to and
clarified at: http://www.uk-human-rights/lawcompi.htm#brief
SPECIFICALLY the brief clarification / application of 'Parliament's Law' that relates to
ACCOUNTABILITY for instruments that lead to pecuniary advantage FOR third persons.
2. POINTED TO the positives published at the site and specifically THE
STATED FACTS with the results in the page:
3. ADDRESSED any of the issues you were
pointed to (as an alleged guru on matters legal), as readily as you sent out YOUR
MALIGNED, 'remove from this list' RESPONSES to postings of the very serious issues you
allegedly were / are concerned with and about.
> Barry Worrall
> tel: (+44) (0)191 285 5629
> email: email@example.com
Andrew Yiannides NDD., ACFI., ATI., FNAAAS
Founder * human-rights * (NGO)
London - UK
20th July 2005
IF you wish to forward any private FAX
communications in respect of the above requests / demands, let me know and I will furnish
you with a number. In case you followed the email exchanges between Dr. K Badsha and John
Charville when they both attempted to draw me into their petty squabbling by referring to
my person and my work (to one another) in a positive and complementary way, you will
appreciate why NOW, I am affording to you the opportunity to either change direction or
COME CLEAN as MY RESPONSE TO YOUR COMPLAINTS ABOUT THE MILD TOUCHES OF THE TRUTH of the
matters and the roles of mischievous 'maintenance engineers' who.....
I request that you ask of George McA to let you know of what he wrote to me in an email
about 'fear to expose the protected who can afford invisible services'.
THESE LAST COUPLE OF PARAGRAPHS are NOT
(for the time being) scheduled for inclusion in the page planned for the parts played by
the managers / leaders / gurus of the UKMM 'in misleading the men they target and USE for
their own selfish ends'.
Do read the attachment to the signature
below and IF YOU CAN COMPREHEND THE IMPLICATION let me know. If on the other hand you
cannot, seek assistance from anyone who CAN understand such a straight forward ASSERTION
& PROVISION for the managers and employees of "Crimes Incorporated United Kingdom
Unlimited' (CIUKU Enterprises) by non-elected fraudsters
AY -- webmaster
FOR 'the rampant FRAUD & CORRUPTION in
most 'civilised states' access the exclusive page: http://www.uk-human-rights.org/confraud.htm
For PROOF of the collaboration, between the Executive &
the Administrative read below the explicit arrangements for 'the serfs':
"The court has
inherent jurisdiction to stay an ACTION which MUST FAIL; as for instance, an action
brought in respect of an act of State."
The above qualify: 'Criminals are in control in pseudo-democratic states'.